Refresh   Tag(s): ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; (more...) ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ;  (less...)
Add to My Group
September 2, 2007 at 05:04:21

View Ratings | Rate It

Why Liberals Should Support Ron Paul

FACEBOOK
submit to twitter
submit to reddit
submit to digg
Tell A Friend

By Karsten Nicholson (about the author)     Page 1 of 2 page(s)

opednews.com     Permalink

For OpEdNews: Karsten Nicholson - Writer

Why Liberals Should Support Ron Paul

September 1, 2007

By Karsten Nicholson

This is a response to: Peace, Injustice and Ron Paul by David Swanson.

“If Ron Paul had been president for the past 6 years, a million more Iraqis would be alive, and another 4 million would not be refugees. The world would be a safer place, and Americans would have lost fewer freedoms.” -- David Swanson

This is very true. Many liberals have recognized and praised Ron Paul’s courageous stance on foreign policy and civil liberties. This is a man who is not afraid to go into a Republican debate, with 9 neo-cons, in South Carolina, on Fox News, and stand up to thugs like Rudy Giuliani. In the second Republican debate to which I am referring to, Ron Paul correctly pointed out that our foreign policy is a major contributing factor to the underlying cause of 9/11. “They don’t hate us because we’re rich or we’re free, they hate us because we’ve been over there, we’ve been bombing Iraq for 10 years.” Ron Paul stood his ground, and said that with a non-interventionist foreign policy, we’d be less likely to incite hatred, and therefore more safe and more free.

Nobody could call Ron Paul a neo-con. His record stands on his own. He voted against the Iraq war, and the funding bills for it that have come since the war started. Ron Paul spoke out against a possible war in Iraq years before it started. In 1998, he voted against regime change in Iraq. Ron Paul has also recently voted against a similar condemnation of Iran. Unlike many of the Democratic front-runners, he believes a nuclear first strike should absolutely be taken off the table. He believes that it makes no sense to preemptively attack 3rd world nations with no military, and no threat posed to us. Ron Paul believes that if we are to go to war, it needs to be done constitutionally. Congress, which represents the people, should declare war, and the people should be behind it. We should go to war, fight it, win it, and come home. He is completely against the War Powers Act, which gives the President the authority to go to war when he sees fit. Ron Paul has never voted to increase the power of the executive branch. Ron Paul would never send troops unconstitutionally to invade a 3rd world nation, to enforce U.N. resolutions or pretend that nation poses a national threat to us. Ron Paul wants to bring all US troops home from Iraq immediately, and stop policing the world. He knows that it was not the intent of the founders to police the world. If Ron Paul were in office, we would follow a non-interventionist foreign policy, and the defense budget would be able to be cut significantly.

Ron Paul is also an ardent supporter of civil liberties. He voted against the patriot act. He has sponsored a bill to overturn the patriot act. He is strongly against warrant-less searches, government spying, and strongly opposes torture. He completely supports habeas corpus. He also opposes the death penalty. Also, a little known fact is that if Ron Paul got his way, there would be no federal war on drugs. He has called the war on drugs “as stupid as the war in Iraq”. He is uncompromisingly against federal laws banning medical marijuana, and completely opposed to the federal government coming in, when a state has legalized medical marijuana, and using force to nullify this legalization (such as has happened in California, where medical marijuana is legal, but the federal government uses force to effectively keep it criminalized. This would NOT happen under a Paul administration.)

Fascism is when the corporations and the businesses control a country. Liberals are completely opposed to this, and opposed to too much corporate power. The Federal Reserve is the most powerful and most dangerous corporate power in this country. It is the greatest threat to the poor, working poor, and middle class. The federal reserve is a private bank, which has a monopoly over the money making process in this country. The Federal Reserve is secretive, and nobody really knows who owns it. Congress has absolutely no oversight. When a private, secretive entity controls the nation’s money supply, it controls the nation. The fed also allows the banks to charge very high rates of interest, and makes it very hard to declare bankruptcy and get a fresh start. The federal reserve prints phony paper money, which has no more backing than Monopoly money. The more money it prints, the more inflation it causes. As you increase the money supply, you devalue it. Prices to food, housing, gas, health care, and everything else that is a necessity rises exponentially. Who does this hurt? The poor and middle class. It transfers their wealth to wall street. Wall Street benefits from inflation. The federal reserve was created in 1913, the same year the IRS was created. Is this a coincidence? No. We borrow money from the federal reserve, and pay fees on the borrowed money using income tax money. In the end, it all ends up in the hands of the private bankers. Liberals should be outraged by this. The income tax, and the federal reserve’s “inflation tax” (in all senses it is a tax when the fed prints money to causes inflation) eats up a HUGE amount of money from the average middle class person. It benefits the rich. Even with a progressive income tax, rich people who own real estate, or are in bed with Wall Street, benefit because of the inflation. The inflation tax is more regressive than the income tax could ever be progressive -- and they both go together. The income tax funds the federal reserve fascists, as well as the unconstitutional, empire-building foreign policy we now have. The income tax is itself unconstitutional and illegal. The 16th amendment was never ratified. Nobody has ever found a law requiring the majority of Americans to pay an income tax. Some might say that this sounds evil, but it is a necessary evil, because we need the funds to keep our government going. Otherwise, our roads and freeways would collapse. But, for example, our infrastructure is funded through gas taxes, not the income tax. Most social services are funded by taxes other than the income tax. It is a bait and switch to believe that we need the income tax to fund our social services, when really it goes to fund the fascists that control our government, and our empire building. Ron Paul has never said he would slash or get rid of social services. He would let young people opt out of social security if they wanted to (no social service should be forced on anybody), for instance, but he would not deny services to people who have paid into the system. In fact, Ron Paul has sought to protect the money from the social security find, rather than spending it on the general fund as the federal government often does. Ron Paul would work to get rid of the IRS, Federal Reserve, and our empire building the moment he got into office. He would return the authority to make money back to the government (as mandated by the constitution), and away from the private bankers. Money should be gold and silver, not printed money out of thin air.  (Please google "Freedom to Fascism".  You will see a free movie, labled "Director's Authorized Version".  Please watch this.  It discusses these issues in depth.)

Liberals have long recognized the evil of so called “free trade” deals. Ron Paul would end GATT, NAFTA, WTO, CAFTA, and all of these deals which hurt the American workers and American businesses. He is also opposed to our involvement in the UN, which sets him apart from all Democratic candidates. If you think America is becoming a police state now, do you really want to know what it will be like when an even bigger, more powerful entity, the UN, assumes control over our lives? What we have left of the Bill of Rights will not be there to protect us, as the UN grows in power. Also, it must be said that part of the reason for going to war with Iraq was their violation of the UN resolutions. We went to war, illegally, to enforce UN resolutions. If we do not get out of the UN, this could happen again, and again, and again. Ron Paul is not an isolationist. Ron Paul would trade (but not under so-called “free trade” deals), be friends with other nations, and talk with other nations. However, Ron Paul would put the American worker, and the American business, and the American citizen first. He would protect the constitution and the Bill of Rights, and never compromise them, no matter what some foreign entity might want.

Ron Paul is a staunch opponent of a National ID card. Some politicians have pushed a National ID card as the way we’re going to stop illegal immigration. Ron Paul realizes that a National ID card is an absolute infringement on the liberties of American citizens. It also makes absolutely no sense as a method to counter illegal immigration, since only American citizens would be required to have a National ID card. It is true that Ron Paul wants to secure the borders, but he believes that immigrants have become the “scapegoat” of our current economic system. Because of reasons I have already discussed, America is headed into bankruptcy. If we lived within our means, and did not have the runaway inflation caused by the Federal Reserve, and stopped policing the world, we would probably need the workers, and they would be welcome. First correct our economic policies, and then the immigrants will not be the scapegoat.

Ron Paul has called himself “pro-life”, and sometimes uses such rhetoric. He has delivered over 4,000 babies, and he is personally pro-life. However, he believes the federal government should be out of the abortion question. It should be an issue for the states. Ron Paul does not desire to ban all abortion at a federal level, the way some conservatives would like to. Ron Paul would leave the abortion issue up to the states. If the states want abortion to be legal, Ron Paul would not interfere. Ron Paul voted against making it a crime for minors to cross state lines to get an abortion. He also believes the federal government should be out of the marriage issue. Ron Paul voted against the federal marriage amendment. If a state like Massachusetts wanted to legalize gay marriage, Ron Paul would not stop it. That is the state’s right. Ron Paul has said that, ideally, government should be out of the marriage issue altogether, and it should be a private matter.

I hope I have convinced you to support the Ron Paul Revolution. The biggest reason to support Ron Paul, however, is to break up the Republican establishment. I hope I have already convinced you that Ron Paul is as far from neo-con as you can get (farther than most Democrats, even -- half of them running, unlike Ron Paul, voted for the Iraq war, and the front-runners, unlike Ron Paul, would take no options off the table regarding Iran). Wouldn’t it be a blast to see him win the nomination? All of the neo-con pundits would go ape. The imperial, neo-con movement might be fatally wounded. Do you really want to have to sit through months of the general election cycle, with a neo-con hawk like Thompson, Giuliani, or Romney? Do you want to see their ugly faces in the Newspaper every morning, or on TV every night? Let’s destroy the Republican establishment. Even though the mainstream media says that it can’t happen, it can. Ron Paul is currently leading in Straw Polls, which measure real support on the ground. He has over 34,000 active meetup.com members throughout the country, more than any other candidate running for President. Please, be a part of the Ron Paul Revolution. Register Republican now, and vote in the in the Republican primary for Ron Paul, and destroy the neo-con movement. Click here to see if your state has an open or closed primary (if it has a closed primary, please re-register immediately), and if you have to re-register to vote in the Republican primary: http://www.primarilypaul.com/ron-paul-in-the-primaries/.

www.ronpaul2008.com

Meet up with active supporters in your area: http://ronpaul.meetup.com

Next Page  1  |  2

 

Member of the Ron Paul Revolution

The views expressed in this article are the sole responsibility of the author
and do not necessarily reflect those of this website or its editors.

Contact Author Contact Editor View Authors' Articles

 

Book Recommendations for " Abortion"
Abortion: The Supreme Court Decisions, 1965-2007
by Ian Shapiro

$14.95
Lowest New Price $12.80

Number of pages: 336
Publisher: Hackett Pub Co

Abortion and the Politics of Motherhood (California Series on Social Choice
by Kristin Luker

$23.95
Lowest New Price $20.00

Number of pages: 324
Publisher: University of California Press

You're Not Alone: Healing Through God's Grace After Abortion
by Jennifer O'Neill

$14.95
Lowest New Price $8.49

Number of pages: 240
Publisher: Faith Communications

Forgiven and Set Free: A Post-Abortion Bible Study for Women
by Linda Cochrane

$10.99
Lowest New Price $3.99

Number of pages: 112
Publisher: Baker Books

View All Book Recommendations

Share this page: (what's this?)                   Tell a Friend: Tell A Friend

FACEBOOK      DIGG THIS      Add This Page to Mr Wong!           NEWSVINE      DEl.ICIO.US      Looksmart Furl      NETSCAPE      My Web      Tag!RawSugar      Blink List     (More...)

Comments: Expand   Shrink   Hide  
84 comments
To view all comments:
Expand Comments
 

Ron Paul is a Libertarian by John R Moffett on Sunday, Sep 2, 2007 at 6:10:37 AM
So untrue by J. Vorhees on Sunday, Sep 2, 2007 at 12:02:57 PM
Liberals who support Paul need brain transplant. by DinahMason on Sunday, Sep 2, 2007 at 6:48:46 AM
Thanks Dinah by John R Moffett on Sunday, Sep 2, 2007 at 7:25:12 AM
Actually... by Karsten Nicholson on Sunday, Sep 2, 2007 at 2:36:01 PM
Progressives? by Rick Fisk on Sunday, Sep 2, 2007 at 10:18:53 PM
I guess I need a brain transplant, then. by Melissa E on Sunday, Sep 2, 2007 at 11:31:49 AM
Missy by pratliff94 on Monday, Sep 3, 2007 at 3:31:34 PM
Whats This by J. Vorhees on Sunday, Sep 2, 2007 at 12:05:06 PM
Sorry, I'm a very progressive liberal by John R Moffett on Sunday, Sep 2, 2007 at 3:06:29 PM
Founder of the Democratic Party by Babyhuey on Sunday, Sep 2, 2007 at 6:50:06 PM
Department of Peace by Ed Buffey on Sunday, Sep 2, 2007 at 9:59:52 PM
I like that idea by Babyhuey on Sunday, Sep 2, 2007 at 10:37:28 PM
No Child Left Behind progressive? by Babyhuey on Sunday, Sep 2, 2007 at 5:37:41 PM
Ron Paul by CD Rodgers on Sunday, Sep 2, 2007 at 10:19:12 AM
Ron Paul supported by Liberals????? Are you nuts? by Caronome on Sunday, Sep 2, 2007 at 10:46:20 AM
Very Bad by J. Vorhees on Sunday, Sep 2, 2007 at 12:08:23 PM
Paul by CD Rodgers on Sunday, Sep 2, 2007 at 12:46:37 PM
Couldn't agree more CDR by John R Moffett on Sunday, Sep 2, 2007 at 3:09:41 PM
Time to actually read some Ron Paul by Babyhuey on Sunday, Sep 2, 2007 at 5:42:42 PM
Kucinich wants to control guns? by Bob Kincaid on Monday, Sep 3, 2007 at 3:06:32 PM
Yes, it's a bad thing! by Karsten Nicholson on Monday, Sep 3, 2007 at 3:09:43 PM
And I'm sure you have a copy of that "draft," by Bob Kincaid on Monday, Sep 3, 2007 at 5:54:17 PM
draft by undergroundrr on Monday, Sep 3, 2007 at 8:12:10 PM
I need some help from the Paulistas, please by Bob Kincaid on Sunday, Sep 2, 2007 at 11:29:57 AM
I by CD Rodgers on Sunday, Sep 2, 2007 at 11:38:28 AM
WHat? by J. Vorhees on Sunday, Sep 2, 2007 at 12:06:38 PM
slander by Cody B on Sunday, Sep 2, 2007 at 12:51:27 PM
So he DID say them then, right? by Bob Kincaid on Monday, Sep 3, 2007 at 1:33:08 PM
You're lying by Bob Kincaid on Monday, Sep 3, 2007 at 3:19:33 PM
bobkincaid by pratliff94 on Monday, Sep 3, 2007 at 3:46:17 PM
Is that an order? by Bob Kincaid on Monday, Sep 3, 2007 at 5:31:41 PM
A hack job of a hack job by Melissa E on Sunday, Sep 2, 2007 at 2:23:04 PM
Which is it, then? by Bob Kincaid on Monday, Sep 3, 2007 at 3:37:43 PM
Not Ron Paul's words by Babyhuey on Sunday, Sep 2, 2007 at 5:45:28 PM
He didn't? by Bob Kincaid on Monday, Sep 3, 2007 at 3:44:05 PM
Ramble on by Cody B on Sunday, Sep 2, 2007 at 12:49:09 PM
Why does he believe these things? by undergroundrr on Sunday, Sep 2, 2007 at 1:56:43 PM
The way I see it, by Rob Kall on Sunday, Sep 2, 2007 at 2:25:39 PM
Hi Rob by John R Moffett on Sunday, Sep 2, 2007 at 3:14:16 PM
Small group? by Melissa E on Sunday, Sep 2, 2007 at 4:17:17 PM
not a small group by Karsten Nicholson on Sunday, Sep 2, 2007 at 4:22:32 PM
Karsten by CD Rodgers on Sunday, Sep 2, 2007 at 4:29:11 PM
Sure, he is a Republican... by Karsten Nicholson on Sunday, Sep 2, 2007 at 4:33:31 PM
What are you afraid of? by Babyhuey on Sunday, Sep 2, 2007 at 7:06:10 PM
Trying to drum up support on a progressive web site by Bob Kincaid on Monday, Sep 3, 2007 at 3:58:53 PM
Thank you, Rob. by Babyhuey on Sunday, Sep 2, 2007 at 7:29:51 PM
Ron Kall by pratliff94 on Monday, Sep 3, 2007 at 4:11:57 PM
Hillary's support for war is enough by Babyhuey on Monday, Sep 3, 2007 at 5:44:58 PM
Babyhuey by pratliff94 on Monday, Sep 3, 2007 at 9:44:23 PM
Ron Paul is supported by a wide range of people. by Karsten Nicholson on Sunday, Sep 2, 2007 at 2:32:41 PM
This proves my point by Bob Kincaid on Monday, Sep 3, 2007 at 6:22:51 PM
Hardcore by Ozzy Sandoval on Sunday, Sep 2, 2007 at 3:26:16 PM
OK, some real Ron Paul quotes by John R Moffett on Sunday, Sep 2, 2007 at 3:40:56 PM
Ron Paul and Guns by Melissa E on Sunday, Sep 2, 2007 at 4:33:20 PM
Social by CD Rodgers on Sunday, Sep 2, 2007 at 5:07:34 PM
Social Programs by Rick Fisk on Sunday, Sep 2, 2007 at 10:50:33 PM
Projected public good by Babyhuey on Sunday, Sep 2, 2007 at 11:40:10 PM
So true! by Madison on Monday, Sep 3, 2007 at 1:00:00 AM
Your interpretation is the problem by Babyhuey on Sunday, Sep 2, 2007 at 7:18:46 PM
Here's my view by Madison on Monday, Sep 3, 2007 at 12:57:54 AM
Johnmoffett by pratliff94 on Monday, Sep 3, 2007 at 4:25:18 PM
A few brief comments by Matt on Sunday, Sep 2, 2007 at 4:10:19 PM
Fascism by Karsten Nicholson on Sunday, Sep 2, 2007 at 4:17:15 PM
Medical Marijuana by Karsten Nicholson on Sunday, Sep 2, 2007 at 4:18:27 PM
The UN by Ty on Sunday, Sep 2, 2007 at 5:57:35 PM
The UN does the US bidding by Babyhuey on Sunday, Sep 2, 2007 at 6:10:48 PM
Freedom from Fascism by Babyhuey on Sunday, Sep 2, 2007 at 6:43:55 PM
I could not have said it better by Babyhuey on Sunday, Sep 2, 2007 at 6:08:00 PM
Ron Paul Is What's Needed... Not nessisarily What's Wanted by shpshftr on Sunday, Sep 2, 2007 at 6:32:27 PM
Why big government is bad... by Co6aka on Sunday, Sep 2, 2007 at 7:11:44 PM
I'm not sure... by CD Rodgers on Sunday, Sep 2, 2007 at 7:50:21 PM
And she now argues with self... by CD Rodgers on Sunday, Sep 2, 2007 at 7:52:35 PM
Not just the implementation by Babyhuey on Sunday, Sep 2, 2007 at 11:06:47 PM
Divided... by mrk * on Sunday, Sep 2, 2007 at 10:02:51 PM
A Liberal voting for Paul is like a chicken voting for KFC by ann staley on Sunday, Sep 2, 2007 at 10:27:14 PM
Mrk Has It Right...We may already have lost this one... by shpshftr on Sunday, Sep 2, 2007 at 11:30:35 PM
Ron Paul's Patriotic Rhetoric by Babyhuey on Monday, Sep 3, 2007 at 1:26:17 AM
He didn't say that. Give a source if you are going to accuse by Madison on Sunday, Sep 2, 2007 at 11:48:50 PM
My results by Madison on Monday, Sep 3, 2007 at 1:01:12 AM
Kofi Annan said invasion of Iraq was illegal by Brett Paatsch on Monday, Sep 3, 2007 at 2:59:49 AM
UN Charter vs the Constitution by Babyhuey on Monday, Sep 3, 2007 at 12:44:19 PM
Illegal by undergroundrr on Monday, Sep 3, 2007 at 12:49:33 PM
So who decides? by zenpiper on Tuesday, Sep 4, 2007 at 5:34:09 PM

 

 

 

Tell a Friend: Tell A Friend

Copyright © 2002-2010, OpEdNews

Powered by Populum