Home
Refresh   Tag(s): ;
Add to My Group
September 30, 2007 at 09:44:08

View Ratings | Rate It

Phasers, the World Trade Center, And Discrediting the Left

submit to twitter
submit to reddit
submit to digg

Tell A Friend

By John R Moffett (about the author)     Page 1 of 1 page(s)

opednews.com     Permalink

For OpEdNews: John R Moffett - Writer

According to some, the World Trade Center buildings could not have collapsed as fast as they obviously did, and therefore must have been destroyed by directed energy weapons which caused “molecular dissociation” of the building materials.

The latest hero of this movement is Dr. Judy Wood, formerly of the Department of Mechanical Engineering at Clemson University. Dr. Wood has released a long article on her supposed evidence that the World Trade Center buildings did not collapse, but in fact were destroyed by energy beams.

After reading through the tedious article, which was filled with leaps of ill-logic and lots of photos that showed no evidence of directed energy weapons, or phaser fire, or “molecular dissociation”, I am amazed that people can so easily confuse science fiction with science fact.


I am not going to bother refuting the arguments anymore, that has been done very well by others. I am much more interested in what I feel is a concerted effort to divide, demoralize, and discredit the progressive movement.

For all you conspiracy theorists, this may be a new one that you had not thought of, which is much more plausible than the idea of phasers taking down the World Trade Center buildings.

George Bush and Dick Cheney were in charge during the worst attack against Americans on US soil in US history. They blew it as badly as anyone in charge could have blown it. They ignored all the warnings and did absolutely nothing to protect the country. As Democrats and progressives began scoring points against the administration by pointing out their extreme ineptitude and negligence, Karl Rove comes up with the idea of circulating wild 9/11 conspiracy theories all over the Internet to discredit detractors.

Everyone knows that hired Republican trolls prowl progressive websites and comment sections. It would be very easy for them, posing as liberal commenters, to begin spreading rumors that were outlandish to most people, but intriguing to some. The initial conspiracy theories suggested that pre-planted explosives and cruise missiles were involved in the destruction of the World Trade Center and the damage to the Pentagon. All sorts of details were eventually added, including who had access to the buildings in such a way that the detonation charges could have been planted, who might have actually pressed the button to detonate the charges, etc.

More recently, the conspiracy theories have turned clearly away from doubtful yet plausible explanations such as controlled demolition to the idea that top-secret military molecular dissociation energy beams were used to deliberately destroy the buildings. In case you hadn't noticed, this is precisely what phasers from Star Trek were supposed to do.

I am sure that many conspiracy theorists are well intentioned progressives, and are also very sincere, yet I have a very strong feeling that some small proportion of the 9/11 conspiracy movement includes planted conservative trolls. That's my conspiracy theory. And it's just a theory, not a fact. Their purpose would be to discredit all 9/11 conspiracy theories as outlandish. It also helps confuse the issue, and tarnish the left-wing progressive movement in general because the movement is composed of people who can not even agree on simple basic facts such as the fact that there are no such things as phasers.

If George Bush and Dick Cheney had taken the presidential daily brief’s warnings seriously throughout August 2001, and had implemented tighter security measures at airports, the disasters of September 11, 2001 could have easily been avoided. I believe that the conspiracy theory they wanted to distract everyone's attention away from is the one that seems most plausible. The administration was looking for a so-called “Pearl Harbor-like event” to galvanize the country behind a war against Iraq. The news that an attempted terrorist attack against the United States was imminent, maybe a small bomb on a Subway train for instance, might have actually been considered good news to Bush and Company.

Then came a Pearl Harbor-like event beyond their wildest imagination.

Think of the expression on George Bush's face as he sat reading My Pet Goat to a gradeschool class, and then was told about the second plane striking the World Trade Center. His expression was completely consistent with them expecting a small, ineffective attack, and just like everything else he has ever done, getting it completely wrong.

This is still the only 9/11 conspiracy theory I have heard that makes any sense whatsoever, and it is the one I believe they are trying to distract everyone from with the outlandish ideas being offered by people like Dr. Wood. Whether Dr. Wood believes these things, or has other motives, I can not say, but this type of conspiracy theory divides progressives, and tarnishes them all with an unfairly broad brush.

“Fire the phasers Dick!”,

“No Mr. President, you have the honor”.

 

www.factinista.org; www.n-acetylaspartate.com

Dr. John Moffett is a Managing Editor at OpEdNews.com, and is an active research neuroscientist in the Washington, DC area. Dr. Moffett has published numerous scientific articles on the nervous and immune systems. Dr. Moffett's main area of research (more...)
 

The views expressed in this article are the sole responsibility of the author
and do not necessarily reflect those of this website or its editors.

Contact Author Contact Editor View Authors' Articles

 

Book Recommendations for "Conspiracy Theories Science"
The Age of Anxiety: Conspiracy Theory and the Human Sciences (Sociological Review Monographs)

$39.95
Lowest New Price $28.23

Number of pages: 320
Publisher: Wiley-Blackwell

Counterknowledge: How We Surrendered to Conspiracy Theories, Quack Medicine, Bogus Science and Fake History
by Damian Thompson

$20.73
Lowest New Price $6.01

Number of pages: 176
Publisher: Atlantic Books

Debunking 9/11 Myths: Why Conspiracy Theories Can't Stand Up to the Facts
by The Editors of Popular Mechanics

$14.95
Lowest New Price $8.45

Number of pages: 192
Publisher: Hearst

The Rough Guide to Conspiracy Theories 1 (Rough Guide Reference)
by James McConnachie

$14.99
Lowest New Price $17.47

Number of pages: 432
Publisher: Rough Guides

View All Book Recommendations

Share this page: (what's this?)                   Tell a Friend: Tell A Friend

FACEBOOK      DIGG THIS      Add This Page to Mr Wong!           NEWSVINE      DEl.ICIO.US      Looksmart Furl      NETSCAPE      My Web      Tag!RawSugar      Blink List     (More...)

Comments: Expand   Shrink   Hide  
71 comments
To view all comments:
Expand Comments
 

Phasers, the world trade center by bird on Sunday, Sep 30, 2007 at 10:08:44 AM
The obvious by Winston Smith on Sunday, Sep 30, 2007 at 11:29:43 AM
conspiracies by Sheila Jackson on Monday, Oct 1, 2007 at 1:21:55 PM
WTC by Reverend Mark J. Seydel on Sunday, Sep 30, 2007 at 12:03:10 PM
A new 9/11 investigation by Joel S. Hirschhorn on Sunday, Sep 30, 2007 at 5:23:33 PM
WTC 7 by CB Brooklyn on Sunday, Sep 30, 2007 at 5:55:48 PM
A New Investigation by CB Brooklyn on Sunday, Sep 30, 2007 at 6:56:19 PM
Excuse me? by ardee D. on Sunday, Sep 30, 2007 at 8:16:18 PM
It's Simple Really by mrk * on Sunday, Sep 30, 2007 at 2:56:37 PM
Judy Wood Latest Hero? Nope by Mac McKinney on Sunday, Sep 30, 2007 at 3:36:06 PM
Conspiracy? by Sheila Samples on Sunday, Sep 30, 2007 at 4:34:32 PM
Sherlock Holmes by CB Brooklyn on Sunday, Sep 30, 2007 at 5:35:58 PM
Sherlock Holmes this...sheesh you guys are dumb by ardee D. on Sunday, Sep 30, 2007 at 8:22:58 PM
What Dumb-Minded Comments from Ardee by CB Brooklyn on Sunday, Sep 30, 2007 at 9:24:01 PM
sorry for the "dumb"thing by ardee D. on Monday, Oct 1, 2007 at 8:50:36 AM
Some People See It, and Some People Don't by CB Brooklyn on Sunday, Sep 30, 2007 at 4:37:22 PM
Moffett's Key Admission by CB Brooklyn on Sunday, Sep 30, 2007 at 5:16:20 PM
And who, precisely, is John R. Moffett? by Jim Fetzer on Sunday, Sep 30, 2007 at 5:42:03 PM
Hi Jim, by John R Moffett on Monday, Oct 1, 2007 at 5:56:34 AM
Judy Wood is not credible.... by richard on Sunday, Sep 30, 2007 at 5:55:37 PM
Dr Wood is Very Credible by CB Brooklyn on Sunday, Sep 30, 2007 at 6:21:58 PM
Aghast at such closed-mindedness from a Ph.D. by Cathy Garger on Sunday, Sep 30, 2007 at 6:43:44 PM
Dr. M, keep studying! by Cathy Garger on Sunday, Sep 30, 2007 at 7:02:23 PM
Why is Dr Wood the Only One Being Attacked? by CB Brooklyn on Sunday, Sep 30, 2007 at 7:53:33 PM
Poor Judy Wood by richard on Sunday, Sep 30, 2007 at 10:11:12 PM
Your Posts Show Very Little Common Sense by CB Brooklyn on Sunday, Sep 30, 2007 at 10:42:35 PM
Disbeliever by Dale Hill on Sunday, Sep 30, 2007 at 8:32:15 PM
ah, the money angle by richard on Sunday, Sep 30, 2007 at 10:18:58 PM
Architecture is among my majors by Professor Emeritus Peter Bagnolo on Sunday, Sep 30, 2007 at 8:40:09 PM
what on earth? by ardee D. on Saturday, Oct 6, 2007 at 2:45:43 PM
Disbeliever by Dale Hill on Sunday, Sep 30, 2007 at 8:54:00 PM
Let's Be Fair and Balanced Progressives by Michael Bonanno on Sunday, Sep 30, 2007 at 9:10:17 PM
You Shouldn't Make Assumptions by CB Brooklyn on Sunday, Sep 30, 2007 at 9:38:31 PM
The key facts have nothing to do with how the Towers fell by Freedem on Sunday, Sep 30, 2007 at 9:38:56 PM
Why Does Moffett Divert People from the Real Evidence? by CB Brooklyn on Sunday, Sep 30, 2007 at 10:18:09 PM
take a fresh look by gravity32 on Monday, Oct 1, 2007 at 12:11:49 AM
gravity32's comments are clearly misleading by CB Brooklyn on Monday, Oct 1, 2007 at 12:39:36 AM
of course ... by Mr M on Monday, Oct 1, 2007 at 12:28:48 AM
Planted Stories? Absolutely! by CB Brooklyn on Monday, Oct 1, 2007 at 1:07:41 AM
fresh look by gravity32 on Monday, Oct 1, 2007 at 2:06:10 AM
Legal Challenges by CB Brooklyn on Monday, Oct 1, 2007 at 2:15:02 AM
DIRECTED WEAPONS THEORY DESIGNED TO DISCREDIT 9/11 TRUTH by rhalfhill on Monday, Oct 1, 2007 at 2:29:41 AM
First of all... by Pappy on Monday, Oct 1, 2007 at 4:12:51 AM
Here's Some Information by CB Brooklyn on Monday, Oct 1, 2007 at 1:36:11 PM
A great discussion folks, by John R Moffett on Monday, Oct 1, 2007 at 6:21:51 AM
So I arranged a talk radio debate with Judy Wood . . . by Jim Fetzer on Monday, Oct 8, 2007 at 6:26:32 PM
Focus on indisputable facts, demand a real investigation by John Perry on Monday, Oct 1, 2007 at 8:00:59 AM
Scholars for 911 Truth and Justice by richard on Monday, Oct 1, 2007 at 8:41:53 AM
More rubbish . . . by Jim Fetzer on Monday, Oct 1, 2007 at 9:17:04 AM
why do you continuously promote hoax sites? by CB Brooklyn on Monday, Oct 1, 2007 at 1:15:13 PM
Wow! What a crowd! by Mark Sashine on Monday, Oct 1, 2007 at 9:06:11 AM
*A W E S O M E ! --- A W E S O M E ! --- A W E S O M E !* by CB Brooklyn on Monday, Oct 1, 2007 at 1:08:24 PM
then I submit... by Pappy on Monday, Oct 1, 2007 at 2:19:29 PM
That's No Way to Solve a Crime by CB Brooklyn on Monday, Oct 1, 2007 at 2:30:01 PM
Some Directed Energy Weapon Articles by CB Brooklyn on Monday, Oct 1, 2007 at 2:48:26 PM
Researchers Who Take Legal Steps Are Attacked by Cathy Garger on Monday, Oct 1, 2007 at 7:13:01 PM
First of all... by Pappy on Tuesday, Oct 2, 2007 at 1:54:34 AM
Explosive Witnesses by Andrew Johnson on Tuesday, Oct 2, 2007 at 3:38:36 AM
You're absolutely right... by Pappy on Tuesday, Oct 2, 2007 at 2:33:27 PM
If you think all this DEW stuff is silly by CB Brooklyn on Wednesday, Oct 3, 2007 at 2:40:23 AM
Of all the fanatsies posted here by ardee D. on Sunday, Oct 7, 2007 at 9:34:46 AM
Keep Rebutting Conpiracy Theories by Todd Bondy on Thursday, Oct 4, 2007 at 5:39:58 AM
It's Quite Revealing by CB Brooklyn on Thursday, Oct 4, 2007 at 5:33:16 PM
not silly, STUPID!!! by Pappy on Thursday, Oct 4, 2007 at 5:30:45 PM
Yes, you are free to say what you wish. by CB Brooklyn on Thursday, Oct 4, 2007 at 5:38:22 PM
You can rest assured of that by Pappy on Thursday, Oct 4, 2007 at 5:55:59 PM
STILL STUPID! by Pappy on Thursday, Oct 4, 2007 at 6:08:34 PM
YAWN!! by Pappy on Thursday, Oct 4, 2007 at 6:25:09 PM
Drs Wood/Reynolds' RFCs & Other Docs Are Proof by CB Brooklyn on Friday, Oct 5, 2007 at 12:37:47 PM
are these the same... by Pappy on Monday, Oct 8, 2007 at 3:57:13 AM
Pappy, is it reasonable by ardee D. on Monday, Oct 8, 2007 at 4:24:46 PM

 
Want to post your own comment on this Article? Post Comment


 

 

 

Tell a Friend: Tell A Friend

Copyright © 2002-2009, OpEdNews

Powered by Populum