Refresh   Tag(s): ; ; ; ;
Add to My Group
April 15, 2009 at 15:42:26

Must Read 3   Well Said 3   Valuable 2   View Ratings | Rate It

Promoted to Headline (H3) on 4/15/09:

Was it Nanotech-Thermite or Phasers that took down the WTC?

FACEBOOK
submit to twitter
submit to reddit
submit to digg

Tell A Friend

By John R Moffett (about the author)     Page 1 of 2 page(s)

opednews.com     Permalink

For OpEdNews: John R Moffett - Writer

A recently published article in an online science journal has come to the conclusion that minute flakes of thermite have been identified in particle samples collected at the site of the World Trade Center collapse.

The article entitled “Active Thermitic Material Discovered in Dust from the 9/11 World Trade Center Catastrophe” was recently published in “The Open Chemical Physics Journal,” which is part of the Bentham Open Science Publishers group of journals.

Researchers from Denmark, the United States and Australia reported that dust samples collected near the collapsed World Trade Center complex contained iron oxide and aluminum flakes whose chemical composition was consistent with unburned thermite.


The researchers used a number of techniques to analyze the chips including scanning electron microscopy (SEM), X-ray energy dispersive spectroscopy (XEDS), and differential scanning calorimetry (DSC).

The researchers used supposed samples of the dust that spread over lower Manhattan after the WTC buildings collapsed. Several samples that had been kept by residents for years as “souvenirs” of the disaster were given to the researchers between 2006 and 2008, many years after the disaster. This raises serious “chain of custody” issues for the evidence which would almost certainly preclude the samples from being used in a court of law. But assuming the samples were valid, there are many more serious issues with the work of this research group.

First, with regard to the idea that this work was published in a “peer reviewed scientific journal”, it should be noted that the Open Chemical Physics Journal is a pay-to-publish online-only journal that has published a total of 12 articles in its history. They have no track record, and no impact factor in the field. In essence, they are a vanity publisher for scientists who can’t get their work published anywhere else. To call them a peer-reviewed science journal is a real stretch.

Before I get into details about why this work is so poorly done, and why the interpretations of the researchers are so suspect, it is important to state that the thermite argument was put forward by these same researchers years ago, and the idea was fully debunked years ago. See for example here: http://www.911myths.com/WTCTHERM.pdf.

The researchers found unusual looking “red/grey chips” that could be collected with magnets in all of the WTC dust samples given to them. One particularly unusual finding in this research article was that the percentage of "red/gray chips" of supposedly "unreacted thermite" amounted to approximately 0.1% of the total mass of the collected dust. Assuming that most of the "thermite" would have burned when set off, and only a fraction remained unreacted, then the amount of 0.1% of the total dust is astounding. It translates to tens or even hundreds of thousands of tons (assuming many millions of tons of building materials total, see page 23, para 3 of the article).

It is no small coincidence that the major components that the researchers detected in the red and grey chips include iron, aluminum, oxygen, silica, and carbon, since these relate to the primary building materials that the WTC was constructed from. The girders were steel, which rusts to iron oxide, the façade was aluminum, and the floors were concrete. The traces of calcium and sulfur could easily be from wallboard (calcium sulfate), as the authors themselves conclude. 

The chips that they analyzed were thin flakes, often only microns thick (a micron is 1/1000 of a millimeter). They all had a grey layer, and a red layer. The grey layers were said to be composed of iron oxide based on the X-ray dispersive spectroscopy, which seems somewhat unusual, since most iron oxide is red in color, not grey (one form of naturally occurring hematite is metallic grey). The red layer of the chips was said to be composed of carbon, with added iron, aluminum, silicon and oxygen, and lesser amounts of sodium, calcium, and potassium. This is not the composition of thermite. 

X-ray dispersive spectroscopy can tell you what elements are in a sample, but not what molecules those elements are incorporated into. Any sample of dust from the WTC collapse would contain similar amounts of these elements because those are the primary elements that made up the steel superstructure, concrete flooring, aluminum facade and other building materials (not to mention the aluminum fuselage of the aircraft).

There is no thermite product on earth that is made up of thin sheets of grey layers of iron oxide and red layers of carbon with iron and aluminum oxides. In fact, to burn at high temperatures, thermite must contain large amounts of unoxidized aluminum, rather than aluminum oxide. The researchers did not determine if the aluminum present in their samples was oxidized aluminum, or unoxidized aluminum. The researchers get around the fact that their samples did not look like thermite under the microscope by suggesting that is was a form of "nanotechnology enhanced super-thermite". How could there have been tens of thousands of tons of "nanotechnology enhanced super-thermite" in these buildings? 

The researchers also showed that the chips could be ignited, and that they burned at a lower temperature than normal thermite. This is of course not surprising since metals such as aluminum do burn if they are complexed with oxidizing agents, and are heated enough. Rust is an oxidizing agent if heated high enough, and is the oxidizing constituent of many types of thermite.

It is also important to note that thermite is not explosive, and it is difficult to ignite. It also often burns relatively slowly, and not uniformly, making it a very poor choice for building demolition. In building demolition, you need high explosive cutting charges that usually are carefully placed in holes drilled deep into the structures to be severed. Putting a thin coat of thermite onto a structural element, as suggested by the fact that all of the red/grey chips found in the dust samples were very thin flakes, would not result in the reliable cutting of support structures that would be required to bring the WTC down.

It is also interesting that when the red layer of the chips was analyzed by backscattered electron imaging, that the signals for iron and oxygen did not overlap well. If the material was thermite, the iron would be present almost exclusively as iron oxide, and the images for the iron atoms and oxygen atoms should have overlapped very well.

Next Page  1  |  2

 

www.factinista.org; www.n-acetylaspartate.com

Dr. John Moffett is a Managing Editor at OpEdNews.com, and is an active research neuroscientist in the Washington, DC area. Dr. Moffett has published numerous scientific articles on the nervous and immune systems. Dr. Moffett's main area of research (more...)
 

The views expressed in this article are the sole responsibility of the author
and do not necessarily reflect those of this website or its editors.

Contact Author Contact Editor View Authors' Articles

 

Share this page: (what's this?)                   Tell a Friend: Tell A Friend

FACEBOOK      DIGG THIS      Add This Page to Mr Wong!           NEWSVINE      DEl.ICIO.US      Looksmart Furl      NETSCAPE      My Web      Tag!RawSugar      Blink List     (More...)

Comments: Expand   Shrink   Hide  
85 comments
To view all comments:
Expand Comments
 

Easy! by Michael Lee on Wednesday, Apr 15, 2009 at 5:49:34 PM
Easy by Bill Cain on Wednesday, Apr 15, 2009 at 9:03:40 PM
There was no molten metal by CB Brooklyn on Wednesday, Apr 15, 2009 at 9:13:53 PM
I like to believe my own eyes - molten metal by Michael Lee on Wednesday, Apr 15, 2009 at 10:34:13 PM
You can believe your own eyes... by CB Brooklyn on Wednesday, Apr 15, 2009 at 11:53:24 PM
You're Kidding, Right? by Michael Lee on Thursday, Apr 16, 2009 at 11:47:29 AM
Why do you assume the yellow orange color is due to heat? by CB Brooklyn on Thursday, Apr 16, 2009 at 3:50:46 PM
CB you need to detail by Patrick Lafferty on Thursday, Apr 16, 2009 at 1:41:48 PM
Molten Steel, and Seismic Spikes by William Whitten on Thursday, Apr 16, 2009 at 6:48:01 PM
more from Bollyn by William Whitten on Thursday, Apr 16, 2009 at 7:03:10 PM
An honest Truther?!? by Tom Murphy on Wednesday, Apr 15, 2009 at 6:03:01 PM
So tell us, doctor, by Nick van Nes on Wednesday, Apr 15, 2009 at 6:26:51 PM
Thank you by J. Edward Tremlett on Wednesday, Apr 15, 2009 at 8:09:30 PM
a lollipop of misperception by William Whitten on Wednesday, Apr 15, 2009 at 8:50:57 PM
Thanks for this John... by Steven Leser on Wednesday, Apr 15, 2009 at 9:05:14 PM
Brainmatter and bits of nano-thermates,two different monkeys by William Whitten on Wednesday, Apr 15, 2009 at 9:24:48 PM
First off, I wasn't speaking to you by Steven Leser on Wednesday, Apr 15, 2009 at 10:01:11 PM
If you wish not to be responded to, don't use a public by Mr M on Thursday, Apr 16, 2009 at 10:47:06 AM
Shouldnt you be looking into where General Clark is hiding? by Steven Leser on Thursday, Apr 16, 2009 at 7:51:31 PM
Steven, did you ever answer what War you supported by Better World Order on Friday, Apr 17, 2009 at 12:42:23 AM
Seriously... what does one have to do with the other? by Tom Murphy on Wednesday, Apr 15, 2009 at 10:10:39 PM
Peer Review and Bentham Open by William Whitten on Wednesday, Apr 15, 2009 at 9:54:56 PM
Believers... by Dave Hunter on Thursday, Apr 16, 2009 at 9:58:28 AM
Thermite Propaganda by CB Brooklyn on Wednesday, Apr 15, 2009 at 9:09:28 PM
Magnetometer readings by Steven Leser on Wednesday, Apr 15, 2009 at 10:11:07 PM
Steven, yes. But when zoomed in to the hours and minutes by CB Brooklyn on Thursday, Apr 16, 2009 at 12:02:51 AM
Greening, Jones on nano-energentics by William Whitten on Wednesday, Apr 15, 2009 at 9:17:07 PM
Further Questions by CB Brooklyn on Wednesday, Apr 15, 2009 at 9:29:52 PM
One time for you by William Whitten on Wednesday, Apr 15, 2009 at 10:04:19 PM
Excellent piece by jeff rock on Wednesday, Apr 15, 2009 at 10:36:37 PM
green light...do it! by William Whitten on Wednesday, Apr 15, 2009 at 11:05:55 PM
I second Mr. Whitten in asking you to post your explanation by Mr M on Thursday, Apr 16, 2009 at 9:47:53 AM
Yes! by Maxwell on Thursday, Apr 16, 2009 at 11:53:35 AM
A crucial misstatement by Jeffrey King on Wednesday, Apr 15, 2009 at 11:19:06 PM
eyes by William Whitten on Thursday, Apr 16, 2009 at 2:25:56 AM
Two things ... by Mr M on Wednesday, Apr 15, 2009 at 11:47:18 PM
When I Got Home by shadow dancer on Thursday, Apr 16, 2009 at 1:31:41 AM
There is no "official story." by Perry Logan on Thursday, Apr 16, 2009 at 7:14:32 AM
Perry by Ms Nan on Thursday, Apr 16, 2009 at 7:25:59 AM
I'm rolling on the floor myself by Maxwell on Thursday, Apr 16, 2009 at 11:56:47 AM
Where you dropped on your head as a child? by Mr M on Thursday, Apr 16, 2009 at 9:36:58 AM
Painful indeed Mother by Patrick Lafferty on Thursday, Apr 16, 2009 at 12:39:54 PM
You can watch his videos? by Mr M on Friday, Apr 17, 2009 at 11:00:00 PM
then how did the people get pulverized? by Carol Cleveland on Thursday, Apr 16, 2009 at 8:53:36 AM
There's even a problem with the linguistics by Jeffrey King on Thursday, Apr 16, 2009 at 10:59:28 AM
For sure al-Qaeda by Patrick Lafferty on Thursday, Apr 16, 2009 at 12:23:24 PM
then how did the people get pulverized? by Carol Cleveland on Thursday, Apr 16, 2009 at 10:45:04 AM
Architects & Engineers for 9/11 Truth by Jeffrey King on Thursday, Apr 16, 2009 at 11:13:39 AM
Some points well-taken, some not by Maxwell on Thursday, Apr 16, 2009 at 11:48:54 AM
The answer is... by Patrick Lafferty on Thursday, Apr 16, 2009 at 12:04:57 PM
Darwin and natural selection exemplified by Tom Murphy on Thursday, Apr 16, 2009 at 2:32:42 PM
I thought you wore it already by Patrick Lafferty on Thursday, Apr 16, 2009 at 3:55:47 PM
Patrick by William Whitten on Thursday, Apr 16, 2009 at 5:08:35 PM
It's been a rough day Willie by Patrick Lafferty on Thursday, Apr 16, 2009 at 7:48:55 PM
a major disappointment by William Whitten on Thursday, Apr 16, 2009 at 4:58:33 PM
Thrift before sophistication by Tom Murphy on Thursday, Apr 16, 2009 at 8:08:03 PM
Liberty by William Whitten on Thursday, Apr 16, 2009 at 10:03:17 PM
Tom, I am glad you will wear by Patrick Lafferty on Friday, Apr 17, 2009 at 8:13:38 AM
What is really going on here? by gravity32 on Thursday, Apr 16, 2009 at 12:25:11 PM
coto guys by jersey girl on Thursday, Apr 16, 2009 at 7:58:20 PM
I had no idea by Mad Jayhawk on Thursday, Apr 16, 2009 at 9:43:58 PM
I have to admit... by William Whitten on Thursday, Apr 16, 2009 at 10:07:20 PM
Never by Mad Jayhawk on Friday, Apr 17, 2009 at 1:02:16 AM
Debunking by Chris Sarns on Thursday, Apr 16, 2009 at 11:19:45 PM
Start with the obvious... by David Chandler on Friday, Apr 17, 2009 at 12:05:33 AM
So- what are the red-gray chips, then? by Better World Order on Friday, Apr 17, 2009 at 1:20:07 AM
Hurricane Erin on 9/11 and Hutchison Effect by Andrew Johnson on Friday, Apr 17, 2009 at 4:33:51 AM
mud by William Whitten on Friday, Apr 17, 2009 at 8:43:07 AM
Where's your evidence and website, Whitten? by Andrew Johnson on Friday, Apr 17, 2009 at 11:42:10 AM
okay by William Whitten on Friday, Apr 17, 2009 at 2:59:27 PM
So some are beginning to look outside the box by Patrick Lafferty on Friday, Apr 17, 2009 at 9:38:07 AM
An interesting set of links and posts... by Andrew Johnson on Friday, Apr 17, 2009 at 11:55:33 AM
Not sure what you mean Andrew? by Patrick Lafferty on Friday, Apr 17, 2009 at 12:47:26 PM
Oops - not quite discussing the relevant evidence... by Andrew Johnson on Friday, Apr 17, 2009 at 2:26:21 PM
point? by William Whitten on Friday, Apr 17, 2009 at 5:46:07 PM
Explaining Clearly - as Will Whitten Muddles up - AGAIN! by Andrew Johnson on Saturday, Apr 18, 2009 at 3:53:49 AM
Oh, I understand now by Patrick Lafferty on Friday, Apr 17, 2009 at 7:54:06 PM
Crucfix by William Whitten on Friday, Apr 17, 2009 at 10:48:50 PM
The doublefix in Russia by Patrick Lafferty on Saturday, Apr 18, 2009 at 2:40:13 PM
HAARP and 911 and chemtrails by Andrew Johnson on Saturday, Apr 18, 2009 at 3:44:22 AM
Right Andrew by Patrick Lafferty on Saturday, Apr 18, 2009 at 2:25:40 PM
Disinformation Debate by Russ Hallberg on Monday, Apr 20, 2009 at 2:17:07 AM
Oops - Ed Ward? by Andrew Johnson on Tuesday, Apr 21, 2009 at 2:48:14 PM
Attack of the disinfo-bots by Chris Sarns on Thursday, Apr 23, 2009 at 4:58:45 PM
Try and mix Aluminum with organic..... by hommedespoir on Monday, May 4, 2009 at 11:38:04 PM

 

 

 

Tell a Friend: Tell A Friend

Copyright © 2002-2010, OpEdNews

Powered by Populum