Tag(s): , Add Tags
Add to My Group(s)

View Ratings | Rate It

Permalink
View Article Stats      (18 comments)

When Comity Turns to Tragic Comedy

Add this Page to Facebook!
Submit to Twitter
Submit to Reddit
Submit to Stumble Upon

Tell A Friend

Become a Fan
Get Embed HTML Code
By (about the author)

Become a Fan Become a Fan  (4 fans)   -- Page 1 of 1 page(s)

opednews.com

The Democrats in Congress have a lower approval rating than George Bush despite the fact that the Democrats have not broken any laws, tortured any prisoners, or stripped away the rights of any citizens. The reason is not too surprising - the Democrats were elected by a majority of Americans to investigate the reasons for going to war, and to begin undoing the mess that Bush and Cheney have put us in. But so far, the Democrats in Congress have resisted doing the hard things that are necessary to hold the administration accountable for their malfeasance.

What are the major reasons for the Democrats reticence?

The first is money. The Democrats are just as dependent on donations from large corporations whose lobbyists are swarming Washington like locust in a wheat field. Many of these corporations are defense manufacturers and contractors, and they are not about to let Democrats spoil their military contract gravy train. Even liberal Democrats like Ted Kennedy are putting multi-million dollar earmarks into bills to keep the money flowing to their donors. If the Democrats push an anti-war agenda too hard, they will lose all monetary support from the defense industry.

But that doesn’t explain the lack of investigations aimed at possible impeachment charges against Cheney and Bush. Theoretically, they could pursue impeachment while still funding the military, thus not jeopardizing their friendly connections to the military industrial complex.

I believe that the primary reasons for the lack of impeachment proceedings are a combination of concern about being perceived as too partisan (Hatfield/McCoy syndrome), and the fact that Democrats are still caught in the archaic Congressional mental trap known as “comity”. Comity is the notion, long ago abandoned by Republicans, that doing the people’s business was a cooperative effort requiring civility, and respect for other’s points of view. Indeed, the Republicans long ago abandoned all comity, and all decency in their interactions with Democrats in Congress, so it is a tad quaint that the Democrats are still locked in a 1950’s mindset where they think the Republicans will play fair, and respect the Democrat’s input. They don’t, and they won’t.

Democrats need to wake up, and realize that the Republicans will always play hard ball, and will do anything to pass their preferred legislation, while blocking the Democrats efforts by any means at their disposal. If Democrats intimate they might filibuster a terrible, partisan Supreme Court nominee, the Republicans bring up the “nuclear option” of eliminating all filibusters permanently. As soon as the Democrats suggest they might set a timetable for withdrawal of troops from Iraq, the Republicans immediately rush to filibuster. No shame, no honesty, no decency, and certainly no comity.


At this point the Democrat’s comity is becoming more like a tragic comedy than bipartisanship. Call your congressperson immediately and urge them to support HR 333, which is Dennis Kucinich’s bill to begin impeachment proceedings against Dick Cheney. Representative John Conyers has said if he gets three more co-signatures on HR 333 he will bring it before the House. It does not guarantee it will go forward or that it will get enough votes, but it needs to be done as soon as possible. While you're at it, urge your congressperson to invoke “inherent contempt” charges against Harriet Miers and bring her before the Congress to testify.

It's high time that the Democrats stop slathering comity all over the Republicans when they only get black eyes in return. Comity Schmomity… it's time for a bare knuckles fight.

 

Take action -- click here to contact your local newspaper or congress people:
Support HR 333

Click here to see the most recent messages sent to congressional reps and local newspapers

Dr. John Moffett is a Managing Editor at OpEdNews.com, and is an active research neuroscientist in the Washington, DC area. Dr. Moffett has published numerous scientific articles on the nervous and immune systems. Dr. Moffett's main area of research (more...)
 

The views expressed in this article are the sole responsibility of the author
and do not necessarily reflect those of this website or its editors.

Contact Author Contact Editor View Authors' Articles

 

Share this page: (what's this?)                   Tell a Friend: Tell A Friend

Add this Page to Facebook!      Submit to Stumble Upon      Submit to Reddit      Add This Page to Mr Wong!           NEWSVINE      DEl.ICIO.US      Looksmart Furl      My Web      Blink List     (More...)

Comments

The time limit for entering new comments on this article has expired.

This limit can be removed. Our paid membership program is designed to give you many benefits, such as removing this time limit. To learn more, please click here.

Comments: Expand   Shrink   Hide  
18 comments
To view all comments:
Expand Comments
(Or you can set your preferences to show all comments, always)

Well said, John.... by Professor Emeritus Peter Bagnolo on Monday, Jul 23, 2007 at 1:03:50 PM
Contacting Congressman by walley on Monday, Jul 23, 2007 at 5:18:04 PM
When you urge Dems to "wake up" and tell them it's time for by Richard Mynick on Monday, Jul 23, 2007 at 2:49:48 PM
DLC Dems vs. liberals (leftists?) by John R Moffett on Monday, Jul 23, 2007 at 3:18:16 PM
Or, the greens could... by Steven Leser on Monday, Jul 23, 2007 at 9:12:52 PM
The so-called "Progressive Caucus" is not really very by Richard Mynick on Monday, Jul 23, 2007 at 9:34:26 PM
So, you believe the Caucus should have a litmus test? by Steven Leser on Monday, Jul 23, 2007 at 9:48:51 PM
My shocking position is that a "Progressive Caucus" should by Richard Mynick on Monday, Jul 23, 2007 at 10:32:51 PM
You made only 1 substantive point about the Caucus in your by Steven Leser on Monday, Jul 23, 2007 at 11:33:57 PM
Further, the Congressional Progressive Caucus... by Steven Leser on Monday, Jul 23, 2007 at 9:34:25 PM
OK, just to clarify -- when you speak of this "substantial by Richard Mynick on Monday, Jul 23, 2007 at 9:49:29 PM
Rich - He said "Side branch" by Steven Leser on Monday, Jul 23, 2007 at 10:04:57 PM
Steven and Rich by John R Moffett on Tuesday, Jul 24, 2007 at 6:47:39 AM
Pressure is not the answer by Steven Leser on Tuesday, Jul 24, 2007 at 11:32:03 AM
Majority of the people by Sheila Jackson on Wednesday, Jul 25, 2007 at 12:35:51 AM
HR 333 is NOT Conyers' bill by m.suskind on Monday, Jul 23, 2007 at 4:47:34 PM
Contact Your Representative by Sheila Jackson on Tuesday, Jul 24, 2007 at 12:09:08 AM
an issue to talk about ... by Godo on Monday, Jul 30, 2007 at 11:55:38 AM