Tags for This Article:

Impeachment (2933)  Congress (2641)  Democracy (1622)  Corruption (1561)  Politics (1137)  Congress Failed Oversight Democracy (272)  Congress Oversight Failures (240)  Congress Legislative Failures (189)  Congress Failed War $$ Oversight (179)  Congress War Funding (177)  Congress War Oversight (170)  Congress Failed Oversight $$ (169)  Congressional Ethics (162)  Congressional Crime (97)  Congress Failed Fiscal Policy (88)  Congress Spending (88)  Congress Graft (78)  Congressional Gravy Train (68)  Incumbents (47)  Pork (29) 

Populum Tag Cloud
       Control Panel
Fine tune your search to access content
Articles
Diaries Products
Events All
All time
Last 6 mos
Last month
Last week
Last 24 hrs
From:
Month  Day   Year

To:
Month  Day   Year
Alphabet
Popularity
Count ON
Count OFF
This Level
Sub-levels

 

 

 

Tag(s): ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ;
Add to My Group
August 24, 2007 at 07:51:06

Why Has Congress Failed Americans?

by Joel S. Hirschhorn     Page 1 of 1 page(s)

http://www.opednews.com


Tell A Friend

The Founders of our nation and the Framers of our Constitution surely did not foresee the day when, of the federal government’s three branches, the public would have the least confidence in Congress.  In fact, the public has a little less confidence in Congress than it has in HMOs.  At 14 percent, the fraction of Americans with a "great deal" or "quite a lot" of confidence in Congress is the lowest in Gallup's history of this measure -- and the lowest of any of the 16 institutions tested in this year's Confidence in Institutions survey.  The Supreme Court received 34 percent confidence and the awful presidency of George W. Bush received 25 percent – nothing to be proud of.

The 2006 congressional elections show that switching power between the two major political parties is an act of utter futility.  We have a bipartisan failure of Congress to fulfill its constitutional responsibilities and serve the public.  In the end, Democrats may have a different style, but like Republicans are also corrupt, arrogant, and incompetent.  Things have gotten so bad institutionally and culturally that we cannot vote our way out of a dysfunctional and destructive Congress as long as the two-party duopoly maintains its grip on our political system.

 

We no longer have a significant number of members of Congress that rise above partisan political priorities to put the good of the nation and the integrity of our Constitution first.

 

For our constitutional republic to really work Congress must have the courage and integrity to use its constitutional powers to safeguard Americans’ freedom, security, health, safety and welfare.  Even the most distracted and cynical Americans now see Congress has done next to nothing to fulfill its constitutional responsibilities.

 

Worst of all, Congress has allowed the Bush presidency to accumulate far more power than our Constitution permits.  Even after years of arrogant disrespect by Bush and Cheney for our Constitution and Congress itself, Congress is too cowardly to do what they are supposed to do to maintain the structure of our federal government.  It has not used the constitutional remedy of impeachment – not to punish Bush – but to preserve the constitutional limits on the presidency.

 

Add to this: the failure to protect the rule of law; the failure to control spending and reduce our debt; the failure to control our borders and protect our national sovereignty; the failure to stop the insane Iraq war; the failure to stop the many forms of corruption of Congress itself; the failure to restore public confidence in our elections; the failure to stop the excesses of globalization that is destroying our middle class; the failure to address rising economic inequality; the failure to fix our broken health care system; and so much more.

 

All this has resulted from repugnant runaway politics.  Getting elected, grabbing power and enjoying the benefits of office trump governing.  Hundreds of members of Congress – in the House and Senate – are mental midgets, embarrassing blowhards, chronic liars, outright crooks, corporate lackeys, and elderly buffoons.  They are plutocracy protectors more than democracy defenders.  And too many that think they should be president.

 

So what can the 86 percent of Americans without confidence in Congress do?

 

Put aside partisan views and stop re-electing members of Congress.  Only a handful of incumbents deserve to be re-elected.  A very few that never supported the Iraq war, do not use pork spending to reward their supporters, and have worked to impeach Bush, for example.

 

Now is the time to elect independents and third party candidates to Congress.  When one objectively sees the utterly low quality of both Democratic and Republican members of Congress it becomes clear that even a random selection of ordinary Americans would probably do better.  But we have thousands of independents and third party members with considerable civic and elective office experience that deserve the opportunity to restore our representative democracy.  How could we do any worse?  Let’s throw the bums out and give real change a chance.

 

We also need much greater public awareness that Congress for a very long time has failed to obey the part of Article V of our Constitution that gives us the right to a convention to propose amendments to the Constitution.  Such an Article V Convention was created by the Framers as an alternative to Congress proposing amendments.  They created this convention option – a temporary fourth branch of government giving us some direct democracy – in case Americans some day lost confidence in the federal government.  That day has arrived!

 

Even Congressman Ron Paul, self-proclaimed champion of the Constitution, has not supported an Article V Convention.

 

There are many constitutional amendments that deserve public discussion, especially ones to make our government work they way our Constitution intended it to work.  We need to strengthen our Constitution to prevent power-hungry presidents, useless Congresses, and Supreme Courts that create new public policy.

 

Moreover, the one and only requirement to have an Article V Convention specified has already been satisfied, because way more than two-thirds of state legislatures have requested such a convention.  Learn more about this congressional disobedience of the Constitution at www.foavc.org, the website of the new national, nonpartisan group Friends of the Article V Convention.

 

Why has Congress failed Americans?  Because Americans have allowed it to fail them.  Now is the time for Americans to assert their sovereign constitutional power and take back their country.  That means YOU,

 

www.delusionaldemocracy.com

Joel S. Hirschhorn is the author of Delusional Democracy - Fixing the Republic Without Overthrowing the Government (www.delusionaldemocracy.com). His current political writings have been greatly influenced by working as a senior staffer for the U.S. Congress and for the National Governors Association. He advocates a Second American Revolution, beginning with an Article V Convention to propose constitutional amendments.

Contact Author
Contact Editor
View Other Articles by Author

 

Bookmark this page: (what's this?)

NETSCAPE      DIGG THIS      NEWSVINE      DEl.ICIO.US      Looksmart Furl      My Web      Spurl      Tag!RawSugar      Shadows Tag!      Blink List     (More...)
Comments: Expand   Shrink   Hide  
13 comments

Living in a time where most everyone has to be associated with "something".  I draw only one association and that is of my personal freedom. 
Michael TwainLiving in a time where most everyone has to be associated with "something".  I draw only one association and that is of my personal freedom. 

A quick follow up...

Although, I agree with the viability of Article V. It appears in the reference links that the last time this was submitted was in 1980. Wasn't the Article V put in place to amend the constitution when there are things that 2/3s of the states disagree with or want something added? My point is, don't the states need a specific amendment they have to push (i.e. abolishing the 16th amendment)? I would find it dubious if a National Convention was called and the 2/3s states had free reign to adjust the constitution wholly. I believe it was designed to address individual amendments.

 

 

by Michael Twain (0 articles, 0 quicklinks, 0 diaries, 22 comments) on Friday, August 24, 2007 at 8:55:57 AM
 


Joel S. Hirschhorn is the author of Delusional Democracy - Fixing the Republic Without Overthrowing the Government (www.delusionaldemocracy.com). His current political writings have been greatly influenced by working as a senior staffer for the U.S. Congress and for the National Governors Association. He advocates a Second American Revolution, beginning with an Article V Convention to propose constitutional amendments.
Joel S. HirschhornJoel S. Hirschhorn is the author of Delusional Democracy - Fixing the Republic Without Overthrowing the Government (www.delusionaldemocracy.com). His current political writings have been greatly influenced by working as a senior staffer for the U.S. Congress and for the National Governors Association. He advocates a Second American Revolution, beginning with an Article V Convention to propose constitutional amendments.

People have been misinformed

To learn the truth about our constitutional right to an Article V Convention, please spend some time examining the many materials on www.foavc.org; there is only one requirement specified in Article V - that 2/3 requiremment for requests from state legislatures, which has been more than satisfied; there is no requirement that a convention must address just one specified possible amendment; any proposed amendments from a convention must meet the same ratification requirements as proposals from Congress (and note that Congress can discuss anything they want); only amendments can be proposed by a convention - not wholesale rewriting of the Constitution; considering how awful our government has become, the Article V Convention is the best path for reengaging Americans in their government and restoring American democracy.

by Joel S. Hirschhorn (113 articles, 20 quicklinks, 46 diaries, 428 comments) on Friday, August 24, 2007 at 9:19:10 AM
 


Bill Walker filed the first two federal lawsuits in United States history dealing directly with the calling of an Article V Convention. He is a co-founder of Friends of the Article V Convention (FOAVC) a group working compel Congress to call an Article V Convention
Bill WalkerBill Walker filed the first two federal lawsuits in United States history dealing directly with the calling of an Article V Convention. He is a co-founder of Friends of the Article V Convention (FOAVC) a group working compel Congress to call an Article V Convention

The public record is clear on this

The public record is clear. 39 states have applied for repeal of the 16th Amendment in addition to many other subjects. All that is required for ratification for an amendment is 38 states. In all all 50 states have submitted 567 applications for a convention call to Congress who has ignored them all despite the clear language of the Constitution which mandates Congress required to call a convention. The term used by Founders was "peremptory."

by Bill Walker (0 articles, 0 quicklinks, 0 diaries, 15 comments) on Friday, August 24, 2007 at 8:51:00 PM
 


I am a Vietnam Vet disabled by MS and other various diseases.  On average I am a Moderate with slight Conservative leanings although it truly depends on what issue I am concerned with at the time.
Hayesml47I am a Vietnam Vet disabled by MS and other various diseases.  On average I am a Moderate with slight Conservative leanings although it truly depends on what issue I am concerned with at the time.

Congress failure.

Congress has definitely failed as has the American voter.  If we the people truly want to regain both our country and our Congress then we the people will need to start voting out all incumbents until Congress enacts term limits, removal of all lobby activities, Congressperson wealth monitoring, and requirements for Congresspersons to be located in their districts/states at least 1/2 of every year.  Term limits for the Supreme Court and separate voting for President and Vice-President will also help make our government much more responsible to the people of these United States.

by Hayesml47 (1 articles, 0 quicklinks, 1 diaries, 245 comments) on Friday, August 24, 2007 at 1:05:57 PM
 


http://one-simple-idea.com/BiographyDanielSummars.htm
Daniel Summarshttp://one-simple-idea.com/BiographyDanielSummars.htm

If only enough voters could arrive at the same conclusion

Good article Joel.

If only enough voters could arrive at the same conclusion (which is true).

Congress’ dismal 18% approval rating is well deserved. But, will it translate into voters that will stop rewarding and re-electing incumbent politicians, of which most (if not all) are irresponsible, corrupt, FOR-SALE, and unaccountable? The problem is that partisan-warfare is so EXTREMELY powerful and effective, too many voters continue to blindly pull the party-lever, and reward and re-elect do-nothing, bought-and-paid-for, irresponsible, incumbent politicians, over and over and without understanding (or admitting) that government can never become responsible and accountable until enough voters do too.

The problem isn’t just politicians. It is the voters that empower them, and repeatedly reward them with 90% to 95% re-election rates (since 1996). Too many voters are so thoroughly programmed to pull the party-lever. Voters are more afraid of losing seats for THEIR party, that they have failed to realize that the politicians in THEIR party are no better than those in the OTHER party. Hence, the two main parites (the duopoly) are allowed to contintue take turns being corrupt and irresponsible. And when the IN-PARTY becomes too corrupt, the voters let the OTHER party have its turn at it. What voters fail to do is hold Congress (as a whole) responsible and accountable.

Why does this happen?
Because it is easier to blame the OTHER party, rather than admit that one’s OWN party is no better. Because that would then require work to improve it. Work is effort and pain. Thus, laziness trumps.

When will it end?
Only when the consequences of so much fiscal and moral irresponsibility finally becomes too painful. And those painful consequences are already in the pipeline, as the do-nothing Congress (a stumbling and fumbling group of 535 and their few hundred thousand employees) and the severely bloated executive branch (a gang of two million, many of which are neither seen nor heard as they that throttle our freedoms and prosperity) continue to ignore the nation’s pression problems that have been growing in number and severity for several decades.

So, there is a built-in self-correcting mechanism.
Pain and misery.
We can only hope we learn sooner than later, because the longer we continue down the current path, the more painful it will be later.

In my opinion, the voters have not yet felt enough pain to snap out of their habit of blindly pulling the party-lever. The next election will most likely result in a continued 90% to 95% re-election rate, and most voters (that is, of the 60% that even bother to vote at all) will continue to reward and re-elect the very same irresponsible, do-nothing, corrupt, FOR-SALE incumbent politicians that use and abuse the voters, and then appear dumbfounded as to why the nation’s problems continue to grow in number and severity. They’ll continue to blame the politicians (but, usually just those of the OTHER party), and refuse to admit that they (the voters) are culpable too. At least, until the consequences of that becomes too painful.  Perhaps when enough voters are jobless, homeless, and hungry they won't be so complacent, apathetic, and disinterested?

http://FOAVC.ORG/file.php/1/Articles/FAQ.htm

by Daniel Summars (0 articles, 0 quicklinks, 0 diaries, 5 comments) on Friday, August 24, 2007 at 1:24:57 PM
 



Rasoul Acheh

American Voters have fallen, and they can't get up

What transpires in U.S. politics these days, can no longer be accurately described as "politics". Voters who "vote" like zombies, automatically voting for the same 'do-nothing but damage' politicians, time, and time again, is not politics. Such voters clearly, have no idea what their doing, nor why they do it! The American voter has fallen, and they can't seem to get up. They're victims of deliberate political miseducation, and ruinous beliefs such as, "liberals vs conservatives over all", "there are only two choices in U.S. politics", and "voting for the lesser of two evils". These beliefs have been firmly impressed upon the minds of U.S. voters. They've subsequently been brainwashed, to such a degree, they no longer seem conscious of how ridiculous their behavior is, nor do they appear capable, of stopping it! U.S. politicians for their part, no longer care what voters think. They've seen enough incompetence, and stupidity, from U.S. voters, to be secure in the knowledge, that U.S. voters are inextricably stuck, in an endless loop, of mindless zombism. The TV will make sure they vote like good zombies, no matter how corrupt and criminal politicians become. Whatever U.S. voters think their doing, it's far from politics, and lacks any political rhyme, or reason. U.S. voters are now like alcoholics, or drug addicts. They must first realize, they have a serious problem, before they can do anything about it.

by Rasoul Acheh (0 articles, 0 quicklinks, 0 diaries, 122 comments) on Friday, August 24, 2007 at 3:46:39 PM
 


Richard Backus is a journalist specializing in economics and politics.He has degrees in physics and engineering, and considerable experience in computer systems development. He is single, a good bridge player, and a lousy but enthusiastic tennis player.
BacchusRichard Backus is a journalist specializing in economics and politics.He has degrees in physics and engineering, and considerable experience in computer systems development. He is single, a good bridge player, and a lousy but enthusiastic tennis player.

The entire government has failed in its duties

 If  Congressman Ron Paul, self-proclaimed champion of the Constitution, has not supported an Article V Convention, he is in violation of his oath of office to "support and defend the Constitution" and should be subject to impeachment. Of course the present government, in all its branches, has been studiously ignoring its Constitutional obligations as well, and wouldn'd dare impeach him.

by Bacchus (13 articles, 0 quicklinks, 0 diaries, 37 comments) on Friday, August 24, 2007 at 2:45:47 PM
 


Living in a time where most everyone has to be associated with "something".  I draw only one association and that is of my personal freedom. 
Michael TwainLiving in a time where most everyone has to be associated with "something".  I draw only one association and that is of my personal freedom. 

Not Sure..

Has anyone asked Ron Paul if he has supported this measure? You realize he has dedicated a large portion of his life trying to do his part in restoring the Constitutional law. He as done this as a Congressman. Article V is invoked by the people of the states. I don't think it's fair to attack someone that is actively participating in the political process. I'm sure he supports Article V, however, it sounds like invoking this measure is largely more difficult than it seems.

by Michael Twain (0 articles, 0 quicklinks, 0 diaries, 22 comments) on Friday, August 24, 2007 at 5:20:24 PM
 


Bill Walker filed the first two federal lawsuits in United States history dealing directly with the calling of an Article V Convention. He is a co-founder of Friends of the Article V Convention (FOAVC) a group working compel Congress to call an Article V Convention
Bill WalkerBill Walker filed the first two federal lawsuits in United States history dealing directly with the calling of an Article V Convention. He is a co-founder of Friends of the Article V Convention (FOAVC) a group working compel Congress to call an Article V Convention

A matter of public record

It is a matter of public record that Ron Paul joined a federal lawsuit in 2004 to assert that as a member of Congress he had the right to disobey the Constitution of the United States and not call an Article V Convention when the states had applied in sufficent number to satisfy the two-thirds requirement of applying states needed to compel a call. I think that answers the issue of Mr. Paul's support.

by Bill Walker (0 articles, 0 quicklinks, 0 diaries, 15 comments) on Friday, August 24, 2007 at 8:39:02 PM
 


Living in a time where most everyone has to be associated with "something".  I draw only one association and that is of my personal freedom. 
Michael TwainLiving in a time where most everyone has to be associated with "something".  I draw only one association and that is of my personal freedom. 

RE: A matter of public record

Can I get a reference on this "public record" so I can see it for myself?

 

 

by Michael Twain (0 articles, 0 quicklinks, 0 diaries, 22 comments) on Friday, August 24, 2007 at 9:19:12 PM
 


Robert Chapman is greatly interested in developing political awareness among as many people as possible.
Robert ChapmanRobert Chapman is greatly interested in developing political awareness among as many people as possible.

What Country has tried this successfully

Mr. Hischhorn has stated three aspects of the degradation of Congress: a multi-party make up in Congress would be a reformist step; coherent party messages and assertion of Congress' constitutional powers.

First Mr. Hirshhorn states more than two parties would be a reform step.

What country has this worked for?

In countries with multiple parties, the political spectrum boils down to a coalition government and a coalition opposition or a grand coalition between the two biggest parties.

Mr. Hirschhorn thinks coherent party messages are important.

One might say that if the parties had a coherent message, that it would enhance good government.

The GOP has had a very consistent message, but have degraded it into corruption.

Everyone can recite chapter and verse exactly what the GOP stands for politically, but they remain corrupt and incompetent in GOVERNING.

Third-

The Congress needs to reassert its power.

 Mr. Hirschhorn advocates the short-sighted and politically and institutionally damaging means of impeachment, such an action would prove that the Democratic Caucus is capable of carrying out a vendetta, but nothing else.

Mr. Hirschhorn advocates Congress assert its power in the appropriations process.

This is a good answer and has sound constitutional, legal and institutional  authority.

Unfortunately, since Congressmen and Senators depend on the distribution of pork to buy votes, logrolling is rampant and Congress is unable to present a united front against Executive Usurptation.

This means that the political culture must be changed.

As the parties stand now, most local parties could be taken over by relatively small groups of concerned and civic minded citizens.

This is because most local parties are mere shells of a handful of good and dedicated volunteers who don't have the resources to contest the advocacy groups' lock on the incumbents.

Instead of attacking the entrenched professional politicians, why not start supporting local and state candidates, develop a network and change the political culture?

This can be done because a race in a good sized town can be effective for under $ 30, 000 and because access to the ballot is gained through the two party nomination process.

Again instead of re-inventing the wheel, why not build a bicycle?

But this process takes getting away from the computer and the choir of like minded friends, and campaigning.

But campaigning is educational, in my own case, I have recently gone into neighborhoods of my town that I have never been in and met like minded and incredible people there.

Democracy only works if you work it.

by Robert Chapman (28 articles, 0 quicklinks, 2 diaries, 557 comments) on Saturday, August 25, 2007 at 3:03:46 PM
 


Frank J. Ranelli is an editorial writer, a research author and critic. He is also a senior editor for OpEdNews. His erudite and chic style of writing has been lauded and extensively published in a variety of news outlets and across the Internet. These include the Naples Daily News, The Online Journal, Information Clearing House, Alternet, The Smirking Chimp, and the former progressive journal of thought, Wicked Philosophy. Frank is currently working on his upcoming book, Rise of the Authoritaria...

to see more of bio, click on member name

Frank J. RanelliFrank J. Ranelli is an editorial writer, a research author and critic. He is also a senior editor for OpEdNews. His erudite and chic style of writing has been lauded and extensively published in a variety of news outlets and across the Internet. These include the Naples Daily News, The Online Journal, Information Clearing House, Alternet, The Smirking Chimp, and the former progressive journal of thought, Wicked Philosophy. Frank is currently working on his upcoming book, Rise of the Authoritaria...

to see more of bio, click on member name

I find this statement very troubling!

“Mr. Hirschhorn advocates the short-sighted and politically and institutionally damaging means of impeachment, such an action would prove that the Democratic Caucus is capable of carrying out a vendetta, but nothing else.” - RC Chapman

This is a powerful and indicting statement that I find very troubling. Rather than explain and list the litany of irrefutable reasons Bush should be impeached, in the face of such lawless, despotic, and outright contemptuous disdain for the rule of law, what do you propose we the people of this nation do?

Even a cursory glance at the transgressions of this administration -- conducting illegal wiretaps of American citizens, lying to Congress and the American public about the reasons for invading Iraq, violating International Law by invading a sovereign country for illegal purposes, ignoring the Geneva Convention by torturing prisoners of war, over 800 unconstitutional signing statements -- categorically proves that this president has violated his oath of office. He has brashly subverted the Constitution on purpose and with great malice.

When exactly, in your mind, do such egregious usurpations rise to the level of a High Crime or even a Misdemeanor? Is impeachment optional in the face of such blatant and indisputable evidence? Does not the Constitution stipulate Congress must act to preserve the sovereignty of the people?

Impeachment of Bush is not about revenge, but about the rule of law. What the Republicans did to Clinton was perverse and a partisan witch hunt. We are a nation of laws and not men. Simply because the country is potentially “impeachment fatigued” does not preclude us from carrying out our moral and civic duty towards true justice.

Impeachment is also about accountability. The only proper instrument for accountability -- when a president becomes despotic in his actions -- is impeachment, trial, and removal for failure to respect and honor the Constitution and faithfully execute the laws of the land. Will you honestly argue that Bush has not been deficient in his duties of faithfully executing the laws of the land?

Impeachment of Bush is a just and necessary remedy for such malfeasance and I disagree with anyone that it takes away from other work Congress should and can be doing. When you have a president who openly flouts and disobeys the law, intentionally attempts to erase the separation of powers of our tripartite government and assume dictatorial powers, no meaningful legislation, as has been the case so far, will be accomplished!

If we allow Bush’s usurpations and grotesque transgressions to be written into history, we have allowed history to reflect precedence, one that a future president will likely build upon, not diminish in the future – republican or democratic.

by Frank J. Ranelli (59 articles, 141 quicklinks, 25 diaries, 322 comments) on Sunday, August 26, 2007 at 12:06:54 AM
 

 

13 comments

 

Tell A Friend

 


Copyright © OpEdNews, 2002-2008

 

 

 

 

Articles
Diaries Members
Products Events
Polls  
  

Articles Popularity:

Momentum Building For Bugliosi's Case Against George W. Bush For Murder
by Linda Milazzo

A Declaration of Independence from the Government of the United States
by Anonymous

Bush Fulfills His Grandfather's Dream
by David Swanson

Fortis Prediction of US Bank Meltdown a Net Hoax: The Making of an Urban Legend
by Paul Haughey

POW/MIA Families Alleged McCain Assault: Senate Ethics Committee Failed to Investigate
by elliot cohen

WHAT HAPPENS WHEN GAS REACHES 7 DOLLARS A GALLON ?
by Allen L Roland

Why were 'first responders' de-contaminated at the Pentagon?
by Len Hart

Ex Weapons Inspector: Iran Not Pursuing Nukes, But U.S. Will Attack Before '09
by Jason Leopold

Twenty-five U.S. Military Officers Challenge Official Account of 9/11
by Alan Miller

Free Energy and the Open Source Energy Movement
by jibbguy