Tags for This Article:

Congress (2641)  Government (2452)  Voting (1176)  Money (704)  Political Values (118)  Political Elite (98)  Advertising (96)  Political Parties (92) 

Populum Tag Cloud
       Control Panel
Fine tune your search to access content
Articles
Diaries Products
Events All
All time
Last 6 mos
Last month
Last week
Last 24 hrs
From:
Month  Day   Year

To:
Month  Day   Year
Alphabet
Popularity
Count ON
Count OFF
This Level
Sub-levels

 

 

 

Tag(s): ; ; ; ; ; ; ;
Add to My Group
July 30, 2007 at 07:43:40

Americans Stuck In Political Stupor

by Joel S. Hirschhorn     Page 1 of 1 page(s)

http://www.opednews.com


Tell A Friend

The latest bipartisan George Washington University Battleground Poll rightfully received media attention because of its depressing data.  There is historic political pessimism and cynicism.  But something is more troubling than the data on the dire views of Americans about their elected representatives and government.  It is that 72 percent of voters still believe that “voting gives people like me some say about how the government runs things.”  Unbelievable!  Such confidence in a system that has failed them.

Despite untrustworthy elected officials and a dysfunctional government that takes care of the Upper Class more than everyone else, Americans retain still believe in their democracy.  This logical absurdity – or delusional state – is best explained by avoidance of the pain of cognitive dissonance.  Americans resist the reality that they are living in a sham representative democracy where the rule of law is a growing fiction.

It should be noted (but was not in the media coverage) that 75 percent of the likely voters were 45 or older, with a third retired.  That makes the results even more unsettling.  They should know better than to keep believing they can vote the nation into a better condition.  Self-identified Republicans were 41 percent, Democrats 42 percent, and Independents 15 percent.

Consider these reasons for giving up on voting and elections under the grip of the two major parties: Some 53 percent have an unfavorable view of politicians, with 55 percent believing that most elected officials are untrustworthy.  A majority of 52 percent disapproves of the performance of the Democrats in Congress and 61 percent disapprove of Republicans there.  An incredible 93 percent feels that lawmakers in Washington put partisan politics first compared with citizens.  But the biggest shift in voter opinion is that 71percent think their own Member of Congress puts partisan politics first compared with them, with 63 percent feeling strongly that way.

For the big picture: Seventy-percent are now convinced that the country is off on the wrong track – and 58 percent feel strongly that way.  This is the worst score recorded in the history of the Battleground survey.  Democrats are universally agreed about this point, but so are 71 percent of Independents and 49 percent of Republicans. 

A plurality of 38 percent believes their children will be worse off in the future and only a third said they "think their own children will be better off than they are right now -- a drop of 7 points since January."  Pessimism is worst among white Americans: Only 29 percent believe that their children will be better off; 38 percent believe their children will be worse off.

 

Dan Balz of the Washington Post summed up: “the American people have entered this campaign with a wholly cynical view of the political process.”

 

One trick of the political status quo establishment to keep many Americans (but still less than about half of all eligible voters) believing in voting is advertising.  Consider the current crowded presidential primary season.  The mass media constantly work to play up the races among Democratic and Republican contenders.  Why not?  They make a ton of money from all the money spent on campaign advertising.  Televised debates and endless state and national poll data are entertainment that fuel fake competition.  It is sheer manipulation of the electorate – to keep them interested in the election and, worse, to keep them believing that it really matters who wins in each party.

 

In the end, greedy and arrogant power elites will ensure that only a “safe” candidate will be chosen so that the two-party duopoly loses no power and no presidency rocks the political boat or harms corporate America.  Having so many contenders in the primary season is a farce.  The eventual Democratic ticket will be Clinton and Obama.  Period.  End of story.  It is the lowest risk, smartest political strategy.  On the Republican side there is more uncertainty, but the likely ticket will be Giuliani and Thompson.

 The true wildcard is whether Michael Bloomberg enters the race as a third party candidate.  I am rooting for this.  Objective statistical analysis of the American electorate shows that the level of public discontent with Democrats and Republicans is so high that a lavishly funded campaign by Bloomberg can make history.  Take independents, turned-off Democrats and Republicans, and the huge numbers of eligible voters that do not usually vote.  Bang!  You have more than enough votes to make Bloomberg president.  By choosing a well known but political maverick that the public trusts as a running mate, he can win.  It is exactly the kind of shake-up our political system desperately needs.

Americans must awake from their political stupor and stop letting themselves be victimized and manipulated by the media/political/financial elites running and ruining our nation.

 

www.delusionaldemocracy.com

Joel S. Hirschhorn is the author of Delusional Democracy - Fixing the Republic Without Overthrowing the Government (www.delusionaldemocracy.com). His current political writings have been greatly influenced by working as a senior staffer for the U.S. Congress and for the National Governors Association. He advocates a Second American Revolution, beginning with an Article V Convention to propose constitutional amendments.

Contact Author
Contact Editor
View Other Articles by Author

 

Bookmark this page: (what's this?)

NETSCAPE      DIGG THIS      NEWSVINE      DEl.ICIO.US      Looksmart Furl      My Web      Spurl      Tag!RawSugar      Shadows Tag!      Blink List     (More...)
Comments: Expand   Shrink   Hide  
14 comments

I've been a farm boy, a bus boy, a millhand, a Marine, a low criminal, a high crazy, a computer technician, a mechanic, a long-haul trucker, a student, a journalist, a technical writer, a teacher. I earned bachelor's degrees in history and English and a master's in magazine journalism before discovering I was better off as an autodidact.
Jimmy MontagueI've been a farm boy, a bus boy, a millhand, a Marine, a low criminal, a high crazy, a computer technician, a mechanic, a long-haul trucker, a student, a journalist, a technical writer, a teacher. I earned bachelor's degrees in history and English and a master's in magazine journalism before discovering I was better off as an autodidact.

The voters you're talking about

The voters you're talking about are simply the last Americans left in the boat. They are the last of those who are (or at least think themselves to be) members of the middle class. They will never give up on the system until they are thrown out of the boat like most other Americans. As long as they have their homes, their toys, adequate healthcare and a little pocket money, they will stay true to the system.

I predict that the system will NEVER CHANGE until the rest of the world does for America what America did for Germany in 1945. That a better world is coming is inevitable, but waiting for its arrival is going to be a purr-dee bitch. Most of us will not live to see it. 

by Jimmy Montague (3 articles, 2 quicklinks, 0 diaries, 63 comments) on Monday, July 30, 2007 at 8:46:54 AM
 


Dr. John Moffett is an active research neuroscientist in the Washington, DC area, who has published articles on the nervous and immune systems. Dr. Moffett is also the author and webmaster of the political opinion website www.Factinista.org, and is a Managing Editor at OpEdNews.com.
John R MoffettDr. John Moffett is an active research neuroscientist in the Washington, DC area, who has published articles on the nervous and immune systems. Dr. Moffett is also the author and webmaster of the political opinion website www.Factinista.org, and is a Managing Editor at OpEdNews.com.

Joel, I'm feeling nauseous...


Just what we need, a billionaire corporatist running the show… again.

I kept looking for a hint that you were being sarcastic, but failed to find any. If you are being sarcastic, I apologize.

How ironic that you speak of “greedy and arrogant power elites” and in the same breath call for a greedy and arrogant power elite to be elected president as some type of cure for what ails this country.

Exactly why would you want another rich, pro-business corporatist as President? Haven’t had enough of that yet?

And you finish with the delightfully ironic phrase “victimized and manipulated by the media/political/financial elites running and ruining our nation”… And you think billionaire Bloomberg is going to fix that…

Whoo boy.

by John R Moffett (78 articles, 14 quicklinks, 2 diaries, 587 comments) on Monday, July 30, 2007 at 9:01:38 AM
 


Dr. John Moffett is an active research neuroscientist in the Washington, DC area, who has published articles on the nervous and immune systems. Dr. Moffett is also the author and webmaster of the political opinion website www.Factinista.org, and is a Managing Editor at OpEdNews.com.
John R MoffettDr. John Moffett is an active research neuroscientist in the Washington, DC area, who has published articles on the nervous and immune systems. Dr. Moffett is also the author and webmaster of the political opinion website www.Factinista.org, and is a Managing Editor at OpEdNews.com.

Because he is a corporatist Republican

Why do people want government-haters running government?

Ron Paul hates government regulation of anything, why would you want him running our government? I am so tired of hearing about Ron Paul. Are we going to be subjected to 17 more months of Ron Paul advertising here?

Ron Paul will never protect you or me against corporate malfeasance, when will you realize that (or are you rich, which would explain your love of Ron Paul?)?


by John R Moffett (78 articles, 14 quicklinks, 2 diaries, 587 comments) on Monday, July 30, 2007 at 11:05:57 AM
 



Rasoul Acheh

In America, Gullibility Has Always Been Stronger Than Reason

By continuing to mistake the 'two party' con game, for democracy, mainstream America not only reveals it's staggering political incompetence, but also that it's too gullible, to do anything about it! Politically, contemporary Americans are like children. Like children, mainstream Americans 'know it all', and are subsequently , far too easily manipulated. Such people rarely wake up, before it's too late, and even if some do, there are always enough, who'll fight tooth and nail, against any type of intelligent, or effective, remedies. Thus politically, things never really get better in America, but they can, and often do, get worse! This has been the case, throughout U.S. history.

All this can be easily seen, in how contemporary mainstream Americans, react, to the most lawless congress, and whitehouse, in U.S. history! While many Americans are rightfully alarmed, and fed up, the sheer inertia of the clueless, and childlike mainstream, will insure that nothing constructive will get done. Never has a nation started, with so much promise, yet so consistently failed, to live up to that promise! The current political crisis, has been at least a century in the making, and it would take quite some time to fix, under any circumstances. By allowing the Dems, GOP, and the media, to turn them against all instincts towards freedom, and independence, contemporary Americans, are actually practicing a form of communism, without even realizing it! In communism, the party bosses dictate the political reality, while the people are mere servile bystanders. This is exactly what the woefully corrupt, two party system has become, in America today. Mainstream America's undying allegience to the Dems, and the GOP, is nothing more, than the undying party servitude, of all brainwashed party cadres!

by Rasoul Acheh (0 articles, 0 quicklinks, 0 diaries, 122 comments) on Monday, July 30, 2007 at 1:24:44 PM
 


Dr. John Moffett is an active research neuroscientist in the Washington, DC area, who has published articles on the nervous and immune systems. Dr. Moffett is also the author and webmaster of the political opinion website www.Factinista.org, and is a Managing Editor at OpEdNews.com.
John R MoffettDr. John Moffett is an active research neuroscientist in the Washington, DC area, who has published articles on the nervous and immune systems. Dr. Moffett is also the author and webmaster of the political opinion website www.Factinista.org, and is a Managing Editor at OpEdNews.com.

I'm all ears

What do you propose we do about the two party system? If you have 8 parties, the winning person might have only 19% of the popular vote. Is that really better? Then the other 81% feel they are getting screwed.

It's not an easy problem to fix. So I'm all ears (or eyes, in the case of internet commenting).

by John R Moffett (78 articles, 14 quicklinks, 2 diaries, 587 comments) on Monday, July 30, 2007 at 1:47:09 PM
 



Rasoul Acheh

In Politics, Treason is never an excusible offence!

As difficult as this may be, a move beyond the now worthless Dems, and the GOP is a political necessity. The political well-being, of all Americans, depends upon this. No remedy to the current ills, can ever take place, as long as the vast majority of Americans kowtow, to the treasonous Dems, and GOP. In politics, treason is never an excusible offence! The Dems and GOP now monopolize all political power, for the special interests, each party vying, for the privilege of swindling, the U.S. public, each election cycle. New viable political parties, dedicated to unity, the constitution, and the public will, are the obvious answer, if it's not already too late!

Powerful foreign, and domestic special interests, have managed to pervert U.S. politics, since the nation's birth. Since the dawn of the 20th century, the collusion of corrupt Dem and GOP politicians, have given them increasing control of the society, and the government. Since then, the nation has been shamelessly manipulated, mired in corruption, and needless foreign wars. Corrupt U.S. politicians, and traitors, have therefore, always been the greatest enemies of the nation, and the people. Due to the unprecidented proliferation, of both corrupt politicians, and traitors, in the current governement, contemporary Americans don't have a choice. They must either break with the two parties, and assume their long neglected, political responsibilities, or the special interests will continue their unchecked crime spree. If Americans fail to change their horrendous political habits however, this will culminate, in a full blown soviet style dictatorship, built upon the political ruins, of the old U.S. republic. The bellicose, and treasonous policies, of the Bush whitehouse, and rubber stamp congress, are nothing more than the nefarious agenda, of the special interests. Due to the iniquities of the 'Two Parties', this agenda now takes precidence, over the law, and the welfare, of the nation!

by Rasoul Acheh (0 articles, 0 quicklinks, 0 diaries, 122 comments) on Monday, July 30, 2007 at 3:54:43 PM
 


Richard Mynick is a US citizen who, despite the best efforts of the corporate media, noticed something disturbing about how the 2000 election was decided, & felt it augured poorly for democracy.
Richard MynickRichard Mynick is a US citizen who, despite the best efforts of the corporate media, noticed something disturbing about how the 2000 election was decided, & felt it augured poorly for democracy.

That's exactly right. Americans don't even understand what a

"political party" really is. They don't see how a "party" connects to different social classes, & expresses the interest of only certain classes.

A precept of US brainwashing is the notion that just because we can choose between D's & R's every 4 years, that this makes us a "democracy." We are indoctrinated to believe that we have a "free press," while in reality the US media is no more than the voice of the Establishment, constantly guiding public thought in channels favorable for Establishment interests. The key concept that what's good for the Establishment is often bad for the rest of us -- this concept is kept suppressed & virtually invisible. 

To undo all these fundamental misconceptions would take an entire process of political re-education. The public has to be de-programmed from the idea that "D's vs R's" really constitutes democracy. There would have to be a total re-education in REAL American history -- including the horrifically dirty & murderous things the US government has done all over the world, to "keep the world safe" for exploitation by US multinational corporations. We'd have to get rid of this idiotic childish pretense that America has always been virtuous, & acted only for noble motives.

Of course, since the Establishment controls the educational system, and since the media is part of the Establishment, it's almost impossible for most people to scale the "propaganda wall." An immense obstacle is also posed by those perceptive enough to see that Republicans are vicious gangsters, but who are still mired in the delusion that Democrats can serve as means of ridding us of Republicans.  To attain some degree of real political consciousness, one must understand that the D's only exist, to lock us into a system where the social forces represented by the R's always get their way.

by Richard Mynick (2 articles, 3 quicklinks, 1 diaries, 1013 comments) on Monday, July 30, 2007 at 2:49:53 PM
 


Dr. John Moffett is an active research neuroscientist in the Washington, DC area, who has published articles on the nervous and immune systems. Dr. Moffett is also the author and webmaster of the political opinion website www.Factinista.org, and is a Managing Editor at OpEdNews.com.
John R MoffettDr. John Moffett is an active research neuroscientist in the Washington, DC area, who has published articles on the nervous and immune systems. Dr. Moffett is also the author and webmaster of the political opinion website www.Factinista.org, and is a Managing Editor at OpEdNews.com.

I'm still waiting for suggestions from 3rd party advocates..

De-program. Fine. Whatever. I don’t care what they call themselves (D vs. R), I care what policies they will work to implement.

Rather than de-program, how about just “properly educate”? To do that will require that education and critical thinking become popular, rather than un-cool. Face it, intelligence isn’t valued much in the US, except in the business environment, or scripting lies for testimony before congress. I personally would rather educate than de-program and re-program. I’d think that the old Soviet Union would do stuff like that, not the modern progressive movement in the US.

I understand that you think that we can’t vote for the Democrats. That also means you don’t want to retake the Democratic party, and purge it of DLC goons. So precisely what do you propose? I hear lots of Democrat-hating, but I don’t hear any practical suggestions for what to do about the next election.

by John R Moffett (78 articles, 14 quicklinks, 2 diaries, 587 comments) on Monday, July 30, 2007 at 4:13:40 PM
 


Richard Mynick is a US citizen who, despite the best efforts of the corporate media, noticed something disturbing about how the 2000 election was decided, & felt it augured poorly for democracy.
Richard MynickRichard Mynick is a US citizen who, despite the best efforts of the corporate media, noticed something disturbing about how the 2000 election was decided, & felt it augured poorly for democracy.

You're not getting my point. Maybe it's just not possible on

an Internet message board. I'm trying to describe a perspective that's outside the conventional framework. It's a perspective elaborated by writers like Chomsky, Parenti, Wm Blum, Edw Herman & many others. Maybe it just can't be summarized adequately in short text blurbs.

I don't understand why you'd find it necessary to quibble about my word de-programming, & to replace it with a phrase like “properly educate”. The word "deprogramming" is perfectly apt, since the conventional US mindset amounts to a state of zombie-like indoctrination.

I also don't see why you bother to write in a dismissive tone, "Whatever. I don’t care what they call themselves (D vs. R), I care what policies they will work to implement." Are you denying that those D & R labels tell us a great deal about the policies they'll work to implement? Are you trying to say something like "Don't judge a book by its cover; just because a pol is a D or an R, they can still advocate terrific progressive policies?" // What's the point of the slur there about the USSR? What did I say that warranted that?

You write "Face it, intelligence isn’t valued much in the US." Do you imagine this is news to me? Do I sound like I don't know that? //  You continue, "That...means you don’t want to retake the Democratic party, and purge it of DLC goons. So...what do you propose? I hear lots of Democrat-hating, but I don’t hear any practical suggestions for what to do about the next election." //  -- The theory that the only problem with the D's is the DLC is wrong. That theory maintains that "the Dems themselves are basically good, but unfortunately have been contaminated by bad DLC infiltrators." The truth is that the very core of the D's is rotten; it's not just the DLC. It's virtually all of them. Even the Dems long held to be the "most progressive" (like Conyers & Feingold in just the last few days) are unable to stand up to defend the Constitution. And it's not just the elected publicly visible officials, it's the consultants, strategists, donors & apparatchiks as well. The party is corrupt as an institution. It's an instrument of big business, & thus intrinsically represents interests conflicting with those of the broader population.

Beyond that, it's not about "Democrat-hating." It's about developing enough insight into how the system really works to recognize that a decisive break with the Democratic Party is necessary, in order to make progress. We have to free ourselves from the 2-party system. As long as people are indoctrinated to believe that their problems can be solved by the Democrats, we can never escape endless cycles of first being gang-raped by R's, then deciding that we "just can't take it anymore" so we opt for the only visible thing that's not R's (but which does nothing to oppose the R's, & is actually joined to them at the hip).

If enough people understood this perspective, there would be support for a genuine leftwing party. The 2-party system represents big business; this puts it in permanent conflict with 99% of the population. The main obstacle to people understanding this simple idea is continued illusions in Democrats.

You top it off by asking for "practical suggestions for what to do about the next election." Thinking in these terms is very nearly asking, "What Dem shall we support?" // To the extent that you're not just asking that, I'd say that there are 3 categories of useful activity: 1) becoming involved in civil disobedience campaigns which demand impeachment  2) supporting genuine leftwing parties, like the Socialist Equality Party, & 3) working to generate awareness of the necessity for a decisive break with the Democrats.

by Richard Mynick (2 articles, 3 quicklinks, 1 diaries, 1013 comments) on Monday, July 30, 2007 at 5:38:21 PM
 


Dr. John Moffett is an active research neuroscientist in the Washington, DC area, who has published articles on the nervous and immune systems. Dr. Moffett is also the author and webmaster of the political opinion website www.Factinista.org, and is a Managing Editor at OpEdNews.com.
John R MoffettDr. John Moffett is an active research neuroscientist in the Washington, DC area, who has published articles on the nervous and immune systems. Dr. Moffett is also the author and webmaster of the political opinion website www.Factinista.org, and is a Managing Editor at OpEdNews.com.

Hi Rich

I’m beginning to think that you are just angry and venting.

1) I don’t care about Democrats or Socialists or Leftists, I care about getting this country working again. If you actually think your going to get a socialist elected, then you are just not being realistic at all. Good luck with that. We can’t even get Kucinich nominated. Remember, you need a majority of votes in a “Democracy”.


2) What precisely is so hard to understand about taking the Democratic party back from corporatists? If we replace key Democrats, including the president, with progressives (socialists in your case), then we get what we want.


3) You say both parties are so corrupt that they can’t be fixed. That is an admission of failure before starting. If parties can never be changed, only created de novo, then you are in a world of hurt. Please Rich, no more speeches about paradigm or frame changes. Just tell me practically, how do we get the corporatists out of our government?


4) I say we need to change the laws of this country to get the money out of politics as a first step.


5) De-program is a term akin to brain washing (reverse brain washing?). In America, we prefer to properly educate our citizens (at least we used to). That’s not nit-picking, it’s using language properly. If you are well educated, you don’t need “de-programming”.

Suggestion - write and post an article at OpEd that clearly lays out your plan to get money out of politics that we can try to implement. Don’t worry about the de-programming, paradigm shifts, or re-framing (we all get it here), worry about the step-by-step practical details of how we could accomplish your goal.

by John R Moffett (78 articles, 14 quicklinks, 2 diaries, 587 comments) on Tuesday, July 31, 2007 at 6:07:34 AM
 


Richard Mynick is a US citizen who, despite the best efforts of the corporate media, noticed something disturbing about how the 2000 election was decided, & felt it augured poorly for democracy.
Richard MynickRichard Mynick is a US citizen who, despite the best efforts of the corporate media, noticed something disturbing about how the 2000 election was decided, & felt it augured poorly for democracy.

Hi John // "Changing the laws to get money out of politics"

1) Sure, I'm all for getting money out of politics. However, in the existing political "framework" (sorry to use that word, I know you dislike it), that can never happen. Both parties support money's domination of politics, because this works very much to the advantage of their corporate patrons.

This is a simple illustration of why it's necessary to examine the "framework" of the existing system. You can't set achievable goals without first understanding what the current system's framework will (or will not) tolerate.

2) "You say both parties are so corrupt that they can’t be fixed. That is an admission of failure before starting" -- Nope. It's simply facing the real nature of the situation, which is necessary to do, before anything can be fixed. It's like recognizing that it isn't worth spending time trying to "reform" Bush & the Republicans, or "pressuring" him/them to do the right thing. It can't happen.

3) "What precisely is so hard to understand about taking the Democratic party back from corporatists?" -- Nothing. I understand it perfectly. The problem is that it's a fantasy & can't be done. All controlling elements of the Dem Party, as well as its real history, demonstrate that it's a naive fantasy to speak of "taking the party back from the corporatists."

4) "De-program is a term akin to brain washing ... In America, we prefer to properly educate our citizens .... If you are well educated, you don’t need 'de-programming.'"  -- Are you giving me a speech on what "we" prefer in America? If you're not aware that the US population is indeed "brainwashed" in a very real sense, you're not paying attention. Hirschhorn's article here is called "Americans Stuck In Political Stupor." That's exactly what he's talking about. It's also what 'acheh' was talking about, above. 

Your demand for "practical details" while excluding examination of the prevailing framework amounts (as I complained last week in your "Organize or Squabble" article thread) to your trying to pre-determine the shape of the solution.

by Richard Mynick (2 articles, 3 quicklinks, 1 diaries, 1013 comments) on Tuesday, July 31, 2007 at 1:23:11 PM
 


Hartford, Connecticut, lawyer, grandfather, Air Force veteran. Organizer: xdem.org
Steve FournierHartford, Connecticut, lawyer, grandfather, Air Force veteran. Organizer: xdem.org

"Some" say

Many of these people probably took the poll question literally.  "Some" is a quantity ranging from a lot to almost none.  Asking whether people believe they have "some say" is not asking much.  Poll should have asked whether people believe voting has any serious effect on public policy.  I'm betting that would cut the affirmative vote by half, at least. 

by Steve Fournier (31 articles, 17 quicklinks, 5 diaries, 41 comments) on Monday, July 30, 2007 at 2:55:07 PM
 


http://one-simple-idea.com/BiographyDanielSummars.htm
Daniel Summarshttp://one-simple-idea.com/BiographyDanielSummars.htm

What Will Life Be Like in the Next Great Depression?

A third party or independent would be great.
They are valuable at forcing the two-party duopoly to address substantive issues, rather than their typical fueling of the petty, destructive, distracting partisan warfare

I don't know exactly the date when American voters are gonna wake up, but I know the reason it will happen:  

   When not doing so becomes too painful.

And we're well on our way.

The problem isn't really Democrats or Republicans.
They are very similar, actually.

The real problem is the same problem that's been with us for a long time.
It's not really class warfare.
But it does have something to do with the HAVES and the HAVE-NOTS.

Unfortunately some (not all) with vast wealth and power will abuse it to control and influence government.  Being wealthy isn't a crime, but abusing vast wealth to control and influence government should be a crime.  But, sadly, it is not. 

The average American can not compete with the vastly wealthy, which is why government is FOR-SALE.  For example, a very tiny 0.15% of all 200 million eligible voters makes 83% of all federal campaign donations (i.e. $2.0 billion of the total $2.4 billion in 2004).  

How can the remaining 99.85% of the 200 million eligible voters compete with that?   They can't.  So, it's really no wonder at all that most (if not all) politicians are bought-and-paid-for.    And voters that repeatedly reward and re-elect those very same politicians just makes then more irresponsible and unaccountable.

When will it end?
When it becomes too painful.
And some of the painful consequences are already in the pipe-line, as a result of our near total fiscal and moral bankruptcy, growing worse every year. 

Can a nation commit suicide?
Yes it can.
Look to the fiscal situation to get a measure of a nation's health.

Fiscal responsibility is a measure of the credibility and viability of the established institution of government itself.  It is a measure of the health of a nation in many ways. The effects of fiscal irresponsibility are not immediate, but they are certain.  When our extremely over-bloated, wasteful, irresponsible government is finally unable to ward off the inevitable collapse, the unmet obligations will be so immense that they dwarf even the monstrous primary $8.9 trillion National debt, not to mention the collapse of Social Security (not $12.8 trillion in the hole), and the Pension and Benefit Guaranty Corp. ($450 billion in the hole).

If we do not meet these obligations, we can expect nothing less than civil disorder.  This is what history shows us.  The American people will not be so apathetic when they are hungry or homeless.  People that have nothing to lose can be dangerous.  Especially if they feel like they have been cheated. 

Already, several economic factors have never been worse since the Great Depression.  Total federal debt (over $22 trillion) has never been worse (ever).  That's 165% of GDP!   The 1% of the wealthiest 300 million Americans now has 40% of all wealth (up from 20% in 1980).

There is perhaps a simple solution, but it is very elusive.
It's the one thing we were supposed to be doing all along (always).
It's voting responsibly.
Yet 90% of elections are won by the candidate that spends the most money.
Congress enjoys a cu$hy 90% to 95% re-election rate since 1996.
The voters, largely, have themselves to thank for it, because they repeatedly reward and re-elect those very same politicians.
It makes no sense at all, but that is what most voters do.
And then 40% to 50% don't bother to vote at all.
Most voters do not even know who their Senators or Representative are.
Most voters do not even know their Congress persons' voting records.
Most voters blindly pull the party-lever (i.e. vote straight ticket), which empowers the two-party duopoly to continue to use and abuse the voters, while the bought-and-paid-for politicians fill their own pockets, vote themselves raises every year (9 times between 1997 and 2007), give themselves more cu$hy perks and unfair incumbent advantages, and dream up new taxes and ways to make their incumbencies more secure.

But don't worry.
Humans have a built-in survival instinct.
When the consequences of their own apathy and ignorance finally becomes to painful, they will become much more interested.

It's just too bad that it has to be the hard was so often.
Progress is very slow, as history shows us (which repeats itself often).
It's 2.000 steps forward, and 1.999 steps backward.

However, with the world population at 6.7 billion and growing by 249,000 per day, the consequences may become increasingly painful for billions of people.  
In 1959, there were 12.16 acres per person (i.e. 36.48 billion acres / 3 billion people).
In 2006, there was 1.15 acres of arable land per person (i.e. 7.68 billion acres / 6.68 billion people).
By 2039, there may be only 0.59 acres of arable land per person (i.e. 7.68 billion acres / 13 billion people).

So, with world over-population and the impact on the environment and our shrinking planet, our lessons may be more painful than we think.

Just ask China and India about all the advantages of over-population.

At any rate, recessions in the U.S. come and go every 2 to 11 years.
That's about every 6 years.
The last recession was about 6 years ago.
How difficult will future recessions be to recover from with so much debt ($42 trillion nation-wide)? 

But debt alone isn't the only concern.
It's just one of many pressing problems growing in number and severity, which Do-Nothing Congress ignores, and voters repeatedly reward for it.

So what will life be like in the next Great Depression?

by Daniel Summars (0 articles, 0 quicklinks, 0 diaries, 5 comments) on Monday, July 30, 2007 at 4:00:31 PM
 

 

14 comments

 

Tell A Friend

 


Copyright © OpEdNews, 2002-2008

 

 

 

 

Articles
Diaries Members
Products Events
Polls  
  

Articles Popularity:

Momentum Building For Bugliosi's Case Against George W. Bush For Murder
by Linda Milazzo

A Declaration of Independence from the Government of the United States
by Anonymous

Bush Fulfills His Grandfather's Dream
by David Swanson

Fortis Prediction of US Bank Meltdown a Net Hoax: The Making of an Urban Legend
by Paul Haughey

POW/MIA Families Alleged McCain Assault: Senate Ethics Committee Failed to Investigate
by elliot cohen

WHAT HAPPENS WHEN GAS REACHES 7 DOLLARS A GALLON ?
by Allen L Roland

Why were 'first responders' de-contaminated at the Pentagon?
by Len Hart

Ex Weapons Inspector: Iran Not Pursuing Nukes, But U.S. Will Attack Before '09
by Jason Leopold

Twenty-five U.S. Military Officers Challenge Official Account of 9/11
by Alan Miller

Free Energy and the Open Source Energy Movement
by jibbguy