Many neo-progressives think that voting for Democrats this year equates to voting against Bush. So much hatred of Bush and his administration has, unfortunately, created too much support for Democrats. There is a much better way to punish Bush and also send a much needed message to the Democratic and Republican establishments. If you are a Texan, vote for Kinky Friedman for governor. If you live elsewhere, contribute to Kinky's campaign and get Texans you know to get out and vote for Kinky.
Make no mistake. What our current plutocracy and economic aristocracy need is a real jolt, a needle in the eyes of all the arrogant and corrupt elites running and ruining our country. As an irreverent political outsider, Kinky is the man for this patriotic task. For him to become governor of Texas, where Bush resides and votes, and following in Bush's political footsteps, offers a unique opportunity to stick it to Bush. Just imagine the joy of Kinky beating the no-brain Republican incumbent. Better yet, imagine how Bush would have to react politely in public and go nuts privately.
A Kinky victory would be a celebration of DEMOCRACY IN TEXAS!
How could Bush say anything negative about his FELLOW TEXANS freely choosing singer, songwriter, novelist and status quo basher Kinky? Could Bush and other Republican elites blame Texans for exercising democratic right?
Imagine how people around the world would also enjoy a Kinky victory – a vivid demonstration of democracy working in America. Foreigners would clearly see a Kinky victory as a rejection of Bush.
All the arrogant, elitist politicians in America would be knocked over by a Kinky tsunami. The implications for the 2008 presidential election would be enormous. It could energize the majority of eligible voters in the nation that do not vote and independents, third-party loyalists, and enormous numbers of fed up Democrats and Republicans. Governor Kinky Friedman would instantly energize the disrespected and largely ignored third-party movement.
Americans are ready to embrace true outsiders who are not professional politicians, not beholding to the Democratic or Republican parties, and not in the pocket of special interests.
With all his quirks Kinky has established himself as a truth-teller. He personifies a status quo buster, someone able and willing to creatively address problems on behalf of we the people. Columnist Liz Smith wrote this the other day: "Now you may not care who becomes the governor of Texas but as this great state has sent three men to the White House, maybe you should. And if you were an Ann Richards fan, you could memorialize her by endorsing her own candidate -- Kinky. And if you are a real Democrat, a populist or a liberal-thinking person, I'd say Kinky is your man. I hope he wins."
Texas columnist John Kelso observed: "Isn't it refreshing to have a candidate who's actually smart enough to be a smartass? It's been a long time coming."
Nervous Democrats and Republicans have lately attacked Kinky for being a racist. This is sheer nonsense. African-American columnist Bob Ray Sanders said this: "Come on, y'all. There may be plenty of reasons not to vote for Kinky Friedman, but him being a racist is not one of them, namely because he is not. He may be -- he is --a lot of things, but not a bigot. I know satire can be hard to comprehend and, even if one understands it, hard to swallow. But that's what the man does." Texas writer Dolph Tillotson also addressed this issue and said: "Interestingly, the Republican frontrunner tended to ignore Friedman until the challenger's poll numbers took an upward turn. Now the masters of spin are scouring Friedman's writings and tapes of his performances. Kinky being Kinky, it's not hard to find offensive remarks. Still, based on what I've seen so far, I haven't changed my mind. I still find Friedman more appealing than the empty suits he's running against. I don't think he's a racist. Here's where I think the truth lies. Calling Kinky Friedman "insensitive" is a little like calling former Gov. Ann Richards, God rest her, a Democrat. ... What he offers voters ... is the rare opportunity to say emphatically how disenchanted we are with traditional, empty, lobby-dominated politics in Texas."
And by the way, Kinky favors legalizing marijuana, mainly to make room in prisons for more dangerous criminals.
So don't hesitate. Don't just be mad, get even with Bush. Help get Kinky elected. By all accounts he will win if the voter turnout is significantly better than the 29 percent in the last gubernatorial election. His opponents have enormously more money. But Kinky has the guts, humor and honesty to redefine not only Texas politics, but national politics as well. Helping Kinky is sticking it to George W. Bush.
www.delusionaldemocracy.com
Joel S. Hirschhorn is the author of Delusional Democracy - Fixing the Republic Without Overthrowing the Government (www.delusionaldemocracy.com). His current political writings have been greatly influenced by working as a senior staffer for the (more...)
The views expressed in this article are the sole responsibility of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of this website or its editors.
Gettin' Kinky
Yep I am voting for Friedman, but not for Joel's reasons.
I think of it as supporting an intermission in Texas politics. So both sides can cool off and start again come 2010.
Kinky does not have the best record of following through on his promises, likely because he is not committed to anything on that level. But he will bring about a mood change to Austin, and thus I can't help but support him. And I have since 2005.
by
Vulture (0 articles, 0 quicklinks, 0 diaries, 150 comments) on Thursday, Sep 28, 2006 at 8:21:16 AM
I just wanted to make one correction. Kinky does NOT want to legalize marijuana, he wants to DECRIMINALIZE it. I've been noticing people making this mistake across the board and I wanted to clear it up.
Vote Kinky '06!
by
pipsy831 (0 articles, 0 quicklinks, 0 diaries, 1 comments) on Thursday, Sep 28, 2006 at 9:58:53 AM
While it may not seem as such by the tone of some of my articles here, I am a serious libertarian with conservative fiscal views, and liberal personal freedom views. I am not a Democrat, and considering their rollover on the issue of legalizing torture, I am getting to the point where I won't vote for any of them. Bastards every one!
So, as I have said before, I am definitely voting for Kinky Friedman! Hell, I knew I was going to vote for him when my roommate first turned me on to his web site, over a year ago. A libertarian such as myself would be a total and absolute fool not to vote for him.
Not only do I adore his style, his honesty, and his humor, but I love the fact he's so down to earth. Even though I no longer partake of the evil weed, I applaud him for committing to decriminalize it.
On the issue of him being racist, isn't that the pot calling the kettle black? A racist in Texas? Texans calling other Texans racist? Come on here, let's get real. With his surname, you can rest assured he's felt the sting of racism once or twice. I don't buy it for a second, and even if it is true, what's the difference?
I've lived here ten years now, and let me tell you, I know more racists than I ever knew in my first thirty-four years of life. So it's kind of a silly issue in the first place.
But we know that the Republicans will go to any lenght to win. If they get to smear someone's name in the process, all the better!
All I can say is Rick (get the fags out of Texas) Perry, I hope you dig hanging out on the unemployment line. Your sorry ass is going to be on it soon enough!
And for once, I agree with vulturetx. No, it's not a sign of the apocalypse, but it is interesting.
Blessed be!
Pappy
by
Pappy (61 articles, 0 quicklinks, 11 diaries, 860 comments [5 recommended, 0 rejected]) on Friday, Sep 29, 2006 at 4:33:28 AM
I would enjoy nothing better than to ' stick it in the eye ' of those currently in power. However, what has been their reaction when those of whom they don't get elected in other countries ( the Palestinians and Iran ). Do you suppose Washington could or would cut off all aid and trump up a case to bomb Texas if Kinky were to win?
by
Cranford Ducaine (0 articles, 0 quicklinks, 0 diaries, 3 comments) on Friday, Sep 29, 2006 at 4:56:19 AM
DUBYA would only drop a nuke on Texas if he knew it wouldn't hurt his precious ranch in Crawford. Of course, if he knew he could do it and get rid of Cindy Sheehan, he might just give it a whirl.
Blessed be!
Pappy
by
Pappy (61 articles, 0 quicklinks, 11 diaries, 860 comments [5 recommended, 0 rejected]) on Saturday, Sep 30, 2006 at 2:56:58 AM
(0+)
Want to post your own comment on this Article?
How would you rate this?
You must be logged in (if signed up) to do ratings.
It's free to signup! And easy. And takes just a minute or two....
Contact Author
View Authors' Articles
(0+)
Must Read (0) 
Well Said (0) 
News (0) 
Touching (0) 
Funny (0) 
Supported (0) 
Interesting (0) 
Inspiring (0) 
Valuable (0) 
