 |
|
Add to My Group
|
February 11, 2008 at 11:18:24
What Would It Mean If Continuity of Government Measures Were Still In Effect? by George Washington Page 1 of 1 page(s) |
|
 
|
What would it mean if -- as I have previously argued -- continuity of government measures implemented on 9/11 were still in effect? Well, Congress would be more or less disbanded, and the president could become a sole figurehead, implementing the orders of the real president under the COG regime (someone like Cheney, for example). And there would be so such thing as a "two-party system". The COG could be run entirely by a single party (and methodical researcher Paul Thompson claims that the COG implemented on 9/11 was made up entirely of Republicans). Basically, the government, the law, and the power structure would be whatever those in charge of the COG said they were. There would be no constitutional mandates, no judicial process, no congressional input.
Do you get it yet? Do you understand how serious this would be?
Other likely effects of a COG government would be:
- The media is ordered - under penalty of treason – to only promote stories authorized by the COG government (executive orders prohibiting stories discussing the Homegrown Terrorism bill or impeachment, or questioning 9/11, fake intelligence, or the Bush administration's unconstitutional actions could be issued)
- A law could be passed stating that anyone who revealed the existence of the COG could be punished for treason; the law could also say that anyone who blew the whistle on the fact that "our elected leaders" had no power in the COG government, and that the show was really being run by unelected people could also be hung
- Laws could be passed saying that Constitutional processes such as impeachment are repealed forever (is this why John Conyers keeps saying he knows things that other people don't?) . They could also suspend elections
Do you see that COG is a very important issue?
Given that there is a real possibility that COG measures are currently in effect, this is a crucial story.
See this short talk by UC Berkeley professor Peter Dale Scott.
www.WashingtonsBlog.com
The views expressed in this article are the sole responsibility of the author
and do not necessarily reflect those of this website or its editors.
 Contact Author |
Contact Editor |
 View Authors' Articles |
|
|
|
|
| 6 comments |
|
Is this important
? by George Washington (188 articles, 27 quicklinks, 189 diaries, 219 comments [17 recommended, 0 rejected]) on Monday, Feb 11, 2008 at 12:05:02 PM  (0+)
|
|
Important?
helly, it's urgent! add to your research the following: Rumsfelds P2OG and the SF Chron article wrt End Game They all go hand in hand, we have some serious issues here IMHO and we are nearly out of time to save ourselves, let alone our country. by Cheri Roberts (16 articles, 15 quicklinks, 10 diaries, 435 comments) on Monday, Feb 11, 2008 at 12:26:36 PM (0+)
|
|
COG's don't cause fascism -- Fascists cause fascism.
Since thier first days in the halls of power that they stole their way into, the Rethuglicans have been putting TOOLS in place to promote their eternal power (or, as Karl Rove so eloquently put it, "a permanent Republican majority"). But, just because they have the weapons to install fascism in the United States, doesn't mean they have the capability or nerve to do it. Let's face it, if they do it correctly, they give their corporate keepers the GRAND PRIZE of a full generation of the kinds of profits that Exxon/Mobile have enjoyed under Bush/Cheney and the Rethuglicans, but IF THEY DO IT WRONG, they leave the word "Republican" with about as much political value as "Nazi" or "Pedophile" would have. It's a fine line these Rethuglicans have to walk. They would like to solidify the power of the "Unitary Executive," but only if they are POSITIVE that a progressive or even moderate won't have that power. by Charlie L (2 articles, 4 quicklinks, 1 diaries, 747 comments [2 recommended, 0 rejected]) on Monday, Feb 11, 2008 at 2:49:01 PM (0+)
|
|
Reply: and do you think...
This doesn't play into your equation? by Cheri Roberts (16 articles, 15 quicklinks, 10 diaries, 435 comments) on Monday, Feb 11, 2008 at 4:12:14 PM (0+)
|
|
the revolution is coming
Well if that’s going to happen we better start storing canned goods and ammo cause the revolution is coming. by Michael Chavers (53 articles, 0 quicklinks, 15 diaries, 198 comments [5 recommended, 0 rejected]) on Monday, Feb 11, 2008 at 4:47:09 PM (0+)
|
|
Kafka?
So you're saying that since 9/11 we've been under martial law, but it's illegal for anyone in the formerly co-equal branches of government to reveal this fact under penalty of secret execution? Am I the only one here who finds this idea difficult to take seriously? by Maxwell (0 articles, 0 quicklinks, 0 diaries, 409 comments [85 recommended, 0 rejected]) on Tuesday, Feb 12, 2008 at 3:38:00 PM (0+)
|
Want to post your own comment on this Article? 
|
||||
|
||||||||||||||
Must Read (0) 
Well Said (0) 
News (0) 
Touching (0) 
Funny (0) 
Supported (0) 
Interesting (0) 
Inspiring (0) 
Valuable (0)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Tell a Friend:
|
Copyright © 2002-2009, OpEdNews |
