Many essays have discussed the U.S. government's foreknowledge of the 9/11 attacks. Indeed, the number of facts pointing towards likely foreknowledge are so numerous that it is easy to get lost in the details.
This essay focuses solely on the proof that American and allied intelligence services actually heard the hijackers discuss and make their plans before 9/11.
Forget complicated arguments about warnings. The government actually heard the plans for 9/11 from the hijackers' own mouths.
http://georgewashington.blogspot.com/
George WashingtonGeorge Washington is a pen name. I am using the pen name, with the approval of the publisher, because I have received death threats due to my 9/11 research and writing. I am using a pen name to protect myself and my family.
The government/media's story of 9/11 is fiction from beginning to end.
There were no hijackings and no plane crashes. The cell phone calls were fabricated using advanced voice synthesizer technology, as reported in the Washington Post in 1999.
There's no significant plane wreckage at any of the four "crash" sites. The government refuses to release prove via the millions of time-change serial numbered parts each plane had.
A study of the black box data by 15 professional pilots at Pilots for 9/11 Truth show that Flight 77 few over the Pentagon, not into it.
Rumsfeld said a missile damaged the Pentagon and "similar" damaged the WTC.
The videos of a plane hitting the south tower were cartoons. Even Peter Jennings knew this, as we can tell from his nervousness and word fumblings when ABC played the video in slow motion. See video here.
The eyewitnesses who "saw" commercial planes hit the towers were witnessing a projection. This study of the First Responders' transcripts prove only a small number reported seeing planes, and even fewer reported hearing them. But... they had no problem hearing the fighter jets later on. They saw a projection.
There were no hijackings on 9/11.
But the 9/11 perps want the "truth movement" to promote real hijackers as that's their only defense for staying in Iraq.
by
CB Brooklyn (0 articles, 0 quicklinks, 0 diaries, 355 comments)
on Wednesday, December 5, 2007 at 1:39:26 PM
Why broadcast cartoons when surely, with so many news crews with cameras around covering WTC1, somebody would have shot an authentic recording of the second crash? As Brooklyn points out, if there were real planes involved, most of the aluminium, light steel frame, plastic, glass, possibly even the titanium and steel engines, would have bounced off the WTC-building steel lattice wall onto the street below, out of reach of the subsequent explosions (honestly, aluminium and glass don't pass through steel and concrete intact, as those videos want you to believe. Only Superman can do that, and he's made out of kryptonite). And in any case, chances are the plane would have exploded on impact, not on the other side of the building, having, somehow, slid across the entire floor (and through the massive 47-beam steel core). So, fake videos were being broadcast.
Those three buildings were brought down by controlled demolitions using military-grade explosives and chemicals, or even directed-energy weapons. Here's how one man wants to fit that into the broader picture of what Bush and a few other insane power-possessors have planned. Hang on to your hats, folks!
