Home
Refresh   Tag(s):
Add to My Group
January 11, 2007 at 15:13:43

View Ratings | Rate It

The Escalation

by Dave Johnson     Page 1 of 1 page(s)

www.opednews.com


Tell A Friend

Thoughts:

Surge is a focus-group word, designed to sell an escalation of the war. The strategy is to deflect the incoming Democrats' argument for winding down the war by offering the opposite. And look what we are all discussing. This places "stay the course" as the reasonable middle ground.

It is ALWAYS about appearances and political strategies not reality or the good of the country with this crowd.

EVERYone said from the start that 250-500,000 troops would be needed to occupy Iraq. Bush didn't do this because sending that many troops would undermine political support for the Republican Party. With enough troops there could have been a peaceful Iraq following our illegal invasion. The Iraqi people have paid the real price for this - not us. Yes, we have lost over 3,000 troops dead and how many injured and how many "contractors" and how much money? But the Iraqi people have suffered the loss of hundreds of thousands and of the possibility of going on with their lives in peace - and are instead entering into a horrible civil war because of Bush's choices.


Bush has not asked for tax increases to pay for the war, either. Because it would undermine political support for the party. Instead he offered candy - tax cuts.

Party over country.

Bush and his surrogates say we are fighting "Islamofascism" and it is the worst threat America has ever faced - and then says "go shopping." Fight the worst threat the nation has ever faced by going shopping? Because any kind of sacrifice would undermine support for the Republican Party. Meanwhile fear changes the way people think, and leads much of the population to more easily accept the authoritarian agenda of the right.

Party over country.

In the face of the worst threat the nation has ever faced, and declining readiness of our military - "stretched too thin" - Bush does not ask for a draft to protect the country. Because that would be politically unpopular and undermine support for the Republican Party.

No draft to protect the country. No taxes to pay for the war. No lowering of oil use to cut finding to terrorists states. Nothing that might undermine support for the Republican Party.

Party over country at every turn.

 

http://seeingtheforest.com

Dave Johnson is a Senior Fellow with the Institute for the Renewal of the California Dream working on progressive messaging, and a Fellow at the Commonweal Institute, where he researches and writes about the activities of the conservative movement (more...)
 

The views expressed in this article are the sole responsibility of the author
and do not necessarily reflect those of this website or its editors.

Contact Author Contact Editor View Authors' Articles

 

Book Recommendations for "Iraq"
The Gamble: General David Petraeus and the American Military Adventure in Iraq, 2006-2008
by Thomas E. Ricks

$27.95
Lowest New Price $8.19

Number of pages: 400
Publisher: Penguin Press HC, The

Overthrow: America's Century of Regime Change from Hawaii to Iraq
by Stephen Kinzer

$17.00
Lowest New Price $6.98

Number of pages: 416
Publisher: Times Books

Down Range: To Iraq and Back
by Bridget C. Cantrell

$16.99
Lowest New Price $2.70

Number of pages: 160
Publisher: Hearts Toward Home International

Fiasco: The American Military Adventure in Iraq, 2003 to 2005
by Thomas E. Ricks

$16.00
Lowest New Price $4.69

Number of pages: 512
Publisher: Penguin (Non-Classics)

View All Book Recommendations

Share this page: (what's this?)                   Tell a Friend: Tell A Friend

FACEBOOK      DIGG THIS      Add This Page to Mr Wong!           NEWSVINE      DEl.ICIO.US      Looksmart Furl      NETSCAPE      My Web      Tag!RawSugar      Blink List     (More...)
Comments: Expand   Shrink   Hide  
1 comments


The escalation

During the 06 campaign President Bush frequently made the statement that his Iraqi policies were correct and did not require change. President Bush's deceit on the campaign trail cannot be allowed to go unchallenged. In light of the his lies, President Bush's denunciation of Congress as irresponsible in his 1/13/07 radio address is grossly inappropriate. Due to the President's clear contempt for truthful communication with the American people,any change in policy must come as the result of full debate in Congress. Robert Chapman Lansing, NY

by Robert Chapman (28 articles, 0 quicklinks, 2 diaries, 556 comments) on Saturday, Jan 13, 2007 at 2:28:58 PM

Recommend  (0+)

 
Want to post your own comment on this Article? Post Comment


 

Most Popular Articles
in the Last 2 Days
(by Recommend Emails)

Rothschild's Federal Reserve Must Be Abolished by Allen L Roland

Photo Essay: Thoughts for the Fourth of July: Talking the Talk and Walking the Walk for Peace by Mac McKinney

Health Insurance Exec Whistleblower Wendell Potter Testifies Before Congress by Wendell Potter

Our Nation has a Great Deal to Learn from Phillip Butler about Morality, Law, and Torture by Lawrence Gist

A Not-So-Glorious Fourth Posted by Josh Mitteldorf

Capricorn Full Moon Eclipse 2009 by Cathy Lynn Pagano

Obama and "Pre-Emptive Capitulation" as a Modality of Democratic Governance by Herbert Calhoun

The Real Cause of the Current Financial Crisis by Joe Reeser

Tennessee's Law Allowing Guns in Bars Doesn't Go Far Enough by Grant Lawrence

Israeli Embassy Correspondence Concerning Spirit of Humanity Capture Clarifies Centuries of Conflict by Meryl Ann Butler

Go To Top 50 Most Popular

 

Tell a Friend: Tell A Friend

Copyright © 2002-2009, OpEdNews

Powered by Populum