Tags for This Article:

Democracy (1948)  Democratic (1925)  Power (1401)  Russia (611)  Democracy (599)  Chavez Hugo (161)  Putin (133)  People Putin Vladimir (65)  People Chavez Hugo (57)  Medvedev (54)  Communism Communists (48) 

Populum Tag Cloud
       Control Panel
Fine tune your search to access content
Articles
Diaries Products
Events All
All time
Last 6 mos
Last month
Last week
Last 24 hrs
From:
Month  Day   Year

To:
Month  Day   Year
Alphabet
Popularity
Count ON
Count OFF
This Level
Sub-levels

 

 

 

Tag(s): ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; (more...)  (less...)
Add to My Group
December 17, 2007 at 11:26:06

View Ratings | Rate It

Russian Dictatorship: Putin's Democracy Coup

by Brock Novak     Page 1 of 1 page(s)

www.opednews.com

 
Tell A Friend

Vladimir Putin, Russia's President since 2000, completes his second and final term in May 2008. The current Constitution bars him from a third, yet he makes no bones about retaining power. The question he grapples with being "how to appear doing so in visibly legitimate democratic fashion, unlike his Communist predecessors - e.g. Stalin and Breshnev, who simply seized it?"

In doing so, he thwarts any global democracy lash-back. In fact, cleverly leveraging democracy rather than the traditional pure, unilateral power grab would be a new global model for despot-like power seekers.

Seeking to be seen as pursuing a democratic approach to indefinite power, and hiding behind a democracy veneer, Mr. Putin has but two choices:

1) Either legitimately changing the Constitution (by abolishing term limits), which is to late in this term to do so, that is by democracy protocols anyway – i.e. Referendum, or
2) Orchestrate/engineer an inside your own party (United Russia) takeover to nominate (i.e. unilaterally choose/designate) your candidate successor, one you can be assured will win and you can totally control - like a puppet.

Deciding on Choice 2, in what the Analyst coins "Vladimir's 3P's", i.e. "Putin's Puppet Plan", kicks off his effort to permanently remain in power once his formal term ends.

On Mr. Putin's handpicked (stepping stone) successor, one can readily appreciate from the attached article excerpt, the absolute dominance Putin will have over him, and why he is but a cog in Putin's personal long term power retention plan. The Dec. 11, 2007 NY Times reports "A day after President Vladimir V. Putin endorsed a loyal protégé, Dmitri A. Medvedev, as his successor, Mr. Medvedev went before the nation today and declared that he in turn wanted to name Mr. Putin as his Prime Minister...Mr. Medvedev is seen here as a relatively weak figure beholden to Mr. Putin.....Unlike Mr. Putin and many top officials in the Kremlin, Mr. Medvedev appears to have no background in the K.G.B., the F.S.B. or other state security agencies...."All Medvedev has is that he is a creature of Putin...Everything that Medvedev has is owed to Putin. There is no Medvedev without Putin."

With no political background, no connection to the judiciary, FSB (KGB successor) or military, Medvedev comes with absolutely no credibility to these organizations. Without their collective respect and support, a Russian President has no power. In fact, an individual without those connections would never even get elected. So assuming Mr. Medvedev does succeed and win the Presidency, it's solely because he has the key "connection to those other connections", the/his Chief Puppet Master - Vladimir Putin.

As for Mr. Putin's own positioning, he is a born and bred former KGB'er and therefore knows the reincarnate FSB inside out. He too clearly has the entrenched political/governmental/military relationship infrastructure and associated power connections. He would therefore win in a heartbeat if allowed to run for a third time.

In other words, Medvedev is merely the pawn or the vehicle to "legitimately" circumvent the Constitution, running akin to a non-credited novel writer as "ghost candidate" or rather "Putin proxy". He is Putin's chosen one to represent the dominant political/parliamentary party United Russia. That coupled most importantly with Putin's complete support, makes Medvedev's (and therefore Putin's) victory in the 2008 Presidential election a fait accompli.

What's Next?

The "Vladimir 3P 3 Step"

Consider the role of Puppet Master as Step 1 in Vladimir Putin's creative "3 Step" march toward permanent power. Step 2 coming upon Medvedev's stepping down mid term or probably even much earlier (the day after inauguration?) and allowing Putin to then legitimately bypass Constitutional term limits and rise to President for the remainder of Medvedev's term. At that point, the world can swiftly expect commencement of Step 3 - a Putin package of sweeping Constitutional reforms vis-à-vis Referendum/Plebiscite and/or other creative/derivative constitutionally legitimate approaches, including abolishing President term limits, ala Venezuela's recent Referendum attempt, of course leveraging appropriate lessons learned.

Mr. Chavez has upwards of 5 more potential attempts at successful Referendum. Noting of course his need for creative derivative and/or popular initiative approaches, as the Venezualen Constitution does not allow pursuing the "same amendment" change twice during the same term, which runs out in 2013. Mr. Putin would similarly then have upwards of 3 or 4 (derivative attempts) depending on when Medvedev predictably (not if, but when – Putin tells him too) steps down. Indeed one can be sure both leaders will share lessons learned on how to turn prior losses and/or coming opportunities into a future winning Referendum and/or other popular initiative.

The inevitability of Mr. Putin's success at achieving "President for Life" is therefore all but certain. Ironically too, achieving this de-facto, yet coveted czar and/or dictator like status through shrewd, clever and legal manipulation of the rules/laws. Indeed, who would ever have imagined the road to Putinian Dictatorship was engineered thru Democracy.

And in the end, isn't that Mr. Putin's real Presidential coup.

 

Brock Novak is a freelance Military and Geo-Political Analyst. He is credited with coining the contextual term "COMMULISM" (COMMUnism fueled by capitaLISM), the "Commulism Series", and creating the "Commulism Response Framework" (CRF). Among others, his credits further extend to coining and defining the 21st century concepts of "Fusion Warfare" and "Fission Threat Environment", as well as the contextual terms "Pandanomics", "Benevolent Terrorism", "Phased and Jammed Democracy". Coming: The launch of COMMULISM.COM - A website dedicated to increasing the U.S. government and public awareness of this, the greatest near and long term threat to U.S. economic and national security.

Contact Author
Contact Editor
View Other Articles by Author

 

Bookmark this page: (what's this?)

NETSCAPE      DIGG THIS      Add This Page to Mr Wong!           NEWSVINE      DEl.ICIO.US      Looksmart Furl      My Web      Tag!RawSugar      Blink List     (More...)
Comments: Expand   Shrink   Hide  
5 comments

*I like posting on OpEdNews.Com because is one of the few websites that let's me speak about REALITY without trying to make me be "PC" because political correctness is EVIL!
*
-"Living is everything death is nothing"-me
*
-"IMPEACH NOW THEN LET THEM STAND TRIAL!"-me

BenMarbleMD*I like posting on OpEdNews.Com because is one of the few websites that let's me speak about REALITY without trying to make me be "PC" because political correctness is EVIL!
*
-"Living is everything death is nothing"-me
*
-"IMPEACH NOW THEN LET THEM STAND TRIAL!"-me

the thing most pundits miss is that PUTIN is following DUBYA

Dubya Gump set the example for PUTIN to follow.  Putin will probably make up a few 'signing statements' as to why he ignores Russian law and as long as a significant portion of the populace supports him via lame ass polls then he can say IT'S "DEMOCRACY"!  One more reason to say...MISSION ACCOMPLISHED DUBYA GUMP!~

by BenMarbleMD (22 articles, 0 quicklinks, 217 diaries, 322 comments) on Monday, December 17, 2007 at 11:36:47 AM
 


Dietwald used to work as a journalist in Moscow for six months after having lived in a small Russian town for almost two years. His views are decidedly uncompromising in tone. If you are offended by his views, he is unlikely to care. He firmly believes that in a free society, everybody has the right to make a fool of himself to the best of his abilities.

(The generic use of the male human third person is meant to include all sentient beings capable of expressing their thoughts thro...

to see more of bio, click on member name

dietwaldclausDietwald used to work as a journalist in Moscow for six months after having lived in a small Russian town for almost two years. His views are decidedly uncompromising in tone. If you are offended by his views, he is unlikely to care. He firmly believes that in a free society, everybody has the right to make a fool of himself to the best of his abilities.

(The generic use of the male human third person is meant to include all sentient beings capable of expressing their thoughts thro...

to see more of bio, click on member name

This is stupid

Apparently, Putin isn't breaking any rules. So what's the problem? People are free to vote against him. So the process isn't as 'fair' as the primary-two-party-electoral college system in the United States of A, but... please, apart from the fact that you don't LIKE Putin... what's the problem?

 

You say "In fact, an individual without those connections would never even get elected." There is no logic to that. The president is elected by the public, which had now two years to get to know him almost daily on TV. Don't you think that having been on TV almost daily for almost two years would not have made the man known to the public? 

Then you go on claiming "In other words, Medvedev is merely the pawn or the vehicle to "legitimately" circumvent the Constitution, running akin to a non-credited novel writer as "ghost candidate" or rather "Putin proxy"."

Maybe Putin simply wanted to make sure that his policies are continued and are not jettisoned the next day after the election is over? The drivel you are writing is almost the same drivel that was written about Putin in 1999/2000...

Oh well, who cares, really. Russia does her thing, and we in the West better accept or suffer the consequences.  

 

by dietwaldclaus (0 articles, 0 quicklinks, 0 diaries, 12 comments) on Monday, December 17, 2007 at 8:33:01 PM
 


I'm a 57 year old Australian Vietnam Veteran, currently living in Australia.Spent the last 30 years as a Locomotive engineer and Union official negotiating with various Federal and State Govt authorities in that capacity.Pet hate are bullies of any nature/nationality, life's goal is to destroy/ridicule/minimise damage done by such people.
Eddy SchmidI'm a 57 year old Australian Vietnam Veteran, currently living in Australia.Spent the last 30 years as a Locomotive engineer and Union official negotiating with various Federal and State Govt authorities in that capacity.Pet hate are bullies of any nature/nationality, life's goal is to destroy/ridicule/minimise damage done by such people.

Russian Dictatorship

Oh Dear, here we go again, expert pundits standing on their soap boxes proclaiming their World views to fit us all, whether we like them or not, coming to a country near you thru the barrel of a gun to bring you freedom and democracy.

God spare us all from this hyperbole. From whence, does the author lay claim to his expertise on Russian matters, does he live in Russia, does he even speak Russian, and sadly, most condeming of all, the very same author I assume is an American citizen, thus IMHO, not of any creditability to point the finger at ANY other country regards totalarinism or Dictatorship as a blind man can see what's going on in the U.S. these days, and to claim that's a Democratic system is simply an outright lie.

I say, get your own house in order, before trying to coherce others to follow your example.

by Eddy Schmid (0 articles, 0 quicklinks, 0 diaries, 207 comments) on Monday, December 17, 2007 at 9:21:20 PM
 


I am a retired (disabled) electrician. I worked in the agricultural field as an irrigation specialist. I am 60 years old and still married to my high school sweatheart. We have been married for 41 years. I have 5 grown chrildren and 3 grand chrildren.  We live on a boat in Seattle.
DCDobbsI am a retired (disabled) electrician. I worked in the agricultural field as an irrigation specialist. I am 60 years old and still married to my high school sweatheart. We have been married for 41 years. I have 5 grown chrildren and 3 grand chrildren.  We live on a boat in Seattle.

Putin

Good Evening Brock,

It looks like I have company this time. Putin is very popular in Russia. They went through how many years of of a drunk Yeltsin selling off Russian assets to the West. Right now Russia needs a strong leader and he seems to fit the bill. Canada, Britain, France and other Democracies do not have term limits. The US can't run a fair electon and our choices for office are picked by corporations and the news media. We are not free!

by DCDobbs (0 articles, 0 quicklinks, 0 diaries, 15 comments) on Monday, December 17, 2007 at 11:21:11 PM
 


Authored four books in Canada; Economics in the Workplace, Can Business, labor and Government Talk?, Oh, See Can you See Canada? Can we Assist Students to Work in the 21st Century? Most of my writing centers around Human and Civil Rights. Currently doing articles and videos on the myths of Canada. We often portray ourselves as being squeaking clean in world affairs, when in fact, the opposite is true.
IwasJuliusAuthored four books in Canada; Economics in the Workplace, Can Business, labor and Government Talk?, Oh, See Can you See Canada? Can we Assist Students to Work in the 21st Century? Most of my writing centers around Human and Civil Rights. Currently doing articles and videos on the myths of Canada. We often portray ourselves as being squeaking clean in world affairs, when in fact, the opposite is true.

President Putin

The "New York Times" are the same people that brought you informed "news" on bacterial and nuclear weapons in Iraq. President Putin is one of the most popular World Leaders and why is that so tought to take.

Wait a minute there is breaking news. What democracy had their president appointed by a panel of judges in 2001?

Since nobody bought the Iran bashing the next best thing to do is to start bashing another elected President. Elected that is, by the people, not appointed by a panel of judges. What arrogance and ignorance.

 

by IwasJulius (0 articles, 0 quicklinks, 0 diaries, 31 comments) on Tuesday, December 18, 2007 at 11:42:02 AM
 

 

5 comments

 

Tell A Friend

 


Copyright © OpEdNews, 2002-2008

Blog Ads

 

 

 

 

Most Popular Articles
in the Last 2 Days
(by Recommend Emails)

NEW IDEAS ON RESTORING U. S. ECONOMY, for the Next Secretary of Commerce, William Blaine Richardson III by Stephen Fox

Detroit vs. Wall Street: The Trillion Dollar Class War by Cameron Salisbury

Saving the Big 3 for You and Me ...a message from Michael Moore by Michael Moore

SO SAY THE BANKERS: Learn to Love the 'AMERO' by Patrick Henningsen

Credit Card Crisis Is Here / Derivatives Next by Allen L Roland

No Bailout Oversight: Bush Stalls Inspector General Selection by Allen L Roland

Odetta Sings Her First Song, from Way Up Above Us by muservin

Paulson shoots another arrow into the heart of the Economy by Andrew Hughes

For the GOP, the Economic Meltdown May Have Happened Just a Wee Bit Early by Bernard Weiner

Don't Expect Change: Ian Sinclair interviews Mickey Z. Posted by Mickey Z.

Go To Top 50 Most Popular