OpEdNews » "Why Vote?"

Support OEN
With Your
Tax-Deductible Donation

Tags for This Article:

Populum Tag Cloud Control Panel
	Fine tune your search to access content

Articles	Links
Diaries	Products
Events	All

All time
Last 6 mos
Last month
Last week
Last 24 hrs

From:
Month Day Year

To:
Month Day Year

Alphabet Popularity	Count ON Count OFF
This Level	Sub-levels

Tag(s): Election-Voting Issues
Add to My Group

March 1, 2006 at 03:31:59

"Why Vote?"

by Bill Tower Page 1 of 1 page(s)

www.opednews.com

SAVE FAVORITES

VIEW FAVORITES

View Ratings | Rate It

"Why Vote?"

To those who are still whining about Ralph Nader's candidacy I say, "You've all been had...not by the Republicans, but by the Dem Party slicksters who managed to demonize Nader and convince you that Kerry (like Gore in 2000) was 'the only candidate who could beat Bush' in 2004."

Votes are precious things, but all of you smartass 'strategic' voters threw your votes away. If all the self-professed progressives who actually preferred Nader to Gore in 2000 had voted their preference, the Democrats might have fielded a decent candidate in 2004. Instead you proved you'd vote for ANYBODY they nominated, and would be willing to villify a candidate who actually represented your own values and interests. Predictably, the DNC (already assured YOUR votes were in the bag) responded by running the hemming-hawing obfuscator (and fellow Bush 'Bonesman'!) John Kerry.

If progressives had ignored the Democratic Party's scare tactics, if they hadn't allowed themselves to be threatened and cowed into voting for Gore in 2000, if they hadn't disempowered themselves, the resulting Nader vote might have convinced the Dems that their Republican-Lite strategy was a loser....as, indeed, it proved to be (again!) in 2004.

Had progressives not sold their votes so cheaply in 2000, the DNC wiseguys might have sponsored an ANTI-war, ANTI-Patriot Act, ANT-NAFTA, PRO-Universal Healthcare candidate in 2004. Such a candidate would have been swept into office by the votes of millions who (as it turned out) didn't see much point in voting for a PRO-War, PRO-Patriot Act, PRO-NAFTA, Healthcare-waffling "Democrat" who had no more appeal than a wet toilet seat.

Now do you see how it works? It ain't rocket science....and it certainly ain't beanbag....but if politics is done right we wouldn't have 50% of the electorate staying home out of disgust or despair.

Bio -- I'm a Vietnam War veteran, Antioch College graduate, and sometime schoolteacher....pushing 60, and living in Massachusetts.

	Contact Author
	Contact Editor
	View Other Articles by Author

Bookmark this page: (what's this?)

(More...)

1 comments

My name it means nothing, my age it means less. My deeds of activism are mine to enjoy and share as I feel necesary, not as some clown in a small forum's administration thinks I must..This place gets worse each and every visit.
Member banned on June 3, 2008 for repeated abuse of editors.
ardee D.My name it means nothing, my age it means less. My deeds of activism are mine to enjoy and share as I feel necesary, not as some clown in a small forum's administration thinks I must..This place gets worse each and every visit.
Member banned on June 3, 2008 for repeated abuse of editors.

Brace Yourself

I am one who echoes your sentiments about the worthlessness of the leadership of the Democratic Party and have said so here and elsewhere. This has resulted in some rather silly and invective laden emails from folks who cant spell or parse a sentence. Neither ,apparently, can they work within their "beloved" party to bring about a change that would make this party more effective. All they can do apparently is become outraged when someone criticizes that which they love but fail to think about at all. Pity.

by ardee D. (6 articles, 4 quicklinks, 1 diaries, 2377 comments) on Wednesday, March 1, 2006 at 7:29:38 AM