OpEdNews Op Eds

The Abuse of the Word "Censorship"

By (about the author)     Permalink       (Page 1 of 1 pages)
Related Topic(s): ; ; ; ; ; ; ; , Add Tags Add to My Group(s)

View Ratings | Rate It

opednews.com

Become a Fan
  (9 fans)

February 22, 2008

  “I will show you nonsense, in a handful of comments” – AW 

I remember with longing a simpler time at opednews. I was just starting out back then as a writer and Bush was just starting out as the worst president we would ever see. My work had been on a handful of sites, but nothing big. Opednews was just starting out back then and I cannot even remember how I found it but soon I had submitted an article to Rob Kall and his upstart website on political dialogue. I was eager to see an article of mine actually gain traction and maybe get networked. Then Rob emailed me and rejected it. He was kind enough to call me and explain that the title, while a cute play on words, was not specific enough to generate the readership we desired. He explained that titles need to convey what the piece is really about, so that people can make their usual quick decisions on whether to read it or not. He asked me to redo the title before he would run it. I got to tell you people, I disagreed with Rob that day. I liked my cute title which played on words. I thought it was better than the article itself; and therein lay the problem.

 

Never once though did I consider that what Rob was doing was censoring my work. In the end, I changed the title. Why? Because it is his website folks. It did not matter that I disagreed with his editorial decision. I could have taken my ball (article) and went home but without the court to play on (opednews), what good was having the ball to begin with? That article which I resubmitted, with what I thought was a really bland and boring title, was then picked up by two other websites with greater traffic then opednews. It took a little bit of time to crack through my literary ego but soon I realized, “hey maybe the editor was right.” Rob would go on to run close to 200 more articles of mine. I would represent opednews at national conferences and I had done several talk radio spots. My articles ran consistently on multiple websites and publications all because I chose to listen to the editor of the website that agreed to host my work. It really is that simple.

 

Now we fast forward to today and see that opednews has grown beyond our wildest dreams. It has grown because of the efforts of Rob Kall to stick to what works. It has grown because of a growing list of people willing to volunteer their time to be editors, such as Amanda Lang, who was also there at the beginning. It has grown because it became one of the only places on the Internet where political discourse was allowed from all sides with virtually no restriction. You think I’m kidding? Take a walk over to dailykos and try to say something against any mainstream democrat. You will be tarred and feathered. Go over to one of the conservative sites and try to say something against any mainstream republican and see what happens. Opinion is not only controlled on most other sites but it is done with a ferocity that undermines the very principles of freedom they claim to protect. But not opednews.

 

I remember awhile back there was the flap Rob created when he considered banning words such as zio-nist. I will be honest with you, I disagreed with Rob substantively on the issue but at the end of the day I had two choices. One is to accept the policies of my editor and two was to take my ball and go home. I said my peace to him and backed him up in the thread when people viciously attacked him screaming “censorship!” Shut up already with the big “C” word. If you do not have the intelligence to understand the difference between trying to manage a huge website, instill editorial policy and respect people’s opinions do not use words like censorship. They are too big for you to use if you do not understand their meanings. Just because you disagree with an editorial policy it does not mean you have been censored.

 

But we have this element now at opednews. We have these people who think you should be allowed to yell fire in a crowded theater. That is the equivalent. These people think that any incursion upon their ability to say whatever floats through their semi-consciousness is an incursion upon liberty and freedom itself! Nonsense! Absolute and pure nonsense. That is not what freedom is. Freedom has limitations folks and it always has. The absence of limitation is not freedom but rather, anarchy. I have seen websites that thought they did not need limitations and allowed anarchy to reign. I speak in the past tense because they did not make it. They were failed social experiments. Freedom of speech has always has limitations on it. I do not mean that ridiculous “freedom zones” forced upon us by the Bush administration but rather the previously mentioned shouting fire in a crowded theater. Likewise, the press has always had its limitations as well. They are needed to prevent anarchy. Remember, these limitations are not on the freedoms, but rather they are on the abuses of those freedoms.

 

I find it somewhat comical to see all of these opinionated folks coming into article threads with the only goal of wreaking as much havoc as they can. The first thing I check is how much they are in the game. Usually it is the same modus operandi. Zero to two articles and a smattering of comments. Nonsense in a handful of comments. People who are quick to disparage other people’s work but not put their own butt on the line. Clearly if you have that much opinion in you, then you need to be more invested. I did an article last week merely suggesting that we approach impeachment in an intelligent manner and I was lectured ad nauseam by people who apparently were still in grade school while I was writing about impeachment in 2003. People who take grand stands on the constitution but have nothing to back it up but nonsense in a handful of comments. As I wrote that day, disagreement and debate are healthy but not what these folks engage in. They stroll into threads of people who write on the front lines of the political discourse in this country for years and proceed to be snarky and belittling for only self-serving principles. They do not seek debate; they seek to mock and deride. That would be bad enough but they do it and bring nothing to the table. I have never seen someone with a healthy amount of articles slamming someone in comments. You know why? Because they understand what it is like to expend the energy and time to write. You think it easy writing 200 articles? For free? But I digress.

 

The point being made here is the same from all those years ago when opednews was just starting out. Rob Kall is the editor. As an editor I have found him to be incredibly helpful and insightful, even if it was on re-examination; once my literary ego was repressed. As a friend he has been more though. Ultimately, at the end of the day, this is still his website and I owe more to opednews then it owes me. You all have the same choice I had when I asked Rob to run my first article and he asked me to rethink the title. You can listen to your editor or you can pack up your article and go home. Remember, you are the one asking for the pulpit from which to preach. You have no right to that pulpit, you have to ask.

 

But please, hold off on the ridiculous censorship talk. Instilling editorial guidelines is not censorship, period. Asking someone to rethink a title is not censorship. Asking people to have some sense of civility is not censorship. You can stand on that soapbox all you like and claim that one man’s editing is another man’s censorship but in the end you are simply wrong. Making grand speeches in the comments section but not having the cajones to back it up with articles of your own doesn’t really impress me. It shows me that you do not mind the opinion business but you don’t want to be the one on the front lines taking the shrapnel. You would rather stand behind the scenes and toss literary grenades all over people’s work and somehow feel like you have done your patriotic duty in doing so. Nonsense in a handful of comments is all you are. You have confused freedoms with anarchy and fairness with censorship. What is worse though is you bite the hand that feeds. You are provided the platform to voice these confused opinions and then debase the very man who provides you the platform. In other words, you are not even grateful. You think that somehow you have a right to the platform. Well, this may come as a shock to you; but you do not.

 

I do not fear editing. I do not fear being asked to rethink a title. Heck, if Rob had not taught me years ago, I would have named this article, “nonsense in a handful of comments” and no one would have read it because it would have been so vague. A cute play on word from TS Eliot’s famous line but vague nonetheless. What I do fear is the ruining of opednews. I fear the day when people who like to comment drive off the people who like to write. It is not about thick skin or any other silly comment you might want to make. It is about having some modicum of respect. It is about having some civility in our discourse. It is realizing that while debate is healthy being snarky is just not acceptable. If you think that asking for some level of civility and respect is censorship then I suggest you pick up your two articles and your handful of comments and go home. I am sure there is someone there willing to listen to how right you are.  

 

Anthony Wade, a contributing writer to opednews.com, is dedicated to educating the populace to the lies and abuses of the government. He is a 46-year-old independent writer from New York with political commentary articles seen on multiple (more...)
 

Share on Google Plus Submit to Twitter Add this Page to Facebook! Share on LinkedIn Pin It! Add this Page to Fark! Submit to Reddit Submit to Stumble Upon

Go To Commenting
The views expressed in this article are the sole responsibility of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of this website or its editors.

Writers Guidelines

Contact Author Contact Editor View Authors' Articles

Most Popular Articles by this Author:     (View All Most Popular Articles by this Author)

Preparing the Cover Story for the Theft of the Election

Sarah Palin, A Wolf in Moose Clothing

Hate and Hypocrisy Pays Well – The Rush Limbaugh Payoff

Birth of the Red-Letter Christian Movement

First They Came For the Soda"

Why, As a born again Christian, I cannot morally vote for John McCain

Comments

The time limit for entering new comments on this article has expired.

This limit can be removed. Our paid membership program is designed to give you many benefits, such as removing this time limit. To learn more, please click here.

Comments: Expand   Shrink   Hide  
26 people are discussing this page, with 70 comments
To view all comments:
Expand Comments
(Or you can set your preferences to show all comments, always)

Anthony,  Thank you for the articulate, poign... by Frank J. Ranelli on Friday, Feb 22, 2008 at 6:08:01 AM
I don't want to discourage commenters. People ... by Rob Kall on Friday, Feb 22, 2008 at 10:42:42 AM
I do not want to discourage commentors either, jus... by Reverend Anthony Wade on Friday, Feb 22, 2008 at 11:06:45 AM
AW, you keep saying stuff about people *being arou... by Cheri Roberts on Friday, Feb 22, 2008 at 2:53:29 PM
AW, you keep saying stuff about people *being arou... by Reverend Anthony Wade on Friday, Feb 22, 2008 at 3:57:44 PM
Perhaps you have a slight tendency to react emotio... by Oh on Friday, Feb 22, 2008 at 6:37:49 PM
It is quite possible that you are right but the is... by Reverend Anthony Wade on Saturday, Feb 23, 2008 at 12:57:51 AM
Equivocating yelling fire in a crowded room with w... by ardee D. on Friday, Feb 22, 2008 at 6:38:22 AM
You obviously did not read the article; you clearl... by Frank J. Ranelli on Friday, Feb 22, 2008 at 6:42:58 AM
I know you love to get your negativity out of your... by Reverend Anthony Wade on Friday, Feb 22, 2008 at 7:03:24 AM
Ad hominem attack edited out. Anthony,the entire i... by ardee D. on Saturday, Feb 23, 2008 at 8:29:29 AM
So you admit ignorance of the origin of the issue?... by Reverend Anthony Wade on Saturday, Feb 23, 2008 at 3:53:23 PM
I do believe I understand what Anthony  means... by Mark Sashine on Friday, Feb 22, 2008 at 7:40:24 AM
I do believe I understand what Anthony  means... by Reverend Anthony Wade on Friday, Feb 22, 2008 at 8:30:10 AM
We should watch the malice. It has a tendency to m... by Mark Sashine on Friday, Feb 22, 2008 at 9:03:08 AM
Anthony was around before we built the current PHP... by Rob Kall on Friday, Feb 22, 2008 at 10:37:38 AM
I miss some of the old ones, especially the satire... by Reverend Anthony Wade on Friday, Feb 22, 2008 at 11:08:56 AM
Never!  Not you, Mark.You have 28 articl... by Sandy Sand on Friday, Feb 22, 2008 at 2:15:43 PM
I haven't been here very long, but you have alread... by Oh on Friday, Feb 22, 2008 at 6:48:57 PM
Sometimes, however censorship is needed to prevent... by John Hanks on Friday, Feb 22, 2008 at 8:34:00 AM
If you are making the argument that any controls a... by Reverend Anthony Wade on Friday, Feb 22, 2008 at 8:59:39 AM
A person's illiterate and disruptive and clums... by John Hanks on Friday, Feb 22, 2008 at 12:57:07 PM
While I do think the piece was a little long it wa... by Pat Dazis on Friday, Feb 22, 2008 at 10:36:05 AM
I have been accused of being too lengthy. Guilty a... by Reverend Anthony Wade on Friday, Feb 22, 2008 at 11:12:50 AM
I am disgusted when I see people cry "censors... by Charlie L on Friday, Feb 22, 2008 at 11:21:48 AM
Good job... by Reverend Anthony Wade on Friday, Feb 22, 2008 at 11:58:55 AM
Please forgive those of us that are uneducated and... by john riggs on Friday, Feb 22, 2008 at 11:54:39 AM
Exactly what trench do you occupy in this war? Sav... by Reverend Anthony Wade on Friday, Feb 22, 2008 at 12:02:18 PM
 Anthony, you own an ivory tower? Why was I n... by Frank J. Ranelli on Friday, Feb 22, 2008 at 12:29:02 PM
Just because someone wasn't posting HERE doesn... by Cheri Roberts on Friday, Feb 22, 2008 at 3:02:49 PM
Just because someone wasn't posting HERE doesn... by Reverend Anthony Wade on Friday, Feb 22, 2008 at 3:20:35 PM
AW, try again, this has nothing to do with anythin... by Cheri Roberts on Friday, Feb 22, 2008 at 3:35:20 PM
AW, try again, this has nothing to do with anythin... by Reverend Anthony Wade on Friday, Feb 22, 2008 at 4:14:00 PM
rob's call will actually help people like you ... by Cheryl Biren on Friday, Feb 22, 2008 at 12:47:12 PM
It is the motive i question. I believe that these ... by Reverend Anthony Wade on Friday, Feb 22, 2008 at 1:42:36 PM
In the end, when the darkest days arrive, we will ... by welshTerrier2 on Friday, Feb 22, 2008 at 1:50:21 PM
You can be passionate about your argument and not ... by Reverend Anthony Wade on Friday, Feb 22, 2008 at 2:10:36 PM
I hope you realize i am not speaking about you, bu... by Reverend Anthony Wade on Friday, Feb 22, 2008 at 2:12:03 PM
I thought it was a great article, and very very to... by Pixie on Friday, Feb 22, 2008 at 2:41:02 PM
Excellent point pixie. I also used to frequent mes... by Reverend Anthony Wade on Friday, Feb 22, 2008 at 3:38:03 PM
Are you introducing the element of commercial viab... by welshTerrier2 on Friday, Feb 22, 2008 at 3:15:30 PM
sorry, that was not what i was inferring.... by Reverend Anthony Wade on Friday, Feb 22, 2008 at 4:15:33 PM
you really ought to try it sometime........ by ardee D. on Sunday, Feb 24, 2008 at 11:21:00 AM
I'm one of those commenters with no articles. ... by Dooglio on Friday, Feb 22, 2008 at 11:58:42 AM
Stick around, we need more even-tempered folks, lo... by Reverend Anthony Wade on Friday, Feb 22, 2008 at 12:03:21 PM
Anthony, I'm afraid with all the good points y... by welshTerrier2 on Friday, Feb 22, 2008 at 1:22:25 PM
If you are always right, who am I to argue? But i ... by Reverend Anthony Wade on Friday, Feb 22, 2008 at 1:55:23 PM
Exactly. And, if you notice AW loses his own civil... by Cheri Roberts on Friday, Feb 22, 2008 at 3:07:40 PM
I even apoplogized for sounding elitist, which i d... by Reverend Anthony Wade on Friday, Feb 22, 2008 at 4:17:26 PM
I appreciated your response to me. I think you wer... by welshTerrier2 on Friday, Feb 22, 2008 at 4:46:55 PM
I enjoy debate and sometimes in my zeal for writin... by Reverend Anthony Wade on Friday, Feb 22, 2008 at 4:52:58 PM
     Anthony. To you sir I say... by mikel paul on Friday, Feb 22, 2008 at 3:58:27 PM
Just for clarity, can you state whether you feel t... by Reverend Anthony Wade on Friday, Feb 22, 2008 at 4:31:01 PM
     First may I say I am guil... by mikel paul on Friday, Feb 22, 2008 at 6:36:52 PM
I want you to read the entire responses in this th... by Reverend Anthony Wade on Saturday, Feb 23, 2008 at 1:20:19 AM
AW maybe this poster says it better than I, but th... by Cheri Roberts on Friday, Feb 22, 2008 at 4:42:45 PM
This poster was professional. He was kind to start... by Reverend Anthony Wade on Friday, Feb 22, 2008 at 5:01:27 PM
I would like to see more editing from OpEdNews edi... by tabonsell on Friday, Feb 22, 2008 at 5:07:48 PM
Editing is best done by the writer. My first artic... by Dale Hill on Friday, Feb 22, 2008 at 7:26:48 PM
My philosophy is this: Your right to swing your fi... by Barbara Peterson on Friday, Feb 22, 2008 at 5:42:34 PM
Someone gets it!!!Thank you so much, nice hat by t... by Reverend Anthony Wade on Saturday, Feb 23, 2008 at 1:14:41 AM
We have anarchy now in dc. The same bigots of the... by Michael Dewey on Friday, Feb 22, 2008 at 8:01:11 PM
It really is a question of intent. Someone who go... by ibrahim turner on Saturday, Feb 23, 2008 at 8:49:14 AM
The only content that should be censored is illega... by Ty on Saturday, Feb 23, 2008 at 9:40:28 AM
Personal response."I have no personal beef wi... by Pixie on Saturday, Feb 23, 2008 at 10:51:00 AM
I appreciate your insight and you are quite right.... by Reverend Anthony Wade on Saturday, Feb 23, 2008 at 3:23:31 PM
The author's vision is so limited as to cause ... by Steve Fallon on Saturday, Feb 23, 2008 at 2:46:50 PM
No offense intended but can you translate that int... by Reverend Anthony Wade on Saturday, Feb 23, 2008 at 3:25:04 PM
Crystal clear and easy to understand English.In di... by coyote on Saturday, Feb 23, 2008 at 10:06:53 PM
When I saw the title of this article in Rob's ... by Kitty Antonik Wakfer on Wednesday, Feb 27, 2008 at 3:10:15 PM