Home
Refresh   Tag(s): ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; (more...)  (less...)
Add to My Group
January 2, 2008 at 14:41:13

View Ratings | Rate It

ABC Now Considering Banning Ron Paul from Debates

submit to twitter
submit to reddit
submit to digg

Tell A Friend

By Anthony Wade (about the author)     Page 1 of 1 page(s)

opednews.com     Permalink

For OpEdNews: Anthony Wade - Writer

January 2, 2008

 

The last article I did produced some stir, as it dealt with the decision by Faux News to ban Ron Paul from the upcoming presidential debate in New Hampshire. Most of the responses were supportive as this is a travesty. That any news agency, let alone a fake one, would purposefully try and influence the outcome of a presidential election has to be unacceptable for all Americans.

 

But toward the end of the comments I was attacked for "sloppy reporting" by a Mr. Westmiller, who claimed that Paul was not being excluded from the debates at all! Well, all is fair in propaganda I guess. Not only is Paul being excluded, as I correctly reported, but ABC may also be blacklisting him as well. Here is a link for those who ought to check their sources before accusing anyone of sloppy reporting:

 

http://www.cnn.com/2007/POLITICS/12/31/debate.limits.ap/index.html?section=cnn_latest

 

ABC seems to be applying fairer standards but why can't the American people hear all the opinions? Paul is still leading in fundraising, so why exclude him? Fox’s lame excuse is they do not have enough room in their trailer...I kid you not. An alleged media giant can only afford a trailer that fits five candidates comfortably. They have enough room for Fred "I don't really want to be here" Thompson, who has been in for a month and has done NOTHING, but not for the top fundraiser in the pack.

 

We all know why there is such bias against Dr. Paul. It is because he represents something other than the script the other guys will be reading off of. He would have been the only GOP hopeful talking about NOT blowing up the world, true fiscal discipline, and restoring civil liberties. Can't have that on Fox where they pretend to report, but they have already decided. Instead now we will be regaled with tales from the five would be tyrants who all believe they can more efficiently bomb Iran. They will spin yarns about how we need them to protect us and how the democrats are all spineless wimps because they do not lockstep to the war drumbeats and thrashing of our civil liberties. Most important to Fox News of course, is that they get to present their view of the Republican Party unblemished. They get to present the neocon vision as the only articulated platform for the GOP. No more uncomfortable post-debate polls showing how Ron Paul handily defeated their host of war-mongering candidates. Sean Hannity will not have to exclaim how Paul backers somehow rigged a poll. Fox gets to draw the sharp delineation they have been seeking. It is either the big brave republicans or the wimpy ole democrats. Nothing in the middle folks, nope, nothing to see here. Move along and cast your vote for one of our pre-selected candidates.  

 

I guess some might be confused as to why ABC has hopped along the un-American express? I mean, everyone knows Fox is biased but ABC is “mainstream”, right? WRONG. The corporate media is the corporate media. The true damage Fox does is to make other corporate media appear more central, when they are in fact just as in bed with the machine as Fox. ABC might cave quicker to pressure though.

 

I suggest a call for a boycott of all advertisers for Fox and ABC unless they rethink their decision to subvert the democratic process. If someone could link how we could do that, it would be very helpful. Maybe hitting them where it hurts will help. Ron Paul is not Duncan Hunter. He has the largest support base and has raised the most money than any candidate in the GOP field. His appeal has now crossed party lines and his message is starting to resonate with the public. They have tried to ignore him. They have tried to scoff him off the stage. Now they are just getting desperate. It is time we rose up and spoke against the rigging of our presidential electoral system.

 

Anthony Wade, a contributing writer to opednews.com, is dedicated to educating the populace to the lies and abuses of the government. He is a 41-year-old independent writer from New York with political commentary articles seen on multiple websites. (more...)
 

The views expressed in this article are the sole responsibility of the author
and do not necessarily reflect those of this website or its editors.

Contact Author Contact Editor View Authors' Articles

 

Book Recommendations for " Boycott Democratic"

View All Book Recommendations

Share this page: (what's this?)                   Tell a Friend: Tell A Friend

FACEBOOK      DIGG THIS      Add This Page to Mr Wong!           NEWSVINE      DEl.ICIO.US      Looksmart Furl      NETSCAPE      My Web      Tag!RawSugar      Blink List     (More...)

Comments: Expand   Shrink   Hide  
32 comments
To view all comments:
Expand Comments
 

Confirmed by Michael Twain on Wednesday, Jan 2, 2008 at 3:01:54 PM
Thank God by Parke Nicholson on Wednesday, Jan 2, 2008 at 3:26:29 PM
RE: Confirmed by fuzzy wzhe on Wednesday, Jan 2, 2008 at 3:33:46 PM
Here you go by Michael Twain on Wednesday, Jan 2, 2008 at 4:18:41 PM
RE: Here you go by fuzzy wzhe on Wednesday, Jan 2, 2008 at 4:42:38 PM
No no no by Michael Twain on Wednesday, Jan 2, 2008 at 5:04:16 PM
Room in the Trailer????? by Thaddeus Kaczor Jr on Wednesday, Jan 2, 2008 at 3:25:36 PM
Banned on Fox by John Sanchez Jr. on Wednesday, Jan 2, 2008 at 3:34:01 PM
Get up, Stand up! by Eric Stirling on Wednesday, Jan 2, 2008 at 5:15:35 PM
Take the poll -- hit them where it hurts by collin28 on Wednesday, Jan 2, 2008 at 7:13:18 PM
link shows the survey is closed by Ingrid on Wednesday, Jan 2, 2008 at 8:31:29 PM
Polling point polls by cuda on Thursday, Jan 3, 2008 at 10:10:26 AM
Boycott's by Henry Allred on Wednesday, Jan 2, 2008 at 7:16:48 PM
2nd Option for real change by Henry Allred on Wednesday, Jan 2, 2008 at 8:04:33 PM
Proud to boycott by Ingrid on Wednesday, Jan 2, 2008 at 8:28:06 PM
Once again, I am glad Paul is being included. It is totally by Steven Leser on Wednesday, Jan 2, 2008 at 9:25:45 PM
To Clarify by Anthony Wade on Wednesday, Jan 2, 2008 at 9:50:33 PM
ron paul by laszlo horvath on Thursday, Jan 3, 2008 at 12:08:35 AM
Go ahead, limit the 'debate' by truthtruffle on Thursday, Jan 3, 2008 at 1:59:15 AM
Paul and Kucinich by RLAnchors on Thursday, Jan 3, 2008 at 8:13:02 AM
Kucinich by cuda on Thursday, Jan 3, 2008 at 10:23:46 AM
Judicial Watch? by John Sanchez Jr. on Thursday, Jan 3, 2008 at 10:44:05 PM
The land deal by John Sanchez Jr. on Thursday, Jan 3, 2008 at 10:48:27 PM
Just what Hitler and Mussolini Did by Ryan on Thursday, Jan 3, 2008 at 10:09:05 AM
Hitler guid book by cuda on Thursday, Jan 3, 2008 at 10:27:28 AM
Ron Paul will win Iowa tonight by Lorring II on Thursday, Jan 3, 2008 at 12:04:01 PM
Fox News: Fair and Balanced? by ronheri on Thursday, Jan 3, 2008 at 12:07:41 PM
These so called "scientific" polls are a farse by Ed Beard Jr. on Thursday, Jan 3, 2008 at 1:56:49 PM
BLOCK FOX! ABC TOO! by k kelly on Thursday, Jan 3, 2008 at 2:20:59 PM
Media bias by Henry Allred on Sunday, Jan 6, 2008 at 2:46:03 AM
Faux News by nymta3 on Thursday, Jan 3, 2008 at 3:53:36 PM
"ABC Now Considering Banning Ron Paul from Debates" by dave stanley on Friday, Jan 4, 2008 at 6:21:24 AM

 
Want to post your own comment on this Article? Post Comment


 

 

 

Tell a Friend: Tell A Friend

Copyright © 2002-2009, OpEdNews

Powered by Populum