Home
Refresh   Tag(s): ; ;
Add to My Group
February 13, 2007 at 10:59:14

View Ratings | Rate It

It's Got to Be Gore: Part II– What Does it Make Sense to Hope For?

submit to twitter
submit to reddit
submit to digg

Tell A Friend

By Andrew Bard Schmookler (about the author)     Page 1 of 2 page(s)

opednews.com     Permalink

For OpEdNews: Andrew Bard Schmookler - Writer

In response to Part I, one commenter on my website wrote, after declaring that I'd gone bonkers:

Do you suppose that any one man can change the historical trend that has existed for more than half a century, and put the historical toothpaste back in the historical tube? There can be better or worse presidents in 2008 but the simple truth of the matter is that the election isn't going to change anything much."


Which raises the question: what indeed does the record of history allow us to hope for in terms of what the best possible new leadership might achieve?


This commenter acknowledges that there might be better or worse presidents, but says that the difference between the best and the worst presidents we might get will not matter much.

But I would say that any reasonably sensible observer of the American scene in 2006 would say that getting the presidency of George W. Bush was MUCH WORSE than alternative possibilities (whether we confine ourselves to Gore in 2000, or simply compare the conduct of this presidency with that of other presidencies of the past).

And is there any reason to believe that what was true on the downside would not also be true on the upside?

Moreover, though the full achievement of all those goals I listed in the first installment may be unreasonable to hope, surely it matters plenty how much progress we make toward their achievement. These goals are not matters of all-or-nothing.

I'll tell you the historical example that I have in mind in my envisioning of what I hope our next leadership might accomplish. I'm thinking of what FDR accomplished upon becoming president in the election of 1932.

Then, as now, the country was in terrible shape. In that case, it was a break down of the economic system. Now it is a breakdown of those aspects of the culture that converge on our governmental system (moral, legal, political, media).

FDR, it is often said, saved capitalism. But he did more than that. He made use of that breakdown to create a new kind of society by expanding in creative ways the role of government in the life of the nation and of its citizens. Not everything worked, of course, but with the Civilian Conservation Corps and Social Security and countless other programs, he gave impetus to a more humane, more liberal kind of American capitalist democracy. The wave he imparted into our political system continued to carry America forward in many important (and valuable) ways for almost half a century.

In my view, FDR was a great president. In the century since Mount Rushmore was carved into that rock (a travesty, I know), there's only one president who has served who belongs up there. And that's Franklin Delano Roosevelt.

Had the president elected in 1932 been a mediocre president, or perhaps even a poor one, what would have happened? My guess is that America would have taken a very different path and become a different, and lesser, nation. Even if we exclude the scenario (not impossible) that the Depression could have led to the breakdown of democracy and the rise of either a fascist or communist dictatorship --not impossible, I would guess-- a less visionary, less constructive, less effective, less inspiring leader would have bequeathed to America a lesser future than we got because this particular man became president at that time of crisis.

Perhaps to an observer during the Depression year 1931, anyone who'd proposed that a leader might take the country to the place where it was by the end of FDR's tenure would have seemed bonkers, calling for "putting the historical toothpaste back into the historical tube."

That whole image of putting the toothpaste back into the tube --that it's bonkers to imagine reversing the trends of one's times-- is a counsel of despair. It suggests that the course of history is ruled by inevitability. The course of history reveals, on the contrary, that history can take different courses depending on matters that are not inevitable-- such as whether Booth could succeed in killing Lincoln, and whether the ballot in Long Beach County was confusing to voters in 2000.

But even if we were simply uncertain whether history's course was inevitable --and how could anyone be CERTAIN that nothing we can do might turn around the destructive tendencies of recent times?-- it would seem that rationality and prudence would require us to choose as Pascal did in his famous wager: he operated on the assumption that there IS a God, reasoning that if he did so and he was wrong, the cost of his error was nothing great, but if he lived as if there were no God (who judges mortals) and he was wrong about THAT, then he'd pay a huge price for eternity.

Next Page  1  |  2

 

Andrew Bard Schmookler's website www.nonesoblind.org is devoted to understanding the roots of America's present moral crisis and the means by which the urgent challenge of this dangerous moment can be met. Dr. (more...)
 

The views expressed in this article are the sole responsibility of the author
and do not necessarily reflect those of this website or its editors.

Contact Author Contact Editor View Authors' Articles

 

Book Recommendations for "2008 Election Presidential History"
The 2008 Presidential Elections: A Story in Four Acts

$80.00
Lowest New Price $68.93

Number of pages: 272
Publisher: Palgrave Macmillan

Presidential Elections 1789-2008 (Presidential Elections Since 1789)
by CQ Press

$59.00

Number of pages: 417
Publisher: CQ Press

The Disappearing God Gap?: Religion in the 2008 Presidential Election
by Corwin Smidt

$24.95

Number of pages: 304
Publisher: Oxford University Press, USA

Us Government
by Anthony J. Bennett

$19.95
Lowest New Price $11.90

Number of pages: 92
Publisher: Philip Allan Updates

View All Book Recommendations

Share this page: (what's this?)                   Tell a Friend: Tell A Friend

FACEBOOK      DIGG THIS      Add This Page to Mr Wong!           NEWSVINE      DEl.ICIO.US      Looksmart Furl      NETSCAPE      My Web      Tag!RawSugar      Blink List     (More...)

Comments: Expand   Shrink   Hide  
13 comments
To view all comments:
Expand Comments
 

Gore will not run by Mark Sashine on Tuesday, Feb 13, 2007 at 2:05:11 PM
I don't get the deal by Andrew Bard Schmookler on Tuesday, Feb 13, 2007 at 2:17:23 PM
there are numerous situations by Mark Sashine on Tuesday, Feb 13, 2007 at 2:55:19 PM
Could be, but on the other hand by Andrew Bard Schmookler on Tuesday, Feb 13, 2007 at 4:33:31 PM
Wait a hold it by ardee D. on Tuesday, Feb 13, 2007 at 5:42:37 PM
Here are two quotes from the essay you just read by Andrew Bard Schmookler on Tuesday, Feb 13, 2007 at 5:54:45 PM
Good Article by pratliff94 on Wednesday, Feb 14, 2007 at 11:00:26 AM
thanks for the citings, and the illumination. by ardee D. on Thursday, Feb 15, 2007 at 12:29:23 PM
gore for president by liberalsrock on Wednesday, Feb 14, 2007 at 9:09:22 AM
If you were trying to do a parody of libs' wishful thinking, by Richard Mynick on Wednesday, Feb 14, 2007 at 10:43:04 AM
Wishful thinking is another word for "Hope" by Andrew Bard Schmookler on Wednesday, Feb 14, 2007 at 12:27:33 PM
Nicely parried, but here's the rub. You're tacitly admitting by Richard Mynick on Wednesday, Feb 14, 2007 at 2:59:18 PM
Rich got there first, and well done indeed by ardee D. on Thursday, Feb 15, 2007 at 7:19:43 PM

 
Want to post your own comment on this Article? Post Comment


 

 

 

Tell a Friend: Tell A Friend

Copyright © 2002-2009, OpEdNews

Powered by Populum