Tag(s): ; ; ; ; , Add Tags
Add to My Group(s)

Well Said 6   Must Read 4   Valuable 4   View Ratings | Rate It

Promoted to Headline (H3) on 5/17/10:     Permalink
View Article Stats      (123 comments)

To Anti-Obamite Lefties: It Doesn't Matter If You're Right

Add this Page to Facebook!
Submit to Twitter
Submit to Reddit
Submit to Stumble Upon

Tell A Friend

Become a Fan
Get Embed HTML Code
By (about the author)

Become a Fan Become a Fan  (14 fans)   -- Page 1 of 2 page(s)

opednews.com

This piece is addressed to those --like many here on the opednews website-- who have used my pieces on President Obama as an occasion to attack him for being so much less progressive, so much less morally upright and bold, than they would want their president to be.

The point I am here to make is that IT REALLY DOESN'T MATTER WHICH OF OUR PERCEPTIONS OF BARACK OBAMA IS CORRECT.

It's my belief that Obama, if he could just snap his fingers and move America forward in very progressive ways, would do so, but that he holds back on many of them out of his calculations (correct or otherwise) of political necessity and of overall political strategy. By contrast, a number of lefties here on opednews see him as just plain morally corrupt, not deeply committed to their values.

It has not proved very fruitful to debate these two different perceptions, but we don't have to. Either way, for us in America today who care about advancing progressive values, the basic nature of the action we are called upon to take is basically there same: either way, our best hope of advancing our values is to help Obama to prevail over his right-wing foes.

Whether we like it or not, there's no escaping one basic strategic fact: if the forces we care about are to advance, there's no other strategy than by using Obama to lead the charge, which means supporting him so he can triumph over his enemies.

However true it may be that the positions Obama has staked out fall short --or even far short-- of what one or another of us to the left of center would like, the fact remains that there are clear differences on all the issues we care about between Obama and the movement for which the likes of Sarah Palin and Rush Limbaugh and Mitch McConnell are spokespeople.


Those who don't believe there are big differences should ask the people in the trenches: are things any better for your side under Obama than they were when Bush II was president? The answer across the board is yes. Even in those issue areas where progressives have experienced big disappointments as with the constitutional issues raised by the way the Bushites set up their "war on terror"-- the people will tell you that there have been beneficial changes. So also in all those areas like the environment, and health care, and regulating the bank industry, in which Obama is demonstrably closer to us than are the forces with which he has to contend.

Even if Obama declines to lead in a bolder and more assertive way to advance progressive values, on all fronts the picture is undoubtedly better than it was under Bush.

You may say, "That's not saying much." But however much or little it is saying, the reality remains that in this America --with this dark right-wing force still working to drag America down into its toxic pit-- the crucial point at which the battle against the darkness is being fought is where Obama is embattled against the right, on one issue after another. That's just the reality of the political struggle.

In this world, we do not always get to choose those on whom we must rely to deliver us from evil.

If you were a Jewish survivor in a concentration camp in Poland, you had to root for the forces of the Soviet Army to advance quickly enough to reach you in time. They were the actors "on your side," even though this Red Army was also the instruments of the brutal dictator who'd killed millions of his countrymen and had just set his country through a period of terror and mock-trial purges, the man who'd made a nefarious deal with Hitler to carve up Poland. Nonetheless the captives in the concentration camps in Poland perceived the Soviet troops, correctly, as liberators.

One has to know where one's real concern is, who is the central enemy.

With us, the vital concern is beating back that dark spirit that expressed itself in the form of the criminal enterprise which was the Bushite Presidency, and is now expressing itself as the party of fear-and-hating mongering lies and refusal to work together to solve the problems of our country.

On every political battle now being fought in Washington, the administration is closer to the progressive position than are its opponents.

Anyone who cannot see the difference is blind.

Anyone who CAN see it is driven to this inescapable conclusion: In the current political arena, with no other comparable force available to us, it is Obama's victories that will move the ball in the RIGHT direction and it is his defeats that will advance the dark right-wing agenda.

Next Page  1  |  2

 

Andy Schmookler is running for Congress in Virginia's 6th District.

The views expressed in this article are the sole responsibility of the author
and do not necessarily reflect those of this website or its editors.

Contact Author Contact Editor View Authors' Articles

Follow Me on Twitter

 

Share this page: (what's this?)                   Tell a Friend: Tell A Friend

Add this Page to Facebook!      Submit to Stumble Upon      Submit to Reddit      Add This Page to Mr Wong!           NEWSVINE      DEl.ICIO.US      Looksmart Furl      My Web      Blink List     (More...)

Comments

The time limit for entering new comments on this article has expired.

This limit can be removed. Our paid membership program is designed to give you many benefits, such as removing this time limit. To learn more, please click here.

Comments: Expand   Shrink   Hide  
123 comments
To view all comments:
Expand Comments
(Or you can set your preferences to show all comments, always)

This deserves by Mark Sashine on Monday, May 17, 2010 at 4:04:47 PM
what I said, and didn't by Andrew Bard Schmookler on Monday, May 17, 2010 at 4:13:19 PM
Not really by Mark Sashine on Monday, May 17, 2010 at 4:25:19 PM
Andy, come on. What debate? by Alan MacDonald on Monday, May 17, 2010 at 4:39:34 PM
I look at trends and calculate progress by Margaret Bassett on Monday, May 17, 2010 at 4:36:09 PM
From reading Obama's first book by Margaret Bassett on Monday, May 17, 2010 at 5:07:09 PM
I respectfully disagree and would like to tell you why by Jeffrey Rock on Monday, May 17, 2010 at 7:14:05 PM
you've given me a hearing, but not heard me well by Andrew Bard Schmookler on Monday, May 17, 2010 at 7:35:05 PM
OK I understand now by Jeffrey Rock on Monday, May 17, 2010 at 9:00:25 PM
that path has proven dangerous not that long ago by Andrew Bard Schmookler on Monday, May 17, 2010 at 9:27:55 PM
Not Exactly by Jeffrey Rock on Monday, May 17, 2010 at 10:46:22 PM
Correction by Jeffrey Rock on Monday, May 17, 2010 at 11:00:17 PM
Good article and comments. by Steven Leser on Monday, May 17, 2010 at 11:38:22 PM
Another perspective by Don Smith on Monday, May 17, 2010 at 10:59:40 PM
dunno about that by J. Edward Tremlett on Monday, May 17, 2010 at 11:57:19 PM
agreement by Andrew Bard Schmookler on Tuesday, May 18, 2010 at 8:27:15 AM
Roll up our sleeves by Marika on Tuesday, May 18, 2010 at 2:34:20 AM
not the point by Andrew Bard Schmookler on Tuesday, May 18, 2010 at 8:30:09 AM
Not again by Marika on Tuesday, May 18, 2010 at 9:47:36 AM
call it what you will by Andrew Bard Schmookler on Tuesday, May 18, 2010 at 10:01:30 AM
These are shots I'd prefer not to call by Marika on Tuesday, May 18, 2010 at 11:35:54 AM
Let's not forget... by Bia Winter on Wednesday, May 19, 2010 at 9:55:47 AM
Have we heard this song before? by Andrew Bard Schmookler on Wednesday, May 19, 2010 at 11:43:56 AM
those sneaky Jews. by J. Edward Tremlett on Wednesday, May 19, 2010 at 9:23:17 PM
ignore may be good, but.... by Andrew Bard Schmookler on Wednesday, May 19, 2010 at 9:38:38 PM
Ignore at your own risk by Bia Winter on Thursday, May 20, 2010 at 8:52:45 AM
Not getting Paid?!? LOLOLOL! by Bia Winter on Thursday, May 20, 2010 at 12:56:28 PM
it's not the "Z word" by Andrew Bard Schmookler on Thursday, May 20, 2010 at 2:30:52 PM
Your argument is hollow by Bia Winter on Friday, May 21, 2010 at 8:04:37 AM
Dr. Martin Luther King Jr. thought the words were the same by Steven Leser on Saturday, May 22, 2010 at 12:47:58 AM
They define themselves Steven... by Bia Winter on Saturday, May 22, 2010 at 8:59:01 AM
No, they dont and I have empirical evidence by Steven Leser on Saturday, May 22, 2010 at 1:08:47 PM
Ok, OK, Steven... by Bia Winter on Sunday, May 23, 2010 at 8:57:37 AM
and if you'd read further... by J. Edward Tremlett on Monday, May 24, 2010 at 6:25:47 PM
Au Contraire! by Bia Winter on Tuesday, May 25, 2010 at 8:51:15 AM
yes indeed by J. Edward Tremlett on Tuesday, May 25, 2010 at 9:55:26 AM
false assumptions by Contextnow on Thursday, May 20, 2010 at 6:23:19 PM
Perhaps by Marika on Friday, May 21, 2010 at 3:30:53 AM
i agree with your content by Contextnow on Saturday, May 22, 2010 at 6:17:01 PM
P.S. by Marika on Friday, May 21, 2010 at 3:41:08 AM
results in the closet by Contextnow on Saturday, May 22, 2010 at 5:56:03 PM
PRESIDENT OBAMA HOLDS CONTEXTNOW'S FEET TO THE FIRE by Blaine Kinsey on Friday, May 21, 2010 at 9:01:10 PM
conventional wisdom is not always wise by Contextnow on Saturday, May 22, 2010 at 5:53:14 PM
CONTEXTNOW RESORTS TO DISHONEST TACTICS AGAIN by Blaine Kinsey on Saturday, May 22, 2010 at 9:10:48 PM
not a tactic by Contextnow on Sunday, May 23, 2010 at 12:10:49 PM
CONTEXTNOW, YOU'VE BEEN HANGING YOURSELF WITH YOUR OWN ROPE by Blaine Kinsey on Sunday, May 23, 2010 at 2:49:38 PM
If we want "progressive" we want bottom/up by Margaret Bassett on Tuesday, May 18, 2010 at 5:29:32 AM
Supporting Barack Obama damages the Democratic Party by Perry Logan on Tuesday, May 18, 2010 at 6:20:00 AM
certainties by Andrew Bard Schmookler on Tuesday, May 18, 2010 at 8:43:55 AM
You think too small by Bia Winter on Wednesday, May 19, 2010 at 10:03:05 AM
Cool video effects and skillful craziness by Don Smith on Tuesday, May 18, 2010 at 9:46:39 PM
Proves? by Contextnow on Thursday, May 20, 2010 at 6:53:46 PM
Obomem is a Globalist. by Mike Preston on Tuesday, May 18, 2010 at 7:45:17 AM
none dare call it treason, but the deluded by Andrew Bard Schmookler on Tuesday, May 18, 2010 at 8:45:47 AM
You think only Rightwingers are concerned about "Treason"? by Bia Winter on Wednesday, May 19, 2010 at 10:17:15 AM
IT DOES MATTER by Blaine Kinsey on Tuesday, May 18, 2010 at 10:22:56 AM
Reality by astrobabe on Tuesday, May 18, 2010 at 11:14:02 AM
DEEP WITHIN YOUR HIDEBOUND REALITY by Blaine Kinsey on Tuesday, May 18, 2010 at 1:01:02 PM
can you read? by Contextnow on Tuesday, May 18, 2010 at 7:15:48 PM
DEAR BEFUDDLED CONTEXTNOW by Blaine Kinsey on Friday, May 21, 2010 at 12:28:10 AM
propaganda by Ty on Tuesday, May 18, 2010 at 11:35:11 AM
agitprop by J. Edward Tremlett on Tuesday, May 18, 2010 at 12:26:59 PM
is this "irony"? by Andrew Bard Schmookler on Tuesday, May 18, 2010 at 10:24:31 PM
T y, you've been around almost 3 years by Margaret Bassett on Tuesday, May 18, 2010 at 12:24:48 PM
Schmookler's Corporate Talking Points! by William Bianchi on Tuesday, May 18, 2010 at 2:30:07 PM
just how does this work, Mr. BIanchi? by Andrew Bard Schmookler on Tuesday, May 18, 2010 at 10:32:21 PM
It is not just treason, it is "hangable treason" by Mike Preston on Tuesday, May 18, 2010 at 4:21:37 PM
The central issue by Contextnow on Tuesday, May 18, 2010 at 6:11:20 PM
IT IS YOU WHO AIDS AND ABETS THE REPUBLICANS by Blaine Kinsey on Wednesday, May 19, 2010 at 1:25:16 PM
you're right about some things, but not on my argument by Andrew Bard Schmookler on Wednesday, May 19, 2010 at 1:58:45 PM
PLEASE NOTE THE JUXTAPOSITION OF COMMENTS by Blaine Kinsey on Wednesday, May 19, 2010 at 2:10:01 PM
this is a highly skewed assessment by Contextnow on Thursday, May 20, 2010 at 7:24:11 PM
misquoting me (the GOP tactic) again by Contextnow on Saturday, May 22, 2010 at 6:39:16 PM
CONTEXTNOW IN WONDERLAND by Blaine Kinsey on Saturday, May 22, 2010 at 8:04:05 PM
what?!?! by Contextnow on Sunday, May 23, 2010 at 12:45:39 PM
CONTEXTNOW, PLEASE READ CAREFULLY by Blaine Kinsey on Sunday, May 23, 2010 at 2:01:05 PM
Format by Marika on Friday, May 21, 2010 at 5:52:24 AM
didn't change the format on purpose. by Contextnow on Saturday, May 22, 2010 at 6:26:12 PM
Misguided loyalties by Jeffrey Rock on Tuesday, May 18, 2010 at 6:22:46 PM
Jeffrey Rock is clearly a GOP shill by Contextnow on Tuesday, May 18, 2010 at 6:35:18 PM
The Shameless One by Jeffrey Rock on Tuesday, May 18, 2010 at 7:05:15 PM
Oh yeah! by Contextnow on Tuesday, May 18, 2010 at 7:29:47 PM
Still thinking by richard on Tuesday, May 18, 2010 at 7:15:08 PM
differences by Andrew Bard Schmookler on Tuesday, May 18, 2010 at 10:36:29 PM
Speaking of shills by Miriam Callaghan on Friday, May 21, 2010 at 11:33:08 PM
And that reflects on any facts he might present how? by Steven Leser on Saturday, May 22, 2010 at 12:38:04 AM
Addendum by Miriam Callaghan on Saturday, May 22, 2010 at 12:05:02 PM
That's what I tell them, Jeffrey... by Bia Winter on Wednesday, May 19, 2010 at 10:31:52 AM
A Thank you by witch1 on Friday, May 21, 2010 at 8:42:42 PM
reality by Katrin R. on Saturday, May 22, 2010 at 3:57:53 AM
THE REALITY OF YOUR MESSAGE by Blaine Kinsey on Saturday, May 22, 2010 at 10:48:55 AM
shocking by Contextnow on Sunday, May 23, 2010 at 12:53:13 PM
CONTEXTNOW, DO NOT BE SHOCKED THAT YOU DID NOT UNDERSTAND by Blaine Kinsey on Sunday, May 23, 2010 at 4:26:05 PM
Obama's Presidency by Nancy S on Tuesday, May 18, 2010 at 6:32:33 PM
I couldn't help it... by richard on Tuesday, May 18, 2010 at 7:27:34 PM
the United States Corporation by richard on Tuesday, May 18, 2010 at 6:55:59 PM
Write on by Jeffrey Rock on Tuesday, May 18, 2010 at 7:08:57 PM
Cynics by Contextnow on Tuesday, May 18, 2010 at 7:39:43 PM
'K' has already been subverted. by richard on Tuesday, May 18, 2010 at 7:49:37 PM
sorry for not being clear enough by Contextnow on Sunday, May 23, 2010 at 1:48:20 PM
Marika, where do you see hope and despair in politics? by Margaret Bassett on Friday, May 21, 2010 at 12:17:39 PM
Hello Margaret by Marika on Sunday, May 23, 2010 at 4:04:29 AM
The title is perfect! by Katrin R. on Friday, May 21, 2010 at 8:05:17 PM
Kumbaya My Lord Kumbaya by David Glenn Cox on Saturday, May 22, 2010 at 7:49:16 AM
blindness of the "all shades of gray are black" sort by Andrew Bard Schmookler on Saturday, May 22, 2010 at 12:09:43 PM
We were not by David Glenn Cox on Saturday, May 22, 2010 at 8:00:27 PM
If You cannot see by richard on Saturday, May 22, 2010 at 9:37:05 PM
Well said, but sad that you need to say it. by Steven Leser on Saturday, May 22, 2010 at 11:23:48 PM
Truth? by Miriam Callaghan on Sunday, May 23, 2010 at 11:47:37 AM
Hate to say it, but ... by William Meyer on Sunday, May 23, 2010 at 11:11:23 AM
good point by J. Edward Tremlett on Sunday, May 23, 2010 at 11:45:44 AM
Furthermore by Don Smith on Sunday, May 23, 2010 at 12:16:43 PM
Have to respectfully disagree by J. Edward Tremlett on Sunday, May 23, 2010 at 12:54:35 PM
The way it was, and how it is now... by witch1 on Sunday, May 23, 2010 at 12:10:25 PM
Blame verses holding Obama's feet to the fire by Lynne Kringler on Monday, May 24, 2010 at 4:06:03 AM
WE DO REMEMBER by Blaine Kinsey on Monday, May 24, 2010 at 10:38:29 AM
I understand your position by Lynne Kringler on Monday, May 24, 2010 at 4:33:57 PM
TO LYNNE KRINGLER by Blaine Kinsey on Monday, May 24, 2010 at 10:55:10 PM
ERROR by Blaine Kinsey on Tuesday, May 25, 2010 at 8:11:23 AM
Democracy = majority rules by Lynne Kringler on Monday, May 24, 2010 at 6:03:48 AM
It is not a matter of 'anti' by richard on Monday, May 24, 2010 at 9:54:28 PM
Get rid of the Corporations? by Lynne Kringler on Monday, May 24, 2010 at 11:55:02 PM
Thanks by witch1 on Tuesday, May 25, 2010 at 8:54:35 AM