OpEdNews Op Eds

Guess Who's Going to Dinner with Diebold, Sequoia, and Electronic ES&S?

By (about the author)     Permalink       (Page 1 of 1 pages)
Related Topic(s): ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; , Add Tags Add to My Group(s)

View Ratings | Rate It

opednews.com

Become a Fan
  (9 fans)
Wednesday, January 17:
[Note: Let's take another look at this Summer 2004 article written by OpEdNews' senior news editor, Amanda Lang, while the 108th Congress was in session. The article serves as a benchmark reminding us that our efforts haven't had much of an impact in the last three years. From the 108th to the 110th Congress, two elections down, and another fast approaching and we're even deeper in that quicksand called electronic voting. The more we struggle,the deeper we sink. (This is the same DeForest Soaries who has recently come out so strongly against the government's total disregard for safe voting.) - Joan Brunwasser, Voting Integity Ed.]
August, 2004 When speakers from the Election Assistance Commission (EAC) attend the August 24-28, 2004, for federal and state election employees in Washington, DC, they will be participating in a huge conflict of interest as they eat, drink, and make-merry at the Diebold, Sequoia, and ES&S (voting machine vendors) sponsored events. Sequoia Voting Systems is co-sponsor for a dinner cruise on the Potomac and a monuments by night tour. A welcome reception compliments of Diebold with ES&S throwing in a graduation luncheon and awards ceremonies. It being Washington, members of the House and Senate are also invited. Supposedly an independent bipartisan agency, the EAC was appointed by President George W. Bush following the Election Fiasco of 2000, and is authorized by the Help America Vote Act (HAVA) to serve as "...a national clearinghouse and resource for the comparison of information" on various matters involving the administration of Federal elections. Apparently, the EAC wants to be more than a clearinghouse -- EAC Chairman,DeForest Soaries**, recently authored a letter to Homeland Security czar, Tom Ridge, requesting his agency be the statutory authority to cancel and reschedule a federal election" if a terrorist attack is launched in the U.S. As a result, Ridge's office has requested that the Justice Department's Office of Legal Counsel analyze whatlegal steps would be needed to permit the postponement of the election were an attack to take place. **Note: Soaries, a Bush appointee and Baptist pastor, two years ago was an unsuccessful GOP candidate for Congress. The Election Center is a nonprofit organization, which trains election workers and advises Congress and government agencies on election process issues. The Election Center also provides staff services to the National Association of State Election Directors (NASED) for the voting systems program. NASED is responsible for the testing and certification (through independent laboratories) of voting systems hardware and software manufactured by Diebold, Sequoia, and ES&S Disturbing! -- It could not be more inappropriate for this non-profit, non-partisan organization to accept money and funding from Diebold, Sequoia, and ES&S whose machines they are tasked to monitor. The Election Center executive director, R. Doug Lewis, confirmed in March that the Center has taken donations from all three vendors. The Sequoia donations surfaced on the Center's latest 990 IRS filing. It revealed donations of $10,000 per year from 1997 through 2000. According to the conference schedule, one of the big topics of the day is "The Media:Fighting Back --Getting the Story Straight." Is the Election Center suggesting that it is now the responsibility or duty of election officials to influence media coverage and reporting that has in the past, been highly critical of the many documented failures and flaws of these companies voting machines? (One analysis reveals that votes were not recorded for one out of 100 votes using the new ATM-style machines --eight times more than pencil marks on paper ballots in the same election!)? Write, email or call the EAC and the Election Center. Ask them to seek othersponsorship or funding that does not reflect such an egregious conflict of interest. Ask your representatives or senators in the 108th Congress to get off their butts, and practice a little oversight. Maybe they could even pass some legislation that would actually secure that most basic American right -the right to vote and be counted. Amanda Lang, PhD Augusta, GA ------------------------------------------- Now get on your 110th Congress members ass and stay there until Americans can secure, verifiable voting systems.

 

OpedNews volunteer from 2005 to 2013.

Share on Google Plus Submit to Twitter Add this Page to Facebook! Share on LinkedIn Pin It! Add this Page to Fark! Submit to Reddit Submit to Stumble Upon

The views expressed in this article are the sole responsibility of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of this website or its editors.

Writers Guidelines

Contact Author Contact Editor View Authors' Articles

Comments

The time limit for entering new comments on this article has expired.

This limit can be removed. Our paid membership program is designed to give you many benefits, such as removing this time limit. To learn more, please click here.

Comments: Expand   Shrink   Hide  
No comments