Home
Refresh   Tag(s): ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; (more...) ;  (less...)
Add to My Group
May 1, 2007 at 06:57:38

View Ratings | Rate It

Impeach Cheney? What's at stake if we don't?

submit to twitter
submit to reddit
submit to digg
Tell A Friend

By Alan Kobrin (about the author)     Page 1 of 1 page(s)

opednews.com     Permalink

For OpEdNews: alan k - Writer

One thing everyone has to agree that this Administration certainly gets right: our national honor is at stake.

Our ability to to create and implement successful strategic policies that address urgent issues such as institutionalized violence and terror, nuclear proliferation, and global climate change is on the line. We are at risk of losing respect and goodwill. Much of this will be determined by how our nation deals with the difficult and dangerous situation in Iraq.

We will see the worst of this fallout, however, not because of seeking a rapid end to US troop involvement in Iraq. U.S. prestige, honor and credibility will be damaged for the foreseeable future if we do not hold accountable those people who used every artifice, true or not, legal or not, to get our nation into an unnecessary and illegal conflict no one wanted except a small circle of ideologues with illusions of grandeur and little concern for the lives of others.


At the center of this ideological operation sits Dick Cheney whose disdain for public participation in governance goes back decades when he and Donald Rumsfeld tried to deep-six the Freedom of Information Act during the Ford Administration. As he himself admits, he feels it is time to "work in the shadows." His taste for an authoritarian "imperial presidency" that scuttles any real balance of powers dates from Nixon's days.

When it is one day revealed through the use of that very Freedom of Information Act, it is likely we will see that he personally gathered such responsible and democratic stalwarts as Enron's Ken Lay to lay out, in secret, what he euphemistically called a national energy policy--otherwise known as the War on Iraq.

Enough evidence already exists that at least some of those closed-door "energy policy sessions" had to do with maps of Iraqi oil fields and the doling out of oil concessions to various companies. Nice turn of American Ingenuity to resolve our problems without having to leave the lucrative hydrocarbon business behind. It just happened to involve someone else's oil. No problem for Mr. Cheney.

Getting into the White House has its perks. Like moving with real soldiers around on a map, or writing no-bid contracts to friends.

Did we remind everyone yet of Cheney's Halliburton background? Well, these things mentioned here alone should be enough to question not only Dick Cheney's dedication to and passion for democracy, but also his, shall we say, cool and neutral examination of the circumstances in the Middle East that might require urgent military action because of perceived threats from the Saddam Hussein regime. I would say minimally that his judgment on the question at hand might have been clouded.

There is every reason to believe he was never straight forward with the American people about a real justification for war with Iraq. All announced threats were unproven innuendoes, pushed hard by the White House in spite of contrary information coming from onsite inspectors and our best intelligence. The climate of fear which resulted from 911 was steadily nourished by this Administration to get support for their planned invasion of Iraq. Rational thinking, any thorough investigation and openness were tossed into the trash heap.

Our nation's security, contrary to Cheney's assertions, has never been so compromised, as it is now, whether by creation of new enemies through preemptive use of force, the use of torture, the stretching thin of our military including the use of our National Guard abroad, or by the obscenely expensive and morally outrageous privatization of vital military services.

Yes, this nation faces a crisis of credibility and honor.

We will further erode an already badly battered image abroad, lose allies, escalate military confrontations, recruit anti-American forces, create a global distrust and distaste for American-styled "democracy", and deal a terrible blow to the rule of law both here and abroad if we do NOT impeach Mr. Cheney for all that he has done to seriously and deeply damage this nation, its people and its Constitution because of his own hubris and narrow exploitative view of human life.

It is therefore in the highest interest of this nation to go forward with the articles of impeachment brought about by Rep. Dennis Kucinich.

Impeach? Yes, of course. Anything less would make this Congress and the American people complicit in all that has gone on to damage the national fabric and our place in the world.

 

Take action -- click here to contact your local newspaper or congress people:
Show Congress your support for the impeachment of Dick Cheney (H.R. 333).

Click here to see the most recent messages sent to congressional reps and local newspapers

Watching, observing, analyzing, communicating, provoking, organizing....

The views expressed in this article are the sole responsibility of the author
and do not necessarily reflect those of this website or its editors.

Contact Author Contact Editor View Authors' Articles

 

Book Recommendations for "Congress In Crisis Democracy"
Peru in Crisis: Dictatorship or Democracy? (Woodrow Wilson Center Current Studies on Latin America)
by Joseph S. Tulchin

$11.95
Lowest New Price $67.15

Number of pages: 200
Publisher: Lynne Rienner Pub

Japan in Crisis: Essays on TaishO Democracy.
by Quail Roost, N.C., 1970. Conference on TaishO Japan

$21.00

Number of pages:
Publisher: Princeton Univ Pr

Japan in Crisis: Essays on Taisho Democracy (Michigan Classics in Japanese Studies)
by Ann Waswo

$18.95

Number of pages: 469
Publisher: University of Michigan Press

View All Book Recommendations

Share this page: (what's this?)                   Tell a Friend: Tell A Friend

FACEBOOK      DIGG THIS      Add This Page to Mr Wong!           NEWSVINE      DEl.ICIO.US      Looksmart Furl      NETSCAPE      My Web      Tag!RawSugar      Blink List     (More...)

Comments: Expand   Shrink   Hide  
18 comments
To view all comments:
Expand Comments
 

Impeachment by walley on Tuesday, May 1, 2007 at 10:26:22 AM
Impeachment by Ron McCallie on Wednesday, May 2, 2007 at 12:10:51 PM
wahhh wahhh I don't like war by Logical1 on Thursday, May 3, 2007 at 12:40:09 AM
Impeach? What a JOKE!! by RasDebol on Thursday, May 3, 2007 at 1:08:19 AM
U.S. prestige, honor and credibility will be damaged???? by RasDebol on Thursday, May 3, 2007 at 1:21:55 AM
RE Rasdebol by David Utz on Thursday, May 3, 2007 at 1:47:45 AM
Get a Life! by dennis1105 on Thursday, May 3, 2007 at 2:44:14 AM
Nice Argument... by RasDebol on Thursday, May 3, 2007 at 4:19:01 AM
Nice Argument #2 by RasDebol on Thursday, May 3, 2007 at 4:24:09 AM
Quit wasting my time. by ohcomeon on Thursday, May 3, 2007 at 2:30:49 AM
Quit wasting our time. by Josh Fletcher on Thursday, May 3, 2007 at 9:06:01 PM
Forget impeachment... IMPRISONMENT! by Null Null on Thursday, May 3, 2007 at 2:36:05 AM
"Forget impeachment... IMPRISONMENT!" by RasDebol on Thursday, May 3, 2007 at 4:29:37 AM
Crimes? by dennis1105 on Thursday, May 3, 2007 at 3:00:37 AM
I wish he could be impeached... by Sarah Wilson on Thursday, May 3, 2007 at 9:11:43 AM
no matter what the "difficulty" impeachment must proceed!! by Populist Party on Thursday, May 3, 2007 at 2:59:33 PM
Impeachment? Really? by Jason on Thursday, May 3, 2007 at 9:56:32 PM
American values demand Impeachment and there's lots of time. by GeoRip on Friday, May 4, 2007 at 11:39:17 AM

 
Want to post your own comment on this Article? Post Comment


 

 

 

Tell a Friend: Tell A Friend

Copyright © 2002-2009, OpEdNews

Powered by Populum