Tags for This Article:

USA United States Of America (7159)  FDA (157)  FDA (153)  Food Industry- Industrial (111)  Food Industry- Organic (76) 

Populum Tag Cloud
       Control Panel
Fine tune your search to access content
Articles
Diaries Products
Events All
All time
Last 6 mos
Last month
Last week
Last 24 hrs
From:
Month  Day   Year

To:
Month  Day   Year
Alphabet
Popularity
Count ON
Count OFF
This Level
Sub-levels

 

 

 

Tag(s): ; ; ; ;
Add to My Group
May 4, 2007 at 06:21:43

Headlined on 5/4/07:
Contaminated pet food exposing trouble in the human food system

by Suzanne Nelson     Page 1 of 1 page(s)

www.opednews.com

 
Tell A Friend

(0.0 from 0 ratings) View Ratings | Rate It

After over a month of news stories claiming that a dozen or so dogs and cats have died in the contaminated pet food debacle, the FDA is finally acknowledging that thousands of dogs and cats have died after eating poisoned food. It's about time. 

In that same announcement, the agency expanded the hold on Chinese imports to include: wheat gluten, rice gluten, rice protein, rice protein concentrate, corn gluten, corn gluten meal, corn by-products, soy protein, soy gluten, mung bean protein, soy bean meal/powder/gluten/protein isolate, soy protein powder, wheat gluten, wheat flour gluten, wheat gluten, rice protein, rice gluten, rice protein, corn gluten, milled rice products, amino acids and protein hydrosylates.

Take a trip down the center isle of any grocery store -- including Whole Foods and even my local natural foods co-op -- and you'll find some combination of those ingredients in just about everything that comes in a box or a can. Those are the raw ingredients of the processed food industry, including the "organic" processed food industry. It will be interesting to see how this hold on ingredients from the world's largest producer of everything will affect the price and availability of certain foodstuffs in the United States. I suspect, however, that the machine will grind on, and the industry's need for these ingredients will blow past the FDA's day-late-and-dollar-short efforts to assert caution. I'd like to be wrong about that.

Speaking of regulation, I found a rather apropos overview by a Harvard graduate student of the virtually nonexistent oversight governing pet food. It's worthwhile for the short history of pet food alone. One paragraph that I found very interesting was this one:

During the 80s, the revelation that the world's food supply was lagging behind population growth attracted substantial media attention. Consumers began wondering why they were paying so much money for their pets' food when there might not be sufficient food for humans. This forced a once booming industry to defend the need for its products. Ironically, this meant that instead of selling their products as "fit for humans" complete with peas and carrots in canned dog foods, the industry began insisting that their "principal ingredients are not suitable for human use."

Is this where the door opened for dead, diseased, dying and decayed animals to be included in pet food, including the bodies of euthanized cats and dogs? This has been documented as recently as several years ago, when tests revealed that commercial foods contained traces of the chemical used to euthanize pets. Rendering plants mix dead dogs and cats with road kill and parts from slaughtered animals that humans don't eat and sell it as a protein substrate to pet food companies.

All I know is this: My dogs are carnivores and I am happy to be a thoughtful omnivore, and although it often requires more effort to do so, the only way I can find peace when everyone sits or lies down to eat is to know where that food came from, how it was raised and whether the animals we rely on for our nourishment were raised according to their creature comforts. It's taken me a couple of years and several moves to more hospitable environs, but I am proud that virtually all of the meat my husband, the dogs and I consume is raised on pasture by small farmers within a 50-mile radius.

With a heavy heart I acknowledge that the money and time that goes into those choices very well may be overwhelming for most of my fellow citizens. But I am also not the first to point out that we may collectively be spending our money and time in ways that are in direct contradiction to the lives of peace, grace and health we claim to want to lead. The simple abundance of nourishing food is more within our grasp than we realize, and the first step may be turning down the noise and haste of a disposable culture, one that unknowingly serves its furry companions adulterated grain proteins and the rendered flesh of its fellow species.

 

www.honesthuman.com

.

Contact Author
Contact Editor
View Other Articles by Author

 

Bookmark this page: (what's this?)

NETSCAPE      DIGG THIS      Add This Page to Mr Wong!           NEWSVINE      DEl.ICIO.US      Looksmart Furl      My Web      Tag!RawSugar      Blink List     (More...)
Comments: Expand   Shrink   Hide  
14 comments

Dr. John Moffett is an active research neuroscientist in the Washington, DC area, who has published over 45 scientific articles on the nervous and immune systems. Dr. Moffett is also the author and webmaster of the political opinion website www.Factinista.org, and is a Managing Editor at OpEdNews.com.
John R MoffettDr. John Moffett is an active research neuroscientist in the Washington, DC area, who has published over 45 scientific articles on the nervous and immune systems. Dr. Moffett is also the author and webmaster of the political opinion website www.Factinista.org, and is a Managing Editor at OpEdNews.com.

Local meat and produce are a great idea

Thanks Suzanne,

I concur, and we also are cooking human food for our dogs. I should point out however, that dogs are not true carnivores, they are omnivores like people. Cats are obligate carnivores, but dogs are clearly omnivorous which is why many commercial dog foods are based on grains such as rice.

I don't know if you caught my OpEd article earlier this week on the same topic, but it is clear that the human food supply is no longer as safe as it once was.

http://www.opednews.com/articles/opedne_john_r_m_070501_is_china_slowly_pois.htm

This is at least in part due to Bush's dismantling of the FDA.

Getting your meat and produce locally is a fantastic idea, and everyone should check for farmer’s markets and local produce in their area by going to the Sierra Club’s “Zoomer”, and plug in your zip code under “Markets”:

http://zoomer.sierraclub.org/

John

by John R Moffett (80 articles, 14 quicklinks, 2 diaries, 601 comments) on Friday, May 4, 2007 at 10:00:44 AM
 


.
Honest Human.

dogs are carnivores

John,

Thank you for your comment.

I have to disagree with you, however, about dogs being "clearly omnivorous which is why many commercial dog foods are based on grains such as rice." Dog foods are based on grain such as corn, soy, rice, wheat, etc. because it's a "value-added" product for grain manufacturers. It has nothing to do with the dogs' digestive systems. It's a cheap way to manufacture protein, which our dogs can't digest. 

For an absolutely outstanding and scientific read on this subject, check out Raw Meaty Bones by Tom Lonsdale, DVM. 

Suzanne

by Honest Human (3 articles, 1 quicklinks, 0 diaries, 3 comments) on Friday, May 4, 2007 at 11:03:10 AM
 


Dr. John Moffett is an active research neuroscientist in the Washington, DC area, who has published over 45 scientific articles on the nervous and immune systems. Dr. Moffett is also the author and webmaster of the political opinion website www.Factinista.org, and is a Managing Editor at OpEdNews.com.
John R MoffettDr. John Moffett is an active research neuroscientist in the Washington, DC area, who has published over 45 scientific articles on the nervous and immune systems. Dr. Moffett is also the author and webmaster of the political opinion website www.Factinista.org, and is a Managing Editor at OpEdNews.com.

Maybe for some vets, but not to biologists

I know that there is a lot of controversy over whether dogs are carnivores or omnivores, and many web sites say dogs are absolute carnivores. But as most biologists like me will tell you, despite having the teeth of carnivores, dogs have the intestines of true omnivores, and digest grain completely (97% or more). Indeed, wolves and fox eat a substantial amount of plant material in the wild because it is good for them.

Dogs have evolved with the people that have bred them for 20,000+ years, and are even more adapted to a varied, omnivorous diet than wolves.

Dogs are omnivorous, and it is fine to feed them rice mixed with meat. A meat-only diet puts a lot of strain on dog’s kidneys.

In any case, our dogs love the food we make them, and it is about 1/3 to ½ rice. They tend to live over 16 or 17 years on what we feed them.

by John R Moffett (80 articles, 14 quicklinks, 2 diaries, 601 comments) on Friday, May 4, 2007 at 11:38:07 AM
 


Dr. John Moffett is an active research neuroscientist in the Washington, DC area, who has published over 45 scientific articles on the nervous and immune systems. Dr. Moffett is also the author and webmaster of the political opinion website www.Factinista.org, and is a Managing Editor at OpEdNews.com.
John R MoffettDr. John Moffett is an active research neuroscientist in the Washington, DC area, who has published over 45 scientific articles on the nervous and immune systems. Dr. Moffett is also the author and webmaster of the political opinion website www.Factinista.org, and is a Managing Editor at OpEdNews.com.

Wikipedia on dog diet

 

From Widipedia... 

At present, there is some debate as to whether domestic dogs should be classified as omnivores or carnivores, by diet. The classification in the Order Carnivora does not necessarily mean that a dog's diet must be restricted to meat; unlike an obligate carnivore, such as the cat family with its shorter small intestine, a dog is dependent on neither meat-specific protein nor a very high level of protein in order to fulfill its basic dietary requirements. Dogs are able to healthily digest a variety of foods including vegetables and grains, and in fact dogs can consume a large proportion of these in their diet. Wild canines not only eat available plants to obtain essential amino acids, but also obtain nutrients from vegetable matter from the stomach and intestinal contents of their herbivorous prey, which they usually consume.

by John R Moffett (80 articles, 14 quicklinks, 2 diaries, 601 comments) on Friday, May 4, 2007 at 11:41:29 AM
 


I am a breeder of Australian Shepherds and raw feeder since 1998.
sherylI am a breeder of Australian Shepherds and raw feeder since 1998.

Dogs are carnivores

Sorry, but dogs are carnivores.  Look at their physiology;

http://rawfed.com/myths/omnivores.html

http://b-naturals.com/Spr1999.php

http://www.dogtorj.net/id51.html

http://www.geocities.com/havens_home/feedraw.htm

Read David Mech's works on wolves.   Dogs and wolves have nearly identical DNA and they surely have identical physiology.  Wolves shake out the stomach contents of their prey.  They do not eat the plant matter of their prey.  Sure they eat some grasses but those pass thru in about the same state they entered.   Or they may eat some berries when they haven't made a kill in a while.  But they do not seek out plant material or grain in preference over meat.

 I have dogs who have never eaten any vegetable matter or grains and are the healthiest dogs I've ever had.  Why would feeding a dog something it's system cannot digest be good for it?  I don't understand that logic.  Just because dogs CAN exist on a diet consisting largely of grains and plant matter doesn't mean it's optimal.  I have fed a raw diet to my dogs since 1998 and quit the veggies and grains in 2005.  My dogs have eaten prey model style for over 2 yrs now and are thriving!!!

 

 

by sheryl (0 articles, 0 quicklinks, 0 diaries, 1 comments) on Friday, May 4, 2007 at 3:53:59 PM
 


I am a former Ohio steelworker, disabled in an industrial accident in 2003. I am concerned about the ways in which the people we pay to protect us trashing our country and way of life.
mattzcatI am a former Ohio steelworker, disabled in an industrial accident in 2003. I am concerned about the ways in which the people we pay to protect us trashing our country and way of life.

Off track

Carnivore or Omnivore is a moot point. The article's main point was the safety and quality control of what is in a bag/can of dog food. The melamine was added to the wheat gluten to purposely defraud the public by giving false readings of the protein analysis. I do not believe that this was the idea of some chinese supplier. Some corporate bigwig got exactly what he ordered!

by mattzcat (0 articles, 0 quicklinks, 1 diaries, 58 comments) on Saturday, May 5, 2007 at 2:44:14 AM
 


Dr. John Moffett is an active research neuroscientist in the Washington, DC area, who has published over 45 scientific articles on the nervous and immune systems. Dr. Moffett is also the author and webmaster of the political opinion website www.Factinista.org, and is a Managing Editor at OpEdNews.com.
John R MoffettDr. John Moffett is an active research neuroscientist in the Washington, DC area, who has published over 45 scientific articles on the nervous and immune systems. Dr. Moffett is also the author and webmaster of the political opinion website www.Factinista.org, and is a Managing Editor at OpEdNews.com.

scientists and vets can disagree

Mattzcat is correct. The main issue is food safety, which has declined. Esoteric discussions about meat vs. grain, raw vs. cooked are far less important for health. I also suspect you are right that corporate people have known about this for some time. Let's hope the Democrats pass more food safety and inspection legislation.

But just for the record, a raw meat diet can be dangerous, in the case of parasites or bacteria in the meat (despite what those web sites say). Modern science and medicine say cooking is good, in fact, essential. I concur. If humans followed the same concept of going back to some primeval human diet, we would only eat raw roots, berries, and an occasional dead animal.

Finally, while I realize that there is no point in arguing the issue, dogs are not obligate carnivores like cats. You don't need a long small intestine if your eating only meat. It's just a fact. So we need to define “optimal”. Optimal diets lead to long healthy lives, and my dogs live very long lives without medical issues.

I have never understood the “only raw meat” for dogs concept. There is no scientific evidence that says it is an optimal diet. The links you sent do not appear to be written by scientists. They also have incorrect information, including the idea that dogs have a relatively short “foregut”. That is wrong. I don’t understand why they keep repeating that. I found their “myths” section to be full of inaccuracies (myths). Like I said, detailed studies have shown that dogs digest more than 97% of the grain starch they are fed, so the idea that they can’t digest it is demonstrably wrong. When web sites report such myths as facts, it reduces their credibility.

If raw was so important, why don’t people only eat raw foods? The information presented there goes against all scientific and medical research. The idea that proteins and vitamins are destroyed by cooking is wrong. Stomach acid is far more destructive than cooking, but is necessary for digestion and absorption. Ask any biologist. Finally, people and animals get many of their vitamins and other nutrients from their enteric (gut) bacteria, that is one area of my research.

In any case, we can just agree to disagree. My dogs get cooked food, including meat and grains, and I am confident that it is very healthy for them. And they love it! 

 

by John R Moffett (80 articles, 14 quicklinks, 2 diaries, 601 comments) on Saturday, May 5, 2007 at 6:03:30 AM
 


Interested in canine health - have been raising my dogs naturally for almost a decade
TeraInterested in canine health - have been raising my dogs naturally for almost a decade

credibility of sources

Like Suzanne and Sheryl, I feed a carnivorous diet to my dogs.  The information they've provided is very good.  In your last post, John, you seem to question the credibility of the sources Suzanne and Sheryl have provided.  I wonder, then, why you've chosen to support your claim that dogs are omnivores with information from Wikipedia, a sight nearly anyone can post information on, innaccurate or not.

 I do not mean to begin a large argument here, but I do assume someone else will read this article and its comments, and I do not want them being mislead to think they should be feeding their dogs grains.  You seem adamant about the fact that dogs are omnivores, John, just as Suzanne, Sheryl, and I will argue they are carnivores.  Therefore, I do not expect to change your mind. 

However, for the reader of this conversation who is on the fence, I strongly suggest you look at the sources Suzanne and Sheryl have provided and continue doing your own reasearch as well.  I do not suggest you refer to Wikipedia, and I also do not suggest you throw away any information not prescribed by a "scientist."  Remember, dog food companies have funded many "scientific" studies themselves, and anyone even comsidering feeding raw understands the danger in believing those studies.

by Tera (0 articles, 0 quicklinks, 0 diaries, 1 comments) on Saturday, May 5, 2007 at 11:24:27 AM
 


Live in Ohio 
ChristineLive in Ohio 

Dogs as Carnivores

I will agree with John on one point.  Dogs are not obligate carnivores.  They are carnivores who, if starving and unable to find meat, will eat various fruits and grasses.  Their preferred and ideal diet, however, is large prey. 

Those of us who feed the carnivore diet do not feed "only meat".  We feed a variety of muscle meat, bones and organs including raw green tripe.  By feeding as many parts of the animal as possible, we provide the complete range of vitamins and minerals required by a carnivore.  My dogs eat whole prey as often as possible and I buy a wide variety of animal parts.  Today I was at a public market where I was able to find a wide variety of meat and organs including liver, stomachs, heart, kidneys, sweet breads and even a lovely goat head for my dogs. 

I hope you will do further research, John, and consider feeding the appropriate diet to your dogs.  While I agree that your cooked diet is better than the commercial diet, a raw diet would be far superior and the health of your dogs would improve in ways you never dreamed possible.

Christine 

 

by Christine (0 articles, 0 quicklinks, 0 diaries, 1 comments) on Saturday, May 5, 2007 at 1:05:31 PM
 


Dr. John Moffett is an active research neuroscientist in the Washington, DC area, who has published over 45 scientific articles on the nervous and immune systems. Dr. Moffett is also the author and webmaster of the political opinion website www.Factinista.org, and is a Managing Editor at OpEdNews.com.
John R MoffettDr. John Moffett is an active research neuroscientist in the Washington, DC area, who has published over 45 scientific articles on the nervous and immune systems. Dr. Moffett is also the author and webmaster of the political opinion website www.Factinista.org, and is a Managing Editor at OpEdNews.com.

Obligate Carnivores

Hi Folks,

 OK, I feel obliged to write an article on this. I only used the wiki post as a simple explanation of a biological fact. I have a bunch of peer-reviewed PDF files here for any scientists in the crowd who would like to read them.

 Dogs can eat 100% meat and live fine. They can also do very well on a diet with about 30% meat. They are very adaptable.

 But it is a scientific fact that dogs are not "obligate carnivores". At least if you accept the scientific definition of obligate carnivore.

 My article will be posted shortly. I hope it will be helpful, rather than argumentative.

John 

by John R Moffett (80 articles, 14 quicklinks, 2 diaries, 601 comments) on Saturday, May 5, 2007 at 2:02:02 PM
 


Harpist, unemployed blue collar worker, and Bush basher living deep in the heart of Texas.
PappyHarpist, unemployed blue collar worker, and Bush basher living deep in the heart of Texas.

Beyond the inanely moot question...

...of whether or not dogs can tolerate grain in their diet is the incredibly important, and unanswered question of why in the name of the goddess do we need to import ANY foodstuffs whatsoever from China!? Was I asleep somewhere in recent history when American stopped being the place of food production preeminence? Am I wrong in thinking that food production on our own shores is far superior to anything grown outside of our borders?

I know there's a big push on to outsource everything that we can so corporations can make insanely criminal profits, but outsourcing our food supply, whether for us or for our canine and feline companions, is sheer lunacy. It's cheap just for the sake of being cheap.

We grow lots of rice right here. We grow lots of corn here. We grow lots of wheat here. We have cows, chickens, and pigs in farms that dot every inch of available agricultural space we haven't turned into strip malls. So why the need to get food from anywhere else?

The FDA's inspection arm has been hurt by the tax cutting, spending cutting idiots in DC. Inspections of our home food chain have been so bad as to allow E. Coli outbreaks, and other food borne problems. International food inspection is all but non-existent. How can we think that the cost savings of buying anything edible by us or our pets that comes from anywhere other than our own land is a good thing?

I know I have asked more questions than I have answered, but that's just the reality. Whether or not a dog (or cat) is a carnivore or an omnivore is completely unimportant when compared to whether or not importing food from China for humans to eat is a good idea.

In my opinion, let the Chinese choke on their melamine "enhanced" food. Whether or not it directly comes into our bodies, or gets there through the carcasses of the animals we slaughter for consumption, it is finding its way into our bodies. With the amount of G-A-R-B-A-G-E we already consume, do we really need to put known toxic chemicals in at the same time?

I mean, come on people!

I'd be really sad to see my lovely cat, Ashley, destroyed by purposely tainted pet food. I'd be even sadder to see my roommate in his coffin because of this shit. So why the fuck quibble over whether or not a dog is a carnivore or an omnivore?

It's a complete waste of time. It misses the point in a big way. Unfortunately, it seems that progressives are so busy trying to be right over moot points, they miss the big picture.

If Fido dies, you can get a new puppy anywhere. We have more than enough feral cats and dogs making more feral cats and dogs to give two shits about what happens when they eat pet food laced with melamine, or whether they can digest grains. If your husband, wife, son, daughter, friend, roommate, or lover dies because of melamine getting into OUR food chain, they are gone for good. The question of whether they were omnivores or carnivores wouldn't even enter into the debate. So why the insistence it happen here?

Frankly, sometimes I really don't get the progressive mindset.

Blessed be!
Pappy

by Pappy (61 articles, 0 quicklinks, 11 diaries, 863 comments) on Saturday, May 5, 2007 at 1:11:35 PM
 


Harpist, unemployed blue collar worker, and Bush basher living deep in the heart of Texas.
PappyHarpist, unemployed blue collar worker, and Bush basher living deep in the heart of Texas.

First of all...

...please stop being so presumptuous. I am very much a social liberal. While I'm sure that once you find that I am also a Libertarian, you are going to start saying I am as close to Republican as a gay man can get without becoming a Log Cabin Republican. Once again, you would be incredibly presumptuous and wrong.

You can continue to quibble over completely bullshit side issues, or deal with the reality that the melamine that has found its way into livestock feed has now found its way into OUR food supply. That means there is yet another toxic chemical floating around in our food supply. Because of that, it's a surety that someone somewhere (or many someones) is going to get sick and die from the cumulative effects of this contamination.

This is the important issue. This is the important reality. Anything else, any other side issue pales in comparison! Debating whether a dog is a carnivore or not will not bring back your loved one when they die from melamine toxicity.

So, why on earth was so much time and effort spent on arguing a stupid and completely moot point?

I am not the enforcer for what people discuss here. I am not the arbiter of others' ideas. I am not the comment police.

However, there comes a time when I feel someone needs to bring people back around to reality. In my opinion, the discussion about dog anatomy and gastronomic function was completely off topic.

My point, which you ignored to attempt to put me down, was and remains that there is absolutely NO REASON for the USA to import foodstuffs from anywhere. We can grow anything here. We have lots of farms. There is no reason whatsoever to outsource our diets. We have already outsourced American jobs. Do we now have to outsource food production? Has anyone even bothered to ask that question?

Nope.

The FDA and the USDA have been tragically underfunded under the asshole DUBYA and his regime. The only thing that receives less inspection than native foodstuffs is foodstuffs from other countries. Has anyone bothered to ask why that is?

Nope.

But there was plenty of discussion about dogs and their digestive tracts.

How dumb is that?

So, it's ok for you to admit that I made a good point without trying to say I wouldn't understand about being a liberal. That kind of bullshit is one of the many reasons I sometimes question the mindset carried by those who label themselves progressive. Just because you think you tow the party line so nicely is no reason to assume that those who don't; those who think for themselves are wrong.

Blessed be!
Pappy

by Pappy (61 articles, 0 quicklinks, 11 diaries, 863 comments) on Sunday, May 6, 2007 at 9:12:09 PM
 

 

14 comments

 

Tell A Friend

 


Copyright © OpEdNews, 2002-2008

Blog Ads

 

 

 

 

Most Popular Articles
in the Last 2 Days
(by Recommend Emails)

Sarah Palin, A Wolf in Moose Clothing by Anthony Wade

Librarians Against Sarah Palin Founder a Mystery by Judy Swindler

John McCain: Morally, Mentally, and Emotionally Unfit by Jim Fetzer

Iran War ~ How It Will Unfold by Lord Stirling

Sarah Palin: Small Mind In A Big Little Town by Judy Swindler

Protester who interrupted McCain's speech is an Iraq War Veteran by Mary MacElveen

IS SARAH PALIN SATAN? by Sherman Yellen

Falujah Veteran is Attacked by McCain Republicans at Speech by Dean Powers

Live OEN Street Medic Report From Occupied St Paul by Michael Cavlan

So How Many Poor Vietnamese Did McCain's Bombs Kill in 23 Runs? by Jay Janson

Popularity Navigation
Control Panel:

Select Time
6 hrs 12 hrs
1 Day 2 Days
3 Days 1 Week
2 Weeks 1 Month
2 Months 3 Months
6 Months Last Year
Select Content
Articles Diaries
Polls Events
All Op-Eds
News Life/Arts/Science
Select Popularity
Page Views
# of Comments
Recommend Emails
  

Go To Top 50 Most Popular