 |
|
Add to My Group
|
March 5, 2008 at 10:04:23
by Kyle Hunt Page 1 of 3 page(s) |
|
 
|
I lay very still. The thought we once had was finally catching hold again. Birth of a Star What we call “I” began as tiny vibrations of energy. We began to grow as the cloud of material, which were the lesser energies around us, became incorporated into our orbit. We took mass. We were mainly only plasma way back then, though. We had a guidebook – a set of rules - that showed us how to develop. And we were nurtured along the way by the loving vibrations surrounding and engulfing us. 
When we were ready to be “born”, we left our mothers. It was a less tranquil, volatile existence, but we burned brightly. We took in more mass, but this time in a much clumsier fashion - through engulfing. We eventually we got the hang of it and were able to consume many different sources of energy.
As we sometimes ate inefficient sources of energy without burning it, we took on some slowly vibrating energy. This stopped us from burning very brightly - it actually smoldered our inner flame. It was not in vain, though, as this mass was only providing convenient storage for later consumption- so we could grow even bigger and brighter.
By reaching out into the world, we were able to develop a perception and conception of what we call reality. And we were very much in control of it. When we wanted something, it was provided for us. All we had to do was ask in our simple ways.
We can still remember those old days. Our world appeared to us in its true nature: as radiating energy. But somewhere along the line, we seemed to forget this. We forgot that we can change the way we view our reality, and in doing so, create the future.
We were made to feel powerless, insignificant, and ineffectual. At one point, we might have considered ourselves to be separate. But then truth flooded through us in a wave of brilliance.
Scale
Our true nature does not become immediately apparent when we only consider our reality within a limited framework.
We might feel very small when we imagine that our sun is only a small star in the midst of an expansive, unfathomably large galaxy full of stars much bigger than our own. And this Milky Way Galaxy is only one galaxy among myriads.
But we can also imagine downward in scale. Our bodies are made up of organs, each of which has a specialized function, intended to support our existence in this realm. Each of these organs is made of tissue, which is a collection of cells working together to produce an effect. We do not usually have to tell them what to do, but they sure tell us when there is a crisis. Each one of these smaller parts is a living microcosm of us!
And below this, our cell has beautifully crafted parts, which are also made of even more fascinating parts – all of which are made up purely of energy. Each one of these smaller parts is a living microcosm of us! When this all works in a cohesive, balanced, and constructive manner, the “I am” begins to materialize as a strong, yet submissive force. This is all us!
The Nature of Light
Through quantum physics, we were able to show that an event and its observer are always inherently linked. Heisenberg’s uncertainty principle indicates that if we probe the exact location of any particle, then we are clueless to its momentum or energy, and vice versa. This is because “matter” is not made up of divisible and solid parts – as we once viewed the atom. This dualistic nature of energy allows it to manifest in both wave and photon form. We came to understand that space and time are also connected in this incredible way.
The views expressed in this article are the sole responsibility of the author
and do not necessarily reflect those of this website or its editors.
 Contact Author |
Contact Editor |
 View Authors' Articles |
|
|
|
|
| 11 comments |
|
Light & Energy,,
Are the ultimate limitations. What we are is an aware of being aware nothing. Everything else is the illusion of: mass energy space and time. These four add up to the separateness which is also a lie. It's not higher dimensions or rarefied energy you seek, What you seek is the seeker which is in reality, nothing. A nothing which can conceive the universe in the palm of it's hand. by "Hoss" David P. (51 articles, 5 quicklinks, 14 diaries, 338 comments [4 recommended, 0 rejected]) on Wednesday, Mar 5, 2008 at 11:52:43 AM  (0+)
|
|
Reply: I thinks you get it
We do too. by Ferdinand (17 articles, 4 quicklinks, 39 diaries, 259 comments) on Wednesday, Mar 5, 2008 at 12:01:44 PM (0+)
|
|
Reply: 112358
I and i met in the 2nd millenium, in the 3rd month, on the 5th day, of the 8th year. Patterns all around us are labeled as "coincidence." :-) by Ferdinand (17 articles, 4 quicklinks, 39 diaries, 259 comments) on Wednesday, Mar 5, 2008 at 4:38:50 PM (0+)
|
|
a wonderful explanation
Point illustrated beautifully in my opinion. This is a great explanation for a novice to the idea of mixing religion and science. And no matter which way we go, infinitesimally small or grotesquely large, we will end up in the same place. by Angela Zayak (8 articles, 0 quicklinks, 6 diaries, 36 comments) on Wednesday, Mar 5, 2008 at 5:38:56 PM (0+)
|
|
Reply: a wonderful name
Thank you for the kind words. Although I find many labels to be frivolous, yours is fabulous. You are an angel: incorporating both the Alpha and the Omega. I am glad you have found resonance in this explanation. by Ferdinand (17 articles, 4 quicklinks, 39 diaries, 259 comments) on Wednesday, Mar 5, 2008 at 5:55:28 PM (0+)
|
|
Just do pure halluciantion
If you want to hallucinate go ahead. Don't drag quantum physics, or science, into it. Your Star Theory is not even sci-fi. by TomK (0 articles, 0 quicklinks, 0 diaries, 330 comments [22 recommended, 0 rejected]) on Wednesday, Mar 5, 2008 at 11:37:34 PM (0+)
|
|
Reply: May I suggest meditation?
It seems that your reality is very divided. This is probably because you do not realize that we have three I's - literally. Objects to the right of us vibrate (usually through reflection) frequencies of visible light that are received through our eyes. The cones in our eyes - at the fovea - receive the more detailed and colorful information, while our rods are able to pick up movement and contrast. This light then crosses over at the optic chiasm, and is then transmitted through the LGN (lateral geniculate nucleus)- where color is filtered out - over to our left occipital lobe. The opposite process is completed for our left field of vision. As we know, both the right and left hemispheres of our cortex can store light as information - at the cellular level this is done through long-term potentiation (LTP). But the way in which each hemisphere processes the vibrations around us is different, resulting in the left-brain/ right-brain split. Our own king - who pronounces "I am" - does not come into being until these two cameras can focus their 2-dimensional pictures. At the eyeball level this is done through the iris - kinda makes us question the name of Egyptian god Osiris, huh? And how when we understand something we say "I see," which is the actual pronunciation of Isis? But in the brain, there is an actual crossover that ocurrs between these hemispheres, and a balanced human can arise and grasp consciousness. This is because we are able to marry the two images into one cohesive "unity," and in doing so we are able to use our will to probe into the 3rd-dimension and see "distance" and "space." Through the use of memory and our will do to meta-analysis, we are able to perceive of dimensions, like space-time, that are beyond our physical existence in these dimensions. Unfortunately, it is the duality that I mentioned in the theory that causes us to fall into a divided state of being where everything appears as opposites and we cannot reconcile the logic and reason of the left with the emotions, creativity, and intuition of the right. Therefore, we have three different i's working in a less than harmonious fashion and we become psychologically scarred - furthering our divisions. You might consider the theory I have presented to be less than science fiction, but I - who we will call Kyle Hunt - cannot actually perceive of any lack of logic or reason in it. Can you please provide me flaws so I might rectify them? We must just be operating on different wavelength. I do wish you all could join me here. Start asking, "Who is it am I refering to when I say, 'I see'," and you might. Take care and thank you for reading. :-) by Ferdinand (17 articles, 4 quicklinks, 39 diaries, 259 comments) on Thursday, Mar 6, 2008 at 1:14:49 AM (0+)
|
|
Reply: 13, 21
And that was just how I becomes 3, and 2 becomes 1. 1123581321 Abre los ojos. by Ferdinand (17 articles, 4 quicklinks, 39 diaries, 259 comments) on Thursday, Mar 6, 2008 at 1:58:01 AM (0+)
|
|
Great Article
Religion and science are colliding more and more challenging the way we have been taught to perceive ourselves and Creation. It takes a spiritual mind to appreciate the beauty of the cosmos many channels and connections within all life forms. by Sharon Roach (15 articles, 0 quicklinks, 7 diaries, 184 comments [2 recommended, 0 rejected]) on Thursday, Mar 6, 2008 at 12:33:14 PM (0+)
|
|
Empty Mind
Only a totally empty mind can perceive the actualities. But how can there be meaning without mind to "interpret"? Meaning is a limitation. Meaning misses the mark, it is a contstruct. Weighed down by the literal mass of concepts, symbols and words. Ultimately shallow and contrived. Perhaps convenient. Just a process. Uh, What is the meaning of no meaning? Nothing, Nothing at all. "But isn't the concept of nothing, something?" Yes it is. Oh you must mean intuition or apperception? Substitute and label whatever process you want, it's still a process. But what is awareness with no object, what can self awareness be if there's again no object? How can you be aware of nothing? Right! Since it's nothing that is aware. Leave the mirror. Don't be a mirror. Nothing isn't something, it's everything. by "Hoss" David P. (51 articles, 5 quicklinks, 14 diaries, 338 comments [4 recommended, 0 rejected]) on Thursday, Mar 6, 2008 at 9:12:53 PM (0+)
|
|
Pathetic
Rarely am I at a loss for words, but this "article" brings me close. This is the most pathetic mental masturbation that I have encountered since est. by James Strait (39 articles, 0 quicklinks, 7 diaries, 193 comments [1 recommended, 0 rejected]) on Monday, Mar 17, 2008 at 10:36:44 AM (0+)
|
Want to post your own comment on this Article? 
|
||||
|
||||||||||||||
Must Read (0) 
Well Said (0) 
News (0) 
Touching (0) 
Funny (0) 
Supported (0) 
Interesting (0) 
Inspiring (0) 
Valuable (0)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Tell a Friend:
|
Copyright © 2002-2009, OpEdNews |
