General News

Many Americans Don't Realize Iraq War Is Illegal

By (about the author)     Permalink       (Page 1 of 2 pages)
Related Topic(s): ; ; ; ; ; , Add Tags Add to My Group(s)

View Ratings | Rate It

Become a Fan
  (46 fans)
- Advertisement -

Mistakenly, many Americans still believe President Bush's war on Iraq is justified because Congress supported it and funds it. 

 Yet, as international legal authority Francis Boyle of the University of Illinois points out, President Bush got congressional backing by lying that Hussein had W.M.D. and that Hussein was connected to 9/11.

That's fraud, probably the bloodiest, costliest lie in White House history. 

 Also, to start a war, a country needs UN Security Council approval, which Bush failed to get. Otherwise, a nation can fight only in self-defense when attacked.  

 By attacking Iraq, Bush violated the Hague Conventions of 1899 and 1907, the Kellogg-Briand Peace Pact of 1928, the UN Charter, the Tokyo War Crimes Tribunals, and the Nuremberg Charter, Judgment and Principles, Boyle said.

 As all treaties become the supreme law of the land under Article VI of the U.S. Constitution, the Bush-Cheney presidency is guilty of breaking all of the above, warmongering in spades.

 In testimony defending U.S. soldiers who have refused to fight in Iraq, Boyle noted that, under Nuremberg, "a soldier has a right to absent himself or herself from committing international crimes."

In short, if given a criminal order, the defense used by Adolf Eichmann, Hitler's master killer, that he was only doing his job, is a phony.

- Advertisement -

 Boyle testified that First Lt. Ehren Watada had the right, "if not the obligation," to say, "I don't want to participate in this." Watada faced an army court martial for not deploying with his unit for Iraq. Watada won a victory when the judge ruled a mistrial.

 Boyle believes, "A soldier has an obligation to disobey illegal orders," which he says is printed in black-and-white in the Army's Field Manual(AFM) 27-10. Without Security Council authority, President Bush's war is "a crime against peace," Boyle says.

That's also written in paragraph 498 of the AFM.  "Any person, whether a member of the armed forces or a civilian, who commits an act which constitutes a crime under international law is responsible therefore and liable to punishment (as)...crimes against peace," the AFM reads.

 This broad definition would seem to include trigger-happy private contractors in Iraq.And since the U.S. has committed war crimes in Iraq, U.S. soldiers are legally within their rights not to serve there, Boyle said. 

These crimes include torture of prisoners, authorized by former Defense Secretary Rumsfeld and White House lawyers; the use of cluster bombs in civilian areas; and the firing of depleted uranium shells--- this last also a violation of the Geneva Protocol of 1925. "It's a war crime," Boyle said, that is "not only poisoning Iraqis, it is poisoning our own troops."

- Advertisement -

 President Bush has repeatedly said the U.S. does not torture, but he is no objective arbiter in this matter. The International Committee of the Red Cross, with supervisory jurisdiction, says it is torture and that it is widespread and systematic.

Thus Bush and his colleagues are guilty of crimes against humanity. Curiously, the public reaction to these crimes includes a large measure of denial.

 If Congress okayed the war and funds it, many people think it's okay. Besides, much of the bloodshed is concealed from their view. Fox TV, for example, runs little film footage of the real carnage in Iraq while reporting endless trivia and gossip. Fox is also continuing its show "24" over Army protests that the series encourages U.S. troops to torture. 

Next Page  1  |  2


Sherwood Ross worked as a reporter for the Chicago Daily News and contributed a regular "Workplace" column for Reuters. He has contributed to national magazines and hosted a talk show on WOL, Washington, D.C. In the Sixties he was active as public (more...)

Share on Google Plus Submit to Twitter Add this Page to Facebook! Share on LinkedIn Pin It! Add this Page to Fark! Submit to Reddit Submit to Stumble Upon

Go To Commenting

The views expressed in this article are the sole responsibility of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of this website or its editors.

Writers Guidelines

Contact Author Contact Editor View Authors' Articles
Google Content Matches:
- Advertisement -

Most Popular Articles by this Author:     (View All Most Popular Articles by this Author)

U.S. Overthrow in the Ukraine Risks Nuclear War With Russia

Radioactive Ammunition Fired in Middle East May Claim More Lives Than Hiroshima and Nagasaki

Obama Expands the American Warfare State


Is George W. Bush Sane?

Inside America's Biological Warfare Center


The time limit for entering new comments on this article has expired.

This limit can be removed. Our paid membership program is designed to give you many benefits, such as removing this time limit. To learn more, please click here.

Comments: Expand   Shrink   Hide  
7 people are discussing this page, with 9 comments
To view all comments:
Expand Comments
(Or you can set your preferences to show all comments, always)

Now this is a good article! Finally someone talkin... by J D on Saturday, Oct 13, 2007 at 6:48:27 PM
This article lays out plainly that the current adm... by Mark A. Goldman on Saturday, Oct 13, 2007 at 7:51:23 PM
Well put Mr. Goldman.And where exactly will we fin... by Munich on Saturday, Oct 13, 2007 at 11:02:26 PM
There are many people who would be the kind of pre... by Mark A. Goldman on Sunday, Oct 14, 2007 at 12:12:12 PM
"Mistakenly, many Americans still believ... by delia on Sunday, Oct 14, 2007 at 2:24:44 AM
Many Americans don't realize that "Operat... by Tony Forest on Sunday, Oct 14, 2007 at 4:38:47 AM
Thanks for the feedback, all very sensible. The my... by Sherwood Ross on Sunday, Oct 14, 2007 at 8:41:10 AM
how right you are. And what a super neato name ! N... by Tony Forest on Sunday, Oct 14, 2007 at 10:35:51 AM
I addressed this exact point back in December of 2... by Mary MacElveen on Sunday, Oct 14, 2007 at 10:24:47 PM