Tag(s): ; ; , Add Tags
Add to My Group(s)

View Ratings | Rate It

Permalink
View Article Stats      (4 comments)

NY Times/ CBS Poll Analysis: Only 15% Support Action Against Iran, Cheney Postiives at Record Low

Add this Page to Facebook!
Submit to Twitter
Submit to Reddit
Submit to Stumble Upon

Tell A Friend

Become a Fan
Get Embed HTML Code
By (about the author)

Become a Fan Become a Fan  (176 fans)   -- Page 1 of 3 page(s)

opednews.com

There's a new March 7-11, 2007 NY Times/ CBS News poll. They've provided some of the basic stats so I've dug in to find some of the interesting findings, some of which, are not being reported in the 15 second sound bytes.

The poll was based on responses from 1,362 respondents, 698 of them Republican, 52% of them women.


Support for action against Iran has dropped significantly. from 15 or 21% in February, to 10% in this poll. The belief that Iran is a threat that can be contained with diplomacy now rose to its highest level of all the past polls reported-- 65%, with Republicans polling even higher, at 69%.

When asked, "members of the Bush administration have accused IRAN of supporting Iraqi insurgents by supplying them with weapons to use against American forces. When members of the Bush administration talk about Iran's involvement in Iraq" only 14% believed the Bush administration was telling the entire truth.


You have to wonder with such weak support for action against Iran, why the congressional Democrats have removed the part of their legislation requiring Bush to go to congress before taking action against Iran. This happened after the annual AIPAC meeting. The congress, both Democratic and Republican sides, are way to fearful of and influenced by AIPAC.


On most points, George Bush's low ratings have improved by a few points-- on Iraq, on Terrorism, the economy...


Congress dropped a few. The republican party actually hit a new low.

The question, "In general, is your opinion of the Republican party favorable or not favorable?"
brought a response of 34% favorable, 58% unfavorable-- the lowest favorable rating since 1994.

The questions, "In general, is your opinion of the Democratic party favorable or not favorable?"
brought a response of 47% favorable to 43% unfavorable.


Next, they asked what first words come to mind for Republicans and Democrats.
People thought-
-Bad/negative one third more for Republicans (16 to 12)
-Good positive 120% more for Democrats (11 to 5)
-Corrupt-- three times as much for Republicans (9 to 3)

Bad/negative was the highest percentage word for Republicans. Liberal was the highest percentage word for Democrats.


Here's a major one. They asked, "Which comes closer to your view: Government should do more to solve national problems; or Government is doing too many things better left to businesses and individuals?"
The results:
41 % Government should do more 52% Government doing too much

These numbers, alone, are deceiving. This question has poll results dating back to 1994. This is the strongest support for govenment seen in the history of this poll question. For some reason, the last time the question was asked, or at least, was listed, was July 2000.

In the previous polls, the highest pro government response was 34%, except for three polls, one reaching 38% in 1998, and two in 1996 at 36%. The support for government dropped to as low as 24% in 1995. Yet, this new poll has REPUBLICANS supporting government at a 35% level.

The immigration issue is not as strong as Republicans might hope. The difference between those who support allowing immigrants already in the states versus deporting them is about the same as previous polls, and the difference between the percentage who support maintaining levels of immigration versus decreasing levels is less than many previous polls.

When asked whether the respondent is a Republican, Democrat or independent, the response for this poll was:

Next Page  1  |  2  |  3

 

Rob Kall is executive editor, publisher and site architect of OpEdNews.com, Host of the Rob Kall Bottom Up Radio Show (WNJC 1360 AM), President of Futurehealth, Inc, more...)
 

The views expressed in this article are the sole responsibility of the author
and do not necessarily reflect those of this website or its editors.

Contact Author Contact Editor View Authors' Articles

Follow Me on Twitter

 

Share this page: (what's this?)                   Tell a Friend: Tell A Friend

Add this Page to Facebook!      Submit to Stumble Upon      Submit to Reddit      Add This Page to Mr Wong!           NEWSVINE      DEl.ICIO.US      Looksmart Furl      My Web      Blink List     (More...)

Comments

The time limit for entering new comments on this article has expired.

This limit can be removed. Our paid membership program is designed to give you many benefits, such as removing this time limit. To learn more, please click here.

Comments: Expand   Shrink   Hide  
4 comments
To view all comments:
Expand Comments
(Or you can set your preferences to show all comments, always)

There's no hope, if the duopoly mindset is not broken. by Richard Mynick on Tuesday, Mar 13, 2007 at 11:51:50 AM
I agree, there is no hope, if you ignore scientifically... by Steven Leser on Tuesday, Mar 13, 2007 at 12:17:34 PM
I'm not saying the poll's a sham, but rather that its by Richard Mynick on Tuesday, Mar 13, 2007 at 1:09:00 PM
Again, the exact sort of things the Freepers say, with the by Steven Leser on Tuesday, Mar 13, 2007 at 2:59:30 PM