Tags for This Article:

2006 Election Primaries (423)  2006 Campaigns Incumbents To Dump (354)   (347)  2006 Campaigns Candidates Progressive (328)   (320)  Lieberman-Joe (215)  Lamont Ned (43) 

Populum Tag Cloud
       Control Panel
Fine tune your search to access content
Articles
Diaries Products
Events All
All time
Last 6 mos
Last month
Last week
Last 24 hrs
From:
Month  Day   Year

To:
Month  Day   Year
Alphabet
Popularity
Count ON
Count OFF
This Level
Sub-levels

 

 

 

Tag(s): ; ; ; ;
Add to My Group
July 28, 2006 at 06:56:53

A Ned Lamont Landslide?

by Jpol     Page 1 of 2 page(s)

www.opednews.com

 
Tell A Friend

(0.0 from 0 ratings) View Ratings | Rate It

Taking its cue from a press release that accompanied the latest Quinnipiac poll, the mainstream media is predicting a close Connecticut primary contest that could go either way. Ned Lamont holds a narrow 4-point edge over Joe Lieberman, but that falls well within the polls +/- 3.8 percentage point margin of error. Is it really that close? Careful analysis of the data suggests otherwise. In fact, Lamont may be heading for a landslide victory on August 8th.

The Quinnipiac Press Release:



July 20, 2006 - Lamont Inches Ahead Of Lieberman In Dem Primary, Quinnipiac University Connecticut Poll Finds; Incumbent Still Leads In 3-Way November Match up

Anti-war Connecticut U.S. Senate candidate Ned Lamont has surged to a razor-thin 51 - 47 percent lead over incumbent Sen. Joseph Lieberman among likely Democratic primary voters, according to a Quinnipiac University poll released today..."

"Lamont has turned what looked like a blowout into a very close Democratic primary race," said Quinnipiac University Poll Director Douglas Schwartz, Ph.D.

"Lamont is up, while Lieberman's Democratic support is dropping. More Democrats have a favorable opinion of Lamont, who was largely unknown last month, and see him as an acceptable alternative to Lieberman. But Lieberman's strength among Republicans and independents gives him the lead in a three-way match up in November."...



Just how does a narrow 4-point lead translate into an August blow-out? Read on.

LIEBERMAN IS IN A FREE-FALL THAT HAS YET TO BOTTOM OUT:

Lieberman's job approval rating in the latest Quinnipiac poll conducted July 13-18, 2006 stands at 55%, down from 73% in January 2005 (-25%); down from 62% in January 2006 (-11%); and down 31% from his 80% approval rating in September 2000 when he last ran for the Senate. Ironically, it is only among Republicans that he has not suffered severe job approval erosion. He has a 70% job approval rating among registered Republicans versus 73% in January 2005 (-4%). Among Democrats he has slipped from a 72% Job Approval rating to 47% (-35%). Among Independents he has dropped from 72% to 52% (-28%).

Perhaps even more dramatic are his disapproval ratings. From January 2005 to July 2006 Lieberman's disapproval ratings have increased by 133% among all registered voters (from 15% to 35%); by 193% among Democrats (from 15% to 44%); and by 157% among independents (from 14% to 36%). Among Republicans he is disapproved of by only 22% versus 18% in January 2005.

A declining percentage of voters also have a favorable opinion of Lieberman personally. In the latest Quinnipiac poll he was viewed favorably by only 40% of Democrats (down from 50% in January 2006) and by 42% of Independents (down from 52% in January 2006).

Keep in mind that the numbers cited above are trends. The latest Quinnipiac poll was completed nearly two months before the August 8th Connecticut Primary, and if these trends continue unabated, Lieberman's job approval and favorable ratings could be much lower by Primary Day. The fact that Joe Lieberman decided to collect signatures for a possible independent run for the Senate at a time when he maintained a still strong 15-point lead against Lamont in the polls suggests that private polling told him he was not looking good in the August primary. There is no reason to believe that Lieberman has bottomed out as of yet. Indeed his downward spiral could well accelerate as growing national media attention causes Connecticut voters to focus more closely on the fast-approaching August primary.

NED LAMONT'S SURGE:

A 51 to 47 Lamont edge over Lieberman in the latest Quinnipiac poll may not sound like much -- until you put it in context. That number represents a very significant 19-point swing since the previous Quinnipiac poll was completed only six weeks earlier. Indeed the Lamont surge is nothing short of spectacular since he formally declared his candidacy barely four months before, on March 13, 2006:


  • The February 2006 Quinnipiac poll (February 10-16), conducted before Lamont formally entered the race, gave Lieberman a seemingly insurmountable 55-point edge (68% to 13% with 17% undecided).

  • The April 2006 Quinnipiac poll (April 25-30) showed a slight improvement for Lamont, but Lieberman still held a commanding 46-point point lead (65% to 19% with 14% undecided) with only three and-a-half-months remaining until the primary.

  • The June 2006 Quinnipiac poll (May 31-June 6), still seemed, at first glance, like good news for Lieberman. It showed him with 25-point lead over Lamont (57% to 32% with 11% undecided). Those numbers represented healthy gains for Lamont, but they still seemed to leave him too far behind to catch up. This time, however, Quinnipiac also included "likely Democratic Primary voters," and among that group Lieberman's lead dropped to a much slimmer 15-point lead (55% to 40%). For the first time Lamont seemed within striking distance of catching Lieberman, though it still seemed a daunting task.

  • As noted earlier, the July 2006 Quinnipiac poll revealed a paper-thin 4-point lead for Lamont over Lieberman (51% to 47% with 2% undecided). Were it not for the trend-line the Lamont lead would be statistically insignificant, but the trend-line is there and it is impossible to ignore. In barely four months since declaring his candidacy, Lamont has gone from a 46-point deficit to a 4-point advantage against Lieberman -- an incredible 50-point vote shift. If that trend were mathematically projected forward Lamont would enjoy a 24-point edge over Lieberman by the August 8th Primary Day.


QUINNIPIAC DATA SUGGESTS LAMONT MAY BE PULLING AWAY:


  • According to the July 2006 Quinnipiac poll 24% of respondents who had intended to vote for Lieberman, informed of his strong support for the Iraq war, indicated that they disagreed with his position on the war. Of those who disagreed, another 24% indicated that they would change their vote based on that issue alone. Those respondents would have swung Lamont's 4-point edge to a 9-point edge.

  • WHO IS NED LAMONT? That may seem like a strange question to ask about someone who is beating a three-term, 18-year incumbent Senator and former Vice-Presidential and Presidential candidate in the polls, but the majority of Connecticut voters surveyed in the latest Quinnipiac poll, indicate that they do not know enough about Ned Lamont to have an opinion about him. In February, when Lamont trailed Lieberman by 55-points, 93% of those polled by Quinnipiac said they did not know enough about Ned Lamont to form an opinion about him. In July, When Lamont had surged to a 4-point lead, 51% still maintained that they did not know enough about Ned Lamont to form an opinion about him. The trend-line demonstrates unmistakably that Lamont's support among voters grows as they learn more about him. The attention this race is generating virtually guarantees that the vast majority of Democratic voters will know plenty about Ned Lamont by Primary Day, and the evidence suggests that his advantage over Joe Lieberman will grow as the voters get to know him better

  • The Bush albatross will continue to haunt Joe Lieberman, George Bush's favorite Democrat. Lamont is already running a commercial showing Joe Lieberman morphing into George W. Bush, and photos of the infamous Bush "kiss" follow Joe wherever he goes. Nationally George Bush's job approval ratings are languishing in the mid to high 30's. In Connecticut only 27% approve of Bush, and only 7% of Democrats do.



VOTER TURNOUT FAVORS LAMONT:

 1  |  2

 

My primary source of livelihood over the years has been in the field of media ad sales, but I've always written on the side and, in addition to blogging, I have been fortunate enough to have been published in places like Rolling Stone, The Village Voice, New Times Magazine, The Washington Star, The New York Times Op-Ed page, The Realist, and in several book anthologies. My primary area of expertise is the JFK assassination. I am also a front-page blogger at Booman Tribune.

Contact Author
Contact Editor
View Other Articles by Author

 

Bookmark this page: (what's this?)

NETSCAPE      DIGG THIS      Add This Page to Mr Wong!           NEWSVINE      DEl.ICIO.US      Looksmart Furl      My Web      Tag!RawSugar      Blink List     (More...)
Comments: Expand   Shrink   Hide  
4 comments

A concerned citizen and former mathematician/engineer now retired and living in rural Maine.
PrMaineA concerned citizen and former mathematician/engineer now retired and living in rural Maine.

My prediction:

My prediction: The media will attack Ned Lamont.

If you live in Connecticut, you will soon be hearing stories out of nowhere about how Lamont is a wife-beater or involved in bestiality or maybe just a little crazy. Whatever it is, Connecticut voters will learn that Ned Lamont is just not up to the job of being Senator. For some reason or another he is just not a viable candidate and no one sensible would vote for him.

This kind of thing has worked so well in the past that there is little reason to think it won't work again. I would advise voters to ignore the corporate media. Not just when they cast opinions about politicians, but in whatever they say. In fact I think it is past time for a general boycott of the corporate media. We really don't need them and it's time to let them know that.

The media is always tracking their ratings and they will be quick to notice if they loose only a few percent of their audience. A boycott campaign would be a good way to raise awareness in the public of just how bad their media has become.

by PrMaine (8 articles, 5 quicklinks, 1 diaries, 284 comments) on Friday, July 28, 2006 at 12:24:03 PM
 


Charlie Levenson is a writer and activist in Portland, Oregon. In addition to serving as the Manager of Electronic Communications for a social/athletic club in Portland, he instructs in Digital Media at Portland State University, consults on communications strategy, and occasionally writes/directs videos.
Charlie LCharlie Levenson is a writer and activist in Portland, Oregon. In addition to serving as the Manager of Electronic Communications for a social/athletic club in Portland, he instructs in Digital Media at Portland State University, consults on communications strategy, and occasionally writes/directs videos.

A second Prediction

Without even knowing what type of vote-counting software or hardware is being used in Conn, statistics would indicate it is one of three highly-corrupt and partisan companies.

So, I predict that...

1. There will be a last-minute media swipe at Lamont based on some (possibly inconsequential) statement or event.

2. Polls will continue to be spun to claim the race is close.

3. Liberman will win by 51% to 49%, even as last-minute polls (and perhaps even exit polls) show Lamont winning by 5-10%.

The only open question is whether or not Lamont will fight to have the votes fairly counted.

Oh, and if I'm wrong and Lamont wins, then Liberman will run as an Independent, draw just enough Democratic votes to assure a Republican win and then receive some kind of "bipartisan appointment" to the Republican Administration -- maybe Sec. of Defense (that's a good moneymaker) when they finally jettison Rumsfeld.

Liberman is so much more about himself than any party and a Republican after that.

Charlie L
Portland, OR

by Charlie L (2 articles, 2 quicklinks, 1 diaries, 638 comments) on Friday, July 28, 2006 at 1:02:27 PM
 


Bigdavefromqueens
bigdavefromqueensBigdavefromqueens

How To Beat Joe Lieberman

First, I agree that Lamont will win the primary by more than what the media projects. Second, if Rasmussen has it at 40-40 in the general race then Lamont will win barring a major screwup. Lamont will get a 15 pt bounce from an Aug 8 primary win.

Now how to defeat Lieberman
A) Project where you stand on all issues. You're a 100 issue candidate not a 1 issue candidate. Lamont has not countered the Lieberman Lie effectively enough yet.
B) When he loses the primary, Call Joe the spoiler and sore loser who is willing to jeopardize the Democratic seat. Point out that Lamont trounces Schlessinger heads up so Joe should step aside.
C) Don't let Joe label you as weak on national security or anti war. Emphatically point out how you favor going after Osama Bin Laden but Joe Lieberman + others did not. POint out how Joe is more interested in war profiteering than American safety. You must argue this from YOUR frame not Joe LIEberman's. Call him weak on national security.
D) Play to the theme of how Joe represents special interests not the people's interests. LIEberman has handed you Terri Schiavo, Hadassah + the hospital, no birth control for rape victims, Big Pharma, Big Energy, Big Media, opposition to pro middle class tax policies, 49th out of 50 in bringing home the bacon, etc... Turn Joe into a cartoon category who is delusional, mentally incapacitated, and out of touch with ordinary people.

by bigdavefromqueens (0 articles, 0 quicklinks, 0 diaries, 11 comments) on Friday, July 28, 2006 at 1:22:48 PM
 

 

4 comments

 

Tell A Friend

 


Copyright © OpEdNews, 2002-2008

Blog Ads

 

 

 

 

Most Popular Articles
in the Last 2 Days
(by Recommend Emails)

Sarah Palin, A Wolf in Moose Clothing by Anthony Wade

John McCain: Morally, Mentally, and Emotionally Unfit by Jim Fetzer

Librarians Against Sarah Palin Founder a Mystery by Judy Swindler

Iran War ~ How It Will Unfold by Lord Stirling

Protester who interrupted McCain's speech is an Iraq War Veteran by Mary MacElveen

Live OEN Street Medic Report From Occupied St Paul by Michael Cavlan

IS SARAH PALIN SATAN? by Sherman Yellen

Is McCain Campaign Interfering In Alaska Troopergate Investigation of Palin? by Rob Kall

Sarah Palin: Small Mind In A Big Little Town by Judy Swindler

Why We're Planning to Prosecute Cheney and Bush by David Swanson

Popularity Navigation
Control Panel:

Select Time
6 hrs 12 hrs
1 Day 2 Days
3 Days 1 Week
2 Weeks 1 Month
2 Months 3 Months
6 Months Last Year
Select Content
Articles Diaries
Polls Events
All Op-Eds
News Life/Arts/Science
Select Popularity
Page Views
# of Comments
Recommend Emails
  

Go To Top 50 Most Popular