Share on Google Plus Share on Twitter Share on Facebook 21 Share on LinkedIn Share on PInterest Share on Fark! Share on Reddit Share on StumbleUpon Tell A Friend 32 (53 Shares)  
Printer Friendly Page Save As Favorite View Favorites View Stats   34 comments

General News

Obama Admin Seeks Permission To Lie In Response To Freedom Of Information Requests - Even To The Courts

By (about the author)     Permalink       (Page 1 of 2 pages)
Related Topic(s): ; ; ; ; , Add Tags Add to My Group(s)

Must Read 10   Well Said 8   News 4  
View Ratings | Rate It

opednews.com Headlined to H1 10/25/11

Become a Fan
  (16 fans)
- Advertisement -

One of the President Obama's first promises after becoming President of the United States was a commitment to usher in a new era of unprecedented government transparency .  Instead the Obama administration has exhibited what may be an unprecedented obsession with government secrecy including blocking numerous law suits by invoking the doctrine of "State Secrets."   The administration has even come up with an interpretation of the Patriot Act which many in Congress who have seen it claim is overly broad and bestows more power on the Executive Branch than was intended by Congress when they passed it.  

Unfortunately those in Congress who have seen this document are not permitted to divulge its content, and we, the public, cannot see it because the administration has chosen to classify it as a "State Secret."   In other words, you might be doing something that the Obama Administration believes violates the Patriot Act, but you won't know it until they indict you for breaking a law you did not know existed (I might be breaking it just by penning and publishing this article).

Now the Obama/Holder Justice Department is attempting to re-write the Freedom of Information Act (FOIA), empowering or even compelling government agencies to deny the very existence of records they know to exist if they believe they are legitimately exempted from disclosure.  Of course they are most likely the sole arbiter of whether they are indeed exempt from disclosure.  In effect the Obama/Holder Justice Department wants to be free to legally lie about the existence of records in response to FOIA requests.  Apparently they want to avoid the embarrassment and inconvenience of being officially rebuked by the courts for doing exactly that (lying to a Federal judge), as occurred earlier this year when, in a   strongly worded opinion, U.S. District Judge Cormac Carney wrote that the "Government cannot, under any circumstance, affirmatively mislead the Court."   The solution is simple:   re-write the law so the government, in many circumstances, can affirmatively mislead the court.

Despite substantial opposition by such groups as the ACLU, The National Press Club, Citizens for Responsibility and Ethics in Washington, OpentheGovernment.org., Judicial Watch, et al to this radical re-write of the FOIA Law , this controversial effort by the Obama Administration to evade the very transparency it so passionately promised to deliver has been virtually ignored by the mainstream media which is supposed to the guardian of the people's right to know.

Whether you are a Democrat or a Republican or neither, this move by the Obama administration should trouble you deeply.  Is this change we can believe in???

Below are snippets of reports on this controversy, none of them from a mainstream media source.   That was not my intent.   I just could not find any.   I learned about it just this morning in an e-mail from the National Law Journal:

National Press Club Urges Administration to Reconsider Draft Rule on Freedom of Information

"Under the new Department of Justice proposal, in replying to a request for information under the freedom-of-information law, if the information is allowed to be withheld under certain statutory exceptions, then federal officials "will respond to the request as if the excluded records did not exist"--even if that is not the case.

- Advertisement -

"No rule or law should allow, let alone require, the government to mislead the press or the public about anything," said Mark Hamrick , a broadcast journalist with the Associated Press who is the 2011 president of the National Press Club. "If enacted, it appears that this proposed rule would offend the precepts that informed the Freedom of Information Act, and it would tarnish the government's credibility.

"What's more, the change seems unnecessary,"  he said. "If agencies are exercising legally allowable exceptions to the law and withholding certain records, they can just continue to do as they do today: neither confirm nor deny the information's existence.""

Justice Dept. proposes lying, hiding existence of records under new FOIA rule

"The Justice Department has proposed the change as part of a large revision of FOIA rules for federal agencies. Specifically, the rule would direct government agencies who are denying a request under an established FOIA exemption to "respond to the request as if the excluded records did not exist," rather than citing the relevant exemption.

The proposed rule has alarmed government transparency advocates across the political spectrum, who've called it "Orwellian" and say it will "twist" public access to government.

In a public comment regarding the rule change, the ACLU, along with Citizens for Responsibility and Ethics in Washington (CREW) and OpenTheGovernment.org, said the move "will dramatically undermine government integrity by allowing a law designed to provide public access to government information to be twisted to permit federal law enforcement agencies to actively lie to the American people."

- Advertisement -

"Conservative government watchdog Judicial Watch has also lambasted the proposed rules change

"Upon taking office, President Obama released a memorandum declaring his administration was "committed to operating with an unprecedented level of openness. Specifically, he pledged to bolster the strength of the FOIA act, calling it "the most prominent expression of a profound national commitment to ensuring an open government."

Government Could Hide Existence of Records under FOIA Rule Proposal

Next Page  1  |  2

 

I am a retired advertising sales executive/manager and am now Executive Director of the Assassination Archives and Research Center (AARC). I am also a member of the Senior Editor Team at Op Ed News. I also serve as Research Director and Board (more...)
 

Share on Google Plus Submit to Twitter Add this Page to Facebook! Share on LinkedIn Pin It! Add this Page to Fark! Submit to Reddit Submit to Stumble Upon


Go To Commenting

The views expressed in this article are the sole responsibility of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of this website or its editors.

Writers Guidelines

Contact Author Contact Editor View Authors' Articles
- Advertisement -

Most Popular Articles by this Author:     (View All Most Popular Articles by this Author)

Obama Admin Seeks Permission To Lie In Response To Freedom Of Information Requests - Even To The Courts

Barack Obama Spins the Facts, Takes Single-Payer Health Care Off the Table

PA Dem State Committee Takes Single-Payer Healthcare Mainstream, Unanimously Endorses It

Poll Excludes Single-Payer Healthcare; Respondents Implicitly Endorse It Anyway

Health Insurance Monopolies Are Illegal. There Is No Insurance Antitrust Exemption

Chris Christie's Many Tales From the Dark Side

Comments

The time limit for entering new comments on this article has expired.

This limit can be removed. Our paid membership program is designed to give you many benefits, such as removing this time limit. To learn more, please click here.

Comments: Expand   Shrink   Hide  
25 people are discussing this page, with 34 comments
To view all comments:
Expand Comments
(Or you can set your preferences to show all comments, always)

Perhaps the name of the law should be changed to t... by Jerry Policoff on Tuesday, Oct 25, 2011 at 3:31:50 PM
besides WTF? what can you say but PRIMARY the bast... by Rob Kall on Tuesday, Oct 25, 2011 at 5:17:52 PM
That's what happened in NH (and who knows how many... by Jill Herendeen on Thursday, Oct 27, 2011 at 12:14:55 PM
Obama must fire the lawyer who wrote that policy p... by Stephen Hansen on Tuesday, Oct 25, 2011 at 6:32:18 PM
Do you believe for even a second that Obama dis no... by Jerry Policoff on Tuesday, Oct 25, 2011 at 7:13:46 PM
In a way this can be viewed as progress. I mean up... by James Hunter on Tuesday, Oct 25, 2011 at 6:32:35 PM
if Bush did nothing wrong, he should be confronted... by . . on Tuesday, Oct 25, 2011 at 6:50:22 PM
WHITES AREN'T WELCOME IN AMERICA ANY LONGER !!! OU... by Gepaart Visioner on Tuesday, Oct 25, 2011 at 7:21:21 PM
of a desperate administration. Face it people, Oba... by linda jordan on Tuesday, Oct 25, 2011 at 8:57:34 PM
I was thinking one would be Bernie Sanders, but he... by Jerry Policoff on Tuesday, Oct 25, 2011 at 9:43:29 PM
You are buying into the Obama premise. No matter h... by Miriam Callaghan on Wednesday, Oct 26, 2011 at 1:53:43 PM
The only member of the senate that I believe to be... by tim mcghie on Wednesday, Oct 26, 2011 at 8:59:35 AM
we have neither a republician nor a democratic pol... by Anuel Jackson on Tuesday, Oct 25, 2011 at 8:59:42 PM
Someone has to run against the treacherous lying c... by Robert James on Tuesday, Oct 25, 2011 at 9:36:02 PM
The Democrate is Dennis Kucinish and the Republica... by linda jordan on Tuesday, Oct 25, 2011 at 10:15:26 PM
I thought you might be referring to Kucinich, and ... by Jerry Policoff on Tuesday, Oct 25, 2011 at 11:15:47 PM
Isn't he the sponsor of Fisker that got 1/2 billio... by Miriam Callaghan on Wednesday, Oct 26, 2011 at 1:59:04 PM
Whenever I see that statue of lady Justice holding... by myklsamu on Tuesday, Oct 25, 2011 at 11:00:55 PM
I agree more with Ron Paul's platform than not.Any... by linda jordan on Wednesday, Oct 26, 2011 at 1:53:19 AM
Linda, I agree w/your assessment of Ron Paul. I ad... by kate loving shenk on Wednesday, Oct 26, 2011 at 8:12:49 AM
I agree with all assessments of Ron Paul especiall... by Thomas Brown on Wednesday, Oct 26, 2011 at 8:59:27 AM
critical mass in restoring our representative gov'... by cosmic J. on Saturday, Oct 29, 2011 at 11:08:46 AM
Ron Paul not only wants to eliminate the Fed, he a... by Marika on Wednesday, Oct 26, 2011 at 4:13:07 PM
One must also bear in mind that the allowance of f... by Clifford Johnson on Wednesday, Oct 26, 2011 at 5:25:11 AM
  It is impossible to keep track of Governme... by Thomas Brown on Wednesday, Oct 26, 2011 at 8:47:14 AM
You mean we fought WWII - AND the "Cold War" for n... by mrk * on Wednesday, Oct 26, 2011 at 12:57:17 PM
there would be hope that we can vote him out. ... by Al Rodbell on Wednesday, Oct 26, 2011 at 1:47:34 PM
and the "winner" is chosen by whoever controls the... by Jill Herendeen on Sunday, Oct 30, 2011 at 10:20:01 AM
is about completed.  All it needs is a lamb d... by Dennis Kaiser on Wednesday, Oct 26, 2011 at 3:47:44 PM
"empowering or even compelling government agencies... by remo on Wednesday, Oct 26, 2011 at 4:31:39 PM
Thanks for the informative article!Transparency go... by Michael LeVesque on Thursday, Oct 27, 2011 at 1:38:51 AM
10th anniversary of HR2977 banning chemtrails i... by Blaze Gold on Saturday, Oct 29, 2011 at 6:30:12 PM
So, what else did you expect from the self proclai... by FrankieC on Monday, Oct 31, 2011 at 7:54:33 AM
I have no illusions about Obama but it is absurd t... by Marika on Monday, Oct 31, 2011 at 1:14:16 PM