Tag(s): ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; (more...) ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; , Add Tags  (less...)
Add to My Group(s)

View Ratings | Rate It

Permalink
View Article Stats

It's Watergate all over again – Only this time it was successful...

Add this Page to Facebook!
Submit to Twitter
Submit to Reddit
Submit to Stumble Upon

Tell A Friend
Become a Fan
Get Embed HTML Code
By (about the author)

Become a Fan Become a Fan   -- Page 1 of 3 page(s)

opednews.com

For some time I have been concerned and in the back of my mind knew that something was wrong. I wondered why the Democrats spluttered and protested about Bush and then gave him everything he wanted without even a fight. Many gave them the benefit of the doubt and swallowed the excuses, ‘we don’t have the votes’, ‘we need sixty votes to override the veto’, etc. Some even think that the democrats are part of the same party – the one party state. Or that they are in it for the money and don’t care about the voters, which might be true since nearly everyone who becomes a Representative or a Congressman or woman is a millionaire, or so I’ve been told, not having the data in front of me. Seems reasonable to me, seeing how much money is involved in running for President, it stands to reason that the same criteria applies in running for Congress or the House.

There are many incidents in the political world that bear scrutiny, like stolen elections, election fraud, ‘caging’ and so on but let me whittle it down to just one, which has been nagging at me for many months.

Lets think for a moment; what was the purpose of the burglary into the oppositions’ offices in the Watergate scandal, and why was it, when it was found out, such a scandal?

First of all, the purpose was to dig up some dirt on the opposition so as to blackmail them in using their vote, right?

People were outraged at this blatant manipulation of Members of Congress, and rightly so.

So things dragged on for a while and then, as I remember, (and I am not a student of what went on), there was the 18 minute blank tape of the Whitehouse conversations, the record keeping of which was written into law.

And that fact alone, in my humble opinion, was the last straw that brought Nixon down.

Any errors of fact or in reasoning in the above, I would gladly be corrected on.

Now, fast forward to the Bush Regime.

Some or most of the people surrounding Bush were there when Nixon went down, so they know first-hand, so to speak, just what not to do, to keep their nefarious ways out of the public eye, right?

So, 18 minutes of blank tape = 5,000 emails, no?

They circumvented the Whitehouse email system by installing a Republican Party site (illegal) and began to do Whitehouse business, in massive amounts on this illegal email system.

When this came to light, and before the Congress committee requested the emails in an investigation, the emails ‘accidentally’ became subject to the delete button.

Again I say, 18 minutes of blank tape = 5,000 emails.

Now, why was the tape blank for 18 minutes?

Because it contained, and everyone should ponder that, it would have incriminated the President and showed his knowledge and complicit involvment in the Watergate Burglary. It was accepted then and went without saying, and it is what brought him down.

Next Page  1  |  2  |  3

 

A well traveled and slightly worse for wear 72 year old Englishman; widower, several children and grandchildren and a penchant for wondering 'what is the hidden agenda' in almost everything I read. A keen interest in American culture (an oxymoron?) (more...)
 

The views expressed in this article are the sole responsibility of the author
and do not necessarily reflect those of this website or its editors.

Contact Author Contact Editor View Authors' Articles

 

Share this page: (what's this?)                   Tell a Friend: Tell A Friend

Add this Page to Facebook!      Submit to Stumble Upon      Submit to Reddit      Add This Page to Mr Wong!           NEWSVINE      DEl.ICIO.US      Looksmart Furl      My Web      Blink List     (More...)

Comments

The time limit for entering new comments on this article has expired.

This limit can be removed. Our paid membership program is designed to give you many benefits, such as removing this time limit. To learn more, please click here.

Comments: Expand   Shrink   Hide  
No comments