Home
Refresh   Tag(s): ; ; ; ; ; ; ;
Add to My Group
April 21, 2008 at 12:14:05

View Ratings | Rate It

Failed Conservative Values Stories: Barbara, Carole, Nina on Dogmatism

submit to twitter
submit to reddit
submit to digg

Tell A Friend

By Edwin Rutsch (about the author)     Page 1 of 3 page(s)

opednews.com     Permalink

For OpEdNews: Edwin Rutsch - Writer

I'm starting a new series of articles on how Conservative Values have Failed.   It's obvious that conservative ideas and policies have failed, but the failures go even deeper to the very heart and essence of the conservative movement, to their Failed Conservative Values. In this series, we will pull back the mask of Conservative Family Values, Conservative Traditional Values,  individual freedom, individual responsibility, individual liberty, Compassionate Conservativism, etc. to reveal the underlying Failed Conservative Values of fear, authoritarianism, secrecy, dogmatism, greed, indifference, self-righteousness, arrogance, hypocrisy, etc.

I ask for your assistance to systematically build the arguments and tell the stories that reveal how Conservative Values have Failed. Join in our effort to create a documentary and book on the subject by contributing  articles, posts, chapters for the book and video clips. Check our website for more information and a growing outline of tasks that need to be done on this project. 
http://progressivespirit.com/Projects/FailedConservativeValues
 

The first failed conservative value we will look at is dogmatism. I interviewed Barbara, Carole and Nina at a conference of Democratic Clubs in Los Angeles. When I asked them to contrast conservative and progressive values, they all talked about conservative dogmatism and rigidity. Conservative dogmatism starts with the beliefs first and fit the facts to support them. The war and occupation of Iraq is a case in point. If the facts don't fit the dogma, they are ignored. 

 

Failed Conservative Values: Barbara Levin on Dogmatism



My own feeling and my own prejudice is that people on the right are believers rather than thinkers. And they start with the belief, and they fix the facts around their beliefs. That’s how we got into Iraq, under the memo that says, as you know, we’re fixing the facts around the policy that’s already established.


You start with a belief, then you fix the facts to go with your belief. And they do that with gay people, they decide that it’s a chosen lifestyle, because they start with a premise that it’s wrong, and if it’s wrong, it can’t be something you’re born with – it has to be chosen. That is a classic example of fixing the facts around the policy.


And I think they do that with a number of things. I think they listen to code words, and then don’t think through what these things actually mean. So family values – what does that mean? To most people on the right, I think it means anti-gay, it used to be anti-black, anti-woman, anti-change. Because they’re used to the universe as they believe it was created. And they think the universe was created as the way they see it existing. And therefore, any change is against the natural order of things. Because the natural order of things is what’s already there – what they’re used to.


Progressive, as the name implies, is always pushing for change, which conservatives, who are anti-change, hate. They are uncomfortable with it. And progressives look for progress – as the name implies. Progress means change of a specific kind, not just any old change, but change to improve people’s lives. Change for betterment, change for economic justice. Change for legal justice, for social justice. Change that will improve conditions for the most number of people.


That’s what progressive values are all about, as the name implies. And conservative values are about, “I’m used to this. Change is threatening. I don’t want change.” I mean, the right likes to have their version morality as very static, “God wants things this way, and this way is the way it is”. And that’s their idea of morality. They start with the rule, and then they use their idea of morality which is to use morality to judge people. So people are bad if they don’t obey the rule.


Progressive values start with the premise being people.  That which helps people is good. That which hurts people is bad. And then they use people to judge the rule. So, if the rule helps people, it’s a good rule. And if the rule hurts people, it’s a bad rule and should be changed.
 

Failed Conservative Values:  Carole Marie on Rigidity

Conservatives values, just um, are very ridged and they deal with almost religious family. From a certain type of religion, which I'm very well aware of because I'm from Okalahoma.  and I know the religion,  I know why they frame it that way.

We need an enlarged support system around our families - education, health care.

More expanded  caring feeling, much more accessible to humans, and egalitarian so to speak.   Whereas republican values is very ridged, very focused, you have to be a certain type of religion or mind set. Whereas we are this large supportive caring type of feeling.

Failed Conservative Values: Nina Sharky on Dogmatism

 

Next Page  1  |  2  |  3

 

my Bio here http://humanityquest.com/Projects/Bios/EdwinRutsch/

The views expressed in this article are the sole responsibility of the author
and do not necessarily reflect those of this website or its editors.

Contact Author Contact Editor View Authors' Articles

 

Book Recommendations for "Caring Conservative"
Caring for the Environment: A Policy for Conservatives
by Stanley Johnson


Number of pages: 28
Publisher: Conservative Political Centre

Conservative Management of Cervical Spine Syndromes
by Donald R. Murphy

$99.95
Lowest New Price $239.97

Number of pages: 747
Publisher: McGraw-Hill Medical

Caring for widows: The church's responsibility
by Elizabeth Tucker


Number of pages: 13
Publisher: Western Conservative Baptist Seminary

View All Book Recommendations

Share this page: (what's this?)                   Tell a Friend: Tell A Friend

FACEBOOK      DIGG THIS      Add This Page to Mr Wong!           NEWSVINE      DEl.ICIO.US      Looksmart Furl      NETSCAPE      My Web      Tag!RawSugar      Blink List     (More...)

Comments: Expand   Shrink   Hide  
27 comments
To view all comments:
Expand Comments
 

Can you pose some questions about conservatives? by Edwin Rutsch on Monday, Apr 21, 2008 at 12:17:15 PM
What are the progressive alternative values to dogmatism? by Edwin Rutsch on Monday, Apr 21, 2008 at 12:17:58 PM
What are other examples of conservative dogmatism? by Edwin Rutsch on Monday, Apr 21, 2008 at 12:19:55 PM
In what other ways have Conservative Values Failed? by Edwin Rutsch on Monday, Apr 21, 2008 at 12:20:57 PM
Poll: What Conservative Value has been the greatest Failure? by Edwin Rutsch on Monday, Apr 21, 2008 at 1:09:09 PM
greed by liberalsrock on Tuesday, Apr 22, 2008 at 7:55:53 AM
thanks - let's keep building on that argument. by Edwin Rutsch on Tuesday, Apr 22, 2008 at 11:16:37 AM
Libertarianism by Ty on Monday, Apr 21, 2008 at 6:51:29 PM
i don't get Libertarianism by Edwin Rutsch on Monday, Apr 21, 2008 at 7:08:16 PM
Support Who????? by Darren Wolfe on Tuesday, Apr 22, 2008 at 6:52:44 AM
valuing freedom over empathy by Edwin Rutsch on Tuesday, Apr 22, 2008 at 11:28:52 AM
Force is not empathy by Darren Wolfe on Wednesday, Apr 23, 2008 at 7:41:42 AM
Believers, not thinkers. by kanawah on Monday, Apr 21, 2008 at 7:50:27 PM
Ultimately a bad idea by Ivan Hentschel on Monday, Apr 21, 2008 at 8:03:40 PM
research is just fine by Rob Kall on Monday, Apr 21, 2008 at 8:55:06 PM
worms are part of nature and good for the soil by Edwin Rutsch on Monday, Apr 21, 2008 at 11:45:45 PM
DOG-matism! Try and run it up the flag poll. by Wolfie on Monday, Apr 21, 2008 at 10:56:10 PM
Closing your mind to the discussion just perpetuates it by Edwin Rutsch on Monday, Apr 21, 2008 at 11:59:50 PM
I am interested in values and not morality.. by Edwin Rutsch on Tuesday, Apr 22, 2008 at 12:16:52 AM
No morals- no need for values. by Wolfie on Tuesday, Apr 22, 2008 at 12:38:55 AM
principles rest on values by Edwin Rutsch on Tuesday, Apr 22, 2008 at 12:52:16 AM
holy moly by shirley reese on Tuesday, Apr 22, 2008 at 12:35:02 PM
control versus ? by Edwin Rutsch on Tuesday, Apr 22, 2008 at 12:58:24 PM
Edwin Rutsch by Professor Emeritus Peter Bagnolo on Tuesday, Apr 22, 2008 at 12:38:39 PM
thanks for comments by Edwin Rutsch on Tuesday, Apr 22, 2008 at 3:09:56 PM
Do You Go Round In Circles? by Anne Kennedy Rackham on Tuesday, Apr 22, 2008 at 1:59:44 PM
reason to faith trick by Edwin Rutsch on Tuesday, Apr 22, 2008 at 3:06:17 PM

 
Want to post your own comment on this Article? Post Comment


 

 

 

Tell a Friend: Tell A Friend

Copyright © 2002-2009, OpEdNews

Powered by Populum