Share on Google Plus Share on Twitter Share on Facebook Share on LinkedIn Share on PInterest Share on Fark! Share on Reddit Share on StumbleUpon Tell A Friend 2 (2 Shares)  
Printer Friendly Page Save As Favorite View Favorites View Stats   19 comments

General News

The Air Force Cover-Up of that Minot-Barksdale Nuclear Missile Flight

By (about the author)     Permalink       (Page 1 of 3 pages)
Related Topic(s): ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; (more...) , Add Tags  (less...) Add to My Group(s)

View Ratings | Rate It

opednews.com

Become a Fan
  (63 fans)

By Dave Lindorff


“It makes the hair stand up on the back of my neck.”
                    ---Pentagon official



There is something deeply disturbing about the Air Force’s official report on the Aug-29-30 “bent spear” incident that saw six nuclear warheads get mounted on six Advanced Cruise Missiles and improperly removed from a nuclear weapons storage bunker at Minot Air Force Base in North Dakota, then get improperly loaded on a B-52, and then get improperly flown to Barksdale AFB in Louisiana—a report that attributed the whole thing to a “mistake.”

    According to the Air Force report, some Air Force personnel mounted the warheads on the missiles (which are obsolete and slated for destruction), and another ground crew, allegedly not aware that the missiles were armed with nukes, moved them out and mounted them on a launch pylon on the B-52’s wing for a flight to Barksdale and eventual dismantling. Only on the ground at Barksdale did ground crew personnel spot the nukes according to the report. (Six other missiles with dummy warheads were mounted on a pylon on the other wing of the plane.)

    The problem with this explanation for the first reported case of nukes being removed from a weapons bunker without authorization in 50 years of nuclear weapons, is that those warheads, and all nuclear warheads in the US stockpile, are supposedly protected against unauthorized transport or removal from bunkers by electronic antitheft systems—automated alarms similar to those used by department stores to prevent theft, and even anti-motion sensors that go off if a weapon is touched or approached without authorization.

    While the Air Force report doesn’t mention any of this, what it means is that if weapons in a storage bunker are protected against unauthorized removal, someone—and actually at least two people, since it’s long been a basic part of nuclear security that every action involving a nuclear weapon has to be done by two people working in tandem—had to deliberately and consciously disable those alarms.



    Since the Air Force report does not explain how this hurdle to unauthorized removal of the six nukes could have been surmounted by “mistake,” the report has to be considered a whitewash, at best, or a cover-up.

    That leaves us speculating about what actually happened, and about who might have authorized the removal of those nukes from storage, and why the Defense Department would be covering up the true story.   We know that the loading of nuclear-armed missiles or bombs onto an American bomber has been barred since 1991, even for practice and training purposes. We know also that the carrying of nuclear weapons by bombers flying over US airspace has been banned for 40 years. So if the evidence suggests strongly that the removal of the nukes from the bunker was done intentionally and with some kind of authorization from higher authorities, then the loading of nukes onto the plane, and the flight of those nukes to Barksdale have to also be assumed to have been authorized.

    This possibility has been dismissed out of hand by the Air Force and Defense Department. The very idea is, in fact, not even discussed in the Air force report released in mid-October.

    Yet we are left with the unresolved question of how the weapons could have been moved out of the bunker accidentally.

    The Air Force has not been forthcoming about the automated alarm protections on American nuclear weapons, refusing to confirm or deny that they even exist. But we can know that they are in place for several reasons. One is that since writing about this incident in ghd  current edition of American Conservative Magazine ("The Mystery of Minot," Oct. 24, 2007 ed.) and in several online venues, I have been contacted by several active-duty and retired military people who have assured me that such electronic protections are in place. A second is that an article in the Oct. 31 issue of the New York Times, reporting on the early completion of a project by the National Nuclear Security Administration, to secure Russian nuclear weapons, said that the measures implemented at 25 classified sites on 12 Russian nuclear bases included “measures that have long been part of American efforts” to secure nuclear weapons, and that these included “alarm and motion detection systems,” as well as “modern gates, guard houses and fighting positions, “ and also “detectors for explosives, radiation and metal.”

    Ask yourselves, would American nuclear weapons be equipped with lesser security systems than those that the NNSA is providing for Russian weapons?

    Of course not!

    And yet we’re asked to believe that some low-ranking ground crew personnel at Minot AFB simply walked out of a nuclear weapons bunker with six nuclear armed Advanced Cruise Missiles, not knowing what they were carrying, and labored for eight hours to mount those missiles and their launch pylon on the wing of a B-52 strategic bomber without ever noticing that they were armed with nuclear weapons. We’re asked to believe that none of those electronic alarms and motion sensors built into the system went off during that whole process.

    When I mentioned the automated alarm and motion sensors to Lt. Col. Jennifer Cassidy, a public affairs person at the Department of the Air Force, and asked her how the movement of the six nukes could have occurred without those alarms being disabled, she said, “It’s an intriguing question, and it makes the hair stand up on the back of my neck.”

     As it should.

Next Page  1  |  2  |  3

 

Dave Lindorff is a founding member of the collectively-owned, journalist-run online newspaper www.thiscantbehappening.net. He is a columnist for Counterpunch, is author of several recent books ("This Can't Be Happening! Resisting the (more...)
 

Share on Google Plus Submit to Twitter Add this Page to Facebook! Share on LinkedIn Pin It! Add this Page to Fark! Submit to Reddit Submit to Stumble Upon

Go To Commenting
The views expressed in this article are the sole responsibility of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of this website or its editors.

Writers Guidelines

Contact Author Contact Editor View Authors' Articles

Most Popular Articles by this Author:     (View All Most Popular Articles by this Author)

Israel's Gaza Atrocities Recall America's Atrocities in Vietnam

The Case for Impeachment of President Barack Obama

Barack Obama: Manchurian Candidate Version 2.0

Free John Walker Lindh, Bush's and Cheney's First Torture Victim!

What Nobody's Saying: The Bailout Will Kill the Dollar

Comments

The time limit for entering new comments on this article has expired.

This limit can be removed. Our paid membership program is designed to give you many benefits, such as removing this time limit. To learn more, please click here.

Comments: Expand   Shrink   Hide  
10 people are discussing this page, with 19 comments
To view all comments:
Expand Comments
(Or you can set your preferences to show all comments, always)

articles very closely, particularly since I am a f... by Steven Leser on Wednesday, Oct 31, 2007 at 11:47:53 PM
See bothhttp://www.minot.af.mil/news/story.asp?sto... by Steven Leser on Thursday, Nov 1, 2007 at 12:10:02 AM
Stay tuned... by Steven Leser on Thursday, Nov 1, 2007 at 12:19:15 AM
I really enjoyed reading this article. An interest... by J D on Thursday, Nov 1, 2007 at 7:17:14 AM
Cheney as chairman of Hallilburton before becoming... by Dave Lindorff on Thursday, Nov 1, 2007 at 7:27:38 AM
Air Force Personnel Involved With Nuke Mishap In M... by Jay Lovestone on Thursday, Nov 1, 2007 at 8:33:42 AM
click here... by Jay Lovestone on Thursday, Nov 1, 2007 at 8:36:30 AM
Anything? Hello?... by Steven Leser on Thursday, Nov 1, 2007 at 8:48:56 AM
Check the post URL's I have sent on this threa... by Jay Lovestone on Thursday, Nov 1, 2007 at 9:12:13 AM
If not, what you are doing is borderline stalking.... by Steven Leser on Thursday, Nov 1, 2007 at 10:44:02 AM
   Once, again, look at  click here... by Jay Lovestone on Thursday, Nov 1, 2007 at 11:00:08 AM
s assertions. David - do you have any comment? The... by Steven Leser on Thursday, Nov 1, 2007 at 12:42:35 PM
it had served the operation's interests, the n... by k kelly on Thursday, Nov 1, 2007 at 11:19:43 AM
this. Many posts were made to the M.T. site by for... by Richard Mynick on Thursday, Nov 1, 2007 at 12:31:22 PM
If you keep writing about the Minot B-52 nuclear a... by Patrick on Thursday, Nov 1, 2007 at 2:57:15 PM
When analyzing actions of the Bush administration... by Steve Moyer on Thursday, Nov 1, 2007 at 7:30:00 PM
Respectfully request a correction...Mr. Lindorff w... by Form on Thursday, Nov 1, 2007 at 11:32:52 PM
Your analogy is futile, Form.We're talking abo... by Munich on Friday, Nov 2, 2007 at 12:26:35 AM
Mr. Lindorff wrote:"Why hasn’t the Air ... by Form on Sunday, Nov 4, 2007 at 11:20:37 AM