Refresh   Tag(s): ; ; ;
Add to My Group
October 19, 2007 at 21:25:38

View Ratings | Rate It

Nukes Over America: All A Stupid Mistake. Sure it Was

FACEBOOK
submit to twitter
submit to reddit
submit to digg

Tell A Friend

By Dave Lindorff (about the author)     Page 1 of 2 page(s)

opednews.com     Permalink

For OpEdNews: Dave Lindorff - Writer

The Air Force’s Friday report on the August 29-30 nuclear weapons incident which saw six armed cruise missiles flown across the continental US in launch position on a B-52H bomber leaves all the big questions unanswered, attempting to shuck the whole thing off as an “unacceptable mistake.”

To be sure, Air Force Secretary Michael W. Wynne and Air Force Deputy Chief of Staff for Operations Maj. Gen. Richard Newton, said that after a six-week investigation, five officers, including Col. Bruce Emig, commander of the Fifth Bomb Group at Minot AFB in North Dakota, where the flight originated, have been relieved of duty, and 65 other Air Force personnel were also removed from their duties, and both Barksdale and Minot were decertified for their strategic nuclear responsibilities. But that’s still pretty small beer for an incident so serious it’s never happened before in half a century of nuclear weapons handling.

There are, at this point, no court martials being contemplated, and nobody’s been discharged from the military.

Put simply, six 150-kiloton warheads were improperly attached to six Advanced Cruise Missiles, all loaded onto a wing launch pod, and then mounted on the wing of a B-52 H Stratofortress at Minot, along with six similar missiles with dummy warheads, which were loaded onto a launch pod on the plane’s other wing, an all 12 were improperly and illegally flown across the country to Barksdale AFB in Louisiana.

The Air Force, following its “investigation,” is saying the same thing it said before the investigation: it was all a big “mistake”—the result of “widespread disregard for the rules” regarding handling of nuclear weapons.

A few guys at Minot “inexplicably” screwed up and loaded the nukes and then there were a chain of mistakes because no one else treated the nuclear-tipped missiles as if they were armed with nuclear weapons.

The trouble with this theory, or story line if you will, is that while nobody at Minot, supposedly, noticed what was happening—even though ground crew workers spent eight hours laboring to get the pod with the six nuke-tipped missiles mounted on the plane’s wing. This despite the warheads are clearly visible and identifiable by the silver coating they exhibit when viewed through a little window in each nosecone cover, and because there are red coverings on the nuke nosecones—once the plane got to Barksdale, the ground crew there, which had no reason on earth to suspect it was looking at nuclear warheads, spotted them immediately upon going to the plane.

They had no reason to expect nukes because for 40 years it has been illegal for the military to carry nuclear weapons on bombers over US territory, and indeed since 1991, it has been illegal to even load nuclear weapons on a plane, period, even for training purposes on the ground. (The weapons went unnoticed for 10 hours in Barksdale, but that's because no groundcrew visited the plane for that long, but when they did go to it, they reportedly spotted the nukes right off the bat.)

How can it be that Air Force ground crew people at Barksdale could spot the nukes in a flash while nobody at Minot—not the workers who mounted the warheads on the missiles in the heavily guarded bunker, not the guards who are supposed to guard those weapons with their lives and prevent any unauthorized removal from the bunkers, not the ground crew that loaded them onto the plan, and not the pilot and crew of the bomber, who are supposed to check every missile before they take off—noticed they were nuclear warheads?

The Air Force, at a press conference announcing the results of its investigation, didn’t answer this question. It appears they reporters at the session didn’t ask it either.

Certainly the AP reporter didn’t ask it, because if she had, she would surely have included the Air Force’s answer, or it’s non-answer, in her story.

Nobody, apparently, asked the Air Force either about six mysterious violent deaths of Air Force personnel from Minot and Barksdale, and from a mysterious Air Force Special Commando Group, all of which occurred in the days and weeks immediately before, during and after the incident. Two of those deaths—of the Special Commando Group officer and of a Minot weapons guard—were reportedly “suicides.”

In an article in the current issue of American Conservative magazine, currently on newsstands, I report that incredibly, no federal investigators from the Pentagon or the federal government even bothered to contact the police investigators or medical examiners who investigated those six deaths—an remarkable failure of due diligence, given the seriousness of this incident.

One retired Navy officer who contacted me during my investigation, who worked in electronic warfare, told me it would be simply impossible for those weapons to have been moved out of the storage bunker. He claims to know for a certainty that all nuclear weapons in the US arsenal are equipped with high-tech tags (“like they have at WalMart and Kmart only better”) that would instantly trigger alarms when the weapons are moved, unless they were deliberately disarmed.

So what we have is pretty clearly a cover-up here.

Next Page  1  |  2

 

www.thiscantbehappening.net

Dave Lindorff's writing is available at www.thiscantbehappening.net. He is a columnist for Counterpunch, is author of several recent books ("This Can't Be Happening! Resisting the Disintegration of (more...)
 

The views expressed in this article are the sole responsibility of the author
and do not necessarily reflect those of this website or its editors.

Contact Author Contact Editor View Authors' Articles

 

Book Recommendations for "Military Minot"
Minot Air Force Base (Minot, ND).: An article from: U.S. Department of Defense Speeches
by Robert M. Gates

$9.95

Number of pages: 8
Publisher: U.S. Department of Defense Speeches

The History Of The Insurrections In Massachusetts In The Year 1786 And The Rebellion Consequent Thereon
by George Richards Minot

$29.95
Lowest New Price $25.50

Number of pages: 192
Publisher: Scholar's Bookshelf

Bombers Moon
by Victor Minot


Number of pages: 169
Publisher: Air Forces Publishing Service

View All Book Recommendations

Share this page: (what's this?)                   Tell a Friend: Tell A Friend

FACEBOOK      DIGG THIS      Add This Page to Mr Wong!           NEWSVINE      DEl.ICIO.US      Looksmart Furl      NETSCAPE      My Web      Tag!RawSugar      Blink List     (More...)

Comments: Expand   Shrink   Hide  
36 comments
To view all comments:
Expand Comments
 

Wayne Madsen's Take on Air Force Report by Mac McKinney on Friday, Oct 19, 2007 at 11:01:01 PM
Conveniently... by Charlie L on Friday, Oct 19, 2007 at 11:44:55 PM
the hacker conspiracy theory of it all by Peter Dearman on Saturday, Oct 20, 2007 at 4:57:37 AM
The 'mysterious deaths' appear to be a myth too by Peter Dearman on Saturday, Oct 20, 2007 at 5:18:03 AM
I don't have a theory by Dave Lindorff on Saturday, Oct 20, 2007 at 10:40:03 PM
Well that's more to consider... by Peter Dearman on Sunday, Oct 21, 2007 at 2:20:41 PM
The Middle East Theater by Susan Guest on Saturday, Oct 20, 2007 at 7:31:44 AM
Theater a Military Term by Mac McKinney on Saturday, Oct 20, 2007 at 1:05:35 PM
Well, that's what they call it at Barksdale by Dave Lindorff on Saturday, Oct 20, 2007 at 10:41:35 PM
One Possible Explanation by Karen Fish on Saturday, Oct 20, 2007 at 9:32:01 AM
Bush/Cheney to Putin and Khamenei: Accidents Happen by Rosa Schmidt Azadi on Saturday, Oct 20, 2007 at 10:05:01 AM
One minor point, havent thoroughly read all yet, but... by Steven Leser on Saturday, Oct 20, 2007 at 11:02:33 AM
It's a blow but hardly adequate punishment by Dave Lindorff on Saturday, Oct 20, 2007 at 10:43:53 PM
See my response further below re: Court Martials by Steven Leser on Sunday, Oct 21, 2007 at 5:35:31 PM
Something really fishy by john riggs on Saturday, Oct 20, 2007 at 11:06:59 AM
Re: "Something really fishy" by Jay Lovestone on Saturday, Oct 20, 2007 at 11:58:18 AM
Re: Re: "Something really fishy" by Jay Lovestone on Saturday, Oct 20, 2007 at 1:51:12 PM
Re: Re: "Something really fishy" by Jay Lovestone on Saturday, Oct 20, 2007 at 1:54:17 PM
Re: "Something really fishy" by Jay Lovestone on Saturday, Oct 20, 2007 at 1:56:41 PM
Lindorff's fishy sources by Jay Lovestone on Saturday, Oct 20, 2007 at 11:42:02 AM
Continued "Lindorff's fishy sources" by Jay Lovestone on Saturday, Oct 20, 2007 at 11:48:07 AM
Re: Re: Lindorff's fishy sources" by Jay Lovestone on Saturday, Oct 20, 2007 at 11:53:01 AM
I've flagged you by Steven Leser on Saturday, Oct 20, 2007 at 3:03:11 PM
This was no Mistake by Patrick on Saturday, Oct 20, 2007 at 3:04:05 PM
Nuklar attack is the least of our worries, check this by john riggs on Saturday, Oct 20, 2007 at 6:16:28 PM
Errors by Lindorff--request corrections by Form on Sunday, Oct 21, 2007 at 1:44:06 AM
I stand corrected. Thanks by Dave Lindorff on Sunday, Oct 21, 2007 at 7:14:09 AM
42 USC 2274 by Form on Tuesday, Oct 23, 2007 at 2:27:09 AM
What Form of inquiry is this? by Peter Dearman on Sunday, Oct 21, 2007 at 2:35:47 PM
Please dont wish Form had identified himself/herself by Steven Leser on Sunday, Oct 21, 2007 at 5:32:51 PM
Not an employee of DoD or USG or USG contractor by Form on Sunday, Oct 21, 2007 at 10:04:17 PM
Well, I'll accept that by Peter Dearman on Monday, Oct 22, 2007 at 11:21:50 AM
Chinese Hacker Theory is a Fallacy by Form on Tuesday, Oct 23, 2007 at 1:01:31 AM
Pulitzer? by Peter Dearman on Tuesday, Oct 23, 2007 at 2:23:44 AM
I hope there are no Courts Martial proceedings by Steven Leser on Sunday, Oct 21, 2007 at 5:52:43 PM
Another decent op-ed on this subject today on OpEdNews by Peter Dearman on Sunday, Oct 21, 2007 at 3:00:37 PM

 

 

 

Tell a Friend: Tell A Friend

Copyright © 2002-2010, OpEdNews

Powered by Populum