In an email last week, I sought to connect the dots between the politicized Department of Justice, the theft of American elections and the railroading of a former Democrat Governor of Alabama who was too tough for the Republicans so they stole his election and locked him away.
That email was entitled, First They Came, for obvious reasons just made perhaps more poignant. One can't say for sure, but certainly something to think about as this unfolds. It's hard, given what passes for journalism, to think that there may be more going on than what is being reported. But, hey, why do any investigative journalism when the public interest has lost all meaning to the media and besides, you have prostitution for your headlines. (see Salacious Sex Raises TV Ratings: Are We Being HOOKERed?)
You can frame a guy like Don Siegelman when you control the reigns of power-- just about all the power. Were they really made so suspicious by Eliot Spitzer's moving a few thousand dollars around (how much money could we be talking about that would have set off alarms?). Or is Spitzer seen as a threat to those in control of our lawless post-911 KGBesque investigatory apparatus? Go back and pay attention to Siegleman and watch how the US Attorneys scandal unfolds- which was always about controlling our elections.
Scott Horton has been connecting the dots, covering Siegelman and now Spitzer and the US Attorneys scandal. Eliminating your political opposition is bad enough. But seizing ultimate lock down control by taking over the process by which we are supposed to elect that opposition raises the stakes to a new level.
This is not about whether you liked our NY Governor or think he deserved what he got: It's not really about him. It's about us. Indeed one might surmise that he was doing something right if he turns out to be a target for political reasons.
The piece "First they came..." shows that the inactivity of those who didn't speak out as the Nazis purged their chosen targets, group after group, resulted in there being no one left to protect them, when the Nazis came for them.It's time to resist. Take initiative and speak out now- time's running out.
Stolen elections are part of a larger plan and computerized elections are part of that plan. Media consolidation is another essential piece of the plan. This is what corporatism, otherwise known as fascism, looks like. This is the time to speak out!
Here are some excerpts from but a few important articles:
It looks like the Bush Justice Department just bagged themselves another Democratic Governor. Here's theNew York Timeson the story:
Gov. Eliot Spitzer, who gained national prominence relentlessly pursuing Wall Street wrongdoing, has been caught on a federal wiretap arranging to meet with a high-priced prostitute at a Washington hotel last month, according to a law enforcement official and a person briefed on the investigation.
The wiretap captured a man identified as Client 9 on a telephone call confirming plans to have a woman travel from New York to Washington, where he had reserved a hotel room, according to an affidavit filed in federal court in Manhattan. The person briefed on the case and the law enforcement official identified Mr. Spitzer as Client 9.
Mr. Spitzer, a first term Democrat, today made a brief public appearance during which he apologized for his behavior, and described it as a "private matter." He did not address his political future. "I have acted in a way that violates my obligation to my family and violates my or any sense of right or wrong," said Mr. Spitzer, who appeared with his wife Silda at his Manhattan office. "I apologize first and most importantly to my family. I apologize to the public to whom I promised better."
The federal investigation of a New York prostitution ring was triggered by Gov. Eliot Spitzer's suspicious money transfers, initially leading agents to believe Spitzer was hiding bribes, according to federal officials. It was only months later that the IRS and the FBI determined that Spitzer wasn't hiding bribes but payments to a company called QAT, what prosecutors say is a prostitution operation operating under the name of the Emperors Club.
http://www.jta.org/cgi-bin/iowa/breaking/107452.html With all the upcoming skirmishes that will take place among Democrats I think we will see more politicians destroyed. The mud slinging that will be escalating promises to make a swamp buggy race look tame.
by
john riggs (0 articles, 0 quicklinks, 0 diaries, 427 comments)
on Wednesday, March 12, 2008 at 12:21:57 PM
'DC Madam' comments on Spitzer scandal 12 Mar 2008 Deborah Jeane Palfrey, the so-called DC Madam, shared her thoughts on the Eliot Spitzer scandal with CLG's Lori Price on Wednesday. Ms. Palfrey said, "Without question in my mind, escort and adult service businesses – which cater to high-powered and influential clients – are being used as the new weapon of choice in American politics."
by
Rady Ananda (110 articles, 262 quicklinks, 30 diaries, 887 comments)
on Wednesday, March 12, 2008 at 3:25:54 PM
A corrupt politician, who ran on the concept that he was incorruptible is being called down for being corrupt, and some people are wondering if this calling down was done for political reasons?
I have some thoughts.. There are quite a few politicians in the DC Beltway that NEED to be called down, FOR POLITICAL REASONS! I can not comprehend how it is that we could somehow ignore the facts in the case.. (Using massive pay-outs to prostitutes $80,000 worth... according to the Boston Herald) and the first thing someone can bring up was that the calling down was politically motivated...
Nobody ever though to wonder about the wife, and what sort of diseases Spitzer might have brought home to his wife.... Nobody ever thought to wonder HOW he managed to hide $80K worth of call girl expenses... Or from whom he received the money... (no way he did that on a governor's salary.)
Nope.. The first comments were to question the timing of the Justice Department... The first comments were to question the motivations of the Justice department!
Sorry, the man is just another corrupt politician who, like the rest of the nest of vipers, should be brought down!!
Ciao, CZ
by
steve scheetz (3 articles, 0 quicklinks, 2 diaries, 591 comments)
on Wednesday, March 12, 2008 at 3:38:15 PM
when the s.o.b. in the whitehouse resigned for killing a million human beings.Spitzer spit on the sidewalk. This above the law crap has got to go.Why is it all selective? When male prostitutes were being shuffled into the whitehouse there was immunity?
I guess its like the big money thefts that dont get prosecuted,Enron, Resolution Trust. But a guy stole a doughnut and got 30 years. If the law only applies to some then there is no law. Spitzer was removed by the owners, lets not cloud the issue with morality talk. I am curious to see clients 1 through 8 . I wont hold my breath.
by
john riggs (0 articles, 0 quicklinks, 0 diaries, 427 comments)
on Wednesday, March 12, 2008 at 8:33:51 PM
The US attorney's office for the district of New York knew this.
The New York State Attorney General's office knew this.
The New York State Police knew this.
22 year old strippers in New Jersey knew he had a hooker habit. This is not a revelation. Mr. Spitzer was being blackmailed with his addiction 10 years ago.
I guess when you are getting black mailed, you can still get "resigned."
I have to guess that media analysis of this event will be about 25% truth and 75% lies.
I love the quotes from two different hookers:
The Department of justice Hooker, who was working for the guy with the Israeli passport, mentioned not being concerned with being able to control his desire for "dangerous sex." I was married for 15 years. How the hell does sex at the Mayflower Hotel get "dangerous" anyway? Dangerous? I have an imagination and I'm looking for "dangerous" and I ain't finding.
Hooker number two interviewed by the ultra reputable ABC news mentioned he was a "nice guy and a good tipper." But, I thought he was dangerous?
Managed information.... what are you going to do?
by
tom storey (3 articles, 0 quicklinks, 2 diaries, 58 comments)
on Wednesday, March 12, 2008 at 6:47:28 PM
"Mr. Spitzer has been using hookers for 30 years. The US attorney's office for the district of New York knew this. The New York State Attorney General's office knew this. The New York State Police knew this."
So then, One would presume that the Party that put him into office ALSO KNEW THIS, but was fine with it... The PARTY who put him into office knew that there could be some embarrassing questions raised, yet they STILL allowed him to gain office....
I need a little more clarification, so bear with me here.. I have to ask the question WHY?? Why would a political party allow a liability like Spitzer's "hooker habit" have the slightest possibility to ever see the light of day? Some politicians are not allowed, by their party, to run because they have too many Ex-wives, but a hooker habit is OK?
On another note... SHOULD be legal is very clearly NOT, legal. Hypocrisy, on the other hand, will ALWAYS be hypocrisy! you want an equal playing field when it comes to being trashed in the media, then start demonstrating that!
Ciao, CZ
by
steve scheetz (3 articles, 0 quicklinks, 2 diaries, 591 comments)
on Thursday, March 13, 2008 at 12:03:41 PM
9 comments
How would you rate this?
You must be logged in (if signed up) to do ratings.
It's free to signup! And easy. And takes just a minute or two....