Tag(s): ; ; ; ; , Add Tags
Add to My Group(s)

View Ratings | Rate It

Permalink
View Article Stats      (9 comments)

Spitzer's Sting, Stolen Elections and the DOJ

Add this Page to Facebook!
Submit to Twitter
Submit to Reddit
Submit to Stumble Upon

Tell A Friend

Become a Fan
Get Embed HTML Code
By (about the author)

Become a Fan Become a Fan  (1 fan)   -- Page 4 of 4 page(s)

opednews.com

State law actually prohibits serving members of the legislature while they are in session. Section 29-1-7 of the Alabama Code protects members from this kind of action by U.S. Marshals yesterday. In fact, the Marshals could have violated this law by their disruption of the session and have been charged with a misdemeanor...

"If Republican operatives had any advance knowledge of yesterday's serving of subpoenas at the Statehouse, they should have to testify before Congress under oath." Spearman concluded.

 

Exactly. This is a subpoena to appear before a grand jury (and strangely, for quite a few Democratic state legislators). This is NOT a failure to comply with a subpoena (like Miers, Rove, and Bolton have done). So why were US Marshals used as part of this spectacle and on whose authority?

She goes on to conclude: 

Once again I ask, why are Democrats the target of these investigations? Where the hell is Congress? When will these police-state tactics be enough finally? Or do we just wait for the rest of the brown shirts to arrive?

Time to head to Alabama folks, a state in our union that appears to be under siege.

I am not a Democrat. But I am an American. Are you? 

And see this August 24, 2007 Democracy Now! Interview with Scott Horton: Political Prosecution? Justice Dept Holds onto Docs in Case of Jailed Alabama Governor Siegelman

Time to take action.

Next Page  1  |  2  |  3  |  4

 

http://electiontransparencycoalition.org/

Andi Novick Election Transparency Coalition, www.etcnys.org, http://nylevers.wordpress.com/

The views expressed in this article are the sole responsibility of the author
and do not necessarily reflect those of this website or its editors.

Contact Author Contact Editor View Authors' Articles

 

Share this page: (what's this?)                   Tell a Friend: Tell A Friend

Add this Page to Facebook!      Submit to Stumble Upon      Submit to Reddit      Add This Page to Mr Wong!           NEWSVINE      DEl.ICIO.US      Looksmart Furl      My Web      Blink List     (More...)

Comments

The time limit for entering new comments on this article has expired.

This limit can be removed. Our paid membership program is designed to give you many benefits, such as removing this time limit. To learn more, please click here.

Comments: Expand   Shrink   Hide  
9 comments
To view all comments:
Expand Comments
(Or you can set your preferences to show all comments, always)

Spitz by tjb on Wednesday, Mar 12, 2008 at 8:09:14 AM
Spitzer a super delegate ? by john riggs on Wednesday, Mar 12, 2008 at 12:21:57 PM
Political prosecution by Rady Ananda on Wednesday, Mar 12, 2008 at 3:25:54 PM
Mass distraction is for a media topic by john riggs on Wednesday, Mar 12, 2008 at 3:37:54 PM
So we are clear... by steve scheetz on Wednesday, Mar 12, 2008 at 3:38:15 PM
He should have resigned by john riggs on Wednesday, Mar 12, 2008 at 8:33:51 PM
Mr. Spitzer has been using hookers for 30 years by tom storey on Wednesday, Mar 12, 2008 at 6:47:28 PM
Was Silverstein probe the reason for this? by john riggs on Thursday, Mar 13, 2008 at 6:47:23 AM
WOW! by steve scheetz on Thursday, Mar 13, 2008 at 12:03:41 PM