Home
Refresh   Tag(s): ; ; ;
Add to My Group
September 23, 2009 at 12:37:32

Must Read 2   News 2   Well Said 1   View Ratings | Rate It

Promoted to Headline (H3) on 9/23/09:

William K. Black's Proposal for “Systemically Dangerous Institutions”

submit to twitter
submit to reddit
submit to digg

Tell A Friend

By George Washington (about the author)     Page 1 of 3 page(s)

opednews.com     Permalink

For OpEdNews: George Washington - Writer

William K. Black, Associate Professor of Economics and Law at the University of Missouri – Kansas City, and the former head S&L regulator, has written the following fantastic new proposal concerning the giant, insolvent banks. Posted/reprinted with Professor Black's permission.

William K. Black
Associate Professor of Economics and Law
University of Missouri – Kansas City

blackw@umkc.edu


September 10, 2009

The Obama administration is continuing the Bush administration policy of refusing to comply with the Prompt Corrective Action (PCA) law. Both administrations twisted a deeply flawed doctrine – “too big to fail” – into a policy enshrining crony capitalism.

Historically, “too big to fail” was a misnomer – large, insolvent banks and S&Ls were placed in receivership and their “risk capital” (shareholders and subordinated debtholders) received nothing. That treatment is fair, minimizes the costs to the taxpayers, and minimizes “moral hazard.” “Too big to fail” meant only that they were not placed in liquidating receiverships (akin to a Chapter 7 “liquidating” bankruptcy). In this crisis, however, regulators have twisted the term into immunity. Massive insolvent banks are not placed in receivership, their senior managers are left in place, and the taxpayers secretly subsidize their risk capital. This policy is indefensible. It is also unlawful. It violates the Prompt Corrective Action law. If it is continued it will cause future crises and recurrent scandals.

On October 16, 2006, Chairman Bernanke delivered a speech explaining why regulators must not allow banks with inadequate capital to remain open.
http://federalreserve.gov/newsevents/speech/bernanke20061016a.htm
Capital regulation is the cornerstone of bank regulators' efforts to maintain a safe and sound banking system, a critical element of overall financial stability. For example, supervisory policies regarding prompt corrective action are linked to a bank's leverage and risk-based capital ratios. Moreover, a strong capital base significantly reduces the moral hazard risks associated with the extension of the federal safety net.
The Treasury has fundamentally mischaracterized the nature of institutions it deems “too big to fail.” These institutions are not massive because greater size brings efficiency. They are massive because size brings market and political power. Their size makes them inefficient and dangerous.

Under the current regulatory system banks that are too big to fail pose a clear and present danger to the economy. They are not national assets. A bank that is too big to fail is too big to operate safely and too big to regulate. It poses a systemic risk. These banks are not “systemically important”, they are “systemically dangerous.” They are ticking time bombs – except that many of them have already exploded.

We need to comply with the Prompt Corrective Action law. Any institution that the administration deems “too big to fail” should be placed on a public list of “systemically dangerous institutions” (SDIs). SDIs should be subject to regulatory and tax incentives to shrink to a size where they are no longer too big to fail, manage, and regulate. No single financial entity should be permitted to become, or remain, so large that it poses a systemic risk.

SDIs should:
1. Not be permitted to acquire other firms

2. Not be permitted to grow

3. Be subject to a premium federal corporate income tax rate that increases with asset size

4. Be subject to comprehensive federal and state regulation, including:
a. Annual, full-scope examinations by their primary federal regulator

b. Annual examination by the systemic risk regulator

c. Annual tax audits by the IRS

Next Page  1  |  2  |  3

 

www.WashingtonsBlog.com

George Washington

George Washington is a pen name. I am using the pen name, with the approval of the publisher.

The views expressed in this article are the sole responsibility of the author
and do not necessarily reflect those of this website or its editors.

Contact Author Contact Editor View Authors' Articles

 

Book Recommendations for "Banking Law Leverage"
No leverage seen to gain banking deal.(financial services reform): An article from: National Underwriter Property
by Steven Brostoff

$5.95

Number of pages: 3
Publisher: The National Underwriter Company

Market regulation of bank leverage (Research papers in banking and financial economics)
by David B Humphrey


Number of pages:
Publisher: Financial Studies Section, Division of Research and Statistics, Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System

View All Book Recommendations

Share this page: (what's this?)                   Tell a Friend: Tell A Friend

FACEBOOK      DIGG THIS      Add This Page to Mr Wong!           NEWSVINE      DEl.ICIO.US      Looksmart Furl      NETSCAPE      My Web      Tag!RawSugar      Blink List     (More...)

Comments: Expand   Shrink   Hide  
4 comments
To view all comments:
Expand Comments
 

a breath of fresh airs by tanya on Thursday, Sep 24, 2009 at 4:38:26 AM
Capitalism by sommers on Thursday, Sep 24, 2009 at 6:54:54 AM
RE: Capitalism by Edward Ulysses Cate on Thursday, Sep 24, 2009 at 8:26:01 AM
Just keep the merchants out of government! by Perry Logan on Friday, Sep 25, 2009 at 12:07:28 PM

 
Want to post your own comment on this Article? Post Comment


 

 

 

Tell a Friend: Tell A Friend

Copyright © 2002-2009, OpEdNews

Powered by Populum