Share on Google Plus Share on Twitter Share on Facebook Share on LinkedIn Share on PInterest Share on Fark! Share on Reddit Share on StumbleUpon Tell A Friend 13 (13 Shares)  
Printer Friendly Page Save As Favorite View Favorites View Stats   7 comments

OpEdNews Op Eds

Why single-payer is the ONLY sensible health care reform (explained in plain English)

By (about the author)     Permalink       (Page 1 of 3 pages)
Related Topic(s): ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; (more...) ; ; ; , Add Tags  (less...) Add to My Group(s)

Valuable 4   Must Read 3   Well Said 3  
View Ratings | Rate It

opednews.com Headlined to H3 8/23/09

Health care is special

Health care services are in a special category of "services". Unlike almost all other services in our "free market" economy, most health care services (just like police and fire services) are necessary for all residents-often a matter of life and death.

Incredibly, we treat most health care services as if they were optional for some residents. The extreme costs, the multiple inefficiencies, and the shameful injustice of our current health care system are the guaranteed results of treating heath care services as optional for some residents.

As a civilized nation, we would never tolerate a system where police or fire services were treated as optional for some residents. To understand how utterly absurd our private health care system is, imagine life in America if we treated police and fire services the way we now treat most health care services.

If police and fire services were optional for some

Instead of groups pooling their resources and providing everyone with police and fire services, where each dollar spent provides a dollar's worth of services (minus the cost to administer payments), imagine introducing a middleman-police and fire insurance companies.

Like our current health care system, about 30% of every dollar we spend wouldn't provide any police or fire services whatsoever, but instead would go to other insurance company expenses.

Aside from administrative costs to pay for services, insurance companies would pay billions to shareholders as profits, plus spend billions more for advertising, lobbying Congress, huge executive salaries, and paying a large staff whose main job would be to find ways to shift costs to purchasers and providers and to maximize profits by minimizing services.

Like our current health care system, maximizing profits would mean charging the highest possible premiums (money in) while spending as little as possible on actual police and fire services (money out). This is simply smart business.

Insurance companies would compete to enroll residents likely to require the least police or fire services, while trying to avoid residents likely to require the most police or fire services. Like our current health care system, this would guarantee that residents who need these services the most would be the least likely to get them (this is simply smart business).

Those residents unfortunate enough to need services "too often" would be denied, dropped, or charged unaffordable premiums. Those who live in "dangerous" (low profit) areas would simply be denied police or fire services due to "pre-existing conditions" (this is simply smart business).

Insurance companies would have great profit incentives to find myriad ways to deny services or to shift costs because any money spent providing actual services comes right out of their profits. Like our current health care system, this would guarantee millions of residents would have no police or fire services at all (this is simply smart business).

In a civilized society, most health care services are no more optional than police and fire services. It's patently absurd to put a middleman (whose profit incentives are plainly against the interests of the American people) between us and our health care providers.

A middleman makes no sense for health services

It's clearly counterproductive to put a middleman between providers of necessary services and those who need these services. This guarantees disastrous results.

Providing real estate services using a middleman (agent) makes sense. A real estate middleman has profit incentives to provide purchasers with reasonably priced products because if prices are too high, purchasers won't buy and the middleman gets nothing. There's no profit incentives to deny purchasers what's being provided. Thus middleman profit incentives benefit both purchasers and providers.

Next Page  1  |  2  |  3

 

Take action -- click here to contact your local newspaper or congress people:
Single-payer is the only sensible plan

Click here to see the most recent messages sent to congressional reps and local newspapers

Carmen Yarrusso, a software engineer for 35 years, designed and modified computer operating systems (including Internet software). He has a BS in physics and studied game theory and formal logic during his years with the math department at (more...)
 

Share on Google Plus Submit to Twitter Add this Page to Facebook! Share on LinkedIn Pin It! Add this Page to Fark! Submit to Reddit Submit to Stumble Upon

Go To Commenting
The views expressed in this article are the sole responsibility of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of this website or its editors.

Writers Guidelines

Contact Author Contact Editor View Authors' Articles

Most Popular Articles by this Author:     (View All Most Popular Articles by this Author)

Wikiarguments: A practical plan to get big money out of politics

Why single-payer is the ONLY sensible health care reform (explained in plain English)

A Manifesto for the Impending Second American Revolution

Why a peaceful, people's revolution is the only way to take back our government

Top Ten Reasons to Legalize Marijuana Now

WikiArguments: a Simple, Efficient, and Effective Way to Completely Eliminate Deceit in Congress

Comments

The time limit for entering new comments on this article has expired.

This limit can be removed. Our paid membership program is designed to give you many benefits, such as removing this time limit. To learn more, please click here.

Comments: Expand   Shrink   Hide  
5 people are discussing this page, with 7 comments
To view all comments:
Expand Comments
(Or you can set your preferences to show all comments, always)

A single payer, once in charge, will set all price... by BFalcon on Sunday, Aug 23, 2009 at 6:18:00 PM
But that's OK, of course.... by Jill Herendeen on Monday, Aug 24, 2009 at 8:11:06 AM
Bailing out a lot of unregulated bankers is OK too... by Jill Herendeen on Monday, Aug 24, 2009 at 8:13:08 AM
Are you trying to match previous administration's ... by BFalcon on Monday, Aug 24, 2009 at 3:30:16 PM
HEALTH CARE REFORM IS A HOAXWhy single-payer is th... by liecatcher on Sunday, Aug 23, 2009 at 8:06:38 PM
What you said was taken as self-evident decades ag... by TomK on Sunday, Aug 23, 2009 at 11:55:52 PM
is not only feasible, in some countries it is the ... by Norman Azadian on Wednesday, Aug 26, 2009 at 11:57:15 AM