Share on Google Plus Share on Twitter Share on Facebook Share on LinkedIn Share on PInterest Share on Fark! Share on Reddit Share on StumbleUpon Tell A Friend 12 (12 Shares)  
Printer Friendly Page Save As Favorite View Favorites View Stats   28 comments

OpEdNews Op Eds

Why is Obama Losing

      (Page 1 of 1 pages)
Related Topic(s): ; ; ; ; , Add Tags Add to My Group(s)

View Ratings | Rate It Headlined to H2 9/11/08

Author 1980
Become a Fan
  (12 fans)
- Advertisement -
Senator Obama is now trailing Senator McCain in many national polls. In fact, his national popularity has been falling ever since he received the nomination and made a decision to move toward what the pundits describe as "the political center."

In the last few months Obama managed to demobilize the millions of young people and centrist Republicans who had momentarily allowed themselves to believe that Obama's idealism represented something so new in politics that they would overcome their own dis-interest in politics and transcend their own skepticism and even reach out to others. Their energy, instead of being understood as the key to electoral victory, was marginalized as the Obama handlers pushed him to be "realistic" and buy the same boring strategy that has lost most Democratic candidates their elections in the past thirty years: abandon your base and put your post-convention energies focused on an elusive "center" that barely exists.

The choice of Joe Biden, the foreign policy chair of the Senate who had resolutely refused to allow anti-war voices to testify before his committee at the outset of the Iraq war and who has been as dull and mainstream of the inside-the-beltway crowd could hope for, was only the crowning blow to the people who had been the energizers for the Obama camp

. But there had been others: the capitulation to AIPAC and the most reactionary elements in the Jewish world rather than a strong affirmation of the Israeli peace movement perspective on the conflict, the emphasis on how Obama would increase military presence in Afghanistan rather than putting forward a challenge to the militarism that had led us into the fantasy that acts of terror can be stopped through military domination of other countries (his victory in the primaries had been won by representing himself as the candidate of the anti-war sentiment in the country, and it was that which made it possible for him to beat Hillary Clinton who resolutely refused to apologize for her having capitulated to the militarist reasoning); his vote for a bill that extended the power of the president to wiretap on national security grounds (though he had previously promised to oppose it); his capitulation on off-shore drilling while failing to unveil a visionary plan to solve the global environmental problem); his embrace of a Supreme Court decision that banned the city of Washington from imposing gun control; and his distancing from the netroots that had supported him from the beginning.

To understand why these betrayals of his core constituency made a big difference in how he is perceived, particularly after Senator McCain did the opposite by choosing as his running mate an obvious soon-to-be-darling of the Republican's core constituency, we need to understand the psychodynamics of American presidential campaigns. There, the first thing to know is that the issues are rarely the issue. What counts much more are two things: the level of hope versus the level of fear, and the degree to which the candidate seems to understand and care about the well-being of the people whom s/he is seeking to lead (or what we might call the elitism factor).

Anyone hoping to end militarism and create social programs to reduce poverty, provide universal health care, and address the global environmental crisis is going to face the charge from the media and the political Right that they are "unrealistic" and "naive." Few Americans have the background to understand the details of the programs being presented, and so the tendency of many liberal and progressive politicians to focus on the details feels like technocratic noise that people quickly turn off. What people need to hear is a plausible account of why it is possible to hope for a world in which people can take care of each other and trust others enough so that we don't have to militarily dominate the world.
- Advertisement -

To do that, Obama needs to address the source of our fears, and to put forward a visionary program (I've suggested a Global Marshall Plan to end both domestic and global poverty, provide adequate education and health care, and repair the global environment) that rests explicitly on a rejection of the fear-oriented policies of the Bush/McCain team. Some of Obama's most loyal supporters imagined they heard that from him at the DNC, but most of the country did not come away excited by some new vision that would provide a fundamentally new direction for American domestic and foreign policy. But to the extent that Obama instead tries to fight on the same terrain as McCain (who is going to do better at wiping out all those evil people in the Middle East) he loses, because if the world is as fearful as the Right claims, then people will choose a genuine militarist, not a lukewarm one. And if that is the nature of the period in which we live, then many will move to the Right, because that's where the social energy is going, and that reinforces the most fearful part inside themselves.

Moreover, switching from being the candidate of the progressives and the visionaries to the candidate of the political center is understood by many people as a transparent manipulation based on the assumption that Americans are too distorted and stupid to embrace what Obama really stands for, so the only way to win their votes is to pretend to be a mild-mannered centrist. Thus the elitism charge seems to stick, because "if he can't trust Americans to hear his real ideas, the ones with which he made his political career as a progressive in the Senate and in the primaries, then why," reason many Americans, "should we trust him, since he obviously shares the general elitism of the liberal world, an elitism that expresses itself in the assumption that if we don't vote their way, it's only because we are stupid or evil. and big fans of some kind of fascism or repression?"

It's not too late to repair this, but Obama would have to reject the wisdom of the inside-the-Beltway talking heads and become once again the Obama that spoke for the possibilities of the 21st century, the Obama who momentarily this past Spring brought hope to millions of young people who now have returned to their cynicism and despair after his various capitulations.
- Advertisement -

Rabbi Michael Lerner is editor of Tikkun and national chair of the Tikkun Community/ Network of Spiritual Progressives. People are invited to subscribe to Tikkun magazine or join the interfaith organization the Network of Spiritual Progressives-- "both of which can be done by (more...)

Share on Google Plus Submit to Twitter Add this Page to Facebook! Share on LinkedIn Pin It! Add this Page to Fark! Submit to Reddit Submit to Stumble Upon

Go To Commenting

The views expressed in this article are the sole responsibility of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of this website or its editors.

Follow Me on Twitter

Contact AuthorContact Author Contact EditorContact Editor Author PageView Authors' Articles
- Advertisement -
Google Content Matches:

Most Popular Articles by this Author:     (View All Most Popular Articles by this Author)

Why is Obama Losing

Why I Disagree with Hedges and Nader on Obama

Trayvon Martin: A Jewish Response

Fr. Roy Bourgeois may be excommunicated for supporting female ordination

Healing from Post Traumatic Abandoned-by-Obama Syndrome

Why Progressives Should Run Against Obama and "Blue Dogs" in the 2012 Democratic Party Primaries


The time limit for entering new comments on this article has expired.

This limit can be removed. Our paid membership program is designed to give you many benefits, such as removing this time limit. To learn more, please click here.

Comments: Expand   Shrink   Hide  
20 people are discussing this page, with 28 comments
To view all comments:
Expand Comments
(Or you can set your preferences to show all comments, always)

Lerner's essay is the implication in the final... by Richard Mynick on Thursday, Sep 11, 2008 at 11:47:47 AM
Obama's not losing ground because he's mov... by Alan Williams on Thursday, Sep 11, 2008 at 1:04:24 PM
neither left nor right. Besides the simple fact th... by Mark Sashine on Thursday, Sep 11, 2008 at 2:17:09 PM
Mark,I think you've read my previous cites of ... by Alan Williams on Thursday, Sep 11, 2008 at 3:49:58 PM
I hope you are  smart enough to understand th... by Mark Sashine on Thursday, Sep 11, 2008 at 7:23:16 PM
Williams's view that the country is centrist a... by goedel on Thursday, Sep 11, 2008 at 4:24:29 PM
Comment from Ratings:   Rabbi Lerner's o... by goedel on Thursday, Sep 11, 2008 at 4:05:20 PM
Obama is not losing.  Any idiot who believes ... by daveys on Thursday, Sep 11, 2008 at 4:32:38 PM
It looks as though they are actually saying that r... by Linda Bemis on Thursday, Sep 11, 2008 at 4:59:44 PM
Picking someone to watch your back, who threatens ... by Hargrove on Saturday, Sep 13, 2008 at 1:14:41 AM
I tend to agree with your argument, but am surpris... by WML on Thursday, Sep 11, 2008 at 5:41:56 PM
Obama's "support" of the Second Amen... by Mike Kimball on Thursday, Sep 11, 2008 at 9:29:17 PM
Obama is not behind.  Obama is not losing.&nb... by Jeffrey Rock on Thursday, Sep 11, 2008 at 5:59:07 PM
Obama is a right winger and has always been a righ... by Ty on Thursday, Sep 11, 2008 at 6:07:56 PM
Rabbi Lerner.First may I say you have beautiful sm... by W. Christopher Epler (Bill) on Thursday, Sep 11, 2008 at 8:36:47 PM
If this election were only depending on "... by Mike Kimball on Thursday, Sep 11, 2008 at 10:00:52 PM
This article is likely correct; however, it really... by William White on Thursday, Sep 11, 2008 at 10:09:51 PM
''One thing I would like to see more infor... by francine on Friday, Sep 12, 2008 at 4:10:43 AM
... there's plenty of room for you idiots to s... by Mr M on Friday, Sep 12, 2008 at 9:11:43 AM
Exactly right. There's not a nickels worth of ... by Brad Griffeth on Friday, Sep 12, 2008 at 11:02:16 AM
To Read Mr M's posts when it comes to this typ... by steve scheetz on Friday, Sep 12, 2008 at 9:56:28 AM
I basically agree with Rabbi Lerner that Obama has... by Nathan Nahm on Friday, Sep 12, 2008 at 11:48:34 AM
I have posted it at my blog on; ... by Stephen Fox on Friday, Sep 12, 2008 at 7:42:51 PM
Has American finally succumed to having been "... by Stephen Fox on Friday, Sep 12, 2008 at 8:15:00 PM
Barack Obama will commence a government in Am... by Hargrove on Saturday, Sep 13, 2008 at 2:43:58 AM
You Obama supporters are a bunch of crackpot idiot... by Ty on Saturday, Sep 13, 2008 at 2:01:01 PM
lotsa comments, but no articles, eh, Ty? Why, Ty?... by Stephen Fox on Saturday, Sep 13, 2008 at 3:13:07 PM
Too many of his stances are of the current reich-w... by nightgaunt on Sunday, Sep 21, 2008 at 4:02:06 PM