Share on Google Plus Share on Twitter Share on Facebook Share on LinkedIn Share on PInterest Share on Fark! Share on Reddit Share on StumbleUpon Tell A Friend 2 (2 Shares)  
Printer Friendly Page Save As Favorite View Favorites View Stats   23 comments

Exclusive to OpEdNews:
Sci Tech

Why Scientists Succumb to Political Correctness

By (about the author)     Permalink       (Page 1 of 2 pages)
Related Topic(s): ; ; ; , Add Tags Add to My Group(s)

View Ratings | Rate It

opednews.com Headlined to H3 9/18/08

Become a Fan
  (4 fans)

Dr. Albert A. Bartlett, University of Colorado at Boulder, addresses America’s love affair with self-delusion. Dr. Bartlett remains the premiere voice in America concerning the greatest predicament facing our civilization in the 21st century.

While everyone in America suffers from its symptoms from gridlock, air pollution, crowding and higher energy prices--no politicians from governors to senators address it. Most Americans avoid demonstrating any awareness or they dismiss it out of hand. Yet, it accelerates as THE single greatest problem facing America and the world in the 21st century.

I’ve known Dr. Bartlett for over 25 years. He hosted the Gamow Lectures at CU for years.  Last month, he lectured in Boulder, Colorado as to the consequences of continued population growth in the USA and the world.  I spoke with him after the presentation at Chautauqua Park to a packed house.

“Throughout the world, scientists are prominently involved in seeking solutions to the major global problems such as global climate change and the growing inadequacy of energy supplies,” Dr. Bartlett said. “They present their writings in publications ranging from newspapers to scientific journals, but with a few rare exceptions, on one point they all replace objectivity with “political correctness.”

”In their writings the scientists identify the cause of the problems as being growing populations. But their recommendations for solving the problems caused by population growth almost never include the recommendation that we advocate stabilizing our population. Political Correctness dictates that we do not address the current problem of overpopulation in the U.S. and the world.

“We can demonstrate that the Earth is overpopulated by noting the following: “A SELF-EVIDENT TRUTH”

“If any fraction of the observed global warming can be attributed to the actions of humans, then this, by itself, constitutes clear and compelling evidence that the human population, living as we do, has exceeded the Carrying Capacity of the Earth, a situation that is clearly not sustainable.

“As a consequence it is “AN INCONVENIENT TRUTH” that all proposals or efforts at the local, national or global levels to solve the problems of global warming are serious intellectual frauds if they fail to advocate that we address the fundamental cause of global warming--namely overpopulation.

“We can demonstrate that the U.S. is overpopulated by noting that we now (2008) import 60 percent of the petroleum that we consume, 15 percent of the natural gas that we consume and 20 percent of the food we eat. Because the U.S. population increases by over three million per year, all of these fractions are increasing. Natural gas production in North America has peaked in spite of the drilling of hundreds of new gas wells annually. In a nutshell, the U.S. in 2008 is unsustainable.

“Let’s look at two prominent examples of this political correctness. The book, “An Inconvenient Truth” (1) was published to accompany Al Gore’s film by the same name. On page 216 Gore writes; “The fundamental relationship between our civilization and the ecological system of the Earth has been utterly and radically transformed by the powerful convergence of three factors. The first is the population explosion…”

“It’s clear that Gore understands the role of overpopulation in the genesis of global climate change. The last chapter in the book has the title, “So here’s what you personally can do to help solve the climate crisis.” The list of 36 things starts with “Choose energy-efficient lighting” and runs through an inventory of all of the usual suspects without ever calling for us to address overpopulation!

“As a second example, in the Clearinghouse Newsletter (2) we read the statement, “Human Impacts on Climate” from the Council of the American Geophysical Union. The title recognizes the human component of climate change which we note is roughly proportional to the product of the number of people and their average per capita annual resource consumption. The last paragraph of the A.G.U. statement starts with the sentence, “With climate change, as with ozone depletion, the human footprint on Earth is apparent.”

“The rest of the paragraph suggests what must be done, and it’s all the standard boilerplate. “Solutions will necessarily involve all aspects of society. Mitigation strategies and adaptation responses will call for collaborations across science, technology, industry, and government.” Etc., Etc., Etc… There is no mention of addressing the overpopulation which the statement recognizes is the cause of the problems.

“A few years ago I wrote an article calling the attention of the physics community to this shortcoming. (3) To my amazement, most of the letters to the editor responding to my article supported the politically correct unscientific point of view. (4), (5)

“Many journalists look to the scientists for advice. The scientists won’t talk about overpopulation, so the journalists and the reading public can easily conclude that overpopulation is not a problem. As a result, we have things such as the cover story in Time Magazine, April 9, 2007, “The Global Warming Survival Guide: 51 Things You Can Do to Make a Difference.” The list contained such useful recommendations as “Build a Skyscraper,” (No. 9, Pg. 74) but not one of the 51 recommendations deals with the need to address overpopulation!

“What’s one to do when scientists and political leaders demonstrate their understanding of the fact that overpopulation is the main cause of these gigantic global problems (collapsing fisheries, ozone hole, air pollution, acidification of our oceans via human pollution, dead zones in our oceans, species extinction, 18 million humans die of starvation annually, loss of rainforests….), yet the scientists’ recommendations for dealing with the problems never call for addressing overpopulation?”

Next Page  1  |  2

 

www.frostywooldridge.com

Frosty Wooldridge Bio: Frosty Wooldridge possesses a unique view of the world, cultures and families in that he has bicycled around the globe 100,000 miles, on six continents and six times across the United States in the past 30 years. His books (more...)
 

Share on Google Plus Submit to Twitter Add this Page to Facebook! Share on LinkedIn Pin It! Add this Page to Fark! Submit to Reddit Submit to Stumble Upon

Go To Commenting
The views expressed in this article are the sole responsibility of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of this website or its editors.

Writers Guidelines

Contact Author Contact Editor View Authors' Articles

Most Popular Articles by this Author:     (View All Most Popular Articles by this Author)

Over-Population Exponentially Increases Air Pollution

Growing Illiteracy in America: Creating entrenched poverty

U.S. economy in trouble and why

Part 1: Overpopulation in 21st century America--our risky future

Who is to blame for $4.00 a gallon gas? How about $10.00 a gallon?

What America will look like in 2050--fractured nation, multiple languages

Comments

The time limit for entering new comments on this article has expired.

This limit can be removed. Our paid membership program is designed to give you many benefits, such as removing this time limit. To learn more, please click here.

Comments: Expand   Shrink   Hide  
15 people are discussing this page, with 23 comments
To view all comments:
Expand Comments
(Or you can set your preferences to show all comments, always)

It's  astounding that this column doesn&#... by Frosty Wooldridge on Thursday, Sep 18, 2008 at 11:24:38 AM
Scientists like me have been warning about overpop... by John R Moffett on Thursday, Sep 18, 2008 at 4:36:51 PM
Whatever happened to the high school health class ... by daveys on Thursday, Sep 18, 2008 at 5:37:52 PM
Comment from Ratings:   ;-)... by hommedespoir on Thursday, Sep 18, 2008 at 5:42:14 PM
this issue to the usual constraints: war and disea... by Laudyms on Thursday, Sep 18, 2008 at 7:28:10 PM
I look at fertility rates in Europe, US and parts ... by pft on Thursday, Sep 18, 2008 at 8:00:29 PM
The hyothesis that man is causng the very limited ... by pft on Thursday, Sep 18, 2008 at 8:08:59 PM
is an oxymoron and a way of stifling anyone who ad... by Oh on Friday, Sep 19, 2008 at 2:43:27 AM
pft, you are right that man-made CO2 is a minor co... by gravity32 on Thursday, Sep 18, 2008 at 8:24:38 PM
I happen to believe we are not running out of reso... by pft on Friday, Sep 19, 2008 at 2:01:42 AM
that you are acquainted with physics and understan... by Oh on Friday, Sep 19, 2008 at 2:48:35 AM
I recognize the limits.  We have a vast sun w... by pft on Monday, Sep 22, 2008 at 7:28:29 PM
Scientists and academics do attempts to deal with ... by Bryan Emmel on Friday, Sep 19, 2008 at 12:00:36 AM
We are a technologically advanced industrial socie... by pft on Friday, Sep 19, 2008 at 2:08:39 AM
Yep, like all those "rapture ready" evan... by Rob Kall on Friday, Sep 19, 2008 at 9:07:53 AM
Directly due to the infliction of finance, we have... by amazin on Friday, Sep 19, 2008 at 2:33:31 AM
I'm sad to see the attacks on you and others who s... by Oh on Friday, Sep 19, 2008 at 3:04:15 AM
The solution to over population, and a lot more be... by R. A. Landbeck on Friday, Sep 19, 2008 at 7:36:40 AM
None of them that I've ever known. I think I k... by Gallaher on Friday, Sep 19, 2008 at 8:33:43 AM
Hyde Park with a twist.  The whole bunch of y... by Mark Sashine on Friday, Sep 19, 2008 at 9:30:38 AM
Mark,That wins the MOST ridiculous response title ... by Frosty Wooldridge on Friday, Sep 19, 2008 at 10:13:56 AM
Everyone gets what he can from the wisdom of ... by Mark Sashine on Friday, Sep 19, 2008 at 10:33:00 AM
It is ironic that while the depradations of the Re... by reasonableperson on Saturday, Sep 20, 2008 at 1:41:50 PM