Share on Google Plus Share on Twitter 1 Share on Facebook 2 Share on LinkedIn Share on PInterest Share on Fark! Share on Reddit Share on StumbleUpon Tell A Friend 17 (20 Shares)  
Printer Friendly Page Save As Favorite View Favorites (# of views)   61 comments

OpEdNews Op Eds

Why Obama can't blame the GOP for his inability to pass progressive legislation

By       Message Don Smith     Permalink
      (Page 1 of 2 pages)
Related Topic(s): ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; (more...) ; , Add Tags  (less...) Add to My Group(s)

Must Read 5   Well Said 4   Valuable 1  
View Ratings | Rate It

opednews.com Headlined to H1 8/23/10

Become a Fan
  (23 fans)
- Advertisement -
Oh, those terrible Republicans. Indeed, indeed. Who can deny it? The Republicans are bad news.

But when I hear President Obama and the Democratic leadership blame the Republicans for the Democrats' inability to pass progressive legislation, I get angry. Nancy Pelosi could have instituted impeachment hearings against Bush and Cheney once it became clear that they had misled the nation into war. At the start of his Administration, Obama could have pushed for prosecution of Bush-era crimes related to the war, torture, the politicization of the Justice Department, corruption of federal agencies, election fraud, and other matters.

In short, President Obama and the Democratic leadership's effort to shirk responsibility for effecting progressive change is belied by one salient fact: had Obama and the Democratic leadership prosecuted the Republicans for their numerous serious criminal acts, then the GOP would be in a much weaker position to mount an effective resurgence. The American people would now know the truth about what had happened, and many Republicans would be in prison or would be cowering in shame with their tails between their legs.

Pelosi and Obama DIDN'T EVEN TRY. Given the magnitude of the crimes perpetuated by the Bush gang, it's hard to see how there couldn't have been convictions and a fallout. Or at least the American public would have gotten a good political education.

The Repugs sure wouldn't have held their punches in a similar situation.

Instead, we all know what happened. Obama chose to look forward, not backwards. Obama chose to be bipartisan, not confrontational. Obama chose to hide the truth from the American people. Obama surrounded himself with advisers from the Bush Administration and from the conservative wing of the Democratic Party. Obama cut back room deals with Big Pharma and Big Insurance to eliminate a public option, the re-importation of drugs, and the ability of the government to negotiate drug prices. Obama continued Bush's bailouts of Wall Street, nixed windfall profit tax on bonuses, escalated the war in Afghanistan, and fired progressive advisers at the slightest provocation. Etc, etc, etc. See this petition.

No wonder Obama and the Dems are "struggling" to accomplish anything!

No wonder millions of progressives are contemplating giving up on the Democratic Party!
- Advertisement -


What did Obama expect? That the Republicans would play nice? That progressives would ignore his repeated betrayals? As Paul Krugman asked, is the Obama team a bunch of idiots?

I too share that healthy and natural urge to hold Obama accountable. In short, Obama actively tried to help the GOP.

But despite my extreme disappointment and anger at President Obama's poor leadership, I still think the best way for progressives to achieve their aims is for them to work within the Democratic Party to reform it. The work is unpleasant and difficult. But given the realities of the America's non-parliamentary political system, third parties have little (constructive) power. And given the damage that could be wrought were the GOP to regain power, progressive can't afford to cut off their noses to spite their faces.

I've argued this position at length here and here.

There really are many good and middling Democrats. For example, on July 27 of this year, 102 out of 250 House Democrats (40% of the Democrats) voted against funding the war in Afghanistan. President Obama had to rely on Republicans to continue funding his war. More Republicans (160) voted for the funding than Democrats (148).
- Advertisement -


So, I say: punish Obama, but don't punish the Dems in general.

How? Condemn Obama widely, pass resolutions critical of Obama in Democratic organizations, write letters-to-the-editor saying why Obama is doing poorly. But don't abandon the many progressives working within the Democratic Party to push it leftward. Such progressive Dems are particularly numerous at the local level.

The alternative is years in third-party oblivion, with likely GOP control of Congress and the White House.

Next Page  1  |  2

 

- Advertisement -

Must Read 5   Well Said 4   Valuable 1  
View Ratings | Rate It

http://waliberals.org
DFA organizer, Democratic Precinct Committee Officer, writer, and programmer. My op-ed pieces have appeared in the Seattle Times, the Seattle Post-Intelligencer, and elsewhere. See http://WALiberals.org and http://TruthSite.org for my writing, my (more...)
 

Share on Google Plus Submit to Twitter Add this Page to Facebook! Share on LinkedIn Pin It! Add this Page to Fark! Submit to Reddit Submit to Stumble Upon


Go To Commenting

The views expressed in this article are the sole responsibility of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of this website or its editors.

Writers Guidelines

Contact AuthorContact Author Contact EditorContact Editor Author PageView Authors' Articles
- Advertisement -

Most Popular Articles by this Author:     (View All Most Popular Articles by this Author)

The myth that the Dems are as bad as the Repugs

Why Abortion Isn't Murder

Image essay about blood soaked NRA

Failure to prosecute: why Obama is having trouble passing health care reform

Government is like a computer's operating system: a response to libertarians

Undividing the Left: Hard-core and Soft-core progressives