Tag(s): ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; (more...) ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; , Add Tags  (less...)
Add to My Group(s)

Must Read 7   Well Said 7   Interesting 4   View Ratings | Rate It

Promoted to Headline (H3) on 8/19/09:     Permalink
View Article Stats      (33 comments)

Why Holder and Obama have not fired the Bush Appointed, Rove-Vetted DOJ Attorneys

Add this Page to Facebook!
Submit to Twitter
Submit to Reddit
Submit to Stumble Upon

Tell A Friend

Become a Fan
Get Embed HTML Code
By (about the author)

Become a Fan Become a Fan  (176 fans)   -- Page 1 of 1 page(s)

opednews.com


It's an unprecedented outrage. There are scores of attorneys-- partisan, engaging in serial prosecutorial misconduct, like the cases of Gov. Don Siegelman and Cyril Wecht, and these Bush-appointees are still on the job, doing damage to the US, to justice and innocent victims.

I offer a theory why this breach of trust by Obama, why he has failed to do what every president before him has done.

The progressive media should be raising an outcry about this daily, pointing its light at the abuses of the individual prosecutors.

The mainstream media should be covering the abuses. All the media should be asking "Why?"

Why are Holder and Obama not firing and replacing these attorneys, as every other president taking office has done? Why are they leaving these partisan appointees, the worst, most partisan bunch in recent history, possibly ever?


I have a theory. Obama and his people, probably starting with Rahm Emanuel, are saving them to trade favors with key Republicans. You see these toxic, partisan attorneys have real value to Republicans, especially when you pair them with Bush appointed Federal judges. Put them together and they can prosecute a frog for hopping, and a public official who pissed off a Republican senator for breathing in the wrong direction. There are so many thousands of regulations and rules that a federal prosecutor inclined to abuse prosecutorial privilege can put the screws to the most honest person in the state.


If a senator, often the most powerful party member in a state, wants to take out the most powerful members, or most up and coming members of the opposition party, the DOJ attorney can be a powerful ally in making it happen. That's what happened to Don Siegelman and Cyril Wecht. They were targeted and accused with charges that were absolutely ridiculous and unreasonable. Wecht had the worst judge imaginable, who was later reversed by a Republican, Bush-appointee.

So, here's my guess on why Holder is holding back. Obama and his advisory team have decided that they can, when the crunch comes, for the next trillion dollar bailout, or when the final push comes to pass the health care bill, trade retention of a toxic Bush-appointed Federal attorney for a vote.

It's reprehensible, unacceptable, but, at a point when history has always seen the DOJ attorneys replaced, we must ask why this has not happened.

There's another hypothese a colleague has offered-- that Obama is bending over backwards not to make waves, to remain non-partisan, or rather, to maintain the lie of non-partisanism in this increasingly ugly, toxic partisan millieu that this 111th Congress has been marinating in.

I'm not satisfied with that explanation. It goes against history without enough of a possible payoff, without enough of a reason for keeping the actively destructive prosecutors in place.

One study shows that 85% of the targets of these prosecutors were Democrats. It is insane to leave them in place, doing the same dirty work when the nation elected a Democratic president.

Take Alabama, where the prosecutor who has vilified and terrorized Gov. Don Siegelman is still at work. We have two Republican Senators Richard Shelby and Jeff Sessions. They had plenty to gain getting rid of a powerful and popular Democratic governor, hurting the state's top Democratic leadership. They have plenty to gain keeping things that way. And hey, Shelby is ranking minority member of the Senate Banking committee. See the possibilities?

To me, this has the fingreprints of Rahm Emanuel, who never met a conservative or DINO he wouldn't sell out a progressive for, all over it.

It's time that progressive talk radio hosts and TV personalities-- Maddow, Schultz, Ratigan and Olbermann-- start counting down the days that these rogue attorneys are still allowed by Holder and Obama to remain in office. They should not be accepted as viable chips to be cashed in. America deserves the DOJ attorneys they voted for as part of the package of electing a president. Obama is letting us down one more way. His defenders say to give him time and that may be a fair request for some things. But he is way past the normal historical time for firing the past administration's attorneys. There's no excuse, no justification that is tolerable. They have to go.

The fruit is rotten, moldy and reeking, crawling with maggots and here, in late August, it is only going to get worse. The Rove-vetted, Bush appointed DOJ attorneys should be fired before Congress returns. Cyril Wecht suggests that the ones Rove had fired should be re-hired. They proved their integrity by refusing to serve their partisan bosses.

 

Rob Kall is executive editor, publisher and site architect of OpEdNews.com, Host of the Rob Kall Bottom Up Radio Show (WNJC 1360 AM), President of Futurehealth, Inc, more...)
 

The views expressed in this article are the sole responsibility of the author
and do not necessarily reflect those of this website or its editors.

Contact Author Contact Editor View Authors' Articles

Follow Me on Twitter

 

Share this page: (what's this?)                   Tell a Friend: Tell A Friend

Add this Page to Facebook!      Submit to Stumble Upon      Submit to Reddit      Add This Page to Mr Wong!           NEWSVINE      DEl.ICIO.US      Looksmart Furl      My Web      Blink List     (More...)

Comments

The time limit for entering new comments on this article has expired.

This limit can be removed. Our paid membership program is designed to give you many benefits, such as removing this time limit. To learn more, please click here.

Comments: Expand   Shrink   Hide  
33 comments
To view all comments:
Expand Comments
(Or you can set your preferences to show all comments, always)

BushCo US Attorneys by thomas unger on Wednesday, Aug 19, 2009 at 6:10:50 AM
Why Holder and Obama have not fired the Bush Appointed by David H Abernathy on Thursday, Aug 27, 2009 at 9:02:28 PM
What Ever Happened to Good Ole Time Protest? by elena dumas on Wednesday, Aug 19, 2009 at 6:23:14 AM
I'm with you, Elena by Josh Mitteldorf on Thursday, Aug 20, 2009 at 6:34:41 AM
Dawn Johnson by tjb on Wednesday, Aug 19, 2009 at 7:30:49 AM
The Jury is Still Out! by Eugene Elander on Wednesday, Aug 19, 2009 at 8:48:05 AM
why oh why by hourglass on Wednesday, Aug 19, 2009 at 9:02:32 AM
Here's kind of another theory. by Nick van Nes on Wednesday, Aug 19, 2009 at 9:23:21 AM
Your theory makes sense. by Nathan Nahm on Wednesday, Aug 19, 2009 at 9:47:10 AM
I hope you're right by Josh Mitteldorf on Thursday, Aug 20, 2009 at 7:05:41 AM
Another Explanation by Scott Baker on Wednesday, Aug 19, 2009 at 9:34:09 AM
Why Holder and Obama have not fired the Bush Appointed by David H Abernathy on Thursday, Aug 27, 2009 at 9:29:21 PM
**harry must go! by Joe Walsh on Wednesday, Aug 19, 2009 at 9:58:34 AM
Another theory... by Old Uncle Dave on Wednesday, Aug 19, 2009 at 10:50:47 AM
Disappointment by Kirk Taylor on Wednesday, Aug 19, 2009 at 11:26:26 AM
Another Reason by Dennis Kaiser on Wednesday, Aug 19, 2009 at 11:28:46 AM
Email I got from Siegelman by Don Smith on Wednesday, Aug 19, 2009 at 11:54:18 AM
got one for you by trail the dogs on Wednesday, Aug 19, 2009 at 3:41:53 PM
Obama is the DINO-in-Chief by Michael Green on Wednesday, Aug 19, 2009 at 12:30:31 PM
Obama is the DINO-in-Chief by David H Abernathy on Thursday, Aug 27, 2009 at 9:39:07 PM
Corrupt US Attorneys by Bruce Arnold on Wednesday, Aug 19, 2009 at 12:35:20 PM
WE SHOULD EMBRACE NONSENSE by Blaine Kinsey on Wednesday, Aug 19, 2009 at 1:21:24 PM
Another reason Holder not firing AUSAs -- former clients? by bright93 on Wednesday, Aug 19, 2009 at 2:39:48 PM
Another theory or two by Harold Barre on Wednesday, Aug 19, 2009 at 3:00:14 PM
any body suprised by trail the dogs on Wednesday, Aug 19, 2009 at 3:33:19 PM
Experience by kwalsh on Wednesday, Aug 19, 2009 at 6:24:36 PM
You and David Swanson Make the Same Mistake by Jason Paz on Wednesday, Aug 19, 2009 at 7:12:19 PM
Great Article, But I see worse to come... by William Cormier on Wednesday, Aug 19, 2009 at 10:50:01 PM
WOW! by James Hadstate on Thursday, Aug 20, 2009 at 1:18:31 PM
Worried? Try leaving the country, but where??? by WhatNow? on Friday, Aug 21, 2009 at 4:36:28 PM
Clear as a bell by Marta Steele on Friday, Aug 21, 2009 at 8:12:25 PM
I speculate blackmail by Paul Karsh on Sunday, Aug 23, 2009 at 1:13:42 AM
Why Holder and Obama have not fired the Bush Appointed by David H Abernathy on Thursday, Aug 27, 2009 at 8:13:11 PM