Share on Google Plus Share on Twitter Share on Facebook 1 Share on LinkedIn Share on PInterest Share on Fark! Share on Reddit Share on StumbleUpon Tell A Friend (1 Shares)  
Printer Friendly Page Save As Favorite View Favorites View Stats   6 comments

Exclusive to OpEdNews:
OpEdNews Op Eds

Why Conflict With Iran Isn't Likely ... Probably.

By (about the author)     Permalink       (Page 1 of 1 pages)
Related Topic(s): ; ; , Add Tags Add to My Group(s)

View Ratings | Rate It Headlined to None 1/20/12

- Advertisement -

With all the sabre rattling in the Middle East in recent weeks, the Islamic Republic of Iran and the United States and its allies in that region appear to be playing a game of brinkmanship that is heightening tensions in a volatile region. This past Wednesday, Mostafa Ahmadi-Roshan, a high level Iranian nuclear scientist was reportedly killed in the Iranian capital Tehran by a magnetic bomb attached to his car according to the BBC. This is not the first such assassination of high level Iranian nuclear personnel.   Nuclear physicist, Massoud Ali Mohammadi was killed in a bombing in January 2010.   Another nuclear physicist, Majid Shahriari was killed in a bombing in Tehran in November 2010.   Darioush Rezaeinejad, a nuclear scientist was shot dead in July of 2011.   Perhaps more troubling for peace, however, is the revelation that Mossad, the Israeli secret service, was acting under the guise of CIA operatives to recruit Pakistani militants to carry out attacks in Iran according to Al Jazeera (hardline Sunni militants - such as Al-Qaeda, or the Haqqani network - view predominantly Shia Iran with almost as much contempt as the United States).

I believe the Americans when they say they had nothing to do with the assassination, however the same cannot be said of America's allies in the region, notably Israel and Saudi Arabia, both bitter enemies of the Islamic Republic.   Iran has come forward recently with "hard evidence" (Al Jazeera) tying the CIA to the assassination.   While I view with skepticism any claims by the Iranian authorities, the evidence does seem to point to foreign backed terrorism being behind the assassination.   Israel and the United States have huge incentives to carry out such an attack and have done so in the past.   Recent comments by Israeli Chief of General Staff, Lt. Gen. Benny Gantz coming the day after the most recent assassination that Iran should expect more "unnatural events" if it does not change course paint a picture of Israeli and or American involvement.  

America is not interested in a conflict with Iran, as it would only exacerbate existing conflicts from Afghanistan, to Iraq to Syria -- areas where Iran can play bull in the china shop if it so chose.   I also believe that the clerics who run Iran don't want a war.   Iran's military is no match for the Saudis or the Israelis, let alone the massive American presence in the region (Iran spends a pithy 1.8 per cent of its GDP on military expenditures, compared with 11.2 per cent for Saudi Arabia according to the Stockholm International Peace Research Institute).   However, if faced with a restive population, a conflict with the hated Americans or Israelis could serve to rally support for the government, much in the way that Saddam Hussien's invasion in 1980 served to galvanize support around the hardline clerics after the Iranian revolution of 1979.   Therefore, the situation that will be most crucial to watch is not the military maneuvers in the Gulf or the bellicose rhetoric coming from Tehran or Washington, but the domestic situation in Iran itself.   With international sanctions beginning to bite, the Iranian people may become restive and demand the sort of change that is happening elsewhere in the Middle East.   If this happens, the Iranian leadership may be willing to engage in riskier and more desperate tactics to hold on to power -- while the rest of us can just hold on.

- Advertisement -
- Advertisement -


I am an economics graduate student at Dalhousie University in Halifax, Canada. My background is political economy with a strong Marxist component. I am studying economics not to be an economist, but so as to better understand the world.

Share on Google Plus Submit to Twitter Add this Page to Facebook! Share on LinkedIn Pin It! Add this Page to Fark! Submit to Reddit Submit to Stumble Upon

Go To Commenting

The views expressed in this article are the sole responsibility of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of this website or its editors.

Writers Guidelines

Contact Author Contact Editor View Authors' Articles
- Advertisement -

Most Popular Articles by this Author:     (View All Most Popular Articles by this Author)

Why Conflict With Iran Isn't Likely ... Probably.


The time limit for entering new comments on this article has expired.

This limit can be removed. Our paid membership program is designed to give you many benefits, such as removing this time limit. To learn more, please click here.

Comments: Expand   Shrink   Hide  
5 people are discussing this page, with 6 comments
To view all comments:
Expand Comments
(Or you can set your preferences to show all comments, always)

Great to have a student posting. We have a pa... by Rob Kall on Friday, Jan 20, 2012 at 8:16:22 AM
Not to discourage  but the article above rese... by Mark Sashine on Friday, Jan 20, 2012 at 10:21:58 AM
Fancy meeting you here, Mark. Well, let's hope ... by Ned Lud on Friday, Jan 20, 2012 at 10:42:13 AM
Books (and university studies) are quite... by Ned Lud on Friday, Jan 20, 2012 at 10:32:36 AM is the website to follow on this... by Mike Preston on Friday, Jan 20, 2012 at 11:27:03 AM
Um excuse me for saying so, but what exactly is it... by Eddy Schmid on Friday, Jan 20, 2012 at 9:08:04 PM