Tag(s): ; ; ; ; ; ; , Add Tags
Add to My Group(s)

View Ratings | Rate It

Permalink
View Article Stats      (6 comments)

What Specter's Spectacular Could Portend

Add this Page to Facebook!
Submit to Twitter
Submit to Reddit
Submit to Stumble Upon

Tell A Friend

Become a Fan
Get Embed HTML Code
By (about the author)

Become a Fan Become a Fan   -- Page 1 of 1 page(s)

opednews.com

Arlen Specter's move to the Democratic Party could be the start of a realignment that would get this country out of the box it built with its two party system.

Here's how I see it. The leftmost member of the Republican Party moves over to the Democratic Party, thereby making it crystal clear that the Dems do not really play left to the Republicans' right, but rather that both are essentially centrist parties.

As long as this equation remains, there is no chance of the United States every rejoining the rest of the civilized world, which is social democratic.  Now, that can happen.

It has hitherto been impossible for a third party to be anything more than an election spoiler.  But attempts have hitherto been confined to dissatisfied members of one or the other of the main parties going off and creating an Independent Party, whether or not it is called such.  Now, very differently, there is a real opportunity for the Progressive Caucus to secede from the Democratic Party to create a Social Democratic Party.

Polarization between the two major parties has for decades been mild.  Since the election of President Obama it is becoming dramatic.  This means that there are in effect three distinct political trends in this country: left, right and center. The now very small Republican Party having slid toward the extreme right, there has to be a party that is explicitly to the left of the Democratic Party, which occupies the middle ground--a Social Democratic Party.

Part of the polarization is an attempt by the right to confuse an untutored public by conflating socialism with fascism, and by conveniently overlooking the fact that for 70 years, "socialism," unless specifically defined, was code for "communism."


Roosevelt's New Deal was bucking Stalinism.  Supporters of Obama's New Deal have to be clear about what they want it to mean: Democratic Socialism.

Now is the time. Specter has opened the way.

 

www.otherjones.com

Born in Philadelphia, I spent most of my adolescent and adult years in Europe. I began my journalistic career at the French News Agency in Rome, then worked as on-set press officer for the shooting of the Fellini film '8 1/2' in order to write a (more...)
 

The views expressed in this article are the sole responsibility of the author
and do not necessarily reflect those of this website or its editors.

Contact Author Contact Editor View Authors' Articles

 

Share this page: (what's this?)                   Tell a Friend: Tell A Friend

Add this Page to Facebook!      Submit to Stumble Upon      Submit to Reddit      Add This Page to Mr Wong!           NEWSVINE      DEl.ICIO.US      Looksmart Furl      My Web      Blink List     (More...)

Comments

The time limit for entering new comments on this article has expired.

This limit can be removed. Our paid membership program is designed to give you many benefits, such as removing this time limit. To learn more, please click here.

Comments: Expand   Shrink   Hide  
6 comments
To view all comments:
Expand Comments
(Or you can set your preferences to show all comments, always)

Deena is confused by M. Bennett on Saturday, May 9, 2009 at 9:56:13 AM
Social democracy??? by Devaron DLH on Saturday, May 9, 2009 at 11:47:45 AM
Create a third party? by Dave Kisor on Saturday, May 9, 2009 at 3:34:53 PM
There is ONLY 1 Major Party by Freedom4America Group on Saturday, May 9, 2009 at 5:32:58 PM
One Dimensional Analysis by Maxwell on Sunday, May 10, 2009 at 9:40:04 PM
Democratic Socialism by Bryan Emmel on Monday, May 11, 2009 at 3:52:54 AM