Share on Google Plus Share on Twitter Share on Facebook Share on LinkedIn Share on PInterest Share on Fark! Share on Reddit Share on StumbleUpon Tell A Friend 1 (1 Shares)  

Printer Friendly Page Save As Favorite View Favorites (# of views)   6 comments
OpEdNews Op Eds

What Specter's Spectacular Could Portend

By   Follow Me on Twitter     Message Deena Stryker     Permalink
      (Page 1 of 1 pages)
Related Topic(s): ; ; ; ; ; ; , Add Tags Add to My Group(s)

View Ratings | Rate It Headlined to None 5/8/09

Author 23276
Become a Fan
  (42 fans)
- Advertisement -
Arlen Specter's move to the Democratic Party could be the start of a realignment that would get this country out of the box it built with its two party system.

Here's how I see it. The leftmost member of the Republican Party moves over to the Democratic Party, thereby making it crystal clear that the Dems do not really play left to the Republicans' right, but rather that both are essentially centrist parties.

- Advertisement -
As long as this equation remains, there is no chance of the United States every rejoining the rest of the civilized world, which is social democratic.  Now, that can happen.

It has hitherto been impossible for a third party to be anything more than an election spoiler.  But attempts have hitherto been confined to dissatisfied members of one or the other of the main parties going off and creating an Independent Party, whether or not it is called such.  Now, very differently, there is a real opportunity for the Progressive Caucus to secede from the Democratic Party to create a Social Democratic Party.

Polarization between the two major parties has for decades been mild.  Since the election of President Obama it is becoming dramatic.  This means that there are in effect three distinct political trends in this country: left, right and center. The now very small Republican Party having slid toward the extreme right, there has to be a party that is explicitly to the left of the Democratic Party, which occupies the middle ground--a Social Democratic Party.

Part of the polarization is an attempt by the right to confuse an untutored public by conflating socialism with fascism, and by conveniently overlooking the fact that for 70 years, "socialism," unless specifically defined, was code for "communism."

- Advertisement -
Roosevelt's New Deal was bucking Stalinism.  Supporters of Obama's New Deal have to be clear about what they want it to mean: Democratic Socialism.

Now is the time. Specter has opened the way.
- Advertisement -


- Advertisement -

View Ratings | Rate It

Born in Phila, I spent most of my adolescent and adult years in Europe, resulting over time in several unique books, my latest being Cuba, Diary of A Revolution

CUBA: Diary of a Revolution, Inside the Cuban Revolution with Fidel, Raul, Che, and Celia Sanchez

Lunch with Fellini, Dinner with Fidel: An Illustrated Personal Journey from the Cold War to the Arab Spring


Share on Google Plus Submit to Twitter Add this Page to Facebook! Share on LinkedIn Pin It! Add this Page to Fark! Submit to Reddit Submit to Stumble Upon

Go To Commenting
/* The Petition Site */
The views expressed in this article are the sole responsibility of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of this website or its editors.

Follow Me on Twitter

Contact AuthorContact Author Contact EditorContact Editor Author PageView Authors' Articles
- Advertisement -

Most Popular Articles by this Author:     (View All Most Popular Articles by this Author)

A time-line comparison of the rise of Fascism in Nazi Germany and today's United States.

Did Assad Make 'A Fatal Mistake? Read his words

The Rise and Fall of American Exceptionalism

Poland: Ukraine's Other Nemesis

On the Brink of WWIII, A Primer on Russian History-- Facts and Fantasy

How So-Called Progressive Journalists Mislead the Public