Listening to the endless stream of cars passing my house every day, and knowing, from watching them from my mailbox, that they are almost all carrying just one person, either commuting to work or running some kind of errand, I know we are headed for disaster.
Two days ago, there was a report by Agence France Presse about the ongoing destruction of the world’s remaining wetlands (60 percent have already been destroyed by man over the past century), and how they contain within them an amount of stored carbon equal to all the carbon currently in the atmosphere. Global warming and property development are drying out those remaining wetlands, causing the release of that carbon, which will more than negate even the most radical efforts at reducing carbon emissions from power plants, factories and automobiles.
There are also credible, well-researched reports that even a few more degrees of temperature rise in the arctic regions of Siberia and northern North America will melt the permafrost and release as much 400 gigatons of methane gas trapped in frozen clathrates for millennia—the release of which would cause global temperatures to soar to levels not seen in 250 million years (methane is 20 times as potent a global warming gas as CO2). Vast regions of Siberia are already bubbling with releasing methane as the permafrost line moves north.
Now I grant that our corporate media, ever focused laser-like on important stories like Brittany Spears’ return to the stage and on the latest gaffe of one or the other presidential candidate, have not been very interested in alerting the masses to these disasters now in progress that could end humanity’s run on the planet (along with exterminating most of the rest of the life on the planet too). But that said, at this point everyone has surely heard enough, and witnessed enough in person of the dramatic changes taking place in the earth’s climate, to know that something scary is going on.
And yet, people are not just going about their business as usual—they are actually, for the most part, complaining not about the lack of highly energy-efficient transportation, the lack of alternative and less energy-wasting public transit, and the lack of government funding for a crash program into researching carbon-free energy solutions, but rather about the high price for carbon fuels. People are clamoring for solutions to make gasoline cheaper!
Years ago, back in the 1970s during an Arab-led oil embargo, when gas prices soared, there were mass campaigns to organize car pools. No such campaigns are being organized today, and if any are they don’t get any media attention. Instead we read that geologists are saying that massive quantities of untapped oil reserves exist in the far north.
Now the last thing we should be wanting to do is take that nicely sequestered carbon out of the ground and burn it into CO2! But that’s what many Americans want done. Screw the climate! We want our cheap gas!
There are so many things we could be doing right now to reduce carbon emissions—as individuals and as a nation. Turning off air-conditioners would be one. Why should entire houses be cooled by central air? Cool one room and use it for the hottest part of the day if need be. Live downstairs during the hottest months and close off the upstairs when it gets too hot. Ditto in the winter. There’s no need to occupy and heat an entire house when it gets really cold. Most Americans’ homes are way too large anyhow, but if you need that much room, use it when it doesn’t require all that extra energy to heat and cool. (When I lived in Cambridge, England as a kid, we used to sleep in unheated bedrooms under cozy comforters, and then in the morning, I’d go down and light a fire in the living room where we’d be during the day. It would be cold as hell until the fire started, but not for long.) Share rides. Plan errands so that many things get taken care of on one outing, instead of in multiple run-outs. Use bicycles. I have yet to see, on my own bike rides in town or when driving anywhere, someone who is actually riding a bike on some errand—carrying a load in a basket or in a backpack. The only bikers I see are people dressed like Tour de France racers out for some exercise. What’s the matter with using bikes for a purpose, instead of the family car?
I’m not trying to criticize, or to say I’m more ecologically virtuous. I’m looking at this as an unprecedented disaster that is dooming my kids, or their future children, to a life of strife, misery and maybe even catastrophe. If I don’t take serious action—and I don’t just mean individual life changes, but political action—to try and save their world, I am guilty of a serious crime. And so are we all.
What the hell happened to any sense of shared responsibility, not just for society, but for our own offspring?
Most decent parents are ready to sacrifice in their lifestyles in order to send their kids to college, or to help them out financially when they are starting out as young adults. But for some strange reason nobody seems ready to sacrifice at all when it comes to rescuing their collective future. This makes no sense.
And yet, this is what our mass culture has done to us. As a nation, as a people, we cannot think beyond our own noses. We cannot even think about the need to act in our own and our children’s interest.
Seventeen years ago, I had occasion while living in Shanghai, China, to visit a rural area in Anhui Province that the year before had been devastated by a flood so huge that the entire region had been not just flooded, but put deep underwater. As I neared a county seat town that was my intended destination, the bus I was on passed a dike-building project. Thousands of peasants were laboring by hand, with shovels and wheelbarrows, to erect a 50-foot wall of earth to keep the river in its banks in the event of another such flood. I got off the bus and, with my travel companion, started walking towards the project. When we were spotted, thousands of those workers dropped their shovels and ran towards us. It was a terrifying moment to have so many people heading towards and surrounding us, but they were very friendly—just curious because none of them had ever met a westerner. We began talking with them, and learned that they were all peasants who had left their fields to build this colossal new Great Wall of dirt. They brought us to the worksite and showed us how they would bring their wheelbarrows to the base of the dike, and then attach a cable, which was connected to a winch operated by those ubiquitous one-cylinder, two-stroke kerosene tractors used across rural China. The winch would whip the barrow up the steep hillside, with a peasant running up behind keeping it upright. At the last minute, the peasant would flip the barrow, dumping the dirt and releasing the hook. Then he’d be off down the hill to collect more dirt.
What struck me, besides their ingenuity, was how all these thousands of people had left their own fields to labor for the collective good that year.
I tried at the time to contemplate my fellow Americans doing the same thing, and couldn’t for the life of me imagine it.
Dave Lindorff, a columnist for Counterpunch, is author of several recent books ("This Can't Be Happening! Resisting the Disintegration of American Democracy" and "Killing Time: An Investigation into the Death Penalty Case of Mumia Abu-Jamal"). His latest book, coauthored with Barbara Olshanshky, is "The Case for Impeachment: The Legal Argument for Removing President George W. Bush from Office (St. Martin's Press, May 2006). His writing is available at http://www.thiscantbehappening.net
We are on the same wave length. We must switch at least 50% of our guns and bombs budget over to the electric car we can plug into our solar powered roofs. That would put generations to work on something useful. Also, by bringing all the troops home we would give the terrorist no reason to attack US again. (And they do have sound reasons to hate US. We shouldn't even need to ask this question: Why is our oil under their sand?)
by
Michael Dewey (4 articles, 1 quicklinks, 3 diaries, 186 comments)
on Thursday, July 24, 2008 at 4:32:23 PM
It's looking more and more like we're not going to make it.
I read article after article bemoaning the lack of response both of ordinary Americans and the ruling class to pressing problems, albeit completely different problems. The people can’t seem to awaken from their collective trance and react effectively to the threats facing them. Faced with the loss of their liberty, their democracy, their leisure and their affluence, they do nothing. Their torpor and acedia threatens to be a lethal response for them.
From a Darwinist perspective, they are becoming progressively less fit as their environment evolves but they don’t adapt. Various hypothesis and speculations are offered up for consideration to account for such a surprisingly inadequate reaction, most of the form of group symptoms induced by some manipulative program of behavior control put into play by our Machiavellian captors, malevolent social engineers who have somehow changed us. None of these hypotheses is compelling or sheds any light. We are not so much lemmings, who are at least directed and motivated, but more like frogs in the pot being slowly brought to boil, dying from an unexpected and inadequately explained failure to react.
But at the same time, our masters seem to have a lethal deficiency of their own which is even more unexpected. Our caretakers have chosen to play chicken with the earth’s climate for no apparent reason other that a lust for profit. They seem to be willing to take an extremely high-risk gamble that the consensus position of science and the scientists with regard to the threat of global warning is mistaken. Who could have predicted such a foolish response from an otherwise rational and competent (albeit morally challenged) class that appears to be hell-bent on self-annihilation?
These plutocrats don’t appear to be playing brinkmanship, like a man scooping up cash in a burning house who will stay in the house as long as he can, but still very aware that he will eventually have to quit scooping up money and abandon it and the house. He may make an error in judgment and remain too long, but his plan was never to ignore or defy the fire. These masters of industry and government appear to have no intention of going to the door or even to scoop up the money closer to it. They’re just going to call the fire’s bluff and not move.
Our aristocracy seems to be firmly and resolutely committed to their bizarre thinking that there is no chance of a greenhouse threat for no reason. They appear to be treating the conclusions of the majority of the scientific community as if they are ignorant notwithstanding a few centuries of brilliance.
That’s bizarre. And very unexpected.
So, what can be said other than the fact that man appears to be about ready to blunder, committed to it, in fact. I have to start taking that seriously. Man may very well be getting ready to boil.
by
Yaybob (12 articles, 0 quicklinks, 1 diaries, 174 comments)
on Friday, July 25, 2008 at 12:31:35 AM
3 comments
How would you rate this?
You must be logged in (if signed up) to do ratings.
It's free to signup! And easy. And takes just a minute or two....