Share on Google Plus Share on Twitter Share on Facebook 2 Share on LinkedIn Share on PInterest Share on Fark! Share on Reddit Share on StumbleUpon Tell A Friend 1 (3 Shares)  
Printer Friendly Page Save As Favorite View Favorites View Stats   4 comments

OpEdNews Op Eds

Water-Free Fracking--Why Not?

By (about the author)     Permalink       (Page 1 of 1 pages)
Related Topic(s): ; ; ; ; ; , Add Tags Add to My Group(s)

View Ratings | Rate It

opednews.com Headlined to H4 3/30/13

Become a Fan
  (22 fans)

Fracking the Boulder Bandshell by j dial


Without a doubt one of the most persuasive arguments against fracking, not just in the west but on the planet, is its promiscuous wastage of water, water that virtually goes away, never to be of use again.  What if someone came up with a way to frack without water? 

Someone has.  LPG (liquefied propane gas) fracking uses in place of water a thick gel made from propane like that which feeds your gas barbeque.  A research engineer critical of fracking's use of vast amounts of water came up with the concept.  Propane fracking is alive in Canada where the inventor, Robert Lestz, has joined the company GasFrac.  While awaiting a US patent the technique has been tested in such states as Texas, Pennsylvania, Oklahoma, New Mexico, and Colorado.  The gel is used like water and has the same effect, pumped underground at pressure with the proppant within it holding open cracks in shale from which natural gas emerges. 

Underground pressure and heat convert the gel to vapor and with the gas it returns to the surface, where it is collected and separated.  The propane vapor can be re-gelled and reused.   Unlike water, propane gas does not ferry drilling chemicals, radioactive water, and other unsavories back to the surface with it.  And with LPG fracking, another knotty problem with water-based fracking--shiploads of wastewater--goes away. 

Fracking with propane was attempted back in the 70s.  At that time the gel was mixed with sand in something like a blender.  Exposed to air, the propane tended to 'boil' into vapors.  A closed-loop system developed by GasFrac now keeps the gel unsublimated. 

When water is used in fracking it can block the cracks through which natural gas is collected.  This can't happen with propane.  And less is needed.  According to Lestz, one gallon of propane is used for every five gallons of water.  With water-free fracking, more natural gas is milked from the tiny pockets in which it accumulates.  Without water to block tiny passages, propane accesses more natural gas.  And compared to 'regular' fracking only about one-quarter of the number of truck trips are required. 

With water-free fracking, have we at last found a way to have our gas and burn it too? 

Avoiding the virtual destruction of water is a huge plus.  So are lack of wastewater and fewer 'thumper trucks'.  But before we pop the cork we might consider more factors. 

Propane is flammable, and a lot of it is needed.  In 2011, a flash fire at a GasFrac site in Alberta injured 13 people.  Since then, during drilling no one can be within the 'hot zone', which is 50 meters or about 150 feet from the wellhead.  The equipment is operated from afar.  Over 20 sensors monitor for vapors, and closed-circuit televisions and infrared cameras seek temperature changes that might imply a propane leak.  Pressure sensors identify failures.  

Expense is an issue.  Despite the fact that it can be reused, propane costs more than water.  The technology is proprietary and will have limited availability; costs will be consonant with demand.  Infrastructure is also a factor for propane delivery. 

Leaking gas is an issue.  Proponents claim that with propane fracking one-hundred percent of the once-gelled vapor is reclaimed and maybe that is so.  But methane leakage from fracking sites is increasingly recognized as onerous.  Annually, about three trillion cubic feet of methane leak from drill sites into the atmosphere.   That's as much warming power as arises each year from about half of this country's coal-burning plants.  The major culprits are Russia and the US; on this, China still lags.  That three-billion-cubic-feet figure, by the way, is an estimate that is probably low.   Thus far regulators have 'encouraged' companies to seek and cap methane emissions from oil and gas wells, pipelines, and tanks, but the industry, citing cost and complexity in inspecting some 700,000 wells, is largely recalcitrant.   Will propane drilling be so different?  

Sadly, we are addicted and nothing is safe.  We drain the easy sources of oil and gas and only drill more deeply and widely.  We seek to extract every cubic millimeter.  We scrape ancient forests from bituminous sands; we blow the tops off mountains.  The ice sheets melt from global warming, so we race to get more hydrocarbons to pump into the air.  We are so eager for the unveiling of virgin territory to exploit that you can hear the heavy breathing.  

Every time we chase the tail of another fossil-fuel energy chimera we delay that much longer any serious quest for sustainable energy solutions.   Do we really believe that we can have our earth and burn it too?   

***

Past articles on fracking:  Everything You Always Wanted to Know About Fracking But Should Be Afraid to Ask--An Overview; Fracking:  Water Issues--Colorado-centric, But Applicable to All; Who the Frack's Really in Charge? (on regulation). 

 

Dr. Dial is a psychologist and medical illustrator who for well over a decade has worked as a freelance medical and science writer and editor. She is an editor for OpEdNews, having contributed a number of articles to it about hydraulic fracturing, (more...)
 

Share on Google Plus Submit to Twitter Add this Page to Facebook! Share on LinkedIn Pin It! Add this Page to Fark! Submit to Reddit Submit to Stumble Upon

Go To Commenting
The views expressed in this article are the sole responsibility of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of this website or its editors.

Follow Me on Twitter

Contact Author Contact Editor View Authors' Articles
Related Topic(s): ; ; ; ; ; , Add Tags

Most Popular Articles by this Author:     (View All Most Popular Articles by this Author)

Seeds of destruction: It's NOT just about food

Who Turned Scientific American?

Who the Frack's Really in Charge?

Why Barack Obama Does Not Disappoint Some Folks

Fracking: Water Issues--Colorado-centric, but applicable to all

Everything You Always Wanted to Know About Fracking but Should Be Afraid to Ask

Comments

The time limit for entering new comments on this article has expired.

This limit can be removed. Our paid membership program is designed to give you many benefits, such as removing this time limit. To learn more, please click here.

Comments: Expand   Shrink   Hide  
4 people are discussing this page, with 4 comments
To view all comments:
Expand Comments
(Or you can set your preferences to show all comments, always)

For starters, the main problem with fracking is po... by Joe Giambrone on Sunday, Mar 31, 2013 at 1:59:33 PM
Well done, Joe Giambrone.  One of the biggest... by Richard Pietrasz on Sunday, Mar 31, 2013 at 4:03:04 PM
thought I wrote the article in favor of fracking, ... by j dial on Sunday, Mar 31, 2013 at 7:31:17 PM
Like many things we do in the name of science and ... by Daniel Geery on Monday, Apr 1, 2013 at 10:23:34 AM