Tag(s): ; ; ; ; , Add Tags
Add to My Group(s)

Must Read 3   Well Said 3   Valuable 2   View Ratings | Rate It

Promoted to Headline (H3) on 4/15/09:     Permalink
View Article Stats      (85 comments)

Was it Nanotech-Thermite or Phasers that took down the WTC?

Add this Page to Facebook!
Submit to Twitter
Submit to Reddit
Submit to Stumble Upon

Tell A Friend

Become a Fan
Get Embed HTML Code
By (about the author)

Become a Fan Become a Fan  (4 fans)   -- Page 2 of 2 page(s)

opednews.com

There are also those that believe the impact of the planes loaded with jet fuel caused fires that weakened the structures, precipitating a fatal catastrophic collapse.

Until new investigations are opened up, and secret intelligence reports are released to the public, the conspiracy theories will have a life of their own, and will be self perpetuating. The controversy will never cease. But it is clear to me that if the people who don’t believe the official story are willing to accept very poor quality data at face value, without scrutiny, then they are hurting their cause of getting to the bottom of what really happened. Progressives hate it when conservatives use suspect data to support ideas like the denial of global warming, or the “safety” of genetically modified foods. But when it comes to their own pet theories, progressives often turn procrustean, accepting any suspect information because it fits with their preconceived notions.

So was it nanotechnology-enhanced super thermite, or matter-disrupting phasers that brought down the WTC? Until new investigations are undertaken, these will be the stuff of internet legends for years to come.

Next Page  1  |  2

 

Dr. John Moffett is a Managing Editor at OpEdNews.com, and is an active research neuroscientist in the Washington, DC area. Dr. Moffett has published numerous scientific articles on the nervous and immune systems. Dr. Moffett's main area of research (more...)
 

The views expressed in this article are the sole responsibility of the author
and do not necessarily reflect those of this website or its editors.

Contact Author Contact Editor View Authors' Articles

 

Share this page: (what's this?)                   Tell a Friend: Tell A Friend

Add this Page to Facebook!      Submit to Stumble Upon      Submit to Reddit      Add This Page to Mr Wong!           NEWSVINE      DEl.ICIO.US      Looksmart Furl      My Web      Blink List     (More...)

Comments

The time limit for entering new comments on this article has expired.

This limit can be removed. Our paid membership program is designed to give you many benefits, such as removing this time limit. To learn more, please click here.

Comments: Expand   Shrink   Hide  
85 comments
To view all comments:
Expand Comments
(Or you can set your preferences to show all comments, always)

Easy! by Michael Lee on Wednesday, Apr 15, 2009 at 5:49:34 PM
Easy by Bill Cain on Wednesday, Apr 15, 2009 at 9:03:40 PM
There was no molten metal by CB Brooklyn on Wednesday, Apr 15, 2009 at 9:13:53 PM
I like to believe my own eyes - molten metal by Michael Lee on Wednesday, Apr 15, 2009 at 10:34:13 PM
You can believe your own eyes... by CB Brooklyn on Wednesday, Apr 15, 2009 at 11:53:24 PM
You're Kidding, Right? by Michael Lee on Thursday, Apr 16, 2009 at 11:47:29 AM
Why do you assume the yellow orange color is due to heat? by CB Brooklyn on Thursday, Apr 16, 2009 at 3:50:46 PM
CB you need to detail by Patrick Lafferty on Thursday, Apr 16, 2009 at 1:41:48 PM
Molten Steel, and Seismic Spikes by William Whitten on Thursday, Apr 16, 2009 at 6:48:01 PM
more from Bollyn by William Whitten on Thursday, Apr 16, 2009 at 7:03:10 PM
An honest Truther?!? by Tom Murphy on Wednesday, Apr 15, 2009 at 6:03:01 PM
So tell us, doctor, by Nick van Nes on Wednesday, Apr 15, 2009 at 6:26:51 PM
Thank you by J. Edward Tremlett on Wednesday, Apr 15, 2009 at 8:09:30 PM
a lollipop of misperception by William Whitten on Wednesday, Apr 15, 2009 at 8:50:57 PM
Thanks for this John... by Steven Leser on Wednesday, Apr 15, 2009 at 9:05:14 PM
Brainmatter and bits of nano-thermates,two different monkeys by William Whitten on Wednesday, Apr 15, 2009 at 9:24:48 PM
First off, I wasn't speaking to you by Steven Leser on Wednesday, Apr 15, 2009 at 10:01:11 PM
If you wish not to be responded to, don't use a public by Mr M on Thursday, Apr 16, 2009 at 10:47:06 AM
Shouldnt you be looking into where General Clark is hiding? by Steven Leser on Thursday, Apr 16, 2009 at 7:51:31 PM
Steven, did you ever answer what War you supported by Better World Order on Friday, Apr 17, 2009 at 12:42:23 AM
Seriously... what does one have to do with the other? by Tom Murphy on Wednesday, Apr 15, 2009 at 10:10:39 PM
Peer Review and Bentham Open by William Whitten on Wednesday, Apr 15, 2009 at 9:54:56 PM
Believers... by Dave Hunter on Thursday, Apr 16, 2009 at 9:58:28 AM
Thermite Propaganda by CB Brooklyn on Wednesday, Apr 15, 2009 at 9:09:28 PM
Magnetometer readings by Steven Leser on Wednesday, Apr 15, 2009 at 10:11:07 PM
Steven, yes. But when zoomed in to the hours and minutes by CB Brooklyn on Thursday, Apr 16, 2009 at 12:02:51 AM
Greening, Jones on nano-energentics by William Whitten on Wednesday, Apr 15, 2009 at 9:17:07 PM
Further Questions by CB Brooklyn on Wednesday, Apr 15, 2009 at 9:29:52 PM
One time for you by William Whitten on Wednesday, Apr 15, 2009 at 10:04:19 PM
Excellent piece by Jeffrey Rock on Wednesday, Apr 15, 2009 at 10:36:37 PM
green light...do it! by William Whitten on Wednesday, Apr 15, 2009 at 11:05:55 PM
I second Mr. Whitten in asking you to post your explanation by Mr M on Thursday, Apr 16, 2009 at 9:47:53 AM
Yes! by Maxwell on Thursday, Apr 16, 2009 at 11:53:35 AM
A crucial misstatement by Jeffrey King on Wednesday, Apr 15, 2009 at 11:19:06 PM
eyes by William Whitten on Thursday, Apr 16, 2009 at 2:25:56 AM
Two things ... by Mr M on Wednesday, Apr 15, 2009 at 11:47:18 PM
When I Got Home by shadow dancer on Thursday, Apr 16, 2009 at 1:31:41 AM
There is no "official story." by Perry Logan on Thursday, Apr 16, 2009 at 7:14:32 AM
Perry by Ms Nan on Thursday, Apr 16, 2009 at 7:25:59 AM
I'm rolling on the floor myself by Maxwell on Thursday, Apr 16, 2009 at 11:56:47 AM
Where you dropped on your head as a child? by Mr M on Thursday, Apr 16, 2009 at 9:36:58 AM
Painful indeed Mother by Patrick Lafferty on Thursday, Apr 16, 2009 at 12:39:54 PM
You can watch his videos? by Mr M on Friday, Apr 17, 2009 at 11:00:00 PM
then how did the people get pulverized? by Carol Cleveland on Thursday, Apr 16, 2009 at 8:53:36 AM
There's even a problem with the linguistics by Jeffrey King on Thursday, Apr 16, 2009 at 10:59:28 AM
For sure al-Qaeda by Patrick Lafferty on Thursday, Apr 16, 2009 at 12:23:24 PM
then how did the people get pulverized? by Carol Cleveland on Thursday, Apr 16, 2009 at 10:45:04 AM
Architects & Engineers for 9/11 Truth by Jeffrey King on Thursday, Apr 16, 2009 at 11:13:39 AM
Some points well-taken, some not by Maxwell on Thursday, Apr 16, 2009 at 11:48:54 AM
The answer is... by Patrick Lafferty on Thursday, Apr 16, 2009 at 12:04:57 PM
Darwin and natural selection exemplified by Tom Murphy on Thursday, Apr 16, 2009 at 2:32:42 PM
I thought you wore it already by Patrick Lafferty on Thursday, Apr 16, 2009 at 3:55:47 PM
Patrick by William Whitten on Thursday, Apr 16, 2009 at 5:08:35 PM
It's been a rough day Willie by Patrick Lafferty on Thursday, Apr 16, 2009 at 7:48:55 PM
a major disappointment by William Whitten on Thursday, Apr 16, 2009 at 4:58:33 PM
Thrift before sophistication by Tom Murphy on Thursday, Apr 16, 2009 at 8:08:03 PM
Liberty by William Whitten on Thursday, Apr 16, 2009 at 10:03:17 PM
Tom, I am glad you will wear by Patrick Lafferty on Friday, Apr 17, 2009 at 8:13:38 AM
What is really going on here? by gravity32 on Thursday, Apr 16, 2009 at 12:25:11 PM
coto guys by jersey girl on Thursday, Apr 16, 2009 at 7:58:20 PM
I had no idea by Mad Jayhawk on Thursday, Apr 16, 2009 at 9:43:58 PM
I have to admit... by William Whitten on Thursday, Apr 16, 2009 at 10:07:20 PM
Never by Mad Jayhawk on Friday, Apr 17, 2009 at 1:02:16 AM
Debunking by Chris Sarns on Thursday, Apr 16, 2009 at 11:19:45 PM
Start with the obvious... by David Chandler on Friday, Apr 17, 2009 at 12:05:33 AM
So- what are the red-gray chips, then? by Better World Order on Friday, Apr 17, 2009 at 1:20:07 AM
Hurricane Erin on 9/11 and Hutchison Effect by Andrew Johnson on Friday, Apr 17, 2009 at 4:33:51 AM
mud by William Whitten on Friday, Apr 17, 2009 at 8:43:07 AM
Where's your evidence and website, Whitten? by Andrew Johnson on Friday, Apr 17, 2009 at 11:42:10 AM
okay by William Whitten on Friday, Apr 17, 2009 at 2:59:27 PM
So some are beginning to look outside the box by Patrick Lafferty on Friday, Apr 17, 2009 at 9:38:07 AM
An interesting set of links and posts... by Andrew Johnson on Friday, Apr 17, 2009 at 11:55:33 AM
Not sure what you mean Andrew? by Patrick Lafferty on Friday, Apr 17, 2009 at 12:47:26 PM
Oops - not quite discussing the relevant evidence... by Andrew Johnson on Friday, Apr 17, 2009 at 2:26:21 PM
point? by William Whitten on Friday, Apr 17, 2009 at 5:46:07 PM
Explaining Clearly - as Will Whitten Muddles up - AGAIN! by Andrew Johnson on Saturday, Apr 18, 2009 at 3:53:49 AM
Oh, I understand now by Patrick Lafferty on Friday, Apr 17, 2009 at 7:54:06 PM
Crucfix by William Whitten on Friday, Apr 17, 2009 at 10:48:50 PM
The doublefix in Russia by Patrick Lafferty on Saturday, Apr 18, 2009 at 2:40:13 PM
HAARP and 911 and chemtrails by Andrew Johnson on Saturday, Apr 18, 2009 at 3:44:22 AM
Right Andrew by Patrick Lafferty on Saturday, Apr 18, 2009 at 2:25:40 PM
Disinformation Debate by Russ Hallberg on Monday, Apr 20, 2009 at 2:17:07 AM
Oops - Ed Ward? by Andrew Johnson on Tuesday, Apr 21, 2009 at 2:48:14 PM
Attack of the disinfo-bots by Chris Sarns on Thursday, Apr 23, 2009 at 4:58:45 PM
Try and mix Aluminum with organic..... by hommedespoir on Monday, May 4, 2009 at 11:38:04 PM