![]() |
3
3
2
View Ratings |
Rate It
By John R Moffett (about the author) Page 2 of 2 page(s)
There are also those that believe the impact of the planes loaded with jet fuel caused fires that weakened the structures, precipitating a fatal catastrophic collapse.
Until new investigations are opened up, and secret intelligence reports are released to the public, the conspiracy theories will have a life of their own, and will be self perpetuating. The controversy will never cease. But it is clear to me that if the people who don’t believe the official story are willing to accept very poor quality data at face value, without scrutiny, then they are hurting their cause of getting to the bottom of what really happened. Progressives hate it when conservatives use suspect data to support ideas like the denial of global warming, or the “safety” of genetically modified foods. But when it comes to their own pet theories, progressives often turn procrustean, accepting any suspect information because it fits with their preconceived notions.
So was it nanotechnology-enhanced super thermite, or matter-disrupting phasers that brought down the WTC? Until new investigations are undertaken, these will be the stuff of internet legends for years to come.
1 | 2
www.factinista.org; www.n-acetylaspartate.com
The views expressed in this article are the sole responsibility of the author
and do not necessarily reflect those of this website or its editors.
Contact Author |
Contact Editor |
View Authors' Articles |
| 85 comments |
Want to post your own comment on this Article?
|
||||
Tell a Friend:
|
Copyright © 2002-2009, OpEdNews |