Tag(s): ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; (more...) ; ; , Add Tags  (less...)
Add to My Group(s)

View Ratings | Rate It

Promoted to Headline (H2) on 7/19/08:     Permalink
View Article Stats      (25 comments)

Warning: This Product Is Hazardous To Your Freedom

Add this Page to Facebook!
Submit to Twitter
Submit to Reddit
Submit to Stumble Upon

Tell A Friend

Become a Fan
Get Embed HTML Code
By (about the author)

Become a Fan Become a Fan  (2 fans)   -- Page 1 of 1 page(s)

opednews.com

Warning: This Product Is Hazardous To Your Freedom

By Rady Ananda and Andi Novick

Top shelf, the crème de la crème, the most succinct, in-plain-English, best quotes by computer security experts.  Do we really want to vote on this "crap?"

"...testing to high degrees of security and reliability is from a practical perspective not possible.

"...insufficient to guarantee a trustworthy election."  

"... provides the opportunity for new kinds of attacks, from new kinds of attackers."

"An attack could plausibly be accomplished by a single skilled individual with temporary access to a single voting machine.  The damage could be extensive – malicious code could spread to every voting machine in polling places and to county election servers." "... numerous studies have shown that currently deployed voting systems are susceptible to undetectable malicious attacks...." 

"Malware in a voting system could be designed to operate in very subtle ways.... be inserted at any of a number of different stages ... from the precinct all the way back to initial manufacture - and lie in wait for the appropriate moment." 

"This is a classic computer security problem.  Whoever gets into the machine first wins.  So if the Trojan horse software is in there first, you ask it to test itself -- it will always lie to you and tell you everything is fine."

"There would be no way to know that any of these attacks occurred...." 

"...'logic-and-accuracy testing' ... will never be comprehensive; important flaws will always escape any amount of testing." 

"The current certification process may have been appropriate [with] a 900 lb lever voting machine.... But software is different....  you cannot certify an electronic voting machine the way you certify a lever machine.... we absolutely expect that vulnerabilities will be discovered all the time...." 

"A certification system that requires freezing a version in stone is doomed to failure because of the inherent nature of software." 

"... vulnerability of the system to malware infection and manipulation. ... large possibility that they could implement malicious programming (malware) into the system with little chance of detection. ...could likely spread from component to component throughout the system."  

"... the lack of capability to detect and report potential malware attacks against the system makes it the single largest threat." 

To learn how to keep software driven voting systems out of New York, visit http://www.re-mediaetc.org/.

For full quotes and citations, see Debunking Pre-Election Testing Myths, or read the 50+ reports listed in this bibliography.

 

In 2004, Rady Ananda joined the growing community of citizen journalists. Initially focused on elections, she investigated the 2004 Ohio election, organizing, training and leading several forays into counties to photograph the 2004 ballots. She officially served at three recounts, including the 2004 recount. She also organized and led the team that audited Franklin County Ohio's 2006 election, proving the number of voter signatures did not match official results. Her work appears in three books.

Her blogs also address religious, gender, sexual and racial equality, as well as environmental issues; and are sprinkled with book and film reviews on various topics. She spent most of her working life as a researcher or investigator for private lawyers, and five years as an editor.

She graduated from The Ohio State University's School of Agriculture in December 2003 with a B.S. in Natural Resources.

All material offered here is the property of Rady Ananda, copyright 2006, 2007, 2008, 2009. Permission is granted to repost, with proper attribution including the original link.

"In a time of universal deceit, telling the truth is a revolutionary act." Tell the truth anyway.

The views expressed in this article are the sole responsibility of the author
and do not necessarily reflect those of this website or its editors.

Contact Author Contact Editor View Authors' Articles

 

Share this page: (what's this?)                   Tell a Friend: Tell A Friend

Add this Page to Facebook!      Submit to Stumble Upon      Submit to Reddit      Add This Page to Mr Wong!           NEWSVINE      DEl.ICIO.US      Looksmart Furl      My Web      Blink List     (More...)

Comments

The time limit for entering new comments on this article has expired.

This limit can be removed. Our paid membership program is designed to give you many benefits, such as removing this time limit. To learn more, please click here.

Comments: Expand   Shrink   Hide  
25 comments
To view all comments:
Expand Comments
(Or you can set your preferences to show all comments, always)

SCARDY CAT, SCARDY CAT, POO POO POO by Wolfie on Saturday, Jul 19, 2008 at 5:33:41 PM
Ha! Wolfie... by Rady Ananda on Saturday, Jul 19, 2008 at 7:06:16 PM
Secret Vote Counting is DANGEROUS and UNCONSTITUTIONAL by Mark Adams on Saturday, Jul 19, 2008 at 6:19:07 PM
you said it, Bro by Rady Ananda on Saturday, Jul 19, 2008 at 7:09:13 PM
....and hazardous to our HEALTH (....jus' riffin' ) by muservin on Saturday, Jul 19, 2008 at 6:28:01 PM
Freedom, Health, bank accounts, and our lives by Rady Ananda on Saturday, Jul 19, 2008 at 7:11:55 PM
WE ARE TOO SELFISH. by Wolfie on Saturday, Jul 19, 2008 at 10:27:27 PM
I hope this goes viral by Michael Collins on Sunday, Jul 20, 2008 at 12:39:26 AM
I LOVED that 20 things you need to know... by Rady Ananda on Sunday, Jul 20, 2008 at 10:21:04 AM
When electronic voting machines were approved, by William Cormier on Sunday, Jul 20, 2008 at 10:01:59 AM
IT background, eh? by Rady Ananda on Sunday, Jul 20, 2008 at 10:13:15 AM
Thank You Rady by William Cormier on Sunday, Jul 20, 2008 at 1:05:53 PM
Rady by Cheryl Abraham on Sunday, Jul 20, 2008 at 12:45:33 PM
BradBlog - good idea by Rady Ananda on Sunday, Jul 20, 2008 at 1:23:19 PM
I did too! by Cheryl Abraham on Sunday, Jul 20, 2008 at 1:43:30 PM
Keep at it Rady by John Haigh on Sunday, Jul 20, 2008 at 1:01:39 PM
I like Preference Voting by Rady Ananda on Sunday, Jul 20, 2008 at 1:29:50 PM
Some tried it and rejected it, by abacus on Sunday, Jul 20, 2008 at 3:20:03 PM
Just a thought and a kick in my pants.. by mikel paul on Sunday, Jul 20, 2008 at 3:05:05 PM
did you like my Hackberry Vote flavor? by Rady Ananda on Sunday, Jul 20, 2008 at 4:32:20 PM
choke it down in 2009..........priceless by mikel paul on Monday, Jul 21, 2008 at 11:43:23 AM
Preferential voting by John Haigh on Monday, Jul 21, 2008 at 12:44:49 AM
IRV probably best solution by Gabe Shames on Monday, Jul 21, 2008 at 5:35:57 PM
Difference b/w IRV and Preferential Voting? by Rady Ananda on Monday, Jul 21, 2008 at 8:04:53 PM
IRV = preferential ? by John Haigh on Wednesday, Jul 23, 2008 at 2:33:03 AM

 

Tell a Friend: Tell A Friend


Copyright © 2002-2012, OpEdNews

Powered by Populum