Share on Google Plus Share on Twitter Share on Facebook Share on LinkedIn Share on PInterest Share on Fark! Share on Reddit Share on StumbleUpon Tell A Friend 2 (2 Shares)  
Printer Friendly Page Save As Favorite View Favorites View Stats   2 comments

OpEdNews Op Eds

Wall Street and Bernanke: The Blind Leading the Blind

By       Message Dave Lindorff     Permalink
      (Page 1 of 1 pages)
Related Topic(s): ; ; ; ; ; , Add Tags Add to My Group(s)

View Ratings | Rate It

opednews.com Headlined to H3 2/24/09

Author 63
Become a Fan
  (71 fans)
- Advertisement -

By Dave Lindorff

Free market aficionados, particularly in the media, have long been
wont to tell us that the "market knows best." That was always the line
when progressives (remember when there used to be progressives in
government?) would come up with some do-good scheme like a public jobs
program during the Johnson War on Poverty, or Medicare, or bigger
subsidies for urban mass transit. If the stock market sank, they'd
pronounce whatever program or bill it was as a bad idea, because "the
market" (meaning investors), had nixed it by selling shares.

The same kind of analytical brilliance has been routinely ascribed
by economic pundits to investors when it comes to business
decisions--particularly mergers and acquisitions, or divestments and
breakups. If Bank of America announces that it is going to buy the
foundering Merrill Lynch and shares of B of A fall, then the merger is
a bad idea. If the shares rise, it's a good idea. And so it goes.

The whole idea that a bunch of people who sit around at computer
screens betting on stocks and eating cheese doodles all day really know
much of anything, or that taking their herd responses collectively as
some kind of delphic oracle has always seemed the height of folly to
me. But if you really wanted proof that investors taken collectively
are idiots, you could simply look at today's stock market. Yesterday,
every index plunged by about 4%, pulling the overall market to lows not
seen in 12 years, because of concerns that the recession was deepening,
that the big banks were toast, and that the government's economic
stimulus plan was not going to help much.

There was every reason to expect the downward trend to continue,
but up stepped Federal Reserve Chair Ben Bernanke, and, in a statement
presented in Congress, said that in his considered view, the current
recession could be over by the end of this year.

Relieved investors jumped back into the market and bought stocks,
pushing the Dow and the S&P indexes back up by almost as much as
they'd lost the day before.

But wait a minute! Isn't Ben Bernanke the same guy who was chair of
the Fed last year and the year before? The same chair who completely
failed to see the coming credit crisis and global financial collapse?
And if that's the case, why on earth would investors take seriously
anything he says about the future direction of the economy?

You'd have to be in a state of glycemic overload to believe anyone
who told you that this recession, which is just starting to really roll
downhill, is going to be over by the end of 2009. Why, we're also
getting reports that earlier estimates that official unemployment this
year would hit 8 percent are far too low, and that it will actually be
closer to 9 and rising by year's end. (Real unemployment--that is as
measured the way the Dept. of Labor used to measure it before the
Carter administration changed the methodology to hide how bad things
were in the late 1970s--is about 18 percent already.)

- Advertisement -

We don't even know as of today what the fate of the three so-called
US automakers will be. One may end up sold, or partly sold to China,
one may go bust, and the other may be belly up a year from now. And as
for the banks, there are plenty of smart people who are pointing out
that banks like Citibank and B of A are really, at this point, zombies,
and that the government may end up, against its will, having to take
them over, break them apart, and sell off the parts that still float,
using the rest for kindling.

I'm no economic prognosticator, but I do know that this economy is
not about to bounce back. The whole American public is now in a
hunkered down, defensive position, hoarding money, worrying about
losing employment, struggling to pay bills. Consumers, whose activities accounted until recently for 72 percent of US GDP, have lost upwards of $8 trillion in lost investments and shriveled home equity. That's not an environment that sets the stage for a recovery.

Bernanke is talking through his hat.

The only rational reason to buy today on Bernanke's comment would
be if you surmised that the average investor is an idiot and would
likely buy based on the Fed chairman's comments. But then, of course,
you would only be buying to ride the short bump those comments would
cause, jumping back out soon afterwards, before common sense returned
and the market continued its downward slide.

Of course, looking more broadly, there is a theory that market
behavior can be predictive as a leading indicator. Major economic
downturns have generally been preceded by major market crashes (just as
recoveries have been preceded by market rises). We had a roughly 40%
crash in the market in 2008, which, judging from history, would be
predictive of a serious recession. But we've also had an additional
slump of 16-18 percent just since Jan. 1. In normal times that would
almost qualify as a "bear market" (a serious market crash, defined as a
fall of 20% over a two-month period) in itself, and as such, would be
considered a "leading indicator" of a coming economic slowdown.

- Advertisement -

Far be it for me to say investors know anything about the future
of the economy, but I'd guess that their longer-term lack of confidence
in the stock market is giving a far more accurate and honest assessment
of the likely direction of the US and global economy than Chairman
Bernanke's latest comments to Congress.

I'd also be willing to bet that they weren't taking Bernanke seriously in Congress or in the White House, where the whole premise of the stimulus packag--a two-year affair--is that things will not start to look better until at least the end of 2010 or sometime in 2011.

________________
DAVE LINDORFF is a Philadelphia-based journalist and columnist. His
latest book is "The Case for Impeachment" (St. Martin's Press, 2006 and
now available in paperback edition). His work is available at www.thiscantbehappening.net

 

Dave Lindorff is a founding member of the collectively-owned, journalist-run online newspaper www.thiscantbehappening.net. He is a columnist for Counterpunch, is author of several recent books ("This Can't Be Happening! Resisting the (more...)
 

Share on Google Plus Submit to Twitter Add this Page to Facebook! Share on LinkedIn Pin It! Add this Page to Fark! Submit to Reddit Submit to Stumble Upon


Go To Commenting

The views expressed in this article are the sole responsibility of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of this website or its editors.

Writers Guidelines

Contact AuthorContact Author Contact EditorContact Editor Author PageView Authors' Articles
- Advertisement -
Google Content Matches:

Most Popular Articles by this Author:     (View All Most Popular Articles by this Author)

Israel's Gaza Atrocities Recall America's Atrocities in Vietnam

Supreme Court Junket King Scalia Dies While Vacationing with Wealthy Patrons at Private West Texas Getaway

Something's happening here: Clinton's Crumbling, Bernie's Surging and a 'Political Revolution' May Be in the Offing

The Case for Impeachment of President Barack Obama

Barack Obama: Manchurian Candidate Version 2.0

Free John Walker Lindh, Bush's and Cheney's First Torture Victim!