Tag(s): ; ; , Add Tags
Add to My Group(s)

View Ratings | Rate It

Permalink
View Article Stats      (54 comments)

WTC 7: A New Kind of Controlled Demolition

Add this Page to Facebook!
Submit to Twitter
Submit to Reddit
Submit to Stumble Upon

Tell A Friend
Get Embed HTML Code
By (about the author)
Page 1 of 1 page(s)

opednews.com

The September 11, 2001 collapse of the Salomon Building, or WTC 7 was an atypical controlled demolition where the idea is to start by crossing your fingers and aiming a carefully measured amount of flaming debris from a much taller nearby collapsing hi-rise you've just bombed toward a smaller building with a precise quantity of directional charges so that you damage it just severely enough while starting major, uncontrolled fires on multiple floors as a cover for a later implosion of the lower building with high explosives or incendiaries. You evacuate everyone inside who hasn't already left, establish a safety zone around the targeted building, and set up a transit to monitor its movement as it slowly degrades structurally for six hours or more from the fires. When you finally "pull it," a catchy new demolition term coined by Larry Silverstein, the long-term lessee of the World Trade Center, and the FDNY to mean "blow up some guy's modern, almost fully-occupied 15 year-old hi-rise so that he can confess publicly to it later and still collect $861 million in insurance from a dozen different companies to pay off his creditors and rebuild while receiving no income from it for years" the targeted building falls asymmetrically and leaves 12 stories on the north side standing, which, by sheer coincidence in this case, is the side that wasn't hit by the falling debris you carefully aimed at it almost seven hours previously. You should always use very quiet high explosives that no one can hear from more than a block away, and randomly detonate them hours before the actual collapse, or you can use thermate, but whatever you choose, it must be the type which leaves no evidence on the column ends or any other piece of structural steel in the debris pile afterward, and is unaffected by the fires. This is a very unusual controlled demolition technique which has only recently been discovered by alert members of the 9/11 "truth" movement. It's highly effective if the debris from the higher building falls exactly where you intended, which it has done every time so far.

 

I have a special interest in discussing 9/11 conspiracy theories, and am still looking for one that makes the slightest bit of sense after objectively reading and evaluating them for several years now. I am familiar with most of the conspiracy web (more...)
 

The views expressed in this article are the sole responsibility of the author
and do not necessarily reflect those of this website or its editors.

Contact Editor

 

Share this page: (what's this?)                   Tell a Friend: Tell A Friend

Add this Page to Facebook!      Submit to Stumble Upon      Submit to Reddit      Add This Page to Mr Wong!           NEWSVINE      DEl.ICIO.US      Looksmart Furl      My Web      Blink List     (More...)

Comments

The time limit for entering new comments on this article has expired.

This limit can be removed. Our paid membership program is designed to give you many benefits, such as removing this time limit. To learn more, please click here.

Comments: Expand   Shrink   Hide  
54 comments
To view all comments:
Expand Comments
(Or you can set your preferences to show all comments, always)

Simple by pft on Wednesday, Jul 30, 2008 at 2:02:10 AM
The Truth about 9/11-- a must read! by Lew Ranger on Wednesday, Jul 30, 2008 at 4:59:20 AM
The FDNY did it? by albury smith on Wednesday, Jul 30, 2008 at 7:13:58 AM
Straight from your link... by scott creighton on Wednesday, Jul 30, 2008 at 7:44:13 AM
Nice spin by albury smith on Wednesday, Jul 30, 2008 at 8:40:57 AM
Oh my God... by scott creighton on Wednesday, Jul 30, 2008 at 8:54:58 AM
Spare me the mock outrage by albury smith on Wednesday, Jul 30, 2008 at 9:10:05 AM
Your link it to a video made by a Tour Guide... by scott creighton on Wednesday, Jul 30, 2008 at 9:44:08 AM
Straw Man Argument by albury smith on Wednesday, Jul 30, 2008 at 10:59:58 AM
still more misinfo huh? by scott creighton on Wednesday, Jul 30, 2008 at 11:23:31 AM
Cherry picking info? by albury smith on Wednesday, Jul 30, 2008 at 11:49:19 AM
It is telling that the one link you post doesn't work. by scott creighton on Wednesday, Jul 30, 2008 at 6:49:41 AM
Making up your own facts? by albury smith on Wednesday, Jul 30, 2008 at 8:16:01 AM
If you see 12 stories there, God bless you... by scott creighton on Wednesday, Jul 30, 2008 at 8:40:41 AM
If you don't, you're not looking by albury smith on Wednesday, Jul 30, 2008 at 9:00:19 AM
Wrong... by scott creighton on Wednesday, Jul 30, 2008 at 9:10:44 AM
NIST isn't investigating the collapse of WTC 7? by albury smith on Wednesday, Jul 30, 2008 at 9:28:01 AM
thank you... by scott creighton on Wednesday, Jul 30, 2008 at 9:54:17 AM
ARE YOU KIDDING? by scott creighton on Wednesday, Jul 30, 2008 at 8:46:04 AM
Are you? by albury smith on Wednesday, Jul 30, 2008 at 9:21:48 AM
More quote mining? by albury smith on Wednesday, Jul 30, 2008 at 11:14:41 AM
One cause can easily be ruled out by albury smith on Wednesday, Jul 30, 2008 at 7:08:51 AM
You are linking to a "forbidden" site... by scott creighton on Wednesday, Jul 30, 2008 at 7:27:09 AM
Obsession by albury smith on Wednesday, Jul 30, 2008 at 9:31:15 AM
This piece of misinformation is most telling... by scott creighton on Wednesday, Jul 30, 2008 at 7:53:59 AM
More "conspirators"? by albury smith on Wednesday, Jul 30, 2008 at 10:05:31 AM
So, Albury... by scott creighton on Wednesday, Jul 30, 2008 at 7:25:08 AM
Please don't take that hapless moron seriously. by Harold Smith on Wednesday, Jul 30, 2008 at 9:21:05 AM
Ad hominem by albury smith on Wednesday, Jul 30, 2008 at 9:35:28 AM
You're a moron, and that's why I say it. by Harold Smith on Wednesday, Jul 30, 2008 at 10:41:20 AM
Find another hobby, goofball by albury smith on Wednesday, Jul 30, 2008 at 11:23:00 AM
Gettin' mad are ya, chumpy? by Harold Smith on Wednesday, Jul 30, 2008 at 11:34:55 AM
you're right, I'm done with him... by scott creighton on Wednesday, Jul 30, 2008 at 10:00:42 AM
Those lucky "conspirators" by albury smith on Wednesday, Jul 30, 2008 at 10:42:40 AM
Lucky isn't the word. by Harold Smith on Wednesday, Jul 30, 2008 at 3:22:24 PM
Wrong again by albury smith on Wednesday, Jul 30, 2008 at 9:41:48 AM
Wrong... by scott creighton on Wednesday, Jul 30, 2008 at 9:17:15 AM
"Minor" details that you can't explain by albury smith on Wednesday, Jul 30, 2008 at 9:48:32 AM
Oh yes, I have seen controled demolition... by scott creighton on Wednesday, Jul 30, 2008 at 9:58:30 AM
Thanks for making my point by albury smith on Wednesday, Jul 30, 2008 at 10:32:34 AM
well, genius... by scott creighton on Wednesday, Jul 30, 2008 at 11:25:17 AM
If? by albury smith on Wednesday, Jul 30, 2008 at 11:38:56 AM
Watch and learn by albury smith on Thursday, Jul 31, 2008 at 8:03:21 PM
There is no doubt that there was a conspiracy by LarryO on Wednesday, Jul 30, 2008 at 2:13:42 PM
I agree by albury smith on Wednesday, Jul 30, 2008 at 2:48:04 PM
Kiddies... by Maxwell on Wednesday, Jul 30, 2008 at 2:31:42 PM
Dr. Steven Jones by albury smith on Wednesday, Jul 30, 2008 at 3:16:25 PM
Please spare me the details. by daveys on Wednesday, Jul 30, 2008 at 3:04:09 PM
Basic and simple by albury smith on Wednesday, Jul 30, 2008 at 3:20:17 PM
Conspiracy or not? by bmobley on Wednesday, Jul 30, 2008 at 3:58:50 PM
What do you know? by albury smith on Wednesday, Jul 30, 2008 at 4:13:39 PM
Keep it simple folks by Michael McCoy on Wednesday, Jul 30, 2008 at 5:44:24 PM
You forgot a few things by albury smith on Wednesday, Jul 30, 2008 at 6:59:07 PM
bury us all albury by remo on Thursday, Jul 31, 2008 at 5:15:25 PM