 |
|
Add to My Group
|
August 24, 2008 at 11:27:15
Promoted to Headline (H2) on 8/24/08: by Rady Ananda |
|
 
|
September 10, 1949 – August 20, 2008 I can't tell you the first time I met Stephanie Tubbs Jones; she always seemed to be part of the political culture in Cleveland. I do remember when she stood up with Senator Barbara Boxer to object to Ohio's 20 electoral votes from the 2004 election. This marked the second time in US history that Congress objected to a presidential election. (The first time was over the 1876 contest between Ruther"fraud" Hayes and Sam Tilden.) On January 6, 2005, 32 members of Congress repeated this phrase: "We reject the counting of the electoral votes from the state of Ohio on the grounds that they are not under all of the known circumstances regularly given." In this video interview with Free Press editor Bob Fitrakis, Mrs. Jones discusses the process behind her decision to lead this historic stand. Some of her colleagues warned her that to do so would cost her funding and votes on projects she was pursuing for her constituents. But the significance of the issue convinced her otherwise. 
"What we're talking about has deeper ramifications than any one or two million dollar project that I might get funded."
Michael Moore maintains videos from that historic day, when 32 out of 535 Members of Congress (6%) stood up for honest elections, and provides this transcript of the initial moments of that proceeding:
Representative Bob Ney, Ohio (later to be convicted of felonies): Mr. President, the certificate of the electoral vote of the well-known and great State of Ohio seems to be regular in form and authentic, and it appears therefrom that George W. Bush of the State of Texas received 20 votes for President and Dick Cheney from the State of Wyoming received 20 votes for Vice President.Dick Cheney (soon to be convicted for war crimes, we hope): For what purpose does the gentlewoman from Ohio rise?
Representative Stephanie Tubbs Jones, Ohio (a voter's hero): Mr. Vice President, I seek to object to the electoral votes of the State of Ohio on the ground that they were not, under all of the known circumstances, regularly given and have a signed objection, and I do have a Senator.
Cheney: Has the Senator signed the objection?
Jones: The Senator has signed the objection.
Cheney: An objection presented in writing and signed by both a Representative and a Senator complies with the law, Chapter 1 of Title 3, United States Code. The Clerk will report the objection.
Clerk: "We, a Member of the House of Representatives and a United States Senator, object to the counting of the electoral votes of the State of Ohio on the ground that they were not, under all of the known circumstances, regularly given. Signed Stephanie Tubbs Jones, State of Ohio, Barbara Boxer, State of California."
Cheney: The two Houses will withdraw from joint session. Each House will deliberate separately on the pending objection and report its decision back to the joint session. The Senate will now retire to its Chamber.
Here's the list of those Members of Congress (all Democrats) who, according to the January 6, 2005 Congressional Record, objected to Ohio's 2004 electoral votes:
Stephanie Tubbs Jones, OH (introduced the objection),
Senator Barbara Boxer, CA (sole Senator to stand with voters), and:
| Corrine Brown, FL | Alcee Hastings, FL | Cynthia McKinney, GA |
| Julia Carson, IN | Maurice Hinchey, NY | John Olver, MA |
| William Clay Jr., MO | Jesse Jackson Jr, IL | Major Owens, NY |
| James E. Clyburn, SC | Sheila Jackson Lee, TX | Frank Pallone, Jr., NJ |
| John Conyers Jr., MI | Eddie Bernice Johnson, TX | Donald M. Payne, NJ |
| Danny Davis, IL | Carolyn Kilpatrick, MI | Jan Schakowsky, IL |
| Lane Evans, IL | Dennis Kucinich, OH | Bennie Thompson, MS |
| Sam Farr, CA | Barbara Lee, CA | Maxine Waters, CA |
| Bob Filner, CA | John Lewis, GA | Diane Watson, CA |
| Raul Grijalva, AZ | Edward Markey, MA | Lynn Woolsey, CA |
In 2006, I sat in an open Cuyahoga County Board of Elections hearing, where about 80 members of the public watched as some questioned the use of Diebold's computerized voting systems. A Diebold representative spoke in glowing terms of its products that the scientific community has wholly condemned. Stephanie Tubbs Jones also spoke that day, and expressed her frank disbelief in the comments made by Board leaders Michael Vu and Bob Bennett (both were later fired).
The struggle for honest elections in the United States suffers tremendously with the loss of Stephanie Tubbs Jones, who showed America what it means to represent the people.
more...The views expressed in this article are the sole responsibility of the author
and do not necessarily reflect those of this website or its editors.
 Contact Author |
Contact Editor |
 View Authors' Articles |
|
|
| 3 comments |
|
Thank you Rady!
Thanks for posting these links. I'm still listening to the Fitrakis interview, and already several things have leaped right out. First, she was accused of "Wanting Kerry to win". Isn't such a call in itself an admission of vote rigging? She was calling for honest voting procedures. Then she was threatened with loss of funding for a project she was working on. (She said, Okay, go ahead and do that.) So those $$$ interests are vested in vote rigging also. Then there was a more sinister threat, to my mind, wherein she was warned that her role as Congresswoman would be made more difficult if she continued. That is about 10 mins into the vid - I'll go back to it when I've finished the rest, and get more clear on what they said. But it all adds up to an extensive, deep and powerful network who seem to be committed to maintaining vote rigging. What is happening is no accident, - there are very powerful vested interests tied up in all this. What an exceptional, courageous lady she was. by Aurora (0 articles, 95 quicklinks, 52 diaries, 648 comments [5 recommended, 0 rejected]) on Sunday, Aug 24, 2008 at 4:43:51 PM  (0+)
|
|
Reply: Exceptional, courageous lady
a true leader and hero of the people. Thanks for you comment, Aurora. by Rady Ananda (182 articles, 374 quicklinks, 49 diaries, 1718 comments [201 recommended, 2 rejected]) on Sunday, Aug 24, 2008 at 5:36:03 PM (0+)
|
|
Reply: correction
I've listened again to the relevant parts of the video and find I need to correct what I said above. She was not being subjected to threats as such. It was more that people, probably even with friendly intention, were trying to dissuade her from getting into something that "could" cause problems in the future. As in, her actions could have influenced decisions of would-be funders, or would-be supporters of her Congressional role. But these were not threats. She was a judge for 10 years and a Prosecutor for eight years before that. Now if only there were some like her, up there on the Supreme Court. by Aurora (0 articles, 95 quicklinks, 52 diaries, 648 comments [5 recommended, 0 rejected]) on Sunday, Aug 24, 2008 at 5:57:44 PM (0+)
|
Want to post your own comment on this Article? 
|
||||
|
||||||||||||||
Must Read (0) 
Well Said (0) 
News (0) 
Touching (0) 
Funny (0) 
Supported (0) 
Interesting (0) 
Inspiring (0) 
Valuable (0)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Tell a Friend:
|
Copyright © 2002-2009, OpEdNews |
