Tag(s): ; ; ; ; , Add Tags
Add to My Group(s)

View Ratings | Rate It

Permalink
View Article Stats      (7 comments)

U.S. Officials Must Be Held Responsible For War Crimes

Add this Page to Facebook!
Submit to Twitter
Submit to Reddit
Submit to Stumble Upon

Tell A Friend

Become a Fan
Get Embed HTML Code
By (about the author)

Become a Fan Become a Fan  (5 fans)   -- Page 1 of 1 page(s)

opednews.com

ANDOVER , Mass. (Sept. 13) -- Any attempt to hold high U.S. officials responsible for war crimes likely “will require time and effort but is nevertheless of urgent importance,” an authority on international law said today.

Amy Bartholomew, an associate professor of law at Carleton University , Ottawa , Canada , told a conference seeking prosecutions of President George W. Bush and his aides for war crimes that aggression by "the world's most powerful state" must be punished just as less powerful countries are punished.

The U.S. and "its junior partners," she said, "have made varied attempts to undermine the international legal framework with respect to nonintervention and key aspects of human rights protection across the world." To prosecute Bush under the Nuremberg Principles would challenge America 's misbegotten efforts "to replace that framework with something very menacing---a 'global and transnational state of exception.'"

"Despite the attempts by 'human rights hawks' to conceptualize the invasion of Iraq as motivated chiefly by humanitarian concerns---and therefore having a just cause---this excuse was never convincing," Bartholomew said. What's more, "the means of war and occupation have been egregiously disproportionate as just a glance at the torture and mistreatment at Abu Ghraib (prison) and the assault on Fallujah and the use of weapons in illegal ways" demonstrates.

Bartholomew said the Nuremberg Principles term aggressive war "the supreme international crime" in that such war "contains within itself the accumulated evil of the whole."  It leads to torture and abuses.

She told a conference of 120 academics, legal authorities, activists, and public officials gathered in Andover that the U.S. seeks to replace the Nuremberg Principles, to which it subscribes by treaty, with "the empire's law" of its own making.

Bartholomew spoke at the "Justice Robert H. Jackson Conference" for planning for the prosecution of high-level American war criminals convened by the prominent law school dean and legal education reformer Lawrence Velvel. Justice Jackson was the American Supreme Court justice who was America ’s Chief Prosecutor at Nuremberg after World War II.

Bartholomew is the author of "Empire's Law" (Pluto Press).

                                                    #

(Reach Ross at sherwoodr1@yahoo.com Ross is the press coordinator for the war crimes prosecution conference.)

 

Sherwood Ross has worked as a publicist for Chicago; as a reporter for the Chicago Daily News and workplace columnist for Reuters. He has also been a media consultant to colleges, law schools, labor unions, and to the editors of more than 100 (more...)
 

The views expressed in this article are the sole responsibility of the author
and do not necessarily reflect those of this website or its editors.

Contact Author Contact Editor View Authors' Articles

 

Share this page: (what's this?)                   Tell a Friend: Tell A Friend

Add this Page to Facebook!      Submit to Stumble Upon      Submit to Reddit      Add This Page to Mr Wong!           NEWSVINE      DEl.ICIO.US      Looksmart Furl      My Web      Blink List     (More...)

Comments

The time limit for entering new comments on this article has expired.

This limit can be removed. Our paid membership program is designed to give you many benefits, such as removing this time limit. To learn more, please click here.

Comments: Expand   Shrink   Hide  
7 comments
To view all comments:
Expand Comments
(Or you can set your preferences to show all comments, always)

Real Change by Tony Forest on Tuesday, Sep 16, 2008 at 1:12:51 PM
I'm aware of the PNAC writings that preceeded 9-11 by Brett Paatsch on Tuesday, Sep 16, 2008 at 10:40:58 PM
Responsible by Archie on Tuesday, Sep 16, 2008 at 10:20:24 PM
What does that mean though Archie by Brett Paatsch on Tuesday, Sep 16, 2008 at 11:04:24 PM
What does it mean? by Archie on Wednesday, Sep 17, 2008 at 12:41:36 AM
I'm not sure your distinctions are actually different by Brett Paatsch on Thursday, Sep 18, 2008 at 10:05:24 PM
response by Archie on Thursday, Sep 18, 2008 at 10:39:58 PM