Share on Google Plus Share on Twitter
  4
Share on Facebook
  3
Share on LinkedIn Share on PInterest Share on Fark! Share on Reddit Share on StumbleUpon Tell A Friend 7 Shares     
Printer Friendly Page Save As Favorite View Favorites View Article Stats
No comments

General News

U.N. Reported Only a Fraction of Civilian Deaths from U.S. Raids

By (about the author)     Permalink       (Page 1 of 3 pages)
Related Topic(s): ; ; ; ; ; , Add Tags Add to My Group(s)

View Ratings | Rate It

opednews.com

(Originally posted on IPS News: http://ipsnews.net/news.asp?idnews=54883)

WASHINGTON/KABUL, Mar 17, 2011 (IPS) - The number of civilians killed in U.S. Special Operations
Forces (SOF) raids last year was probably several times higher
than the figure of 80 people cited in the U.N. report on
civilian casualties in Afghanistan published last week, an IPS
investigation has revealed.


The report also failed to apply the same humanitarian law
standard for defining a civilian to its reporting on SOF
raids that it applied to its accounting for Taliban
assassinations.



The Mar. 9 report, produced by the Human Rights unit of the
United Nations Assistance Mission in Afghanistan (UNAMA)
jointly with the Afghanistan Independent Human Rights
Commission (AIHRC), said a total of 80 civilians were killed
in "search and seizure operations" by "Pro-Government
Forces" in 2010.



But AIHRC Commissioner Nader Nadery told IPS the figure
represented only the number of civilian deaths in night
raids in the 13 incidents involving SOF units that the
Commission had been able to investigate thoroughly.



Nadery said the AIHRC had received complaints from local
people alleging civilian casualties in 60 additional
incidents involving raids and other activities by Special
Forces. "We did not include them in the report, because we
were unable to collect the exact figures for casualties,
which takes time," Nadery said.




The AIHRC is continuing to investigate those 60 events,
according to Nadery, and will report on the results in the
future.



The Mar. 9 report refers to "60 incidents of night raids
that caused civilian casualties", but does not inform the
reader that only a fraction of the total casualties alleged
in those incidents were counted in the total.



At least one of the 13 incidents investigated by the AIHRC
was an air strike called by an SOF unit. The 80 deaths from
at most 12 incidents or less would suggest an average of at
least seven civilians killed per incident.



If the sample of
night raids investigated is representative of the total of
60 incidents of SOF night raids about which civilian
casualty complaints were generated, the total number of
civilians killed would be around 420.



The UNAMA-AIHRC report shows a total 406 killings of
civilians by "Anti-Government Elements" reported for 2010.



But the UNAMA-AIHRC report uses a strict humanitarian law
definition of "civilian" in regard to victims of
assassination by "Anti-Government Elements" which was not
applied to victims of U.S. night raids.



"If Afghan soldiers traveling from one place to another, on holiday, with no
weapon and no uniform, are killed, we count them as
civilians, and the same with policemen," Nadery told IPS.



Mayors and district chiefs, who participate in military
planning with NATO military commanders, were also considered
civilian victims of assassination, according to Nadery.



A large proportion of those killed as "Taliban" in SOF night
raids, however, would also qualify as civilians under this
definition.



Matthew Hoh, formerly the senior U.S. foreign service
officer in Zabul province before his 2009 resignation, was
familiar with the target list for SOF kill or capture raids.
He told IPS the list included Afghans holding every kind of
non-combat function in the Taliban network, including
propagandists and workers who make Improvised Explosive
Devices (IEDs).

Next Page  1  |  2  |  3

 

Gareth Porter (born 18 June 1942, Independence, Kansas) is an American historian, investigative journalist and policy analyst on U.S. foreign and military policy. A strong opponent of U.S. wars in Southeast Asia, and the Middle East, he has also (more...)
 
Share on Google Plus Submit to Twitter Add this Page to Facebook! Share on LinkedIn Pin It! Add this Page to Fark! Submit to Reddit Submit to Stumble Upon

The views expressed in this article are the sole responsibility of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of this website or its editors.

Writers Guidelines

Contact Author Contact Editor View Authors' Articles

Most Popular Articles by this Author:     (View All Most Popular Articles by this Author)

How Mistress Helped Petraeus

From Military-Industrial Complex to Permanent War State

Why Washington Clings to a Failed Middle East Strategy

Obama to Israel: No US War on Iran

Gates Conceals Real Story of "Gaming" Obama on Afghan War

Did Netanyahu Seek War with Iran?

Comments

The time limit for entering new comments on this article has expired.

This limit can be removed. Our paid membership program is designed to give you many benefits, such as removing this time limit. To learn more, please click here.

Comments: Expand   Shrink   Hide  
No comments