Share on Google Plus Share on Twitter Share on Facebook 2 Share on LinkedIn Share on PInterest Share on Fark! Share on Reddit Share on StumbleUpon Tell A Friend 2 (4 Shares)  
Printer Friendly Page Save As Favorite View Favorites View Stats   2 comments

General News

Troops Obama Is Withdrawing Have Been Recently Replaced By Allies

By (about the author)     Permalink       (Page 1 of 1 pages)
Related Topic(s): ; , Add Tags Add to My Group(s)

View Ratings | Rate It

opednews.com Headlined to H3 6/24/11

Become a Fan
  (44 fans)

President Obama alleges "the tide of war is receding" in Afghanistan, thus allowing him to reduce U.S. forces there by 10,000 this year, but the fact is overall Allied strength has been rising, not falling.

That's because the 10,000 U.S. fighters the president plans to bring home by the end of this year have already been replaced in advance, so to speak, by troop surges of NATO allies and other nations.

What the New York Times June 23 rd called President Obama's "Rapid Troop Cuts" is not only hardly "rapid" but is part of an overall strategy for continuing a pointless, illegal, 10-year-long war whose casualty rates are higher than ever!

There are more than 40 countries that have dispatched troops to Afghanistan and a majority of them have increased their forces since July, 2009, according to a nation-by-nation report in the current Guardian.co.UK.

The UK, for example, from July, 2009, to June, 2011, increased its troops from 9,000 to 9,500, up 500; Spain from 780 to 1,550, up 770; Germany from 4,050 to 4,800, up 750; Italy from 2,800 to 3,900, up 1,100; Canada, from 2,800 to 3,000, up 200; Czech Republic from 340 to 500, up 160; Bulgaria from 470 to 600, up 130; Poland from 2,000 to 2,500, up 500; Romania, from about 1,000 to 2,000, up 1,000; and France, from 3,100 to 3,900, up 800. No wonder Mr. Obama can make a token withdrawal in force now: he has already largely replaced his announced troop cuts for 2011 with foreign fighters.

Some of the other nations that have been convinced by the President's open appeals or behind-the-scenes arm-twisting, (figures according to the reliable UK Guardian,) are:

Albania, 210; Armenia, 40; Austria, 3; Azerbaijan, 94; Belgium, 507; Bosnia and Herzegovina, 55; Bulgaria, 602; Croatia, 320; Denmark, 750; Estonia, 163; Finland, 156; Georgia, 1; Greece, 162; Hungary, 383; Iceland, 4; Ireland, 7; S. Korea, 426; Latvia, 139; Lithuania, 237; and Luxemburg, 11.

Also, Macedonia, 163; Malaysia, 31; Mongolia, 74; Montenegro, 36; Netherlands, 192; New Zealand, 191; Norway, 406; Portugal, 133; Singapore, 21; Slovakia, 308; Slovenia, 80; Sweden, 500; Tonga, 55; Turkey, 1,786; UAE, 35; and Ukraine, 55. (The Dutch pulled out their troops in Dec., 2010).

Additionally, Obama's commanders have the support of 94,000 troops of the Afghan National Army and perhaps 100,000 U.S. contractors, thousands of whom are armed.

And if the tide of war is "receding," as Mr. Obama claims, why are civilian casualties there at an all-time high? Since Obama took office, UK's Guardian reports, total Afghan civilian deaths have soared. In 2008, under President Bush, in his last year in office they were 2,118; in 2009, they rose to 2,412; and last year they rose again to 2,777. Does this sound to you like the war is winding down?

According to Wikipedia,: counting U.S. and International Security Assistance Force(ISAF) deaths, "2010 was the deadliest year for foreign military troops since the U.S. invasion in 2001, continuing the trend that has occurred every year since 2003." Does this sound to you like the war is winding down?

In its report of June 23, the New York Times says, "Most American forces are expect to leave Afghanistan by 2014." At the rate Afghan civilians are dying, if past is prologue, Obama's decision means some 6,000 more civilians are liable to be killed. Since the President said that the United States had largely achieved its goals in Afghanistan, what is the point of prolonging the war another three years? Obama's plan is not a peace plan. It is a war plan. Ditto for his attacks on Libya, Pakistan, and Yemen. President Obama looks more like Mussolini every day. #

(Sherwood Ross is director of the Anti-War News Service. To comment or contribute to his effort, e-mail him at Email address removed).

 

Sherwood Ross worked as a reporter for the Chicago Daily News and contributed a regular "Workplace" column for Reuters. He has contributed to national magazines and hosted a talk show on WOL, Washington, D.C. In the Sixties he was active as public (more...)
 

Share on Google Plus Submit to Twitter Add this Page to Facebook! Share on LinkedIn Pin It! Add this Page to Fark! Submit to Reddit Submit to Stumble Upon

Go To Commenting
The views expressed in this article are the sole responsibility of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of this website or its editors.

Writers Guidelines

Contact Author Contact Editor View Authors' Articles

Most Popular Articles by this Author:     (View All Most Popular Articles by this Author)

U.S. Overthrow in the Ukraine Risks Nuclear War With Russia

Radioactive Ammunition Fired in Middle East May Claim More Lives Than Hiroshima and Nagasaki

Obama Expands the American Warfare State

NSA MAY BE READING WINDOWS SOFTWARE IN YOUR COMPUTER

Is George W. Bush Sane?

Inside America's Biological Warfare Center

Comments

The time limit for entering new comments on this article has expired.

This limit can be removed. Our paid membership program is designed to give you many benefits, such as removing this time limit. To learn more, please click here.

Comments: Expand   Shrink   Hide  
2 people are discussing this page, with 2 comments
To view all comments:
Expand Comments
(Or you can set your preferences to show all comments, always)

that NATO is throwing military assets into our sin... by John Sanchez Jr. on Saturday, Jun 25, 2011 at 9:02:21 AM
This is about controlling natural resources. Do a ... by janet O'Connell on Sunday, Jun 26, 2011 at 10:15:11 AM