Home
Refresh   Tag(s): ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; (more...) ; ; ; ; ; ; ;  (less...)
Add to My Group
November 15, 2008 at 07:28:44

Valuable 4   Must Read 3   News 2   View Ratings | Rate It

Totally New Green Energy Source On a Par With Nuclear Power

submit to twitter
submit to reddit
submit to digg
Tell A Friend

By bcmarshall (about the author)     Page 1 of 3 page(s)

opednews.com     Permalink

For OpEdNews: bcmarshall - Writer

We often hear that solar and wind power are the future of renewable energy, and of course they're important. Important, though, is not enough.

We live in a 24/7 society, but neither wind nor solar are 24/7 sources. If you've ever used your computer or turned on a light on a windless night, whether you're aware of it or not, the power is coming from a conventional power plant, fired either by fossil fuels, hydroelectric, or by nuclear power.

That's the reality we're facing no matter how much we invest in solar and wind. The technologies simply don't work when the wind and sun are down. While that's obvious to anyone who's ever been outdoors, policymakers and those who have huge amounts of money at stake would prefer that the issue remain unaddressed. You simply can't turn up the sun or wind with demand.

They have another problem as well. If you've ever seen a wind farm or a commercial solar system, you know they take huge tracts of land, necessary because the energy source they're tapping is not very dense. At best, it takes a whole lot of real estate to gather enough power to make a difference - assuming, of course, that the source of the needed energy happens to be available at that moment.


Hydrothermal Vents Are the Solution


Hydrothermal vents are naturally occurring geysers of superheated water, found along Mid-Ocean Ridges. These are points along the Tectonic Plates, huge tracts of the Earth's crust that move continents around, found where the plates are pulling away from each other. As the crust stretches and weakens, new volcanic crust from the earth's molten core, the magma, rises to create new crust.


Black Smoker Hydrothermal Vent

Because the vents are very deep, around 2,300 m (7,500 feet), the ambient pressure of the ocean is enormous. That pressure continuously forces seawater into cracks and fissures in the sea floor where it eventually contacts the magma, is heated, and then is returned to the ocean as an uninterrupted and uninterruptible geyser of superheated fluid at temperatures up to 400o C (750o F), hot enough to melt lead. Those geysers are the hydrothermal vents.

Although the vents were first confirmed in 1977 and their energy content was immediately apparent, no one had the slightest idea how to utilize this massive energy output. They remained untouched and untouchable at the bottom of a frigid ocean.

Until now.


The Marshall Hydrothermal Recovery System


One night I was watching a National Geographic special on the ocean. Lots of things were discussed, and during a short segment on hydrothermal vents the narrator stated that the energy escaping from just the known vents is about 17 million megawatts, or roughly equivalent to the entire human consumption on the planet.

My first thought was that it was a terrible shame that such abundant energy could not be utilized. Then, as if an invisible hand from a V-8 commercial reached through the screen and slapped me on the forehead, a second thought occurred just a few seconds later which answered the question. Why can't it be used?

In that instant the Marshall Hydrothermal Recovery System was born, a ludicrously simple response to a complex problem. While all previous thought had focused on how to sink a generator to the bottom of the ocean, utilize it effectively and service it, the solution is far simpler.

The Marshall System caps the vent(s) with an insulated pipe, which then ducts the fluid to the surface. A platform similar to that used in oil exploration is stationed above the vent, and the generators are located there, where they're easy to service and access. Undersea cables are then used to bring the power to shore. You can see an animation that completely describes the process here.


 

Next Page  1  |  2  |  3

 

Take action -- click here to contact your local newspaper or congress people:
Support the first new energy source in 60 years

Click here to see the most recent messages sent to congressional reps and local newspapers

http://www.marshallsystem.com

I'm a scientist and inventor with a strong environmental conscience. I am a news and politics junkie, with my main interests being listening to talk radio, watching political things on TV, and reading news reports. Anything to do with news, (more...)
 

The views expressed in this article are the sole responsibility of the author
and do not necessarily reflect those of this website or its editors.

Contact Author Contact Editor View Authors' Articles

 

Book Recommendations for "Energy Biomass"
Sustainable Use of Forest Biomass for Energy: A Synthesis with Focus on the Baltic and Nordic Region (Managing Forest Ecosystems)
by Dominik Röser

$179.00
Lowest New Price $163.48

Number of pages: 262
Publisher: Springer

Biomass and Alternate Fuel Systems: An Engineering and Economic Guide

$89.95
Lowest New Price $71.24

Number of pages: 264
Publisher: Wiley-AIChE

Energy from Biomass: A Review of Combustion and Gasification Technologies (World Bank Technical Paper)
by Hubert E Stassen

$25.00
Lowest New Price $21.67

Number of pages: 100
Publisher: World Bank Publications

View All Book Recommendations

Share this page: (what's this?)                   Tell a Friend: Tell A Friend

FACEBOOK      DIGG THIS      Add This Page to Mr Wong!           NEWSVINE      DEl.ICIO.US      Looksmart Furl      NETSCAPE      My Web      Tag!RawSugar      Blink List     (More...)

Comments: Expand   Shrink   Hide  
49 comments
To view all comments:
Expand Comments
 

Fascinating by Rob Kall on Saturday, Nov 15, 2008 at 7:37:02 AM
Heehee by Bia Winter on Saturday, Nov 15, 2008 at 2:21:00 PM
Licensing is the answer by bcmarshall on Saturday, Nov 15, 2008 at 3:27:12 PM
Ever tried to calculate by Mark Sashine on Saturday, Nov 15, 2008 at 11:05:09 AM
It doesn't matter by bcmarshall on Saturday, Nov 15, 2008 at 3:03:07 PM
Totally New Green Energy Source On a Par With Nuclear Power by Rolland Miller on Saturday, Nov 15, 2008 at 12:11:04 PM
Certainly another source better than nuclear or oil. by nightgaunt on Saturday, Nov 15, 2008 at 12:57:37 PM
Geothermal by Mad Jayhawk on Saturday, Nov 15, 2008 at 1:25:21 PM
It's not easy by bcmarshall on Saturday, Nov 15, 2008 at 5:32:31 PM
A stormy future by Dave Kisor on Saturday, Nov 15, 2008 at 2:06:49 PM
Existing Technology by bcmarshall on Saturday, Nov 15, 2008 at 3:13:40 PM
risks by Jim Eldon on Saturday, Nov 15, 2008 at 3:25:09 PM
No-fault zones by bcmarshall on Saturday, Nov 15, 2008 at 5:48:46 PM
address by Mark Sashine on Saturday, Nov 15, 2008 at 4:18:51 PM
Thanks by bcmarshall on Saturday, Nov 15, 2008 at 6:08:20 PM
This "solution" is an environment disaster. by Jim Barron on Saturday, Nov 15, 2008 at 2:19:54 PM
What's the Alternative? by bcmarshall on Saturday, Nov 15, 2008 at 5:14:13 PM
HYDROGEN! by Bia Winter on Saturday, Nov 15, 2008 at 2:43:53 PM
OOPs! I meant "IN" their garage! by Bia Winter on Saturday, Nov 15, 2008 at 2:51:15 PM
The problem is transmission by cosmogenium on Saturday, Nov 15, 2008 at 3:14:14 PM
Alternative Transmission System by bcmarshall on Saturday, Nov 15, 2008 at 6:03:57 PM
energy with psychopathic humans in the equation by Rand Clifford on Saturday, Nov 15, 2008 at 10:50:39 PM
You're Right by bcmarshall on Saturday, Nov 15, 2008 at 11:11:49 PM
I have a friend... by Kathryn Smith on Saturday, Nov 15, 2008 at 11:38:46 PM
Heat energy by bcmarshall on Sunday, Nov 16, 2008 at 12:44:36 AM
If it's money you need... by Ginger McClemons on Sunday, Nov 16, 2008 at 2:20:57 PM
Thanks! by bcmarshall on Monday, Nov 17, 2008 at 1:07:57 PM
Great technology by Steve Windisch (jibbguy) on Sunday, Nov 16, 2008 at 9:20:19 AM
Can't disagree by bcmarshall on Sunday, Nov 16, 2008 at 11:35:09 AM
Nuclear is the only way to go now by David Walters on Sunday, Nov 16, 2008 at 1:15:22 PM
Nuclear v. Hydrothermal by bcmarshall on Sunday, Nov 16, 2008 at 3:23:53 PM
One more thing by bcmarshall on Sunday, Nov 16, 2008 at 3:42:29 PM
YES by Randje Mitchell on Sunday, Nov 16, 2008 at 5:54:09 PM
Great joy and still some concern: by Kathryn Smith on Monday, Nov 17, 2008 at 12:18:00 AM
It's Scary by nachamkin on Monday, Nov 17, 2008 at 1:02:48 AM
Planet killer? by bcmarshall on Monday, Nov 17, 2008 at 12:37:29 PM
Good points by bcmarshall on Monday, Nov 17, 2008 at 1:11:00 AM
Thanks! Comment: by Kathryn Smith on Monday, Nov 17, 2008 at 7:51:36 AM
Trying to answer by bcmarshall on Monday, Nov 17, 2008 at 1:54:24 PM
"Regulated percentage from heat vent flowing to surroundings by Kathryn Smith on Monday, Nov 17, 2008 at 8:02:15 AM
Imagine.... by Kathryn Smith on Monday, Nov 17, 2008 at 8:12:29 AM
Imagine...or nighmares? by bcmarshall on Monday, Nov 17, 2008 at 12:42:18 PM
Regulated Vent Flow by bcmarshall on Monday, Nov 17, 2008 at 12:01:35 PM
The difference is in alternatives by Steve Windisch (jibbguy) on Monday, Nov 17, 2008 at 11:24:53 AM
Marshall, your commitment to humankind's good is very clear by Kathryn Smith on Monday, Nov 17, 2008 at 3:47:05 PM
Funding source by Kathryn Smith on Monday, Nov 17, 2008 at 4:07:08 PM
Good Idea, Almost Missed by Donald Rankin III on Tuesday, Nov 18, 2008 at 3:13:25 PM
Right on! by bcmarshall on Tuesday, Nov 18, 2008 at 8:23:03 PM
Title by Bob Stuart on Saturday, Nov 22, 2008 at 8:29:35 AM

 
Want to post your own comment on this Article? Post Comment


 

 

 

Tell a Friend: Tell A Friend

Copyright © 2002-2009, OpEdNews

Powered by Populum